Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Correspondence
146 (
6
); 794-794
doi:
10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1274_17

Validity of Broselow tape for estimating weight of Indian children

Department of Paediatrics, Al-Kindy College of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq
Licence

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Sir,

I read with interest the study by Shah and Bavdekar1 on the validity of Broselow tape (BT) for estimating the weight of Indian children. The authors have recommended that BT cannot be used without modifications in Indian children attending public hospitals. The application of 10 per cent correction factor to the Broselow-estimated weight increases the accuracy of the tape to over 60 per cent1. I presume that the clinical implication of that finding is questionable in the light of the following limitation. With the worldwide increase in the prevalence of paediatric obesity, there are increasing concerns on the precision of BT in estimating the weight of obese children. To my knowledge, paediatric obesity is an ongoing health problem in India. The recently published data pointed out that the overweight and obesity rates in children and adolescents were increasing not only among the higher socio-economic groups but also in the lower income groups2. The pooled data after 2010 estimated a combined prevalence of 19.3 per cent of childhood overweight and obesity which was a significant increase from the earlier prevalence of 16.3 per cent reported in 2001-20052. Hence, it would be a distressing problem in employing BT to estimate the weight of the critically ill obese Indian children in the emergency units who might need exact doses of emergency drugs and fixed equipment sizing. The following two points might help solving that distressing state. First, there is a need to develop an adjustment equation that could improve the BT weight estimate in obese paediatric patients similar to that accomplished in certain paediatric populations3. Second, the paediatric advanced weight prediction in the emergency room tape might be considered a better alternative to BT as it has been found to be statistically superior to BT in the estimating the weight of obese children4.

Conflicts of Interest: None.

References

  1. , , . Validity of Broselow tape for estimating weight of Indian children. Indian J Med Res. 2017;145:339-46.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , . Epidemiology of childhood overweight & obesity in India: A systematic review. Indian J Med Res. 2016;143:160-74.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , . A prospective evaluation of the accuracy of weight estimation using the Broselow tape in overweight and obese pediatric patients in the emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2017;33:675-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Weight estimation in an inner-city pediatric ED: The effect of obesity. Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33:1364-7.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    13

    PDF downloads
    14
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections
    Scroll to Top