Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Correspondence
135 (
4
); 560-561

Need to confirm isoniazid susceptibility in Xpert MTB/RIF rifampin susceptible cases

P.D. Hinduja National Hospital & Medical Research Centre, Veer Sararkar Marg, Mahim, Mumbai 400 016, India
Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland

+ For correspondence: dr_crodrigues@hindujahospital.com

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Sir,

The connoisseur performance of the Gene Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) assay (Cepheid Inc., USA) has made rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) and rifampin (RIF) susceptibility in <2 h a true reality. This semi-automated assay is simple to perform, relatively free of infectious aerosols and has high sensitivity of 72.5 and 64 per cent for detection of tuberculosis (TB) in smear negative pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis, respectively (one specimen per patient)12. Similarly, the sensitivity and specificity for detection of RIF resistance are 94-99 per cent and 98-100 per cent, respectively13.

Based on this evidence, in December 2010, World Health Organization endorsed and recommended the worldwide use of Xpert MTB/RIF as an initial diagnostic test for sputum specimens (including pellets from decontaminated specimens) in patients suspected of having MDR-TB and HIV-TB4.

We assessed the performance of Xpert on 857 specimens (310 pulmonary and 547 extrapulmonary)12 at a tertiary care referral centre at Mumbai and reported a pooled sensitivity for MTB case detection in comparison with culture to be 91.7 per cent. In case of pulmonary and extrapulmonary specimens, sensitivity of Xpert was found to be 98.4 and 83.3 per cent, respectively. On comparison with phenotypic rifampicin (1.0 μg/ml) drug susceptibility testing (DST) using liquid culture (BACTEC MGIT 960, BD Microbiology Systems), and after resolution of discrepant specimens by bidirectional sequencing, Xpert correctly identified 98.7 and 98.6 per cent of the RIF resistant and RIF sensitive specimens, respectively.

Of the 310 Xpert positive specimens, 8.7 per cent (n=27) patients (15 pulmonary and 12 extrapulmonary specimens) were reported to be isoniazid (INH) monoresistant. Thus, the assumption that RIF sensitive cases would also be INH sensitive is not necessarily true. A recent report from Mumbai, India, has reported the prevalence of INH monoresistance to be 7 and 11 per cent in untreated and previously treated TB cases, respectively5. Thus, in settings with high expected rates of INH monoresistance, Xpert RIF susceptible cases may receive a single drug therapy with RIF alone. A study by Cattamanchi et al6 has shown the use of a modified and an extended treatment regimen with first-line anti-tubercular drugs to have a favourable treatment outcome in INH monoresistant cases in comparison to those of drug-susceptible patients on standard first-line treatment regimen. All Xpert RIF resistant cases were phenotypically proven to be INH resistant. Ideally, INH susceptibility should be confirmed by phenotypic DST in Xpert RIF susceptible patients.

References

  1. , , , , , , . Rapid molecular detection of tuberculosis and rifampin resistance. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1005-15.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , . Xpert MTB/RIF: a new pillar in diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis? J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:2540-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . Feasibility, diagnostic accuracy, and effectiveness of decentralised use of the Xpert MTB/RIF test for diagnosis of tuberculosis and multidrug resistance: a multicentre implementation study. Lancet. 2011;377:1495-505.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. World Health Organization. In: Rapid implementation of the Xpert MTB/RIF diagnostic test technical and operational ‘How-to’ Practical considerations. WHO/HTM/TB/2011.2. Geneva: World Health Organization; .
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , . High levels of multidrug resistant tuberculosis in new and treatment-failure patients from the Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme in an urban metropolis (Mumbai) in Western India. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:211.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with isoniazid-monoresistant tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48:179-85.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    9

    PDF downloads
    6
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections
    Scroll to Top