Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
135 (
5
); 666-671

Heat stable antimicrobial activity of Burkholderia gladioli OR1 against clinical drug resistant isolates

Department of Biotechnology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India
Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College & Hospital, Chandigarh, India
Department of Natural Products, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education & Research, S.A.S. Nagar, Punjab, India
Department of Chemistry, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India

Reprint requests: Prof. R. Tewari, Department of Biotechnology, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160 014, India e-mail: rupinder@pu.ac.in

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Background & objectives:

Drug resistant microbes are a serious challenge to human health. During the search for novel antibiotics/inhibitors from the agricultural soil, a bacterial colony was found to inhibit the growth of clinical isolates including Staphylococcus (resistant to amikacin, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, clinafloxacin, erythromycin, gentamicin and methicillin) and Candida (resistant to fluconazole and itraconazole). The culture was identified as Burkholderia gladioli and produced at least five different antimicrobial compounds which were highly stable at high temperature (121°C) and in the broad pH range (3.0-11.0). We report here the antimicrobial activity of B. gladioli against drug resistant bacterial pathogens.

Methods:

The bacterial culture was identified using morphological, biochemical and 16S rRNA gene sequencing techniques. The antimicrobial activity of the identified organism against a range of microbial pathogens was checked by Kirby-Bauer's disc diffusion method. The antimicrobial compounds in the cell free supernatant were chloroform-extracted and separated by thin layer chromatography (TLC).

Results:

B. gladioli OR1 exhibited broad spectrum antimicrobial activity against drug resistant clinical isolates belonging to various genera of bacteria (Staphylococcus, Enterobacter, Enterococcus, Acinetobacter and Citrobacter) and a fungus (Candida). Based on TLC profile and bioautography studies, the chloroform extract of B. gladioli OR1 consisted of at least three anti-staphylococcal and two anti-Candida metabolites. The antimicrobial activity was heat stable (121°C/20 min) as well as pH stable (3.0-11.0).

Interpretation & conclusions:

The bacterial soil isolate, B. gladioli OR1 possessed the ability to kill various drug resistant bacteria and a fungus. This organism produced many antimicrobial metabolites which might have the potential to be used as antibiotics in future.

Keywords

Antimicrobial activity
Burkholderia gladioli OR1
Candida
chloroform extract
Staphylococcus

Staphylococcus and Candida are the two major agents causing wide array of microbial diseases, especially in infants and immuno-compromized hosts12. If left untreated, these diseases can be fatal34. Although many antibiotics are available for the treatment of staphylococcal and Candida infections, the choice is becoming limited because of the emergence of antibiotic resistance in the clinical isolates belonging to these genera56. The isolation of multi-drug resistant Staphylococcus and Candida is a frequent observation78. Looking at the alarming situation created by the development of drug resistant pathogens, a concerted effort is being made by the scientists to search for new antimicrobial compounds that can kill or inhibit the growth of such drug resistant microbes.

Antibiotic production is generally considered to be the domain of fungi and actinomycetes. However, a few bacteria have also been reported to produce antibiotics910. During the screening for novel bio-active compounds of microbial origin, a bacterial colony, isolated from rhizospheric soil, subsequently identified as Burkholderia gladioli OR1 exhibited inhibitory properties. Here, we report the antimicrobial activity of B. gladioli against clinical drug resistant bacterial and fungal pathogens of human origin.

Material & Methods

Culture isolation and identification: This study was conducted in the Department of Biotechnology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India. A spoonful of agricultural soil, obtained from a village Khuda Lahora, near Chandigarh (India), was suspended in 20 ml sterile distilled water, thoroughly agitated and allowed to stand at room temperature for 10 min. Ten-fold dilutions of the aqueous phase of the soil mixture were made, spread-plated on nutrient agar (NA) plates and incubated at 30°C for 48 h. One bacterial colony found to inhibit the growth of adjoining microbial colonies, was streaked on a fresh NA plate, incubated at 30°C for 24 h and stored at 4°C. The isolated bacterial culture was identified based on morphological11, biochemical12 and 16S rRNA gene sequencing data13.

Extraction of antimicrobial compounds from B. gladioli OR1: B. gladioli OR1 (1.0% inoculum) was grown in 100 ml of glucose yeast extract (GYE, glucose- 1.0%, yeast extract- 0.05%; pH- 7.0) broth contained in a 500 ml conical flask, under standard conditions i.e., at 30°C, 130-150 rpm in an orbital shaker (Shaker incubator - New Brunswick Scientific Co., Inc., Edison, USA) for 24 h. The culture was centrifuged (10,000 g, 10 min, 4°C) (High speed refrigerated centrifuge - Hitachi, Japan), and the cell free culture supernatant was mixed and agitated with equal volume of distilled chloroform (Thermo Fischer Scientific, USA) in a separating funnel (Borosil Glassworks, India). The chloroform layer was separated and concentrated on a rotary vacuum evaporator (35°C /100 rpm, BUCHI, Switzerland). The solid brownish mass, left after the evaporation, was dissolved in chloroform in a concentration of 20 mg/ml and stored at -20°C for further use.

Antimicrobial activity of B. gladioli OR1 against clinical isolates: The antimicrobial activity (AMA) of the chloroform extract of B. gladioli OR1 (CEBG) against clinical isolates of bacteria and fungi (obtained from Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh) was determined by Kirby-Bauer's disc-diffusion method14. The clinical isolates included 20 isolates of Staphylococcus aureus obtained from various sources like pus, semen, tissue cells, tracheal tip, umbilical tip and wound; 14 isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from blood, pus, trachea, urine and wound; 11 of Acinetobacter CBC isolated from ascites fluid tap, blood, pus, sputum, trachea, tracheotomy pus, urine and wound; 11 Escherichia coli isolates from catheter tip, pleural fluid, pus, sputum, trachea and urine; 6 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from urine and wound; 3 Citrobacter freundii isolates from urine; 3 Enterobacter species isolates from ascites fluid tap and blood; 1 Enterococcus species isolate from blood; 4 isolates each of Candida albicans and C. tropicalis from blood and urine. One hundred microlitres of ten-fold dilutions of actively growing (mid log phase) bacterial (both Gram-positive & Gram-negative) and yeast cultures (clinical isolates) having 0.5 McFarland turbidity were spread-plated uniformly (using a sterile glass spreader) onto NA and yeast extract peptone dextrose agar (YEPDA) (Hi-Media, Mumbai, India) plates, respectively. These plates were then allowed to dry in the laminar flow chamber for 5 min. Ten microlitres of the chloroform extract (conc.- 20 mg/ml) of B. gladioli OR1, was gently transferred to the sterile filter paper disks (6 mm diameter, Hi-Media, India) which were air dried for two min and then placed carefully onto cultured NA/YEPDA plates along with the pure chloroform-treated, dried disks as control. The plates were incubated for 24 h at 30°C (for yeast) and 37°C (for bacteria). The AMA was determined by measuring the diameter of the zone of inhibition of bacterial and fungal growth around the discs.

Association between B. gladioli OR1 growth and antimicrobial activity in GYE broth: A total of six flasks containing GYE broth inoculated with 1.0 per cent overnight grown B. gladioli OR1 culture, were incubated for different time intervals (24, 48 and 72 h), in duplicates under shaking conditions (130 rpm) at 30°C. After each time interval, two flasks were withdrawn and the absorbance of the cultures measured at 600 nm using a UV/VIS spectrophotometer (Lab India UV 3000+, India). The B. gladioli OR1 cultures were then centrifuged, the cell free supernatant pooled and the chloroform extract of the cell free supernatant was prepared and concentrated. The AMA of the chloroform extracts, obtained after each time interval were checked by Kirby-Bauer's disc-diffusion method using test microorganisms S. aureus (resistant to amikacin, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, clinafloxacin, erythromycin, gentamicin and methicillin) and C. tropicalis (resistant to fluconazole and itraconazole).

Thin layer chromatography- Bioautography: The AMA of the chloroform soluble fraction of the supernatant of B. gladioli OR1 culture was qualitatively analyzed using Gibbons and Gray15 TLC bioautography overlay assay. CEBG (20 μl) was spotted onto pre-coated silica gel 60 TLC strips (F 254, Merck Co, USA). The strips were developed in a solvent system [chloroform: methanol (9: 1)], air dried, examined under UV light (254 & 366 nm) and carefully laid over the solid medium (NA or YEPDA) plates. Finally, 20 ml of the soft agar media (agar conc.- 1.0%) containing 100 μl of actively growing cells (N=108 cells/ml) either of multi-drug resistant S. aureus or C. tropicalis, was gently laid over the developed TLC strips, placed on the surface of the respective medium plates, and incubated at 30°C (for C. tropicalis) or 37°C (for S. aureus) for 24 h. The Rf values of the antimicrobial zones exhibited by the compounds, separated on the TLC strips were calculated.

Stability of antimicrobial compounds: The stability of antimicrobial compounds (AMCs) present in the cell free culture supernatant of B. gladioli OR1 [filtered through 0.22 μm PTFE membrane filter, 25 mm (Hangzhou Anow Microfiltration Co., Ltd., China)], towards heat and pH was determined.

Heat stability: Ten millilitres each of the cell free culture supernatant of B. gladioli OR1 were dispensed in various 50 ml screw capped conical flasks. The flasks were subjected to heat treatment (50, 70, 100 & 121°C) for 20 min either in a water bath (up to 100°C) or in an autoclave (121°C).

pH stability: Ten millilitres each of cell free culture supernatant contained in different flasks were individually adjusted to various pH values (3.0, 5.0, 9.0, 11.0) using 0.1 M HCl or 0.1 M NaOH. Same amount of sterile distilled water was added to control samples. The samples were then kept at room temperature for one hour, chloroform extracted and assayed for AMA against multi-drug resistant S. aureus and C. tropicalis.

Results & Discussion

In the genus Burkholderia, mainly B. cepacia has been well documented to possess antimicrobial properties and some of these compounds have been characterized1620. However, there are only a few reports on the antimicrobial nature of other species of Burkholderia including B. gladioli. Although a few studies have reported the antimicrobial activity of B. gladioli against plant pathogens belonging to the genera Alternaria, Aspergillus, Penicillium, Clavibacter, Listeria, Acidovorae, Acetobacter, Monilia, Botrytis and Rhodotorula2123, there is no report on the AMA of B. gladioli against clinical drug resistant pathogens of human origin. This observation, as well as the emergence of drug resistant microbial pathogens to currently used antibiotics led us to explore the antimicrobial profile of our isolate B. gladioli OR1 against clinical strains.

Microbial pathogens belonging to the genera Staphylococcus and Candida are posing serious health hazard, because of the isolation of multi-drug resistant strains from hospitals all over the world2426. In the preliminary experiments (data not shown), a clear zone of inhibition around the B. gladioli OR1 colony patched in the centre of uniformly pre-streaked multi-drug resistant S. aureus and C. tropicalis plates indicated the ability of this organism to inhibit these drug resistant microbial isolates. Subsequent experiments proved that AMA was extracellular in nature and was chloroform soluble (data not shown). The chloroform extract of the cell free supernatant of B. gladioli OR1 was found to inhibit the growth of all the 20 clinical isolates of S. aureus tested. Of these 20, 10 isolates were sensitive to many antibiotics namely amikacin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, clinafloxacin, erythromycin, gentamicin, linezolid, methicillin and vancomycin. The remaining 10 isolates of S. aureus were resistant to one or more antibiotics; four were resistant to a single antibiotic (clinafloxacin or gentamicin), two were resistant to two antibiotics (erythromycin and gentamicin), and four were multi-antibiotic resistant (amikacin, clinafloxacin and gentamicin; amikacin, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin and gentamicin; amikacin, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, clinafloxacin, erythromycin, gentamicin and methicillin). The antimicrobial property of CEBG was confined not only to Staphylococci, but also to other bacterial pathogens namely, Acinetobacter, Enterococcus, Enterobacter and Citrobacter freundii (Table) isolated from various sites of human patients. However, CEBG did not inhibit the growth of E. coli, K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa. These results suggested that CEBG had a wide range of AMA against Gram positives but selective AMA against Gram negatives.

Table. Anti-microbial activity of B. gladioli OR1 against clinical isolates

Similarly, various species of drug resistant isolates of Candida, including C. albicans and C. tropicalis were inhibited by CEBG. Of the four isolates of C. tropicalis tested, one was sensitive to amphotericin B, fluconazole and itraconazole; one resistant to a single anti-fungal agent fluconazole and two were resistant to fluconazole and itraconazole. Of the three isolates of C. albicans inhibited by CEBG, one was sensitive to amphotericin B, fluconazole and itraconazole; two were resistant to single anti-fungal agent, either amphotericin B or fluconazole.

An association between B. gladioli OR1 growth and AMA was observed in GYE medium (Fig. 1). Although highest OD of 3.16 was observed after 48 h of incubation, but maximum AMA was observed during ‘mid log phase’ (OD=2.20) i.e., after 24 h of incubation and remained almost same thereafter, suggesting that very actively growing culture possessed maximal AMA. This observation was interesting because majority of microbes produce antibiotics (penicillin, streptomycin, gentamicin, cephalosporin, etc.) in their stationary phase rather than log phase of growth. Some bacteriocins27 and an antibiotic, pyrrolnitrin28 have also been earlier reported to be produced in the log phase.

Growth and antimicrobial activity of B. gladioli OR1 (Growth conditions: GYE broth, pH-7.0, 30oC, 130 rpm, 1% inoculum. Values are mean ± SD of three individual experiments).
Fig. 1
Growth and antimicrobial activity of B. gladioli OR1 (Growth conditions: GYE broth, pH-7.0, 30oC, 130 rpm, 1% inoculum. Values are mean ± SD of three individual experiments).

The AMA of the cell free culture supernatant of B. gladioli OR1 was found to be highly heat stable as well as pH stable (Fig. 2). The anti-Candida activity was 100 per cent stable when the sample was heated up to 100°C for 20 min but a small decrease of 1.4 per cent occurred in the autoclaved (121°C for 20 min) sample. The anti-staphylococcal activity was 100 per cent heat stable up to 50°C, however, a decrease of 2.8, 8.4 and 13.9 per cent was observed when the samples were heated at 70, 100 and 121°C, respectively. The production of heat stable antimicrobial compounds in the log phase of bacterial growth is not uncommon; some of the bacteriocins belonging to class II have been reported to be heat stable27. The AMA was quite stable in the pH range 3.0-11.0, with maximum stability observed at pH 7.0. Only a slight decrease in AMA was observed when the pH of the sample was adjusted to the acidic or alkaline values i.e., at 3.0, 5.0, 9.0 and 11.0, the sample retained 86.1-94.4 per cent of the anti-staphylococcal activity and 90.0-96.6 per cent of the anti-Candida activity. The pH and temperature data indicate that B. gladioli OR1 produces more than one AMC.

Effect of temperature (a) and pH (b) on antimicrobial activity of the cell free supernatant of B. gladioli OR1. Values are mean ± SD of three individual experiments.
Fig. 2
Effect of temperature (a) and pH (b) on antimicrobial activity of the cell free supernatant of B. gladioli OR1. Values are mean ± SD of three individual experiments.

The CEBG containing AMCs was subjected to silica gel TLC analysis in a solvent system comprising of chloroform: methanol:: 9: 1. The analysis of the separated compounds under UV light (254 and 365 nm) [and upon derivatizing the TLC with methanolic-sulphuric acid (10.0%)], revealed at least five major spots with R fvalues 0.24, 0.45, 0.59, 0.62 and 0.76. In order to find out the correlation of these spots with antimicrobial property, bioautography of the freshly developed air-dried TLC strips containing separated components of the extract was performed, using multi-drug resistant S. aureus and C. tropicalis as target organisms. The results (Fig. 3) exhibited that B. gladioli OR1 produced at least three anti-staphylococcal compounds (Rf values: 0.24, 0.45 & 0.59) and two anti-Candida compounds (Rf values: 0.62 & 0.76).

Bioautography exhibiting anti-S. aureus (a) and anti-C. tropicalis (b) activities of B. gladioli OR1.
Fig. 3
Bioautography exhibiting anti-S. aureus (a) and anti-C. tropicalis (b) activities of B. gladioli OR1.

The present study emphasizes the importance of B. gladioli for the production of various AMCs which possess the potential to kill drug resistant pathogenic microbes. Once the compounds are purified and characterized, these can act as lead molecules in the design of novel microbial inhibitors.

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India, New Delhi, for financial support and Dr (Mrs) Archana Singh, Panjab University, Chandigarh, for editing the manuscript.

References

  1. , . Current and novel antimicrobial approaches. Prog Respir Res. 2006;34:180-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . Invasive candidiasis in pediatric intensive care units. Indian J Pediatr. 2009;76:1033-44.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . Risk factors for fatal candidemia caused by Candida albicans and non-albicans Candida species. BMC Infect Dis. 2005;5:22.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . Current knowledge of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and community-associated methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Biomed Papers-Olomouc. 2008;152:191-202.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , . Evolution of drug resistance in Candida albicans. Ann Rev Microbiol. 2002;56:139-65.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . Novel mechanism of antibiotic resistance originating in vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50:428-38.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , . Isolation and characterization of fluconazole- and amphotericin B- resistant Candida albicans from blood of two patients with leukemia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;44:196-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , . New bisanthraquinone antibiotics and semi-synthetic derivatives with potent activity against clinical Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecium isolates. Bioorg Med Chem. 2006;14:8446-54.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . Natural products with antifungal activity from Pseudomonas biocontrol bacteria. Nat Prod. 2000;56:688-95.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , . Bacillus amyloliquefaciens GA1 as a source of potent antibiotics and other secondary metabolites for biocontrol of plant pathogens. Microb Cell Fact. 2009;8:63.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , . Occurrence of multiple genomovars of Burkholderia cepacia in cystic fibrosis patients and proposal of Burkholderia multivorans sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997;47:1188-200.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , . Taxonomy and identification of the Burkholderia cepacia complex. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:3427-36.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , . Rhodococcus imtechensis sp. nov., a nitrophenol-degrading actinomycete. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006;56:1965-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , . Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disc method. Am J Clin Pathol. 1966;45:493-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , . Isolation by Planar Chromatography. In: , ed. Natural products isolation (1st ed). Totowa, New Jersey: Humana Press Inc; . p. :209-45.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , . Cepacidine A, a novel antifungal antibiotic produced by Pseudomonas cepacia. II. Physicochemical properties and structure elucidation. J Antibiot. 1994;47:1406-16.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , . Structural identification of cepaciamide A, a novel fungitoxic compound from Pseudomonas cepacia D-202. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996;37:1039-42.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , . Plant growth promoting and fungicidal 4-quinolinones from Pseudomonas cepacia. Phytochemistry. 1996;42:365-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , , . Isolation and characterization of antifungal substances from Burkholderia species culture broth. Curr Microbiol. 2006;53:358-64.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , . Novel oxidized derivatives of antifungal pyrrolnitrin from the bacterium Burkholderia cepacia K87. J Antibiot. 2008;61:420-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , , . Biological control of brown rot (Moniliana laxa Ehr.) on apricot (Prunus armeniaca L. cv. Hacihaliloglu) by Bacillus, Burkholderia and Pseudomonas application under in vitro and in vivo conditions. Biol Control. 2006;38:369-72.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , . Biocidal activity in plant pathogenic Acidovorax, Burkholderia, Herbaspirillum, Ralstonia, and Xanthomonas sp. J Appl Microbiol. 1998;84:263-71.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , , . Microbiological and epidemiological features of clinical respiratory isolates of Burkholderia gladioli. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:1510-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , . Antibiotic resistance in Staphylococci. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2000;16:3-10.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , . Antibiotics for treatment of resistant Gram-positive coccal infections. Indian J Pediatr. 2006;73:323-34.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , . Invasive candidiasis: An overview from Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc. 2009;108:443-51.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , , , . The continuing story of class IIa bacteriocins. Microbiol Mol Biol. 2006;70:564-82.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , , . Pyrrolnitrin from Burkholderia cepacia: antibiotic activity against fungi and novel activities against Streptomycetes. J Appl Microbiol. 1998;85:69-78.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections
Scroll to Top