Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
152 (
6
); 575-583
doi:
10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_906_18

Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator-related male infertility: Relevance of genetic testing & counselling in Indian population

Department of Clinical Research, National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Department of Molecular Immunodiagnostics, National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Department of Gamete Immunobiology, National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Lilavati Hospital & Research Center, National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
National Center for Preclinical Reproductive & Genetic Toxicology, National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Sudha Hospital, Erode, Tamil Nadu, India
School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia

For correspondence: Dr Rahul Gajbhiye, Department of Clinical Research, National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health, Indian Council of Medical Research, J.M. Street, Parel, Mumbai 400 012, Maharashtra, India e-mail: gajbhiyer@nirrh.res.in

Licence

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Background & objectives:

Due to limited information available on the frequency and spectrum of cystic fibrosis (CF) transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene mutations in congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens (CBAVD) in Indian population, it is difficult to provide accurate genetic counselling to couples. The present study was undertaken to investigate the spectrum and frequency of CFTR gene mutations in Indian men with CBAVD and to determine the female CF carrier status.

Methods:

Direct DNA sequencing of the CFTR gene was carried out in eighty CBAVD men, their female partners and fifty controls from the general population. Pathological significance of the identified novel CFTR gene variants was carried out using in silico tools. Appropriate genetic counselling was provided to the couples prior to intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

Results:

A significant association was observed for CFTR gene variants in Indian CBAVD men versus controls (odds ratio: 12.1; 95% confidence interval: 4.8-30.4; P<0.0001). A total of 20 CFTR gene variants were identified in 53 CBAVD men. Eight novel missense CFTR gene variants (L214V, A238P, E379V, L578I, F587L, L926W, R1325K and R1453Q); two novel splice-site gene variants (c.1-30C>G and IVS1+2T>G) and ten previously reported mutations (R75Q, c.1210-12[5], F508del, A309G, R334W, I444T, R668C, R709X, A1285V and Q1352H) were detected in CBAVD men. The novel and reported CFTR gene mutations were L926W (2.5%, P=0.26), R1453Q (2.5%, P=0.26), F508del (8.75%, P=0.03) and c.1210-12[5] (42.5%, P=0.002). A total of 13 (16.2%) female partners were found to be a CF carrier. Nine couples had a risk of transmitting mutant CFTR allele to the offspring.

Interpretation & conclusions:

The heterogeneous spectrum of CFTR gene in Indian population suggests the necessity of screening CBAVD men and female partners for accurate genetic counselling prior to undergoing ICSI.

Keywords

Azoospermia
cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene
congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens
genetic counselling
intracytoplasmic sperm injection
male infertility

Congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens (CBAVD), an autosomal recessive disorder, accounts for 1-2 per cent of male infertility with an estimated incidence of 1:1000 men1. CBAVD is considered a primary genital form of cystic fibrosis (CF), associated with abnormalities in the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene2. In humans, the CFTR gene on chromosome 7q31.2 encodes CFTR protein that regulates the chloride ions across epithelial cell membranes2. Structurally, the protein comprises: two membrane-spanning domains which form the channel pores, two nucleotide-binding domains which control channel gating and one regulatory domain (R domain) which determines the phosphorylation activity3.

More than 2000 CFTR gene variants have been documented in the CF mutations Databases (http://www.genet.sickkids.on.ca/cftr/app, http://www.umd.be/CFTR, http://www.cftr2.org/). F508del and the c.1210-12[5] are also referred as (5T) the most common severe and mild mutations, respectively, detected in CF- and CFTR-related disorders (CFTR-RDs) such as CBAVD1. There is a variation in the frequency of F508del, while the 5T variant is found to be present at a similar frequency in CBAVD men with different ethnicity and residing in different geographical regions1234567891011121314. In North Indian CBAVD men, the frequency of F508del and c.1210-12[5] was reported as 11-34 and 26-54 per cent, respectively459. Our previous study reported 39.4 per cent frequency of IVS9-c.1210-12[5] in CBAVD men7. Currently, there is no epidemiological statistics on the incidence of CBAVD phenotype in India. However, data accumulated over a decade suggest that the incidence of isolated CBAVD in Indian population might be comparable to that of Caucasians456789.

CBAVD men have normal spermatogenesis and can achieve biological paternity using assisted reproductive technologies (ART) such as intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)15 with their own sperm retrieved through various sperm retrieval techniques such as microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration, testicular sperm extraction, percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration16 or opt for donor insemination. Moreover, if the female partner of a CBAVD male is a CF carrier, she possesses a risk of transmitting the mutant CFTR allele to the progeny, resulting in a child born with a full-blown CF or CF-related disorders such as CBAVD1617, highlighting the significance of screening female partners. However, CF carrier frequency in the female partner of CBAVD men still remains undetermined. Routine screening for CFTR gene is not conducted in ART clinics in India due to inadequate knowledge of the frequency and spectrum of CFTR gene variants, limited awareness of the CFTR-related male infertility and non-availability of population-specific mutation panel.

Therefore, the present study was undertaken to identify the spectrum and frequency of CFTR gene variants in Indian CBAVD men and to determine their female partner CF carrier status. It was also aimed to understand the genetic risks involved, if the female partner was a CF carrier and to provide accurate counselling to the couples prior to undergoing ICSI.

Material & Methods

This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee for research involving human subjects at ICMR-National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health (ICMR-NIRRH), Mumbai, India. Written informed consent was also obtained from all the study participants prior to blood sample collection.

The present study represents a part of the case–control genetic study conducted during the period 2011-2017 at ICMR-NIRRH, Mumbai. The total sample size was calculated as CBAVD (n=100), female partners of CBAVD (n=100) and fertile controls (n=50). A total of eighty unrelated sub-fertile men with a confirmed diagnosis of CBAVD were recruited from different geographic regions in India [north (n=16), northeast (n=1), west (n=48), central (n=1) and south (n=14)]. The semen parameters were evaluated as reported previously18. Men with semen parameters showing azoospermia, low seminal volume (<1.5 ml), absence/low fructose in semen and absence of the bilateral vas deferens on scrotal examination by the andrologists (Drs Rupin Shah and Vijay Kulkarni) were recruited as CBAVD cases. Testicular volume was assessed using Prader Orchidometer (Holtain Ltd, Crosswell, Wales, UK). Ultrasonography (USG) of the abdomen and pelvis was also performed. CBAVD men with renal abnormalities or those with congenital unilateral absence of vas deferens were excluded from the data analysis. Transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) was carried out in CBAVD men to detect anomalies of seminal vesicles and ejaculatory ducts, wherever possible. Female partners of CBAVD men (n=80) were recruited in this study to assess carrier frequency. Proven fertile men from the general population attending the Family Welfare Clinics at ICMR-NIRRH were recruited as controls (n=50). The controls had normal semen parameters with bilaterally palpable vas deferens. Study participants having family or personal history of CF or CF-related disorders were excluded from the study. The information related to ICSI outcomes were obtained during the follow up of the CBAVD men with the andrologist.

Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene testing and analysis: Peripheral venous blood was collected through venipuncture in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) tubes, and genomic DNA was isolated using QIAamp®DNA Blood Midi Kit (Qiagen Inc., Hilden, Germany). The essential promoter, entire coding regions and splice sites of 27 exons of the CFTR gene were amplified by PCR using specific primers (Supplementary Table I). Sequencing reaction and analysis were carried out as described earlier6.

Supplementary Table I Primers used for polymerase chain reaction amplification and sequencing of the CFTR gene
Amplification site PCR primer Amplicon length (bp) Annealing temperature (ºC/35 cycles)
Promoter + Exon 1 Forward: 5’ - GTGGAGAAAGCCGCTAGAGCAAAT - 3’
Reverse: 5’- GCAAGTAGATGTGGCTCTCTA - 3’
360 58
Exon 2 Forward: 5’ - GTGCATAATTTTCCATATGCC - 3’
Reverse: 5’- TTAGCCACCATACTTGGCTC- 3’
341 58
Exon 3 Forward: 5’ - CATGCAACTTATTGGTCCCAC - 3’
Reverse: 5’- TTCACCAGATTTCGTAGTCTTTTC - 3’
232 58
Exon 4 Forward: 5’ - TCTTGTGTTGAAATTCTCAGGG - 3’
Reverse: 5’- AAAACTACAACAGAGGCAGTTTACAG - 3’
525 58
Exon 5 Forward: 5’ - GAACCTGAGAAGATAGTAAGCTAGATG - 3’
Reverse: 5’- GAAAACTCCGCCTTTCCAG - 3’
321 56
Exon 6 Forward: 5’ - GGGTGGAAGATACAATGACACC - 3’
Reverse: 5’- TCCTGGTTTTACTAAAGTGGGC - 3’
287 56
Exon 7 Forward: 5’ - TGCCCATCTGTTGAATAAAAG - 3’
Reverse: 5’- CAAACATCAAATATGAGGTGGAAG- 3’
340 57
Exon 8 Forward: 5’ - CTTCCATTCCAAGATCCCTG - 3’
Reverse: 5’- TGAACATTCCTAGTATTAGCTGGC- 3’
476 57
Exon 9 Forward: 5’ - TGCTTGGCAAATTAACTTTAGAAC - 3
Reverse: 5’- GCACCTGGCCATTCCTCTAC - 3’
440 58
Exon 10 Forward: 5’ - GGCCATGTGCTTTTCAAACT - 3’
Reverse: 5’- CGCCAACAACTGTCCTCTTT - 3’
270 56
Exon 11 Forward: 5’ - CAAGTGAATCCTGAGCGTGA - 3’
Reverse: 5’- CCGATTGAATATGGAGCCAA - 3’
336 58
Exon 12 Forward: 5’ - GGAAGATGTGCCTTTCAAATTC - 3’
Reverse: 5’- CAGCAAATGCTTGCTAGACC - 3’
204 58
Exon 13 Forward: 5’ - GACCAGGAAATAGAGAGGAAATG - 3’
Reverse: 5’- TGCAATCTATGATGGGACAG - 3’
213 56
Exon 14 Forward: 5’ - AAATGCTAAAATACGAGACATATTGC - 3’
Reverse: 5’- GGATGCTGTTGTCTTTCGGT - 3’
678 58
Exon 15 Forward: 5’ - ACAATGGTGGCATGAAACTG - 3’
Reverse: 5’- TGAGCTTTCGAATCTCTTAACC - 3’
547 57
Exon 16 Forward: 5’ - AATTTAGATGTGGGCATGGG - 3’
Reverse: 5’- GGATTACAATACATACAAACATAGTGG - 3’
201 58
Exon 17 Forward: 5’ - GGCTGCCAAATAACGATTTC - 3’
Reverse: 5’- GATGGTGGATCAGCAGTTTC - 3’
329 58
Exon 18 Forward: 5’ - GAGAAATTGGTCGTTACTTGAATC - 3’
Reverse: 5’- CTAAATGTGGGATTGCCTCAG - 3’
566 58
Exon 19 Forward: 5’ - AAATGTTTACTCACCAACATGTTTTC - 3’
Reverse: 5’- TTTACAAGATGAGTATCGCACATTC - 3’
225 62
Intron 19 Forward: 5’ - CATTCAGTGGGTATAAGC AGC - 3’ 327 58
Exon 20 Forward: 5’ - TCTATTCAAAGAATGGCACCAG - 3’
Reverse: 5’- CAATGGAAATTCAAAGAAATCAC- 3’
549 56
Exon 21 Forward: 5’ - CATGAGGTTCATTTACGTCTTTTG - 3’
Reverse: 5’- CACAGTGACCCTCAATTTATCTG - 3’
276 57
Exon 22 Forward: 5’ - TTGTGAAATTGTCTGCCATTC - 3’
Reverse: 5’- CACAGTCTAACAAAGCAAGCAG - 3’
339 57
Exon 23 Forward: 5’ - CTGAATTATGTTTATGGCATGG - 3’
Reverse: 5’- TTGCAGAGTAATATGAATTTCTTGAG - 3’
317 56
Exon 24 Forward: 5’ - TGATGGTAAGTACATGGGTGTTTC - 3’
Reverse: 5’- TCAGCCATTTGTGTTGGTATG - 3’
283 62
Exon 25 Forward: 5’ - TCAAATGGTGGCAGGTAGTG - 3’
Reverse: 5’- TGATTCTGTTCCCACTGTGC - 3’
362 58
Exon 26 Forward: 5’ - CTACCCCATGGTTGAAAAGC - 3’
Reverse: 5’- TGAGTAAAGCTGGATGGCTG - 3’
421 58
Exon 27 Forward: 5’ - GTCTGACCTGCCTTCTGTCC - 3’
Reverse: 5’- ATTCCATGAGCAAATGTCCC - 3’
291 58

PCR, polymerase chain reaction

In silico prediction of pathogenicity: Bioinformatics tools such as PolyPhen-2, SIFT and Mutation Taster were used to predict the pathological significance of the identified novel CFTR variants. Polyphen-2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/) predicted the possible impact of an amino acid substitution on the structure and function of a protein using physical and comparative considerations. Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant (SIFT) (https://sift.bii.a-star.edu.sg) and Mutation Taster (http://www.mutationtaster.org) predicted the effect of amino acid substitution on protein function based on sequence homology and the physical properties of amino acids. The pathological splicing effects of the exonic and intronic variants were predicted using Human Splicing Finder version 3.0 (http://www.umd.be/HSF3/HSF.html). Multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/) were carried out for understanding the conserved nature of the novel CFTR variants across various species.

Statistical analysis: All data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Differences between proportions of CFTR gene mutations were compared by Chi-square test using STATA software (version 8.2, Texas, USA), and P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Demographic and clinical characteristics: The age of CBAVD men was 31.97±5.18 yr (mean ± SD), range: 23-47 yr. The mean age of the female partners of CBAVD men was 27.78±4.61 yr, (range: 20-38 yr). The duration of infertility was 4.45±3.48 yr, (range: 12 to 240 months). The mean testicular size found was 20.6±4.5 ml. Based on the TRUS reports available, agenesis of seminal vesicles was found in 15 (18.8%) CBAVD men. The head of the epididymis was palpable in most of the CBAVD men. The semen parameters demonstrated azoospermia with a mean semen volume of 0.79±0.9 ml and a mean semen pH of 6.72±0.8.

Genotypic characteristics: Screening of complete CFTR gene in CBAVD men led to the identification of twenty variants comprising ten novel and ten known variants, as represented in Table I. The variants detected comprised 16 missense, two splicing, one non-sense and one frame shift mutations. Out of 80 CBAVD men, CFTR gene mutations were detected in 53 CBAVD men with 66.3 per cent frequency (Table II). A statistically significant association was observed for CFTR gene variants between Indian CBAVD men and controls (odds ratio: 12.1; 95% confidence interval: 4.8-30.4; P<0.0001).

Table I CFTR gene known mutations and variants identified in Indian congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens (CBAVD) men
Mutations Nucleotide change Consequences Exon/intron Number of alleles
c.1-30C>G* Splice error - 5’ UTR region 1
IVS1+2T>G* c.53+2T>G - Intron 1 2
R75Q c.224G>A Arginine to glutamine at 75 Exon 3 3
L214V* c.640C>G Leucine to valine at 214 Exon 7 1
A238P* c.844G>C Alanine to proline at 238 Exon 7 1
A309G c.926C>G Alanine to glycine at 309 Exon 7 1
R334W c.1000C>T Arginine to tryptophan at 334 Exon 8 1
5T c.1210-12[5] Aberrant splicing Intron 9 34
E379V* c.1136A>T Glutamic acid to valine at 379 Exon 9 1
F508del c.1521_1523delCTT Deletion of phenylalanine at 508 Exon 11 7
I444T c.1331T>C Isoleucine to threonine at 444 Exon 9 1
L578I* c.1732C>A Leucine to isoleucine at 578 Exon 13 1
F587L* c.1762T>G Phenylalanine to leucine at 587 Exon 13 2
R668C c.2002C>T Arginine to cysteine at 668 Exon 14 1
R709X c.2125C>T Arginine to pre-mature stop codon at 709 Exon 14 2
L926W* c.2777T>G Leucine to tryptophan at 926 Exon 17 2
A1285V c.3854C>T Alanine to valine at 1285 Exon 20 1
R1325K* c.3974G>A Arginine to lysine at 1325 Exon 25 1
Q1352H c.4056G>C Glutamine to histidine at 1352 Exon 25 2
R1453Q* c.4358G>A Arginine to glutamine at 1453 Exon 27 2

*Novel sequence variant. UTR, untranslated region

Table II Frequency of CFTR gene variants in Indian population
Genotype CBAVD men (n=80), n (%) Female partner of CBAVD men (n=80), n (%) Fertile men as controls (n=50), n (%)
CFTR variant detected 53/80 (66.25)* 13/80 (16.25)* 7/50 (14)
At least one severe/mild variant 41/80 (51.25)* 13/80 (16.25) 7/50 (14)
Two or more variants 12/80 (15)* 0/80 (0) 0/50 (0)

*P≤0.0001 as compared to controls. CBAVD, congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens

Novel variants: Of the ten novel variants, seven were heterozygous missense [L214V (KU325495), A238P (KT121468), E379V (KM596832), L578I (KU325496), L926W (KM014732), R1325K (KM596834) and R1453Q (KM596833)]. A homozygous missense gene variant F587L (KJ606925) was also identified. Electropherograms of the novel CFTR gene variants are represented in Fig. 1. Two of the novel splice-site variants detected were c.1-30C>G (KU325497) in the essential promoter region and IVS1+2T>G (KU325498). The most frequently detected novel gene variants were L926W (2.5%) and R1453Q (2.5%). The correlation of novel CFTR gene variants with semen characteristics, testicular size and epididymal status is shown in Table III.

Sequencing results of novel CFTR gene variants (L214V, A238P, E379V, L578I, F587L, L926W, R1325K, R1453Q, c.1-30C>G and c.317+2T>G) identified in Indian congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens men.
Fig. 1
Sequencing results of novel CFTR gene variants (L214V, A238P, E379V, L578I, F587L, L926W, R1325K, R1453Q, c.1-30C>G and c.317+2T>G) identified in Indian congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens men.
Table III Semen characteristics, testicular volume and epididymal status correlation with novel CFTR gene variants
CBAVD case number and geographical location Semen parameters Testicular size (ml) Epididymal status Novel CFTR gene variant
Volume (ml) PH Liquefaction time (min) Fructose Right Left Right Left
H4 (Maharashtra) 0.5 6 20 Negative 30 30 Head turgid Head turgid L926W
H20 (Maharashtra) 0.3 6 ND Negative 18 18 Half head full Half head full c.1-30C>G
H21 (Maharashtra) 1 8 60 Negative 18 15 Head Half head full IVS1+2T>G, L926W
H22 (Uttar Pradesh) 0.3 6 15 Negative 24 26 Head turgid Cystic head R1453Q
H23 (Kerala) 1 7.8 ND Negative 22 22 Head Head L578I
H28 (Uttar Pradesh) 2 7.2 ND Negative 30 30 Head turgid Head turgid IVS1+2T>G
H29 (Andhra Pradesh) 1.5 7.2 40 Negative 25 25 Head Head R1325K
H31 (Uttar Pradesh) 0.1 6 30 Negative 20 20 Head Head R1453Q
H39 (Maharashtra) 1 7.2 15 Positive 15 15 One third head One third head F587L
H55 (Maharashtra) 0.5 6 20 Negative 20 20 Head Head E379V
H60 (Maharashtra) 1 7 30 Negative 15 15 Head Head A238P
H70 (Karnataka) 0.1 6 20 Negative 16 14 Head Head L214V

ND, not done; CBAVD, congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens

Previously reported mutations: Ten previously known CFTR gene mutations identified in the study population are represented in Table I. Electropherograms of previously reported CFTR gene variants are represented in Fig. 2. The mutations/variants identified spanned the different domains of the CFTR protein and are represented in Fig. 3. The geographic distribution of CFTR gene variants in Indian CBAVD men is depicted in

Supplementary Fig. 1
. The most commonly identified CFTR gene mutations were F508del (8.75%, P=0.03), c.1210-12[5] (42.5%, P=0.002), R75Q (4.2%, P= 0.17), R709X (2.5%, P=0.26) and Q1352H (2.5%, P=0.26). Of the seven CBAVD men with F508del mutation, four men also harboured one of the following mutations: c.4056G>C (Q1352H), c.1517T>C (I506T), c.224G>A (R75Q) or a novel variant c.1732C>A (L578I), while only one of them harboured a c.1210-12[5] variant.

Sequencing results of previously reported CFTR gene mutations (F508del, R75Q, A309Q, R334W, I144T, R668C, R709X, A1285V and Q1352H) identified in Indian congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens men.
Fig. 2
Sequencing results of previously reported CFTR gene mutations (F508del, R75Q, A309Q, R334W, I144T, R668C, R709X, A1285V and Q1352H) identified in Indian congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens men.
Schematic diagram representing putative domain-type structure of the CFTR protein and identified CFTR gene variants. Novel CFTR gene variants are indicated in red and *. Previously known CFTR gene mutations are indicated in black. MSD, membrane-spanning domain; NBD, nucleotide-binding domain; R domain, regulatory domain.
Fig. 3
Schematic diagram representing putative domain-type structure of the CFTR protein and identified CFTR gene variants. Novel CFTR gene variants are indicated in red and *. Previously known CFTR gene mutations are indicated in black. MSD, membrane-spanning domain; NBD, nucleotide-binding domain; R domain, regulatory domain.

Coding single-nucleotide polymorphisms and intronic variants: Of the 26 intronic variants detected, 19 were novel (Supplementary Table II), while 7 were previously reported. Four potential regulatory coding single-nucleotide polymorphisms namely M470V (n=55), T854T (n=21), P1290P (n=4) and Q1463Q (n=30) were detected in CBAVD men.

Supplementary Table II Splice-site analysis of novel intronic CFTR gene variants in congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens (CBAVD) men
Novel intronic variants Intron Interpretation
c.185+84G>A 1 Alteration of an intronic ESS site
Creation of an intronic ESE site
c.405+24A>T 3 No significant splicing motif alteration detected
c.621+91G>A 4 Alteration of an intronic ESS site
c.875+12G>A 6 No significant splicing motif alteration detected
c.1248+80A>C 8 Creation of an intronic ESE site
c.1249-106A>T 9 Alteration of an exonic ESE site
c.1259-167A>C 9 No significant splicing motif alteration detected
c.1898+45A>T 13 No significant splicing motif alteration detected
c.1898+25delT 13 No significant splicing motif alteration detected
c.2751+855delTA 15 Alteration of an intronic ESS site
Creation of an intronic ESE site
c.2751+106T>A 15 Alteration of an intronic cryptic acceptor site Creation of an intronic ESE site
c.2751+174A>C 15 Creation of an intronic ESE site
c.2751+86T>C 15 No significant splicing motif alteration detected
c.2751-75T>G 15 Activation of an intronic cryptic acceptor site
c.3120+529insC 19 No significant splicing motif alteration detected
c.3120+228T>C 19 No significant splicing motif alteration detected
c.4095+61T>A 24 Alteration of an intronic ESS site
Creation of an intronic ESE site
c.4268+30G>A 25 No significant splicing motif alteration detected
c.4269-93A>T 26 Alteration of an exonic ESE site

ESS, exonic splicing silencer; ESE, exonic splicing enhancer

Significant differences were observed in the frequency of CFTR gene variants across the isolated CBAVD and CBAVD with agenesis of seminal vesicle (P<0.001) Supplementary Table III.

Supplementary Table III Comparison of CFTR gene variants between isolated CBAVD and CBAVD with agenesis of the seminal vesicle
Mutations/novel variants Isolated CBAVD (n=130 alleles) CBAVD with agenesis of seminal vesicle (n=30 alleles)
c.1-30C>G* 1 0
IVS1+2T>G* 2 0
R75Q 3 0
L214V* 1 0
A238P* 1 0
A309G 1 0
R334W 1 0
5T [c.1210-12T[5]] 30 4
E379V* 1 0
F508del 7 0
I444T 1 0
L578I* 1 0
F587L* 2 0
R668C 1 0
R709X 2 0
L926W* 2 0
A1285V 1 0
R1325K* 1 0
Q1352H 1 1
R1453Q* 2 0

*Novel sequence variant. CBAVD, congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens

Female partner cystic fibrosis carrier status: Of the eighty female partners of the CBAVD men screened, CFTR gene variant was detected in 13 (16.2%) females (Table II). Twelve females harboured a c.1210-12[5] allele, while one was a carrier of A1285V heterozygous missense CFTR gene variant.

In silico analysis: In silico analysis of the CFTR gene variants is represented in Supplementary Table IV. PolyPhen-2 predicted six novel CFTR gene sequence variants to have a score >0.5 which is the threshold for damaging mutations and therefore, it might be responsible in damaging the CFTR protein structure or function. Similarly, SIFT predicted six novel variants to be damaging, whereas Mutation Taster predicted seven variants to be disease-causing mutations. In silico analysis using Human Splicing Finder v.3.0 predicted novel exonic variants to affect the splicing mechanism, either by altering or creating Exonic splicing silencer and Exonic splicing enhancer sites in the CFTR gene (Supplementary Table IV). Multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega confirmed the wild-type amino acid sequence of all the novel variants except R1325K to be conserved across species such as human, mouse, rabbit, bovine, sheep, monkey, pig and horse (

Supplementary Fig. 2
).

Supplementary Table IV Pathological prediction of novel CFTR gene variants identified in CBAVD men
Novel variants Nucleotide change (HGVS nomenclature) Polyphen-2 SIFT Mutation Taster Human splicing finder (v. 3.0) interpretation
L214V c.640C>G Probably damaging Damaging Disease causing Possible creation of new donor site in exon 7
A238P c.844G>C Probably damaging Damaging Disease causing Possible creation of a new exonic ESS site in exon 7
E379V c.1136A>T Probably damaging Damaging Disease causing Possible creation of new donor site in exon 9
L578I c.1732C>A Probably damaging Damaging Disease causing Possible creation of a new exonic ESS site in exon 13
F587L c.1762T>G Probably damaging Damaging Disease causing Possible creation of a new exonic ESS site in exon 13
L926W c.2777T>G Probably damaging Damaging Disease causing Could affect splicing due to broken ESE site in exon 17
R1325K c.3974G>A Benign Tolerated Polymorphism Could affect splicing due to broken ESE site in exon 25
R1453Q c.4358G>A Benign Tolerated Disease causing Possible creation of new acceptor site in exon 27

The PolyPhen-2 score ranges from 0.0 (tolerated) to 1.0 (deleterious). Variants with scores of 0.0 are predicted to be benign. Values closer to 1.0 are more confidently predicted to be deleterious. PolyPhen-2 and SIFT scores use the same range, 0.0 to 1.0, but with opposite meanings. A variant with a SIFT score of 1.0 is predicted to be benign. ESS, exonic splicing enhancer; ESE, exonic splicing silencer; HGVS, Human Genome Variation Society.

Risk of cystic fibrosis or CFTR-related disorders (CFTR-RD) to the offspring: Of the cohort, 53 men and 13 females who harboured a mild or a severe variant were at risk of transmitting at least one mutant variant to the offspring. Among them, nine couples were both carriers of the CF variant (Supplementary Table V). Three CBAVD men had compound heterozygous CFTR gene mutations L926W/c.1210-12[5] and c.1521_1523delCTT (F508del)/L578I, and their female partner harboured c.1210-12[5] or a CFTR gene mutation, increasing the risk by 50 per cent for the offspring who inherit two CFTR gene variants. Six CBAVD men had one CFTR gene variant and their female partners harboured c.1210-12[5], thereby increasing the risk by 25 per cent for the offspring to inherit two CFTR gene variants.

Supplementary Table V Comparison of CBAVD men genotype with female partner
Couple number CBAVD genotype Female genotype
1 c.[1210-34TG[12];1210-12T[5]] c.[1210-34TG[12];1210-12T[5]]
2 c.[1210-34TG[12];1210-12T[5]]/L926W c.[1210-34TG[12];1210-12T[5]]
3 R709X/- c.[1210-34TG[12];1210-12T[5]]
4 c.[1210-34TG[12];1210-12T[5]] c.[1210-34TG[12];1210-12T[5]]
5 c.[1210-34TG[12];1210-12T[5]]/L926W c.[1210-34TG[13];1210-12T[5]]
6 R1453Q/- c.[1210-34TG[13];1210-12T[5]]
7 F508del/L578I A1285V/-
8 R668C/- c.[1210-34TG[12];1210-12T[5]]
9 F508del/- c.[1210-34TG[12];1210-12T[5]]

Outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI): Among the cohort of CBAVD men who were mild or severe variant (n=53), 21 underwent at least one cycle of ICSI (40%). Among these couples, four successful pregnancies with live births including one twin pregnancy were recorded. One couple opted for adoption after ICSI failures. In nine couples wherein both partners were carriers of CFTR mutations/variants, six underwent ICSI, with two successful pregnancies resulting in live birth.

Discussion

In the present study, a heterogeneous spectrum of CFTR gene variants is reported with 66.3 per cent frequency in Indian men with CBAVD, which is lower than that in the Caucasian population1. CBAVD men were classified as patients with: (i) one variant (51.25%), (ii) two variants (15%) and (iii) no mutations (33.7%). Two CFTR gene mutations detected in 15 per cent of the CBAVD men, were comparable to those found in other studies131920. The most common mutation, F508del, was observed at a lower allelic frequency (8.75%) as compared to that of the Caucasian population1 but was higher than that of Chinese2, Japanese21 and Taiwanese22 populations and was comparable with that of north Indian CBAVD men458. On the contrary, IVS-9 c.1210-12[5] variant was reported at a higher frequency (42.5%) compared to that of studies in literature459. Failure to detect CFTR gene variants could be either due to the presence of large rearrangements such as exon deletion, insertion and duplications2324 or because of genetic aetiology other than CFTR gene. Recent studies suggest that gene ADGRG2 at a frequency of 11-15 per cent in CBAVD cases is negative for CFTR gene mutations25.

Out of the ten novel sequence variants, eight were located in highly conserved regions, which could functionally alter CFTR protein organization. Two novel splice-site variants (c.1-30C>G and c.317+2T>G) were predicted to induce splicing error and thus damage the translated CFTR protein. R75Q mutation detected in 4.2 per cent is a known variant for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)26. R709X detected in 3 per cent of CBAVD men is predicted to result in a truncated and non-functional CFTR protein11. In addition, in vitro functional assays are warranted to provide significant insight regarding the pathogenicity of the identified variants. Although CBAVD men can achieve biological paternity via ICSI, they are at a higher risk of transmitting lethal mutations to offspring727. A few studies have attempted to screen for CF female carrier status in the Indian population. Being said that, due to the increasing burden of mutations in the CFTR gene, it has becomes difficult to provide precise molecular diagnosis and accurate genetic counselling to CBAVD patients. Considering the functional significance of the identified known and novel CFTR gene variants, genetic counselling was provided by assessing female CF carrier status. In the present study a heterozygous A1285V variant was identified in one female whose male partner had a heterozygous F508del mutation. Interestingly, A1285V variant has been reported as a novel mutation in Indian CBAVD male9. Since both the partners were carriers of CFTR gene mutation, there was a 25 per cent risk of having a child with classic CF or CFTR-RD. In addition to this, eight females who were carriers of heterozygous c.1210-12[5] variant had their male partners with a mild or severe CFTR gene variant. Therefore, genetic counselling for couples in which the male partner has CBAVD is important to estimate the risks and possible genotype–phenotype correlations prior to undergoing ICSI.

In conclusion, we found the spectrum and frequency of CFTR gene variants in the Indian population to be different from that of Caucasians. Detection of female partners as CF carriers may be useful for providing genetic counselling to the couples before enrolling them for ICSI. Complete CFTR gene screening is expensive and therefore a population-specific panel should be designed based on the known and novel variants identified in the Indian population. Further studies are underway to identify the genetic basis of CFTR-negative CBAVD subgroup.

Supplementary Fig. 1

Supplementary Fig. 1 Multiple alignments (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/) of conserved CFTR amino acid sequences from multiple species (human, mouse, rabbit, bovine, sheep, monkey, pig and horse) and eight novel CFTR gene variants (L214V, A238P, E379V, L578I, F587L, L926W, R1325K and R1453Q) identified in Indian congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens males. The conserved amino acids are highlighted in red across different species.

Supplementary Fig. 2

Supplementary Fig. 2 Geographic distribution of CFTR gene variants in congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens men in India identified in this study. The red arrow indicates the identified CFTR variants from the region. * indicates novel CFTR variants.

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge Drs Vrinda V. Khole (late); Smita Mahale, Director, ICMR-NIRRH and S.D. Kholkute, Former Director, ICMR-NIRRH, Mumbai for their kind support in implementation of the study. Drs Jyotsna Gokral, Pervin Meherji (late), Anurupa Maitra are acknowledged for scientific inputs during conceptualisation of study. Dr Srabani Mukherjee, Ms Nanada Joshi, Mr C. Saravanan, Dr Parag Tamhankar, Ms Shweta, Dr Suparna Chatterjee are sincerely acknowledged for technical assistance with Sanger sequencing. Mr Ashok Vadigopula is acknowledged for assistance in semen analysis and blood collection. Dr A R Pasi is acknowledged for assistance in statistical analysis and Dr Nobhojit Roy is acknowledged for assistance in coordinating with funding agency, Board of Research in Nuclear Sciences, Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India

Financial support & sponsorship: This study was partially funded by the intramural grant of ICMR (NIRRH/RA/782/07/2019) and extramural grant of Board of Research in Nuclear Sciences (2013/37B/12/BRNS), Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India.

Conflicts of Interest: None.

References

  1. , , , , , , . Recommendations for the classification of diseases as CFTR-related disorders. J Cyst Fibros. 2011;10(Suppl 2):S86-102.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , . Mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) in Chinese patients with congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens. J Cyst Fibros. 2012;11:316-23.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , . CFTR mutations in men with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD): A systemic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:25-35.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , . Heterogenous spectrum of CFTR gene mutations in Indian patients with congenital absence of vas deferens. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:1229-36.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , . Heterogeneous spectrum of mutations in CFTR gene from Indian patients with congenital absence of the vas deferens and their association with cystic fibrosis genetic modifiers. Mol Hum Reprod. 2014;20:827-35.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene abnormalities in Indian males with congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens & renal anomalies. Indian J Med Res. 2016;143:616-23.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , . The CFTR gene mild variants poly-T, TG repeats and M470V detection in Indian men with congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens. Andrologia. 2018;50:e12858.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , . Cystic fibrosis, CFTR gene, and male infertility. In: , , eds. Male infertility: understanding, causes and treatment. Singapore: Springer Singapore; . p. :131-50.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , . Mutation studies in the CFTR gene in Asian Indian subjects with congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens: Report of two novel mutations and four novel variants. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2011;15:307-12.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , . Molecular analysis of the IVS8-T splice variant 5T and M470V exon 10 missense polymorphism in Iranian males with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens. Mol Hum Reprod. 2006;12:469-73.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , . Mutations in the cystic fibrosis gene in patients with congenital absence of the vas deferens. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:1475-80.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , . Heterogeneity for mutations in the CFTR gene and clinical correlations in patients with congenital absence of the vas deferens. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1476-83.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , . Characterization of cystic fibrosis conductance transmembrane regulator gene mutations and IVS8 poly(T) variants in Portuguese patients with congenital absence of the vas deferens. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2502-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , . Mutations of the CFTR gene in Turkish patients with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:1094-100.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , . Congenital absence of the vas deferens. The fertilizing capacity of human epididymal sperm. N Engl J Med. 1990;323:1788-92.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , . Congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens as an atypical form of cystic fibrosis: Reproductive implications and genetic counseling. Andrology. 2018;6:127-35.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , . Proportion of cystic fibrosis gene mutations not detected by routine testing in men with obstructive azoospermia. JAMA. 1999;281:2217-24.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. . WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen (5th ed). Geneva: WHO; . p. :14.
  19. , , , , , , . Heterogeneity of reproductive tract abnormalities in men with absence of the vas deferens: Role of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene mutations. Fertil Steril. 1998;70:724-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , . The genetic basis of congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens and cystic fibrosis. J Androl. 1994;15:1-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , , . CFTR gene mutations in Japanese individuals with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens. J Cyst Fibros. 2003;2:14-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , . Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene screening and clinical correlation in Taiwanese males with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:250-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , , . Large genomic rearrangements in the CFTR gene contribute to CBAVD. BMC Med Genet. 2007;8:22.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , , . Detection of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene rearrangements enriches the mutation spectrum in congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens and impacts on genetic counselling. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:1285-91.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , , , . Truncating mutations in the adhesion G protein-coupled receptor G2 gene ADGRG2 cause an X-linked congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;99:437-42.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , , , . High frequency of the R75Q CFTR variation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Cyst Fibros. 2004;3:189-91.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , . Molecular basis of cystic fibrosis disease: An Indian perspective. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2010;25:335-41.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections
Scroll to Top