Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Commentary
152 (
6
); 535-537
doi:
10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_649_20

CFTR gene variants in Indian congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens & its relevance in genetic counselling

Department of Reproductive Biology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110 029, India

*For correspondence: ashutoshhalder@gmail.com

Read COMMENTARY-ARTICLE associated with this -

Licence

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Cystic fibrosis is an autosomal recessive genetic disorder and common in populations of Northern European descents. The disease is caused by the mutation of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene that encodes a chloride-conducting transmembrane channel and regulates ion and water secretion as well as absorption in epithelial cells (anion transport and mucociliary clearance)1. More than 2000 CFTR gene variants are known with variable (asymptomatic to severe) clinical manifestation2. CFTR variants are classified into Class I to Class VI where variants of Classes I to III present as complete lack of function of CFTR gene with severe manifestations and Classes IV to VI variants present as mild phenotype due to some CFTR gene activity3. F508del (Phe508del/class II) variant is most frequently observed in north-western Europe; however, it is less frequent as well as associated with milder phenotype in Asians, including Indians456. CFTR gene variants (Class I-III) may present as classical cystic fibrosis (with severe pulmonary and pancreatic involvement) or as mild respiratory problem or as male infertility (Class IV-VI) associated with congenital absence of vas deferens (CAVD).

CAVDs are various types such as bilateral (CBAVD) or unilateral (CUAVD), complete or partial and with or without urogenital anomalies, including unilateral renal agenesis. The prevalence of CAVD in infertile men is 1-2 per cent7. Men with CAVD may present as cystic fibrosis or as CFTR-related disorders or as obstructive azoospermia or asymptomatic (discovered by chance). CBAVD is associated in almost all men with classical CF8. CAVD may be associated with two CFTR mutations (homozygous or compound heterozygous) with or without partial penetration or other mechanisms such as mutations in other related genes. Family discordant is also evident like siblings with identical CFTR variant-displaying different phenotypes, one with normal fertility whereas the other inferile9. This indicates involvement of additional genes in the aetiology of CBAVD. Majority of CAVD cases have at least one cystic fibrosis causing mutation, mostly compound heterozygotes10. Men with compound heterozygosity (one mild/variant type IV-VI and other severe mutation/variant type I-III) may have only CBAVD or with mild form of CF. Among these variants 5T, F508del and R117H are common. These mutations have also been found in Indian males with CAVD, although the frequency of 5T allele is more and F508del is less11. 5T is generally considered a mild mutation, but its association with (TG)m variants (12 or 13 TG repeats) in the intron 9 of CFTR gene enhances its severity and association with CBAVD2.

Approximately 90 per cent men with CAVD as a monosymptomatic form of CF have at least one mutated CFTR allele, and those having mutations in both the alleles carry a severe mutation in one allele and a mild mutation in the other but never two severe mutations1213. Meta-analysis studies also have shown hemizygous state/single variants in about 25-28 per cent cases of CAVD, in particular, with unilateral type1415. CFTR variants in CAVD with or without renal agenesis are controversial, some found association1617 whereas others found no association1819. It is also important to mention here that some CBAVD men do not have mutations in CFTR gene. This suggests that there might be other genetic or environmental factors that might also be responsible for CAVD. Other genetic associations with CAVD are mutations in adhesion G protein-coupled receptor G2 (ADGRG2)2021 and copy number variations in pantothenate kinase 2 (PANK2) as well as solute carrier family 9 sodium/hydrogen exchanger isoform 3 (SLC9A3) genes22. About two per cent of CAVD cases are associated with mutation in ADGRG2 gene (X-linked hemizygous mutation). Some of these genes (ADGRG2/SLC9A3) are validated in animal-knockout experiments23. Other rare genes associated with CBAVD are sodium channel epithelial 1 subunit beta (SCNN1B) and carbonic anhydrase 12 (CA12)24. However, in about 25 per cent cases of CAVD, mostly with CUAVD with a solitary kidney, no genetic associations are detectable.

It is often found that men with CBAVD have normal production of spermatozoa, but due to agenesis of vas deferens, there are no sperms in the ejaculate. This suggests that men with CBAVD can attain fatherhood by using assisted reproductive techniques (ARTs) such as epididymal/testicular sperm aspiration followed by in vitro fertilization or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection25. In this modality of achieving fertility, there is always a chance of transmission of CFTR/other pathogenic variants to the offspring, especially if the female partner is a carrier for CF. Therefore, genetic counselling should be offered to such couples undergoing ART, and both partners should be screened for CFTR and other genes mutations to discuss the probability of having offspring with similar problem. Further, parents must be investigated for CFTR mutations of cases with unknown or single mutation/variants associated with CAVD. This will help in proper prediction of pathogenicity/role of variant/s in causing phenotype and thus accurate reproductive genetics counselling.

Due to limited information available on the frequency and spectrum of CFTR and other related gene mutations in CAVD in the Indian population, it is difficult to provide accurate genetic counselling to couples, at present. From this point of view, the study of Gaikwad et al26 published in this issue has a noticeable significance. The study was undertaken to investigate the spectrum and frequency of CFTR gene mutations in Indian men with CBAVD and to determine the female CF carrier status. Significant association was observed for CFTR gene variants in CBAVD men versus controls. Direct DNA sequencing of the CFTR gene in 80 CBAVD men, their female partners and 50 controls from general population, led to the identification of 20 CFTR gene variants (comprising of ten novel and ten known variants) in 53 CBAVD men with 66.3 per cent frequency. Pathological significance of the identified novel CFTR gene variants was carried out using in silico tools. Of the 10 novel sequence variants, eight were located in highly conserved regions, which could functionally alter CFTR protein organization. Two novel splice-site variants are predicted to induce splicing error and thus damage the translated CFTR protein, but further in vitro functional assays or case–parent trio studies will be required to provide significant insights regarding the pathogenicity of the novel (newly identified) variants.

An important aspect of this study is the genetic analysis of female partners, as only a few studies have attempted to screen for CF female carrier status in the Indian population. A total of 13 (16.2%) female partners were found to be CF carriers. The T5 allele was the most frequent variation found in both males and females. Appropriate genetic counselling was also provided to the couples before ICSI. Nine couples had a risk of transmitting mutant CFTR allele to the offspring, while six of them underwent ICSI, with two successful pregnancies resulting in live birth. It would have been interesting to know what the status of their offspring was, had the authors analyzed the CFTR gene status in those children as well. One more area of concern is that 33.7 per cent CBAVD men had no mutations in the CFTR gene and role of genes such as ADGRG2, SLC9A3, PANK2, SCNN1B and CA12 was not evaluated. These genes are also to be evaluated for variants as well as copy number variation (in particular for SLC9A3 and PANK2 genes)27 for associations and prevalence in Indian men with CAVD. Therefore, it is the need of the hour to discover new male infertility genetics in obstructive azoospermic men with CAVD by making use of next-generation sequencing techniques, in particular, the whole-exome sequencing along with copy number variation analysis as the first step. Finally, it is worth exploring CFTR/related genes involvement in conditions such as semen with high viscosity and high liquefaction time or conditions with thick/viscid/scant mucus (cervical, nasotracheal, salivary, etc.).

Conflicts of Interest: None.

References

  1. , , . Role of CFTR in epithelial physiology. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2017;74:93-115.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , . Consensus on the use and interpretation of cystic fibrosis mutation analysis in clinical practice. J Cyst Fibros. 2008;7:179-96.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . A new era in the treatment of cystic fibrosis: Correction of the underlying CFTR defect. Lancet Respir Med. 2013;1:158-63.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , . Ethnicity impacts the cystic fibrosis diagnosis: A note of caution. J Cyst Fibros. 2017;16:488-91.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , . Cystic fibrosis in India: A systematic review. J Assoc Physicians India. 2012;60:39-41.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . Mutation analysis of the CFTR gene in 225 children: Identification of five novel severe and seven reported severe mutations. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2012;16:798-801.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , . Clinical findings in congenital absence of the vasa deferentia. Andrologia. 2000;32:13-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , . Reproductive failure in males with cystic fibrosis. N Engl J Med. 1968;279:65-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . Is congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens a primary form of cystic fibrosis? Analyses of the CFTR gene in 67 patients. Am J Hum Genet. 1995;56:272-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , . Genetics of the congenital absence of the vas deferens. Hum Genet. 2021;140:59-76.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , . Heterogenous spectrum of CFTR gene mutations in Indian patients with congenital absence of vas deferens. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:1229-36.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , . Comprehensive and rapid genotyping of mutations and haplotypes in congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens and other cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator-related disorders. J Mol Diagn. 2007;9:582-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , . Heterogeneity for mutations in the CFTR gene and clinical correlations in patients with congenital absence of the vas deferens. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1476-83.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , . Regulation of male fertility by CFTR and implications in male infertility. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18:703-13.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , . CFTR mutations in men with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD): A systemic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:25-35.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , . Congenital unilateral absence of the vas deferens: A heterogeneous disorder with two distinct subpopulations based upon aetiology and mutational status of the cystic fibrosis gene. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:1728-35.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , . Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene abnormalities in Indian males with congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens & amp; renal anomalies. Indian J Med Res. 2016;143:616-23.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , . Significance of CFTR gene mutations in patients with congenital aplasia of vas deferens with special regard to renal aplasia. Andrologia. 2012;44:305-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , . Urogenital anomalies in men with congenital absence of the vas deferens. J Urol. 1996;155:1644-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , . Truncating mutations in the adhesion G protein-coupled receptor G2 gene ADGRG2 cause an X-linked congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;99:437-42.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , , . X-linked ADGRG2 mutation and obstructive azoospermia in a large Pakistani family. Sci Rep. 2018;8:16280.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , . Gene copy number variations in Asian patients with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:748-55.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , , . Loss of SLC9A3 decreases CFTR protein and causes obstructed azoospermia in mice. PLoS Genet. 2017;13:e1006715.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , , . SCNN1B and CA12 play vital roles in occurrence of congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens (CBAVD) Asian J Androl. 2019;21:525-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , , . Congenital absence of the vas deferens. The fertilizing capacity of human epididymal sperm. N Engl J Med. 1990;323:1788-92.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , , , . CFTR related male infertility: Relevance of genetic testing and counselling in Indian population. Indian J Med Res. 2020;152:575-83.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , , , . SLC9A3 affects vas deferens development and associates with Taiwanese congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:3562719.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    27

    PDF downloads
    12
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections
    Scroll to Top