Parasitic infections in HIV infected individuals: Diagnostic & therapeutic challenges

Cryptosporidium spp., Isospora belli and Microsporidium spp.

Cryptosporidiosis and isosporiasis have been categorized by CDC as ADI2. These are the two most common intestinal protozoan parasites causing diarrhoea and pose a public health problem in AIDS patients. Recent reports from France indicated the increase of isosporiasis from 0.4 per 1000 patients in the pre-HAART era (1995-1996) to 4.4 per 1000 patients in the HAART era (2001-2003)11. The prevalence of cryptosporidiosis varied according to geographical locations. In Southeast Asia, the infective rate of C. parvum is up to 40 per cent12. In clinical cryptosporidiosis, chronic diarrhoea with watery stools, weight loss and dehydration are the prominent features in symptomatic patients13. Cryptosporidiosis occurs in AIDS patients when the CD4⁺ cell count is < 200 cells/μl14. Microsporidium is an obligate intracellular microorganism that was recently reclassified from protozoa to fungi. It has emerged as the causes of OIs associated with diarrhoea and wasting in AIDS patients especially in developing countries where combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) is not always accessible15. Interestingly, most studies found that Cryptosporidium spp. was the most common intestinal parasitic co-infection with Microsporidium spp1416. Clinical symptoms and disease associated with microsporidiosis vary with the status of the host's immune system. Persistent diarrhoea, abdominal pain, and weight loss are common clinical symptoms15. Higher prevalent rates of these intestinal parasitic infections are found related to CD4⁺ cell count of <100 cells/μl17. With greater awareness and implementation of better diagnostic methods, it was demonstrated that microsporidia contribute to a wide range of clinical syndromes in HIV-infected individuals18. Therefore, primary effectiveness of prevention and control strategies against these parasitic infections should be implemented in HIV/AIDS patients particularly in resource limited settings.

Entamoeba histolytica

E. histolytica is one of the most important parasitic diseases in developing and developed countries. It infects approximately 50 million people worldwide. Although, most subjects infected with E. histolytica are asymptomatic, it accounts for more than 100,000 deaths annually19. E. histolytica is unique among amoeba in its ability to disrupt the intestinal mucosa causing colitis and the capability for further haematogenous spread, producing potentially fatal abscesses in the absence of appropriate therapy20.

E. histolytica infection is common in homosexual men, particularly those sexually active HIV-infected men who have sex with men (MSM) are at greater risk of developing amoebic disease than HIV-uninfected MSM and the general population21. Transmission in these men occur by oral-genital or oral-rectal sexual practices21.

A high prevalence of E. histolytica infection in HIV/AIDS patients in various countries has been reported22. E. histolytica seropositivity in HIV-infected individuals was found to be higher in patients with a CD4⁺ cell count of <200 cells/μl22. It is unclear whether HIV infection is a risk factor for E. histolytica infections but it has been suggested that these are more susceptible to an invasive form of the disease than are normal population23. The common clinical symptoms and signs of amoebic liver abscess (abdominal pain, fever and chills, and abdominal tenderness) show a more insidious onset of illness in term of longer duration of hospital stay in HIV patients than in normal population24 but in most cases there are no significantly differences between the two groups25.

Giardia intestinalis

G. intestinalis is one of the most common pathogenic intestinal protozoan parasites of humans causing acute and chronic diarrhoea throughout the world. It is becoming increasingly important among HIV/AIDS patients. Although giardiasis was not considered a major cause of enteritis in AIDS patients, there are reports that some cases of acute and chronic diarrhoea may be associated with G. intestinalis infection426.

In HIV patient as well as in healthy individuals, infection with G. intestinalis is frequently asymptomatic but can also cause abdominal cramps, diarhoea with flatulence and weight loss27. These symptoms generally begin 1-2 wk after infection, and may last 2-6 wk. Studies from Brazil26 indicate a high prevalence of G. intestinalis infection among HIV/AIDS patients, whereas studies form Ethiopia found no significant increase in infection rates of G. intestinalis28. However, HIV patients did have an increased probability of more severe symptoms when infected with this organism, especially in the most advanced stage of disease29.

Diagnosis: The diagnosis of amoebiasis and giardiasis is usually made by examination of stool under microscope for evidence of trophozoites or cysts. For cryptosporidiosis, faecal sample may need acid fast staining and view under microscope for oocyst.

Stool examination - The introduction of stool examination for specific antigen tests has improved diagnostic capabilities. Immunochromatography card for the rapid detection of protozoal proteins from a small sample of stool are available from several different commercial sources and are more sensitive and more specific (>90%) than the traditional microscopec examinations. These kits are available from Meridian (ImmunoCard STAT!^® Cryptosporidium/Giardia), Alexon-Trend (Xpect^® Giardia), Tech-lab (PT5012-Giardia II). The benefits of antigen detection methods are that there are no requirement for expert microscopists and require less time than conventional microscopic method.

Serological diagnosis - Although the available commercial kits were claimed to be the best single test for diagnosing intestinal protozoa, microscopic examination of stool could identify other parasites, in addition to each specific detection kit, that can cause diarrhoea. Therefore, microscopic examination of stool has value beyond diagnosing a single disease.

Treatment: Treatment for amoebiasis and giardiasis involves nitroimidazoles such as metronidazole (Flagyl), which has been used successfully for more than four decades. Undesirable side effects including anorexia, nausea, vomiting, malaise, metallic taste, potential teratogenicity and failures in treatment in normal and HIV patients have been reported30.

In the USA, the only drug approved by FDA for treating giardiasis is furazolidone (Furoxone) for 7-10 days. Nitazoxanide (Alinia) could become the preferred drug as it comes in a liquid form which may be easier for children to swallow. Tinidazole (Tindamax) and ornidazole are alternatives to metronidazole. Although these have many of the same side effects as metronidazole, but can be given in a single dose. Diloxanide furoate (Furamide) was also recommended in case of failure treatment with metronidazole31.

Certain drugs such as co-trimoxazole or nitazoxanide seem to have partial treatment for cryptosporidiosis. There is also no effective drug to treat patients infected with Microsporidium spp. To date, no specific drug has been shown to be effective against these infections. One recent study found no oocysts of Cryptosporidium spp. were detected in stools of patients receive HAART32.

Leishmaniasis

Leishmaniasis is caused by Leishmania spp., an haemoflagellate, intracellular and zoonotic protozoan parasite. It is one of the most common neglected tropical diseases. Global epidemiological surveillance shows that infection with Leishmania spp. was found in more than 12 million people worldwide and 2 million new cases are reported annually33. Of these, 350 million people are considered as “high risk” and the incidence of leishmaniasis is increasing33. Overall, the disease has been reported from 88 developing countries, particularly found among people living in poor conditions. There are two basic forms of clinical manifestations, namely, cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), a disfiguring and stigmatizing disease, and visceral leishmaniasis (VL) or kala azar, a life-threatening but treatable condition if diagnosed early. VL is prevalent in approximately 70 countries and South Asia (estimated 300,000 cases in 2006); India is among the largest foci of the disease followed by East Africa (30,000 cases per year) and Brazil (4,000 cases reported in 2006)34. There is an increase on the occurrence of new foci and the incidence of VL in east Africa. CL, cutaneous form of leishmaniasis, is geographical distributed among 82 countries whereby the predominant foci are countries in middle-east Asia, east Africa, South America and southern Europe36. CL has several (localized, diffuse and mucocutaneous) clinical features which depend on the Leishmania species involved (Fig. 2). Mucocutaneous is the most severe form that causes disfiguring lesions and mutilation of the face.

Close

Fig. 2

Clinical features of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Chronic ulcerative lesions of the lower limb as a result of infection with Leishmania tropica.

Export to PPT

The impact of HIV/AIDS pandemic is not only changing the natural history of leishmaniasis34 but also increasing the risk (100 to 1,000 times) of developing VL in endemic areas, reducing the therapeutic response, and increasing the possibility of relapse cases37. Leishmaniasis in HIV-infected patients is mainly VL, however, some cases of CL have also been reported in HIV-infected patients from endemic countries such as in Africa38 and South America39. Since the introduction of HAART, the numbers of Leishmania-HIV co-infected cases from countries where they are endemic in Europe are rapidly declining.

Diagnosis: The diagnosis of leishmaniasis in HIV-infected patients may not be straightforward due to clinical variations from non-specific to atypical features found in majority of cases. Further, the presence of clinical signs such as hepatomegaly is typically less frequent in patients with this co-infection and about half of these patients present with clinical pictures that mimic with other common OIs making clinical diagnosis difficult. In suspected cases of leishmaniasis in HIV-infected patients, combined diagnostic investigations (if applicable) are recommended to confirm the diagnosis.

Parasitological diagnosis - Microscopic examination and culture are conventional methods that have historically been used to detect the present of Leishmania spp. from different biological specimens and considered as the gold standard. These methods may also help in the detection of treatment failures in cases of leishmaniasis in HIV-infected patients35.

Serological diagnosis - Antibodies detection using several serological tests are available, including immunofluorescent antibody test (IFAT), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using crude antigen or rK39 antigen, immunoblotting, direct agglutination test (DAT), and the Rk39 dipstick test35. The Rk39 dipstick test is a simple, rapid, inexpensive and non-invasive method with a sensitivity of >90 per cent for the detection of VL in India40. However, sensitivities as low as 20 per cent have been reported for VL-HIV co-infected patients in Europe35. In cases of severe immunodeficiency, these serological tests can be of limited use because antibodies to Leishmania spp. may be absent despite an acute leishmaniasis2941. Furthermore, antibodies to Leishmania spp. can cross-react with other parasitic infections such as those of Trypanosoma spp. which make the use of some serological tests problematic35. Since the results of seropositivity vary according to serological tests performed, at least two different serological tests are recommended for each patient to enhance the sensitivity of antibody production42.

Molecular diagnosis - PCR is a useful technique for the detection and identification of different Leishmania species directly from clinical samples43. PCR assays applied to bone marrow and peripheral blood specimens is a useful tool for the diagnosis of VL-HIV co-infected patients35. By using non-invasive biological specimens, PCR assays also seem to be feasible for long-term monitoring the efficacy of treatment and the prediction of relapse cases44.

Treatment: Antileishmanial therapy consists of the antimonial compounds (sodium stibogluconate and meglumine antimoniate), miltefosine, and amphotericin B is used for the treatment of leishmaniasis in HIV-infected patients. Patients with Leishmania-HIV co-infection generally have low cure rates, high drug toxicity and high mortality rates. Moreover, low CD4⁺ cells count and recurrent relapses may contribute to temporary recovery and resistance to the previous drug regimens used35.

The antimonial compounds have been used for past decades as the first line drug for treatment because of their low cost and availability in most countries. However, the compounds are well known for their toxicities such as severe vomiting and emerging drug resistant45. The compounds have high toxicity, high mortality rate and potentially stimulated HIV-1 replication in in vitro, therefore, it is not recommended for the first-line treatment of Leishmania-HIV co-infected patients35.

Lipid formulations of amphotericin B (Liposomal amphotericin B; L-AmB) is the drug of choice for treating VL46. Due to its cost, this therapeutic agent is more commonly used in developed than in resource-poor countries41. A European study demonstrated that L-AmB with a total dose of up to 30-40 mg/kg was well tolerated in small numbers of Leishmania/HIV-coinfected patients but this therapy did not prevent relapse cases47. Data on AmB lipid complex or L-AmB used for secondary prophylaxis in co-infected patients is scanty; therefore, more study are needed to prevent the high possibility of recurrent leishmaniasis in these patients.

Malaria

Of the four Plasmodium species: P. falciparum, P. vivax, P. malariae, and P. ovale, P. vivax is the most common cause of malaria particularly found in endemic areas and P. falciparum is the main cause of severe malaria that leads to high morbidity and mortality. The major foci of malaria are found in many regions such as South America, Southeast Asia and sub-Saharan Africa48. Approximately 300 to 500 million children are infected with malaria each year leading to more than 1 million deaths annually in sub- Saharan Africa49. About 25 million pregnant women are at risk of infection of P. falciparum in this region48. A higher parasites load was detected in HIV-infected multigravidae and also the increasing rates of fever due to malaria with the progressive immunosuppression in HIV-infected partients49.

Diagnosis: Parasitological diagnosis - The diagnosis of clinical malaria is based on a high index of suspicion in both the patient's history of exposure and clinical presentation. The definite diagnosis requires the direct identification of malarial parasite species in the peripheral blood specimens (parasitaemia) from thick and thin blood smears using Giemsa staining technique.

Serological diagnosis - There are a few commercial diagnostic kits available in the detection of anti-malarial antibodies namely ParaSight-F is the simple and accurte diagnostic kits for P. falciparum infection50.

Neuroimaging diagnosis - In cerebral malaria, brain computed tomography (CAT scan) shows cerebral oedema by effacement of the cortical sulci and small or slit-like ventricles, and if it occurs with hypoattenuation of the basal ganglia or cerebellum, a sign of poor prognosis51. Brain magnetic resonance image (MRI) demonstrates diffuse swelling with or without oedema, as well as multifocal cortical and subcortical lesions52. In fatal cases of cerebral malaria, brain CAT scan and MRI reveal a common finding of transtentorial herniation53.

Treatment: The interaction between HIV infection and malaria has been well described over the past few years. As a standard guideline, co-trimoxazole is daily recommended in HIV-infected patients, including pregnant women54. Apart from antimalarial treatment, implementation of insecticide-treated nets, co-trimoxazole prophylaxis, and ART play an important role in reducing the morbidity and mortality of clinical malaria in HIV-infected patients. There are many more treatment challenges that need to be answered regarding clinical malaria in HIV-infected patients: the role of co-trimoxazole prophylaxis in HIV-infected patients undergoing ART, the efficacy of antiretroviral drugs against malaria, the synergistic action between antimalarial and antiretroviral treatments, and the effect of antifolate resistance under co-trimoxazole prophylaxis54.

Neurocysticercosis

Neurocysticercosis (NCC), caused by a larval tapeworm Taenia solium, is the most common helminthic infection of the central nervous system and the most common cause of patients with acquired seizure. Cysticercosis is highly endemic in most developing countries such as Asia, Latin America, parts of Oceania, and sub-Saharan Africa where pigs are raised55. Faeco-oral contamination is the main route of transmission through accidentally ingestion of T. solium egg found among infected humans. Clinical presentations of patients with NCC depend on the number, size, location of CNS lesions, and the host immune response56. Of these, seizures are the most common clinical presentation of NCC, but other syndromic features, such as headache, hemiparesis and ataxia may also be seen in these patients.

Diagnosis: Though, NCC is not that common compared to other OIs in HIV-infected patients, misdiagnosis can easily lead to fatal outcome in immunocompromised hosts. The definitive diagnosis of NCC is recommended based on combined histology, radio-imaging, serology, and clinical symptoms. The diagnosis of NCC is made on histopathologic evidence of NCC, CAT scan or MRI showing a scolex within a cystic lesion, or neuroimaging showing a lesion compatible with NCC or a clinical response to initial therapy of NCC, combined with serological evidence of infection with T. solium using CSF ELISA57.

Treatment: Albendazole and praziquantel are the mainstay drugs for treatment of NCC, especially for meningeal infection and steroids should be administered to reduce oedema as a result of medical treatment58.

Schistosomiasis (Bilharziasis)

Schistosomiasis, a neglected tropical disease or a man-made disease, is caused by five species of blood flukes of the genus Schistosoma: S. mansoni, S. japonicum, S. haematobium, S. intercalatum, and S. mekongi. This parasitic disease infects 200 million people worldwide and about 600 million people are at high risk to the infection in 72 endemic countries59. The infection with Schistosoma spp. is mostly transmitted through water contact and requires an intermediate mollusk host to complete its life-cycle. Factors contribute to the occurrence of this systemic helminthic infections in new geographical foci are international travel, refugee and population migration, and the new development of water resources60.

In HIV-infected patients, a couple of studies showed that up to 17 per cent of HIV-infected patients from sub-Saharan Africa had seropositive for schistosomiasis61. There are three main clinical diagnoses of schisto-somiasis (gastrointestinal, disseminated and CNS) reported in HIV-infected patients. Gastrointestinal schistosomiasis is the most common form and patients typically present with weight loss, diarrhoea, abdominal pain and odynophagia62. Only a few cases of disseminated and neurkoschistosomiasis (NSS) have been reported in HIV-infected patients63.

Diagnosis: The diagnosis of NSS is difficult because clinical CNS symptoms are non-specific and laboratory findings such as eosinophilia and the presence of Schistosoma eggs in clinical samples may not be present64. NSS should be included in the differential diagnosis in any patient who is from endemic area of schistosomiasis and who displays an acute encephalopathy of unknown origin.

Parasitological diagnosis - The definite diagnosis is based on the direct identification of the eggs in tissue biopsy specimens of patients with NSS compared to the supportive evidence on direct detection of Schistosoma eggs in stool (S. mansoni) or urine (S. haematobium) samples for patients with schistosomiasis65.

Serological diagnosis - In general, there are promising serological methods used for antibodies detection such as IgG, IgM or IgE by different diagnostic kits of ELISA, IHA or immunofluorescence66. These methods are sensitive and useful in the diagnosis of schistosomiasis of both affected people living in endemic areas and among travellers. However, there are some limitations to these commercial kits that need to be rectified in order to avoid misdiagnosis: the antibodies persist even after parasitological cure65, or the possibility of cross-reactivity with other helminthic infections. Another promising method of the detection of circulating adult worm antigen and soluble egg antigen is in using monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies from various clinical samples67.

Neuroimaging diagnosis - CAT scan and MRI are useful tools in the investigation of NSS. CAT scan finding typically shows single or multiple hyperdense lesions surrounded by oedema with variable contrast enhancement68, while, MRI of the brain demonstrates a characteristic “arborized” appearance with linear enhancement surrounded by punctate enhancing nodules69.

Treatment: The drug praziquantel, steroids and surgery are currently available as the mainstay for treatment of NSS. A 5-days course of praziquantel of 50 mg/kg/day divided in two daily doses is recommended for treatment of NSS70. Artemether, an antimalarial drug and a synergistic drug with praziquantel is effective against the immature migrating larvae (schistosomula)71. In non-compliance to praziquantel, oxamniquine of 30 mg/kg daily for 2 days can be alternatively used for treatment, particularly for the infection with S. mansoni70. In HIV-infected patients, the treatment is effective for schistosomiasis but it shows a high reinfection rate and correlates with a low CD4⁺ cell count72.

Strongyloidiasis

Strongyloidiasis is caused by Strongyloides stercoralis, a human intestinal helminthic infection. This parasitic disease has been found geographically distributed in both tropical and subtropical foci. In HIV-infected patients, hyperinfection syndrome (HS) and disseminated infection (DI) are uncommon but usually occurs in HIV-infected patients with CD4⁺ counts of <200 cells/μl. So far, very few cases of systemic/disseminated strongyloidiasis have been reported in HIV-infected patients73. The low incidence was due to indirect development of S. stercoralis infective larvae in the gut of HIV-infected patients do not favor disseminated strongyloidiasis74. Only a (<30 cases) of strongyloidiasis HS in HIV-infected patients have been reported75.

Diagnosis: Parasitological diagnosis - Definitive diagnosis is confirmed by direct identification of Strongyloides spp. rhabditiform larvae in different clinical specimens: stool, sputum, serum/blood smears, bronchial aspirates, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), peritoneal fluid or ascitic fluid76. Stool examination is a simple and cheap method but the screening for Strongyloides infection cannot rely solely on this method particularly in cases of HS where there is low number of larvae in the stool. The Harada-Mori filter paper appears to be a less successful culture method for Strongyloides than blood agar plate culture77.

Serological diagnosis - ELISA should be performed if strongyloidiasis is suspected but not detected by parasitological diagnosis77. Serology may give false negative results in patients with disseminated disease, may cross-react with other helminthic infections, or cannot differentiate between recent and remote infections.

Skin testing - The sensitivity of skin test decreases in the immunocompromised and most likely found in HIV-infected patients due to the similar effect and this method is not easily accessible75.

Treatment: Ivermectin 200 μg/kg/day is the treatment of choice for strongyloidiasis, in cases of HS, and DI, should be continued at least for 7-10 days or until the clinical symptoms are resolved57. Secondary prophylaxis is recommended in immunocompromised individuals e.g., a 2-day course of ivermectin every 2 wk may prevent HS or DI75.

Toxoplasmosis

The coccidian Toxoplasma gondii is a ubiquitous, intracellular, protozoan parasite that causes toxoplasmosis. T. gondii infection can enhance the immunodeficiency found after HIV-1 infections. Up till the present day, toxoplasmosis is medically the most important POIs of both epidemiological and clinical aspects in association with HIV-infected patients, which has been reported worldwide. The high prevalent rates of latent Toxoplasma infection (41.9-72%) in patients infected with HIV were reported in South America and in approximately half of the studies (≥40%) from the Asian continent. In North America, however, the rate of Toxoplasma infection was low (Fig. 3). Latent stage of toxoplasmosis is still prevalent as an infection that coexists with HIV pandemic. In concurrence with HIV infection, more than 95 per cent of cerebral toxoplasmosis (CT) occurs primarily due to reactivation of latent Toxoplasma infection and CT is one of the most frequent OIs, particularly in patients with full-blown AIDS. CT is the most common clinical presentation of toxoplasmosis and is one of the most frequent causes of focal intracerebral lesions that complicates AIDS78. When HIV-infected patients develop CT this poses many diagnostic and therapeutic challenges for clinicians79.

Close

Fig. 3

Seroprevalence of toxoplasmosis in HIV-infected patients. Light red equals prevalence above 60%, brown equals 40-60%, blue 20-40%, yellow 10-20% and green equals prevalence <10%. White equals absence of data.

Export to PPT

In general, CT can be prevented by primary behavioural practices in avoiding acquisition of Toxoplasma infection such as consumption of well cooked meat, avoiding close contact with stray cats, contaminated soil and/or water, and receiving unscreened blood transfusions. Compliance to both therapeutic regimens for treatment and prophylaxis of toxoplasmosis is an imperative to prevent relapse of CT in areas where HAART is not fully accessible for people living with HIV/AIDS.

Diagnosis: Among patients with AIDS, cerebral involvement is more common and more serious than extracerebral toxoplasmosis. The definitive diagnosis is crucial for CT patients by directly demonstrating the presence of the tachyzoite form of T. gondii in the cerebral tissues. The presumptive diagnosis for CT, including the clinical presentations, radio-imaging findings, molecular and sero-diagnosis for Toxoplasma infection, and good response to anti-Toxoplasma therapy are widely accepted in clinical practice. The favourable outcome of CT is the improvement of clinical and radiological features after 2 to 3 wk of initiated empirical therapy.

Serological diagnosis - CT poses a diagnostic problem that relies on classical serological methods to detect anti-Toxoplasma immunoglobulins because blood samples from patients with immunodeficiency can fail to produce sufficient titres of specific antibodies. Seroevidence of Toxoplasma infection, independent of antibody levels, is generally seen in all patients before developing CT80. Most cases have high titres of anti-Toxoplasma IgG antibodies with high IgG avidity that provides serological evidence of infection81 and this is the result of a secondary reactivation of latent or chronic Toxoplasma infection81. Therefore, it is important to determine the Toxoplasma serostatus in all HIV-infected patients to define the population at risk for CT.

Radiological diagnosis: Radio-imaging findings, either by CAT scan or MRI, are useful tools for the presumptive/empirical diagnosis of CT. CT usually causes unifocal, and more frequently multifocal lesions, or less likely diffuse encephalitis. These findings are however, not pathognomonic of CT. Radiological diagnosis82 can be classified as typical findings of hypodense lesions with ring-enhancing and perilesional oedema, and are observed in ~80 per cent of CT cases (Fig. 4). A typical pattern of hypodense lesions found without contrast enhancing, CAT scan without focal lesions and MRI demonstrating focal lesions, and diffuse cerebral encephalitis without visible focal lesions, are shown in about 20 per cent of CT cases. An unusual but highly suggestive image of CT is the ‘eccentric target sign’, which is a small asymmetric nodule along the wall of the enhancing ring83. A CAT scan seems to be a sensitive diagnostic method for patients with focal neurological deficits; however it may underestimate the minimal inflammatory responses seen during early disease84. MRI is recommended to be performed in patients with; neurological symptoms and positive serology to anti-Toxoplasma antibodies whose CAT scans show no or only a single abnormality, or persistent or worsening focal neurological deficits of disease if results of the initial procedure were negative85.

Close

Fig. 4

Neuroimaging findings of cerebral toxoplasmosis in an AIDS patients. (A) Contrast enhanced CAT brain showed a ringenhancing lesion and marked surrounding vasogenic brain oedema. (B) Contrast enhanced CAT brain showed a resolution of cerebral lesion after 4 wk of anti-Toxoplasma therapy.

Export to PPT

Molecular diagnosis - The direct detection of T. gondii DNA in biological specimens by PCR has provided a major breakthrough for the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis86. PCR techniques are suitable for patients with AIDS because these methods do not depend on the host immune responses and allow for direct detection of T. gondii DNA from a variety of clinical samples.

Other diagnostic methods - Brain biopsy is generally reserved for those patients with a diagnostic dilemma or do not fulfill the criteria for presumptive treatment and for those patients who fail to improve clinically or radiologically over the succeeding 10-14 days after being empirically treated for toxoplasmosis initially. Stereotactic brain biopsy (SBB) is then required to institute specific and appropriate therapy8587. Surprisingly, SBB is not commonly used for the diagnosis of CT or CT-associated other opportunistic CNS diseases in Asian countries88 compared to other settings where CT cases have been reported in patients with AIDS. Brain biopsies do not influence survival of CT patients89. SBB is an efficient, safe and important diagnostic procedure. In selected patients even expensive investigations should be undertaken before considering specific therapy and cost-effective home-care90. This procedure should be performed early to achieve a prompt and accurate diagnosis and to guide the therapeutic scheme for AIDS patients with focal brain lesions91.

Treatment: Most patients with CT respond well to anti-Toxoplasma agents as demonstrated by findings from studies in various settings. However, about 10 per cent of CT cases died despite what was thought to be adequate treatment82. There are a few options other than anti-Toxoplasma regimens used as first-choice initial therapy; 6 wk with sulphadiazine (1.0-1.5 g per oral PO every 6 h) with pyrimethamine (100-200 mg [PO] loading dose, then 50 mg PO daily) and folinic acid (10-20 mg PO daily) that can reduce the haemato-toxicities related to pyrimethamine92.

Resistance to standard combination therapy (pyrimethamine and sulphadiazine) was reported in patients with CT93. Atovaquone has consistently been found to be a promising therapeutic for salvage therapy in CT patients who were intolerant to or who failed standard regimens94. However, the role of atovaquone in the treatment and prophylaxis of CT in AIDS patients is not well defined and more studies are required before a firm recommendation can be made95.

Trypanosomiasis: American trypanosomiasis

American trypanosomiasis (Chagas’ disease) is caused by T. cruzi, a hemoflagellate, intracellular and zoonotic protozoan parasite. It is a significant public health problem for not only people living in endemic areas (~15-16 million) in Latin American countries96 but also in non-endemic countries due mainly to immigration to European countries, Canada or the United States97. The clinical manifestation of Chagas’ disease is divided into three stages: the acute stage, often remains unnoticed or misdiagnosed due to its initial clinical pictures are non-specific to Chagas’ disease, intermediate stage, a period of asymptomatic carriage of parasites which remains life-long or chronic stage, multi-organs involvement after an incubation period of 10 to 30 years.

T. cruzi is one of the tropical pathogens that can coexist within HIV-infected individuals. T. cruzi/HIV co-infection in some areas of Mexico, Central and South American regions occur as a result of the geographical overlapping of these two pathogens, the occurrence of global migration and international travel98. This dual infection occurs because of the secondary reactivation of chronic (latent) T. cruzi infection triggered by immunosuppression in HIV-infected patients98. In regions where Chagas’ disease is endemic, the reactivation of this parasitic infection may be the first presentation of patients with HIV infection99100 and it can cause a high mortality rate among these coinfected patients101. HIV-related immunosuppression changes the clinical manifestations of Chagas’ disease including the central nervous system involvement102. Patients with reactivated CNS chagasic disease are more common in 75-80 per cent of patients with AIDS103. Since 2004, reactivated Chagas’ disease (meningoencephalitis and/or myocarditis) was included in the AIDS in Brazil.

Diagnosis: In HIV-infected patients, the reactivation of Chagas’ disease can be easily misdiagnosed as the clinical features and pathological appearance mimic with other brain diseases especially with CT. In such cases, Chagas’ disease should be included in the differential diagnosis in HIV-infected patients presenting with focal neurological deficits which requires further investigations98. Chagas’ disease poses a diagnostic dilemma in clinical practice and clinician require highly suspicion of patients with chagasic encephalitis who arrive from endemic areas, has a history of blood transfusion or intravenous drug use, and has no response to empirically anti-Toxoplasma therapy104.

Parasitological diagnosis - The definitive diagnosis is based on the direct detection of trypomastigote stage of T. cruzi in relevant clinical specimens using thick smears or Strout's concentration method, and CSF smears. In HIV-infected patients, the identification of trypomastigotes in CSF sample is the definitive diagnosis of chagasic encephalitis. Based on earlier studies, trypomastigotes are more frequently observed in the blood of HIV-infected patients with low level of CD4⁺ cell count105. In cases of focal brain lesions with an initial empiric anti-Toxoplasma therapy, a stereotactic biopsy should be performed to identify of T. cruzi amastigotes in all brain specimens, to confirm the presence of parasites by using the immunohistochemical method and to differentiate reactivated Chagas’ disease from CT106. Therefore, parasitological studies and histopathology are the confirmatory diagnostic tools for chagasic encephalitis in HIV-infected patients104.

Serological diagnosis - ELISA, indirect immunofluorescence, and indirect haemagglutination are the most common serological methods used to detect antibodies levels indicating the latent or recent infections with T. cruzi. The reactive results are usually obtained from at least two or three serological assays107 and the negative result does not exclude the diagnosis especially for disease reactivation108.

Neuroimaging diagnosis: Neuroimaging finding is the initial diagnosis especially for patients with chagasic encephalitis. The characteristic of space occupying lesions are found to be similar as to those of CT98107. Based on the lesion location, it can suggest the aetiological agent. CAT scan typically shows hypodense, single or multiple, irregular ring enhancing lesions predominantly located in the white matter of the brain lobes108. However, the neuroimaging finding might be normal in a few cases102. MRI demonstrates a heterogenous expansive lesion with mass effect, hypointense in T1 and hyperintense in T2 and FLAIR sequences, with irregular or ring enhancement106. Although Chagas’ disease and toxoplasmosis rarely co-exist in the same patient, PCR or microscopy is essential in differentiating these two pathogens and in preventing disease progression as well as fatal outcome of these patients109.

Molecular diagnosis - PCR is a useful tool for the detection of T. cruzi DNA from various biological specimens: peripheral blood for the early diagnosis of reactivated Chagas’ disease110 and for evaluation of the efficacy of anti-T. cruzi therapy111. The real-time PCR system is considered as an alternative to conventional PCR techniques as it is simpler, faster and more reliable. Moreover, the reduced risk of contamination and the possibility of quantification are added values to this method112.

Treatment: In HIV-infected patients, benznidazole 5 mg/kg daily divided in two doses for 60-90 days is recommended treatment for reactivated Chagas’ disease103113 and nifurtimox 8-10 mg/kg daily divided in three doses for 60-120 days is an alternative option even though clinical experience is generally not encouraging103. After resolution of the CNS Chagas’ disease, benznidazole 5 mg/kg given three times per week is recommended for a lifetime secondary prophylaxis57. The exacerbation of HIV viral load simultaneous with asymptomatic reactivation of chronic Chagas’ disease114. In HIV patients with seropositive for T. cruzi, it might be beneficial to administer a single course of treatment with benznidazole and nifurtimox. ART should be systematically initiated in Chagas/HIV-coinfected patients to further control parasites103113, reconstitute the immune system, and maintain high level of CD4⁺ cell count, hence reducing the incidence of reactivated Chagas’ disease104106.

Trypanosomiasis: African trypanosomiasis

African trypanosomiasis (sleeping sickness) is caused by Trypanosoma brucei gambiense and Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense, a haemoflagellate, extracellular and zoonotic protozoan parasite. These two parasite forms exist only in the lymph vessel, bloodstream and the CSF. The clinical course of African sleeping sickness consists of two stages: the early haemolymphatic, trypanosomal chancre and winterbottom's sign, and the CNS (encephalitic) stage, diversity of neurological deficits and severe condition. Human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) is a potentially fatal disease and continues to pose a major threat to 60 million people in 36 well defined regions of sub-Saharan Africa where HAT is endemic. It is estimated that there are currently 300,000-500,000 cases, with 50,000 deaths yearly115. It remains unclear whether HIV influences the clinico-epidemiology of HAT although both infections are endemic in sub-Saharan Africa and co-infections are also common116.

Diagnosis: Definite diagnosis is based on the direct detection of trypanosomes from various clinical samples stained smears such as, peripheral blood, CSF or tissue biopsy117. The demonstration of trypomastigotes of T. gambiense is more difficult than T. rhodesiense infections because of low parasite load in the blood as well as CSF samples118. In acute phase, the diagnosis can be done by demonstration of trypanosomes in a chancre or the site bitten by an infected tsetse fly. Microscopic examination is not sensitive to detect the presence of parasites during the late-stage of clinical disease. Serology and molecular (PCR assays) diagnosis are neither sensitive nor specific as compared to direct detection of the parasites through a conventional microscopy. However, a combined method of PCR assays and microscopy is recommended using CSF sample in highly clinical suspicion cases of HAT119.

Neuroimaging diagnosis - In CAT scan, no specific findings have been reported. MRI scan is often used to demonstrate the abnormalities in the brain120: focal high signal abnormalities in the white matter, especially with T2 sequences. This appearance is resolved after treatment121.

Treatment: HAT is a life-threatening disease with high mortality rate (2%-7%) and uniformly fatal if left untreated. Pentamidine, suramin, melasoprol, eflornithine, and benznidazole are the regimen uses for treatment of this parasitic disease. These drugs are recommended once confirmation of diagnosis is achieved. In cases of HAT with confirmed or suspected CNS involvement, melarsoprol should be administered immediately. This agent is potentially effective for both T. gambiense and T. rhodesiense infections, nevertheless, the emergence of melasoprol resistance has been reported122. If melasoprol fails, eflornithine can be used to treat CNS infection by T. gambiense but not effective for T. rhodesiense123. Suramin and pentamidine isethionate are recommended therapies for the early-stage124 and systemic HAT but not effective against CNS infection by T. gambiense and T. rhodesiense125. Moreover, treatment with suramin prevents HIV from penetrating CD4⁺ T cells and then inhibits reverse-transcriptase activity125. HAT/HIV co-infected patients are at higher risk for treatment failure and unfavourable outcome than seronegative HIV patients126.