Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Correspondence
135 (
3
); 439-440

Current status of leprosy as seen in a tertiary care hospital in north India

Department of Microbiology, C.S.M. Medical University, Lucknow 226 003, India
Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Sir,

Leprosy is a chronic infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium leprae, which can affect all ages and both sexes. Leprosy has been a major public health problem of India in the last century. Leprosy control programmes based on dapsone monotherapy were initiated in 1955, followed by multidrug therapy in 19821. In 1993, the National Leprosy Elimination Programme (NLEP) was initiated with the goal to decrease the prevalence rate of leprosy below 1 case/10,000 population. India has achieved elimination of leprosy as a public health problem in December 2005 by recording a prevalence rate of 0.95/10,000 population2 and subsequently, it has further declined to 0.84/10,000 population as in March 20063. Leprosy was supposed to be eliminated by World Health Organization at the global level by the end of the year 2000; however, it still remains a significant public health problem at a national level in six countries, where India alone accounts for 64 per cent of prevalence and 78 per cent of new case detection, worldwide. The global registered prevalence of leprosy at the beginning of 2006 was 219,826 cases. The number of new cases reported during 2005 was 296,4994. There are reports that the numbers of leprosy patients presenting to dermatologists in both private and teaching hospitals are increasing as peripheral surveillance activities are discontinued5. This would require a specialized focus on early diagnosis, complete treatment and detection and management of disabilities.

The Department of Microbiology, at Chhatrapati Shahuji Maharaj Medical University (CSMMU), Lucknow, in north India is a tertiary care centre providing laboratory confirmation of leprosy by slit skin smear examination6. Patients with clinical suspicion of leprosy, attending the CSMMU Hospitals are referred to the Department of Microbiology, CSMMU. Smears are prepared from six sites (nasal mucosa of both the nostrils, both the ear lobes and two of the most prominent lesions), and stained with modified Zeihl-Neelsen stain. Smear are examined under oil immersion to look for acid fast bacilli (AFB), both intra- and extra-cellular, and reported as positive or negative for AFB.

We have observed a rise in number of cases of leprosy in the last two years (Table). In 2007, a total of 29 cases with clinical suspicion of leprosy were referred for diagnosis, of whom only 2 cases were AFB positive, showing only a few bacilli in nasal smears. Smears prepared from lesions and ear lobes were AFB negative. A rise in number of referred as well as AFB positive cases was seen in 2008 and 2009 (Table). Majority of smears made from these cases had large number of bacilli even globi, irrespective of the site.

Table Acid fast bacilli positivity in leprosy patients (2007-2009)

All cases seen in 2007 and 2008 were out patients, not requiring hospitalization, while six of 11 patients seen in 2009 had serious manifestations like loss of extremities and hence required hospital admission. Three of ten patients seen in 2008 and six of 11 patients seen in 2009 had depressed bridge of nose. The remaining presented with either loss of sensation and/or hypo-pigmented skin patches and/or thickening of radial nerve, in various combinations.

The end of NLEP signifies the elimination of leprosy as a public health problem in India. However, numbers of leprosy cases are increasing at other teaching hospitals as well4 probably due to discontinuation of surveillance activities, distribution of multidrug therapy, deformity prevention and management performed by leprosy workers during the NLEP phase. Specialized focus on early diagnosis, complete treatment and detection and management of disabilities is still required to keep a check on leprosy. Also, multidrug therapy should also be made available at the tertiary care centres rather than being available only at primary health centers and municipal dispensaries for prompt initiation of therapy.

References

  1. , . Recent advances in the control programs and therapy of leprosy. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2004;70:269-76.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Special Correspondent, India achieves leprosy eradication target. . The Hindu News paper. :15. Available from: col 1 www.thehindu.com
    [Google Scholar]
  3. National leprosy eradication programme. Available from: http://india.gov.in/sectors/health_family/national_programme.php
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , . The imperatives of leprosy treatment in the pre- and post-global leprosy elimination era: appraisal of changing the scenario to current status. J Dermatolog Treat. 2008;19:82-91.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , . Leprosy in the era of integration. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2009;75:190-1.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. WHO. In: Laboratory techniques for leprosy. Geneva: WHO; . p. :21-9. WHO/CSD/Lep/86.4
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    14

    PDF downloads
    11
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections
    Scroll to Top