Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Correspondence
138 (
2
); 267-269

Seroprevalence of pandemic influenza H1N1 (2009) & seasonal influenza viruses in pigs in Maharashtra & Gujarat States, India, 2011

National Institute of Virology-Microbial Containment Complex, 131/1, Sus Road, Pashan, Pune 411 021, India
Bombay Veterinary College, Parel, Mumbai 400 012, India

*For correspondence: pawarshailesh@hotmail.com pawar.sd@niv.co.in

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Sir,

Pandemic influenza H1N1 (2009) virus (H1N1pdm) was reported for the first time in Mexico in March 2009. Pandemic of influenza was declared by the World Health Organization (WHO) on June 2009 as the virus was reported in several countries within a short period of time1. India also reported cases of pandemic H1N1 from various States2. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, USA, reported swine originated variant of influenza H3N2 virus in humans which has been linked to pig exposure. This virus showed matrix M gene from 2009 H1N1pdm virus which might make it easily transmissible in humans3. The pigs are an important host in influenza virus ecology since they are susceptible to infection with both avian and human influenza virus strains4. Pigs express both sialic acid (SA) linked to galactose (Gal) by α-2,3 linkage (SA α-2,3-Gal) and α-2,6 receptors (SA α-2,6-Gal), preferred by avian and human influenza viruses, respectively5.

There are no reports of seroprevalence studies of pandemic influenza H1N1 (2009) virus in pigs from India after emergence of pandemic influenza virus. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to explore transmission of H1N1pdm and other influenza viruses in pigs in Maharashtra and Gujarat States. During this study serum samples were taken from apparently healthy pigs of around 6-7 month of age at an abattoir in Mumbai, Maharashtra. A total of 925 serum samples were collected in 16 visits to an abattoir during May to August 2011. The sample represented 30 per cent of the total slaughtered pig population. The limitation of study was the limited number of samples screened. Hence, the study did not represent the total pig population in Maharashtra and Gujarat. Pigs were randomly received at an abattoir from different locations and piggeries. The samples were from 11 districts of Maharashtra and five districts of Gujarat State (Table). Antibodies to influenza viruses were detected by haemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay6. HI antibody titre of ≥ 20 was considered seropositive. Three influenza viruses namely H1N1pdm (A/Jalna/NIV9436/2009) similar to A/California/04/2009, seasonal H1N1 similar to A/New Caledonia/20/99 and H3N2 similar to A/Perth/16/2009 were used as antigens for detection of antibodies in pig serum samples. Influenza virus strains used in this study were isolated and grown in the allontoic cavity of 10 day-old embryonated chicken eggs6 at the National Institute of Virology (NIV), Pune. The reference hyperimmune serum samples of each subtype, raised in chickens at NIV were used as positive controls. Seroprevalence was estimated and reported as percentages with 95% confidence intervals (CI). As this was exploratory study, the seropositivity was not analyzed district-wise; hence district-wise sample size analysis was not done. Geometric mean titre (GMT) of antibody was estimated for each antigen and CI was calculated using of Nby2 software developed by the Statistics Unit at the NIV, Pune.

Table. District-wise sample collection from an abattoir

A total of 37.8 (C.I. 34.71, 40.96), 29 (C.I. 26.05, 31.81) and 0.3 per cent (C.I. 0, 0.69) serum samples were positive for antibodies against H1N1pdm, H3N2 and seasonal H1N1 viruses, respectively. The GMT of HI antibody indicated high antibody titres against H1N1pdm followed by H3N2 virus (Fig.). A total of 12.5 per cent (C.I. 10.41, 14.67) serum samples were positive for antibodies against both H1N1pdm and H3N2 viruses; 0.1 per cent (C.I. 0, 0.32) serum samples were positive for antibodies against both H1N1pdm and seasonal H1N1 viruses.

Percentages of positive serum samples and geometric mean titres of antibodies against pandemic influenza H1N1 (2009), influenza A (H3N2) and seasonal influenza (H1N1) viruses.
Fig.
Percentages of positive serum samples and geometric mean titres of antibodies against pandemic influenza H1N1 (2009), influenza A (H3N2) and seasonal influenza (H1N1) viruses.

Earlier reports from India have shown prevalence of antibodies against influenza viruses in pigs789. H1N1pdm virus was isolated from pigs in north India in 2009, after emergence of H1N1pdm virus in India10. In Maharashtra and Gujarat States, stray pig population is predominant and these animals wander in backyard. The piggery farms are semi-organized and pigs are reared in backyard. It has been estimated that influenza virus infection results in weight loss in pigs11. Therefore, swine influenza might be of substantial economic concern for farmers, and there is a growing concern of the impact of synergistic infections with influenza and other respiratory viruses12. The higher antibody positivity against H1N1pdm was followed by influenza H3N2 virus. As influenza vaccination is not practiced in pigs in India, the antibody positivity indicates influenza virus infection in recent past. A very small percentage of samples showed antibodies against seasonal influenza H1N1 virus, indicating predominant circulation of H1N1pdm virus. Also, antibodies to both H1N1pdm and H3N2 viruses indicate co-circulation of these both viruses in pigs.

India reported outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 virus in poultry13 and prevalence of avian influenza H9N2 has been reported from poultry markets14. Rearing of pigs in backyard provides an opportunity of intermingling of pigs with backyard poultry which might provide opportunities for reassortant influenza viruses. Therefore, the present study highlights need of influenza surveillance in pig population in India.

Acknowledgment

Authors thank M.R. Khude, S.K. Waghmare, J.P.N. Babu, Drs Aniket Mahse, Shrikrishna Waval, Ajay Masture, Shivali Gaikwad, D.P. Kadam, S.S. Koratkar, Avian influenza staff, and Dr B.V. Tandale for support in field and laboratory work, and the Indian Council of Medical Research, Government of India, New Delhi, for the financial support.

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Outbreak of swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus infection - Mexico, March-April 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009;58:467-70.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , . Seroepidemiology of pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 virus infections in Pune, India. BMC Infect Dis. 2010;10:255.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Interim information for clinicians about human infections with H3N2v virus. . Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/flu/swineflu/h3n2v-clinician.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , . Transmission of swine influenza virus to humans after exposure to experimentally infected pigs. J Infect Dis. 1997;175:7-15.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , . Orthomyxoviruses. In: , , eds. Fields virology (5th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; . p. :1693-739.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. . WHO Manual on animal influenza diagnosis and surveillance, WHO/CDS/CSR/NCS/ 2002.5. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; .
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , . A serological survey of influenza A antibody in human and pig sera in Calcutta. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1995;40:345-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , . Serological evidence of infection with H1N1 subtype of influenza virus at Dibrugarh, Assam. J Commun Dis. 1981;13:248-52.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , . Zoonotic studies on influenza in pigs and birds, India, 1980-81. Int J Zoonoses. 1983;10:40-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , . Influenza A H1N1 virus in Indian pigs & its genetic relatedness with pandemic human influenza A 2009 H1N1. Indian J Med Res. 2010;132:160-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , . Swine influenza. In: , , , , , eds. Diseases of swine. Iowa City, Iowa USA: Iowa State Press; . p. :349-57.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , . Effect of sequential porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome and swine influenza on the growth and performance of finishing pigs. Vet Rec. 1994;135:199-204.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , . Characterization of the influenza A H5N1 viruses of the 2008-09 outbreaks in India reveals a third introduction and possible endemicity. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e7846.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , . Avian influenza surveillance reveals presence of low pathogenic avian influenza viruses in poultry during 2009-2011 in the West Bengal State, India. Virol J. 2012;9:151-7.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    9

    PDF downloads
    8
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections
    Scroll to Top