Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Correspondence
Current Issue
Editorial
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Perspective
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Report
Student IJMR
Systematic Review
Viewpoint
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Correspondence
Current Issue
Editorial
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Perspective
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Report
Student IJMR
Systematic Review
Viewpoint
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Correspondence
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/ijmr_179_24

Salmonella enterica serovars Takoradi, Tananarive and Uganda from foods in Tripura, their virulence & antimicrobial resistance

ICMR-National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Kolkata, India
Centre for Development of Advanced Computing (CDAC), Kolkata, India
Department of Microbiology, Agartala Government Medical College, Tripura, India
Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India

#Equal Contribution

*For correspondence: drtapan1960@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Sir,

The presence of Salmonella in foods has been considered a public health issue, as the pathogen might be transmitted from the contaminated foods into the human food chain. The zoonotic pathogen Salmonella enterica is a leading cause of foodborne infection in humans1,2. Currently, the number of outbreaks due to S. enterica infections is increasing mostly due to contaminated foods of animal origin3.

The species S. enterica is highly diverse with about 2,600 serovars4. Based on the infectivity, they are classified as typhoidal (TS) and non-typhoidal Salmonella (NTS) serovars. Control of NTS is challenging as they have multiple sources and virulence factors. Gastroenteritis caused by the NTS is self-limiting, but it also instigates significant health risks due to its invasive nature5. The incidence of invasive non-typhoidal Salmonella (iNTS) has been increasing in several countries, especially Malawi6-8. Globally, the infections and deaths caused by NTS have been projected to be about 78 million and >59,000, respectively9.

NTS control requires a ‘One Health Approach’, as involving multiple sectors such as public health, animal welfare, and food and environment protection remains essential. The NTS infections in India are on the rise10. Several virulence factors in TS and NTS encoded on the Salmonella pathogenicity islands (SPIs) play an important role in invasion into the host cell, multiplication and spread11.

Since 2020, the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) has conducted an ongoing project on systematic laboratory-based surveillance of foodborne enteric disease and related outbreaks in four North-east Indian States. Between January and April 2023, we screened 1004 food samples collected from 36 places covering 4 different regions of Tripura. During the surveillance period, there was no flux of foreign travellers. In this ongoing study, we identified three S. enterica serovars that were not reported from India. These Salmonella strains were first identified by biochemical tests12, followed by serotyping using Salmonella somatic (O) and flagellar (H) antisera (SSI Diagnostica, Denmark) according to the Kauffmann–White scheme4. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by disk diffusion testing13. To determine the important virulence encoding genes, these strains were subjected to PCR analysis following previously published methods14,15.

S. enterica serovars Takoradi, Tananarive and Uganda were identified from market samples of mutton, sweet and fish, respectively, collected between January and April 2023 in Tripura. The serotype scheme, antimicrobial resistance profile and virulence-encoding genes detected by the PCR assay are shown in Table. S. Takoradi and S. Tananarive were resistant to tetracycline. All these serovars showed reduced susceptibility to azithromycin but were susceptible to fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, ofloxacin), meropenem, ceftriaxone, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, chloramphenicol and cefotaxime. The emergence of reduced susceptibility to azithromycin is a cause of concern. This drug has been used to treat enteric infections in India. Many of the TS and NTS clinical strains have shown resistance to azithromycin16,17.

Table. Detection of antimicrobial resistance and virulence encoding genes in S. Takorandi, S. Tananarive and S. Uganda
Sample ID Source Salmonella enterica serovar (O:H antigen formula) Antimicrobial susceptibility test
Virulence encoding gene*
Resistance Intermediate Susceptible
TRP/NTH/RAWMEAT/1829 Mutton

Takoradi

(8:i;1,5)

TET AM, S, AZM, D, CAZ NA, CIP, NOR, OFX, MEM, CR, SXT, C, CTX invE/A, orgA, ttrC, ssaQ, mgtC, misL, spi4R, spi4D, sopB, pipA, hilA, stn
TRP/STH/SWEET/1966 Sweet

Tananarive

(6,8:y;1,5)

TET AM, S, AZM, D NA, CIP, NOR, OFX, MEM, CR, SXT, C, CAZ, CTX invE/A, orgA, ttrC, ssaQ, mgtC, misL, spi4R, spi4D, sopB, pipA, hilA, stn
TRP/DHL/RAWFISH/1104 Fish

Uganda

(3,10:l,z13;1,5)

AM, S, AZM, D, NA, TET CIP, NOR, OFX, MEM, CRO, SXT, C, CAZ, CTX invE/A, orgA, ttrC, ssaQ, mgtC, misL, spi4R, spi4D, soupB, pipA, pefA, hilA, stn
All the serovars were negative for spvC. AM, ampicillin; AZM, azithromycin; C, chloramphenicol; CAZ, ceftazidime; CIP, ciprofloxacin; CRO, ceftriaxone; CTX, cefotaxime; D, doxycycline; MEM, meropenem; NA, nalidixic acid; NOR, norfloxacin; OFX, ofloxacin; S, streptomycin; SXT, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim; TET, tetracycline

All the three serovars harboured orgA, (oxygen-regulated gene for host recognition and invasion), invE/A (SPI-1, for host cell invasion), ttrC (tetrathionate reductase, fitness advantage), ssaQ (SPI-2 T3SS; secretion system apparatus protein), mgtC (SPI-3 intracellular proliferation inside macrophages, Mg2+ transporter), misL (SPI-3, T5SS-secreted (autotransported) adhesins, involved in intramacrophage survival), spi4R and spi4D (encodes a T1SS), sopB (SPI-1, SPI-5-T3SS secreted effector Salmonella outer protein B for bacterial internalization), pip (SPI-5, pathogenicity island protein for intestinal mucosal fluid secretion and inflammation), hilA (SPI-1-T3SS, hyperinvasive locus the expression of invasion) and stn (Salmonella enterotoxin). In addition to these potential virulence genes, the S. Uganda serovar had pefA that encodes fimbria-associated virulence. The possession of these virulence encoding genes would suggest that the NTS serovars investigated in the current study have the ability to cause enteric salmonellosis in humans. Many of these genes have been reported to be present in S. Typhi. In this study, all the serovars were negative for the plasmid virulence factor encoding gene spvC. Some of the studies indicate importance of this gene for the survival and proliferation of NTS inside the reticuloendothelial cells and associated with bacteraemia in humans18,19.

To our knowledge, S. enterica serovars Takoradi, Tananarive and Uganda have not yet been reported from India. S. Takoradi has been reported from poultry slaughterhouses in Korea20, and birds in Scotland21. S. Tananarive has been isolated from humans22 and food animals ( https://www.fao.org/4/i1547e/i1547e00.pdf , https://www.bvmj.bu.edu.eg/issues/25-2/8.pdf). S. Uganda caused a foodborne outbreak in China23 and was also identified from turkeys in Canada24, cattle and mink in USA25,26, camels in Nigeria27, and ducks in Trinidad28.

Our findings highlight the risks associated with new Salmonella serovars with virulence potential and antimicrobial resistance in foods. Considering the public health risks associated with food contamination, constant surveillance and stringent control measures are needed at the production level and also along the food chain.

Financial support & sponsorship

The study was supported by the fund received from ICMR-task force project “Surveillance of Food Borne Pathogen from Northeast India” [Grant No. 5/8-I(3)/2019-20-ECD-II(Part-G)].

Conflicts of Interest

None.

Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Assisted Technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of AI-assisted technology for assisting in the writing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

References

  1. , , , , , , et al. The global burden of non-typhoidal Salmonella gastroenteritis. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50:882-89.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , et al. World Health Organization estimates of the global and regional disease burden of 22 foodborne bacterial, protozoal, and viral diseases, 2010: A data synthesis. PLoS Med. 2015;12:e1001921.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  3. . Scientific Opinion on the risk posed by pathogens in food of non-animal origin. Part 2 (Salmonella and Norovirus in leafy greens eaten raw as salads) EFSA J. 2014;12:3600.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. . Antigenic formulae of the Salmonella serovars. Available from: https://www.pasteur.fr/sites/default/files/veng_0.pdf, accessed on July 26, 2023.
  5. , . Nontyphoidal salmonellosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:263-69.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , . Invasive non-typhoidal Salmonella disease: An emerging and neglected tropical disease in Africa. Lancet. 2012;379:2489-99.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , . Incidence of non-typhoidal Salmonella invasive disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect. 2021;83:523-32.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  8. , . Invasive salmonellosis in Malawi. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2008;2:438-42.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , et al. World Health Organization global estimates and regional comparisons of the burden of foodborne disease in 2010. PLoS Med. 2015;12:E1001923.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , . The rise of non-typhoidal Salmonella infections in India: causes, symptoms, and prevention. Cureus. 2023;15:e46699.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  11. . A review of Salmonella enterica with particular focus on the pathogenicity and virulence factors, host specificity and antimicrobial resistance including multidrug resistance. Vet World. 2019;12:504-21.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  12. . Standard operating procedures. Available from: https://www.icmrfoodnet.in/static/assets/files/ICMR_StandardOperating Procedures.pdf, accessed on July 29, 2024.
  13. . M100. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. (33rd edition). Available from: https://clsi.org/media/tc4b1paf/m10033_samplepages-1.pdf, accessed on July 29, 2023.
  14. , , , , . Detection of virulence determinants in clinical strains of Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis and mapping on macro restriction profiles. J Med Microbiol. 2006;55:365-73.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , . Non-typhoidal Salmonella in poultry meat and diarrhoeic patients: Prevalence, antibiogram, virulotyping, molecular detection and sequencing of class I integrons in multidrug resistant strains. Gut Pathog. 2015;7:34.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , . Draft whole-genome sequences of two multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Senftenberg sequence type 14 strains resistant to ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, and/or azithromycin, isolated from Kolkata, India. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2022;11:e0097821.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , et al. Spontaneous emergence of azithromycin resistance in independent lineages of Salmonella Typhi in Northern India. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72:e120-e127.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , , et al. The spv Genes the Salmonella Dublin virulence plasmid are required for severe enteritis and systemic infection in the natural host. Infect Immun. 1997;65:1786-92.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , . The Salmonella type III effector SpvC triggers the reverse transmigration of infected cells into the bloodstream. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0226126.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , . Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolated from poultry slaughterhouses in Korea. Jpn J Vet Res. 2013;61:129-36.
    [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. . A note on Salmonella excretion in the black headed gull (Larus ribibundus) feeding at sewage treatment works. J Appl Bacteriol. 1984;56:499-502.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , , et al. Non-typhoidal Salmonella serovars associated with invasive and non-invasive disease in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2017;111:418-24.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , , et al. Etiological analysis on a foodborne disease outbreak caused by two serotypes of Salmonella. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2023;44:1440-46.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , . Comparison of antimicrobial resistance among Salmonella enterica serovars isolated from Canadian turkey flocks, 2013 to 2021. Poult Sci. 2023;102:102655.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , , , et al. Diversity of multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica strains associated with cattle at harvest in the United States. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:1783-96.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  26. , , . Prevalence, serotypes, and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella from mink feces and feed in the United States. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2022;19:45-55.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , , , , et al. Serotypes, antimicrobial profiles, and public health significance of Salmonella from camels slaughtered in Maiduguri central abattoir, Nigeria. Vet World. 2015;8:1068-72.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , , . Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and bacterial culture for Salmonella detection in the Muscovy duck in Trinidad and Tobago. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2008;23:264-67.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
61

PDF downloads
8
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections