Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
154 (
5
); 723-731
doi:
10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_909_19

Retrospective study of the effect of sarcopaenia on post-operative outcomes in patients undergoing thoracic surgery

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Yedikule Training & Research Hospital for Chest Diseases & Surgery, Health Science University, Istanbul, Turkey
Department of Anesthesiology, Yedikule Training & Research Hospital for Chest Diseases & Surgery, Health Science University, Istanbul, Turkey
Department of Chest Diseases, Yedikule Training & Research Hospital for Chest Diseases & Surgery, Health Science University, Istanbul, Turkey
Department of Radiology, Yedikule Training & Research Hospital for Chest Diseases & Surgery, Health Science University, Istanbul, Turkey
Department of Anesthesiology, Haseki Training & Research Hospital, Health Science University, Istanbul, Turkey

For correspondence: Dr Kemal Karapınar, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Yedikule Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Health Application and Research Center, University of Health Sciences, Kazlıçeşme Mh, Belgrat Kapı yolu Cad No:1, 34020, Zeytinburnu, Istanbul, Turkey. e-mail: kemalkarapinar55@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Background & objectives:

Sarcopaenia refers to the pathological loss of muscle mass that may be observed in malnutrition, immobility, chronic disease, particularly chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and malignancies. A relationship has been identified between sarcopaenia and thoracic surgery. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between density and area of the psoas major muscle (PSM), the pectoralis major and minor muscles (PEC) and the post-operative morbidity, mortality and survival of patients undergoing anatomic lung resection.

Methods:

A retrospective review of the medical record data of the patients who underwent lung resection was conducted in between 2009 and 2018. The study included patients who underwent upper abdominal computed tomography (CT) for the measurement of PSM and thoracic CT for PEC. The demographic data, laboratory test results, radiological findings and the survival data of the patients were recorded.

Results:

Evaluation was made of 161 patients with available CT data. With the exception of mean PEC density, the PEC parameters (P=0.013-0.026), and PSM density (P=0.015) were significantly lower in the non-survivors than in the survivors. In general, the mean measurements of the PSM and PEC were seen to affect mortality (P=0.001-0.024).

Interpretation & conclusions:

The mean area and density measurements in the PSM, and particularly in the PEC, were determined to be significantly higher in patients who survived after lung cancer surgery, suggesting that sarcopaenia could be a useful predictor of post-operative mortality risk and survival.

Keywords

Lung cancer
morbidity
mortality
sarcopaenia
thoracic surgery

The term sarcopaenia refers to the pathological loss of muscle mass that may be observed in malnutrition, immobility, chronic diseases, particularly chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and malignancies12. Although lobectomies are associated with lower morbidity in thoracic surgery practice, an increase in the rate of patients referred for surgery is known to increase post-operative morbidity and mortality345. Suzuki et al6 reported that sarcopaenia is a poor prognostic factor in patients undergoing surgery for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It has also been demonstrated that sarcopaenia affects post-operative morbidity and mortality in major surgeries, such as the surgical treatment of lung cancer or transplantation78. Previous studies have identified a linear relationship between survival, density and area measurements of the psoas major muscle (PSM), the pectoralis major and minor muscles (PEC) and the erector spinae muscle (ESM) in patients with COPD7,9-11. There have also been studies investigating the effects of these muscles on early post-operative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing lobectomy for lung cancer, and studies which have reported the effects of ESM7. The ESM erector spinae muscle consists of three muscles (spinal thoracis muscle, iliocostalis thoracis muscle and, longissimus thoracis muscle), the functions of which are to keep the spine erect. The pectoralis muscles that act as the accessory respiratory muscles are expected to be a more accurate indicator of post-operative morbidity and mortality than ESM in thoracic surgery910 . The psoas major muscle is a group of muscles extending from the thorax into the pelvis that can be visualized with computed tomography (CT) scans of the thoracic cavity.

The aim of the present study was to measure the density and area of the PSM and PEC, and to evaluate their relationship with post-operative morbidity, mortality and survival in patients undergoing anatomic lung resection.

Material & Methods

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Istanbul Training and Research Hospital. A retrospective review of the medical records of patients who underwent lung resection and lymph node dissection (standard) and extended lung resection for the four most common indications in Yedikule Training and Research Hospital for Chest Diseases and Surgery, Istanbul, Turkey, between 2009 and 2018. From these patients, those who underwent upper abdominal CT for the measurement of PSM and thoracic CT for the measurement of PEC were included in the study.

The age (old age limit adopted by the social security institutions in Turkey is 65 yr), gender, diagnosis and indication for surgery, type of surgery and objective indicators of post-operative morbidity (number of surgeries and whether or not re-operation was performed for reasons such as post-operative haemorrhage or major bronchopleural fistula), operation time, number of days and number of admissions to surgical ıntensive care unit (SICU), number of nutritional assessments (high-protein oral nutritional supplement given daily under the supervision of a dietician) in the post-operative period, length of hospital stay, mode of discharge from the SICU and blood transfusions, latest condition and follow up were analyzed. Pre-operative biochemical parameters, including albumin, glucose, haemoglobin (HB), glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and blood gases [pH, base excess (BE)] were all reviewed. The risk factors were examined and co-variable analysis modelling was applied to include the factors that may affect mortality, such as the number of surgeries, operation time in hours, blood transfusion, length of hospital stay (days), number of admissions and days in SICU and, number of nutritional assessments.

The exclusion criteria were surgery other than lung resection and mediastinal lymph node dissection or extended lung resection, not having had thoracic and upper abdominal CT scans in the pre-operative period and incomplete data of biochemical parameters.

Radiological evaluation: The densities of PSM and PEC and their areas on axial images were measured by a radiologist. The area of the skeletal muscles was measured by drawing a polygonal region of interest on a single axial image captured with the CT device (Philips, The Netherlands, Ingenuity Elite model, 128-detector, 2 mm slice interval). PSM and PEC were evaluated bilaterally. The number of upper abdominal CT images was extremely low, and so, all images were acquired from the L1-L2 intervertebral disc level to standardize the PSM measurements. The pectoral muscle area measurement was performed in a superior axial section in a caudal direction at the level of the aortic arch. The areas of the right and left PSM and right and left PEC were measured (in cm2), and the total density was calculated in Hounsfield units (HU). The survival data of the patients and mortality in the first 30 post-operative days were documented from the national database.

Statistical methods: Data obtained in the study were analyzed using SPSS 15.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) software. Descriptive statistics included number and percentage for categorical variables, as well as mean, standard deviation, and minimum and maximum values for numerical variables. A Student’s t test was used for the comparison of two independent groups if the numerical variables met the assumptions of normal distribution, otherwise, Mann-Whitney U test was used for the analysis. Kruskal–Wallis test was used for the comparison of multiple groups in which the numerical variables did not meet the assumptions of normal distribution. Mann-Whitney U test was used for the sub-group analyses, and the results were interpreted with Bonferroni correction. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used in the analysis of relationships, as the assumptions were not met for the parametric tests. Survival analyses were made using Kaplan–Meier analysis. Determinants were examined with Cox regression analysis. The level of statistical significance was set at an alpha level of <0.05.

Results

Data from a total of 161 patients with available CT and biochemical records was considered for evaluation in this study. The mean age of the patients was 58.6±12.8 yr (45-89), 82 per cent of the patients were male and 68.9 per cent were aged 65 yr or younger (Table I). Of the patients, 73.3 per cent underwent lung resection and lymph node dissection and 26.7 per cent underwent, extended lung resection, with a mean operation time of 4.9 h. The pre-operative diagnosis of the patients was mostly lung cancer (85.1%). Of the patients with lung cancer, 33 per cent underwent pneumonectomy (45/137), and of these patients, 93.7 per cent were discharged with full recovery, and 10 male patients (6.3%) succumbed during hospitalization.

Table I Demographic characteristics of the patients
Parameters assessed n (%)
Gender
Male 132 (82.0)
Female 29 (18.0)
Age (yr), mean±SD 58.6±12.8
Age (yr)
≤65 111 (68.9)
>65 50 (31.1)
Type of surgery
Extended 43 (26.7)
Standard 118 (73.3)
Operation time (h), mean±SD 4.9±2.5
Diagnosis and indication for surgery
Malignant neoplasm of bronchus or lungs (lobectomy) 92 (57.1)
Malignant neoplasm of the main bronchus (pneumonectomy) 45 (28.0)
Haemoptysis (lobectomy) 21 (13.0)
Bronchiectasis (lobectomy) 3 (1.9)
Mode of discharge
Full recovery 151 (93.7)
Death (surgical mortality) 10 (6.3)
Latest condition
Death 33 (20.5)
Survival 128 (79.5)
Duration of follow up (months), mean±SD 21.8±86.2

SD, standard deviation

Surgical mortality was defined as death occurring during hospitalization or within the first 30 days of discharge, and the rate of surgical mortality in the present study was found to be 6.3 per cent. The surgical mortality rate did not differ significantly between patients with benign and malignant diseases (P = 0.286). From the whole sample, 23 patients succumbed due to non-surgical causes (metastases in 7, pneumonia secondary to adjuvant therapy in 5, tumour recurrence in 4, myocardial infarction in 5, diabetes mellitus in 1 and renal failure in 1) (Table I). During the follow up period of mean 21.8 months, the three and five year survival rates were 69.4 and 56.1 per cent respectively, and the median survival was estimated to be 73 months (95% confidence interval CI 25, 3-100 months). Both the three and five year survival rates for patients with non-malignant neoplasm were 91.3 per cent (log rank P = 0.164) (Figure). For those with malignant neoplasm of the bronchi and lungs and a malignant neoplasm of the main bronchus, the three and five year survival rates were 79.1/79.1 per cent and 69.1/ 46.1 per cent, respectively, and the differences were not significant. The right and left pectoralis minor area values and the density of the psoas major were found to be significantly lower in non-survivors (0.013-0.026) (Table II).

Survival curve of malignant and non-malignant diseases.
Figure
Survival curve of malignant and non-malignant diseases.
Table II Survival rate of the patients according to measurement of muscles
Parameters assessed Cumulative survival (%) Log rank P
Three years Five years
Gender
Men 64.8 48.6 0.057
Female 93.1 93.1
Malignity
Negative 91.3 91.3 0.164
Positive 70.3 50.8
Type of surgery
Lobectomy 79.1 79.1 0.884
Pneumonectomy 69.1 46.1
Mean areas and densities (cm2-HU)
Right pectoralis major 10.22
Low 68.7 57.3 0.506
High 69.3 52.0
Right pectoralis minor 3.50
Low 56.7 35.5 0.013
High 85.9 85.9
Left pectoralis major 10.25
Low 59.6 49.7 0.093
High 83.9 62.9
Left pectoralis minor 3.66
Low 55.3 44.2 0.026
High 88.6 69.3
Total area 27.7
Low 59.3 47.6 0.164
High 82.7 66.2
Density area 52
Low 73.0 50.1 0.686
High 66.3 66.3
Right psoas 2.12
Low 74.7 54.5 0.735
High 62.0 62.0
Left psoas 2.20
Low 73.6 56.1 0.964
High 62.3 62.3
Total 4.22
Low 73.7 56.2 0.998
High 62.2 62.2
Density 48
Low 63.1 42.0 0.015
High 73.6 73.6

HU, Hounsfield unit

The mean total PSM and PEC values were significantly lower in the female patients than in the male patients (Tables III and IV). The mean density of PSM was lower in patients aged >65 yr than in patients aged ≤65 yr. The mean density of PSM did not differ significantly among the diagnosis groups. The mean density of PSM was significantly lower in patients with malignant neoplasm of the main bronchus than in patients with haemoptysis. The mean density of PSM was significantly lower in the non-survivors than in the survivors (Table III).

Table III Change in psoas major muscle according to demographic characteristics
Parameters assessed Right psoas Left psoas Total PSM Density of PSM
Gender
Male 2.56±1.20 (2.24) 2.64±1.35 (2.32) 5.20±2.47 (4.63) 47.6±7.2 (48)
Female 1.63±0.65 (1.46) 1.77±0.77 (1.61) 3.40±1.30 (3.08) 47.7±7.1 (51)
P <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.926
Age (yr)
≤65 2.46±1.30 (2.13) 2.57±1.43 (2.15) 5.02±2.66 (4.10) 49.1±6.1 (51)
>65 2.22±0.79 (2.12) 2.28±0.95 (2.20) 4.50±1.61 (4.32) 44.2±8.2 (45)
P 0.815 0.457 0.630 <0.001
Number of surgeries
1 2.36±1.16 (2.12) 2.45±1.31 (2.20) 4.81±2.39 (4.22) 47.5±7.2 (48)
2 2.71±1.35 (2.18) 2.82±1.23 (2.37) 5.53±2.51 (4.55) 48.7±6.0 (48.5)
P 0.388 0.259 0.294 0.804
Type of surgery
Extended 2.63±1.43 (2.10) 2.60±1.41 (2.27) 5.23±2.76 (4.17) 47.4±7.7 (49)
Standard 2.30±1.07 (2.12) 2.44±1.28 (2.18) 4.74±2.27 (4.24) 47.7±6.9 (48)
P 0.369 0.804 0.551 0.920
Diagnosis and indication for surgery
Malignant neoplasm of bronchus or lungs (lobectomy) 2.48±1.19 (2.20) 2.59±1.36 (2.28) 5.07±2.45 (4.55) 47.8±7.3 (50)
Malignant neoplasm of the main bronchus (pneumonectomy) 2.20±1.28 (1.98) 2.19±1.30 (1.91) 4.39±2.55 (3.91) 46.1±5.8 (46)*
Haemoptysis (lobectomy) 2.23±0.77 (2.08) 2.50±1.03 (2.21) 4.73±1.74 (4.10) 51.6±7.8 (53)
Bronchiectasis (lobectomy) 3.05±0.63 (3.33) 3.18±0.07 (3.20) 6.23±0.58 (6.53) 45.0±10.6 (41)
P 0.107 0.067 0.073 0.026*
Blood transfusion
Yes 2.69±2.58 (1.59) 3.24±3.35 (2.21) 5.93±5.90 (3.80) 48.4±7.1 (44)
No 2.37±1.07 (2.12) 2.44±1.14 (2.19) 4.81±2.13 (4.26) 47.6±7.1 (48)
P 0.454 0.831 0.605 0.907
Latest condition
Dead 2.39±1.17 (2.01) 2.26±1.19 (1.80) 4.65±2.26 (3.87) 43.9±8.4 (42)
Survival 2.39±1.18 (2.15) 2.53±1.34 (2.21) 4.92±2.44 (4.31) 48.6±6.5 (49)
P 0.869 0.138 0.383 0.004

*Lower than haemoptysis. PSM, psoas major muscle

The mean density of the right and left pectoralis major, the mean total PEC and the mean density of PEC were significantly lower in patients aged >65 yr than in patients aged ≤65 yr (Table IV). The mean areas of the right and left pectoralis minor muscles were significantly lower in patients undergoing extended lung resection than in patients undergoing a standard resection. With the exception of mean density, all the PEC parameters were significantly lower in the non-survivors than in the survivors (Table IV).

Table IV Change in pectoralis major and minor muscles according to demographic characteristics
Parameters assessed Right pectoralis major Right pectoralis minor Left pectoralis major Left pectoralis minor PEC total Density of PEC
Gender
Male 11.38±3.65 (11.2) 3.85±1.36 (3.7) 11.21±3.57 (10.9) 3.91±1.42 (3.8) 30.3±9.0 (29.1) 53.4±8.0 (53.5)
Female 7.84±1.80 (7.8) 2.89±0.88 (2.7) 8.04±2.22 (7.7) 3.35±0.89 (3.4) 22.1±4.8 (21.4) 46.9±7.7 (47)
P <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.053 <0.001 <0.001
Age (yr)
≤65 11.17±3.87 (10.7) 3.77±1.44 (3.7) 11.08±3.80 (10.7) 3.92±1.39 (3.7) 29.9±9.5 (28.9) 53.0±8.1 (53)
>65 9.78±2.93 (9.3) 3.46±1.04 (3.3) 9.65±2.82 (9.5) 3.58±1.27 (3.6) 26.5±7.1 (25.2) 50.3±8.6 (49.5)
P 0.039 0.357 0.029 0.176 0.031 0.040
Number of surgeries
1 10.72±3.70 (9.9) 3.70±1.37 (3.5) 10.70±3.61 (10.3) 3.85±1.37 (3.7) 29.0±9.1 (27.5) 52.0±8.5 (52)
2 10.98±3.18 (11.8) 3.38±0.84 (3.7) 9.90±3.18 (9.7) 3.36±1.08 (3.3) 27.6±7.7 (28.5) 54.5±5.2 (54.5)
P 0.532 0.565 0.457 0.248 0.892 0.225
Type of surgery
Extended 10.35±3.69 (10.6) 3.37±1.22 (3.1) 10.18±3.89 (9.9) 3.48±1.39 (3.3) 27.4±9.2 (27.6) 53.0±9.3 (53)
Standard 10.88±3.65 (10.1) 3.79±1.36 (3.7) 10.80±3.46 (10.6) 3.93±1.33 (3.7) 29.4±8.9 (27.9) 51.9±8.0 (52)
P 0.480 0.038 0.333 0.041 0.182 0.398
Diagnosis and indication for surgery
Malignant neoplasm of bronchus or lungs (lobectomy) 10.78±3.76 (10.2) 3.65±1.38 (3.4) 10.85±3.82 (10.5) 3.93±1.45 (3.8) 29.2±9.4 (28.2) 52.7±7.7 (53)
Malignant neoplasm of the main bronchus (pneumonectomy) 10.67±3.40 (10.6) 3.58±1.17 (3.6) 10.46±3.29 (10.3) 3.70±1.28 (3.6) 28.4±8.4 (26.6) 51.8±9.6 (52)
Haemoptysis (lobectomy) 10.76±4.09 (9.7) 3.90±1.54 (3.6) 10.04±3.35 (10.1) 3.54±1.12 (3.3) 28.2±9.1 (26.6) 51.9±8.5 (50)
Bronchiectasis (lobectomy) 10.57±1.34 (10.9) 4.32±0.64 (4.0) 11.02±2.12 (11.6) 3.88±1.15 (3.7) 29.8±3.8 (31.5) 45.0±3.6 (46)
P 0.998 0.497 0.784 0.473 0.929 0.344
Blood transfusion
Yes 12.24±4.53 (11.3) 4.49±2.07 (4.0) 12.12±4.43 (11.3) 4.81±2.08 (4.2) 33.7±12.1 (30.2) 46.8±6.8 (46.5)
No 10.66±3.60 (10.2) 3.63±1.28 (3.5) 10.56±3.53 (10.2) 3.76±1.30 (3.7) 28.6±8.8 (27.7) 52.5±8.3 (52)
P 0.377 0.316 0.230 0.164 0.273 0.062
Latest condition
Dead 9.24±3.24 (9.3) 3.08±0.87 (3.0) 8.95±3.24 (8.7) 3.22±1.05 (3.2) 24.5±7.6 (23.1) 49.9±8.0 (49)
Survival 11.13±3.67 (10.5) 3.83±1.39 (3.7) 11.07±3.54 (10.8) 3.96±1.39 (3.8) 30.0±9.0 (28.4) 52.8±8.3 (52)
P 0.013 0.004 0.002 0.004 0.002 0.075

PEC, pectoralis major and minor muscles

Age, albumin, number of days in SICU, blood haemoglobin (HBG), psoas muscle density and PEC muscle area were determined to have an effect on mortality (P= 0.001-0.024), and of these, the number of days in SICU, glucose, and PEC muscle area were observed to the determinants of mortality (Table V).

Table V Estimates of the relative hazard from the Cox proportional hazard model using different covariates
Parameters assessed Univariate Multivariate
HR P HR P
Age (reference: <65 yr)
≥65 yr 2.412 0.016 0.344 0.228
Gender (reference: Female)
Male 3.655 0.078 0.178 0.146
Albumin (reference: >3.4)
≤3.4 5.118 0.003 1.753 0.561
Number of days in SICU 1.087 <0.001 1.075 0.009
Malignancy 2.634 0.186 2.941 0.355
Type of surgery (reference: lobectomy)
Pneumonectomy 1.058 0.885 0.921 0.911
HGB (Reference: >11)
≤11 3.039 0.002 3.595 0.078
pH 1.886 0.799 5.788 0.855
Blood gases BEecf 1.063 0.149 1.786 0.489
Blood gases Beb33 1.08 0.110 0.584 0.596
Glucose 0.987 0.163 1.032 0.031
GFR 1.006 0.460 0.992 0.572
Psoas muscle area 1.004 0.958 1.284 0.097
Psoas muscle density 0.914 0.001 0.961 0.388
PEC muscle area 0.949 0.024 0.859 0.004
PEC muscle density 0.968 0.153 0.913 0.071

SICU, surgical ıntensive care unit; HGB, haemoglobin, GFR, glomerular filtration rate; HR, hazard ratio

In the examination of the factors that determine mortality, the number of admissions and the number of days in SICU were found to be the most significant factors in the model. In the risk factors and co-variable analysis, the number of admissions to SICU, density of PSM and volume of right pectoralis minor were found to be the most significant factors.

Discussion

Post-operative morbidity and mortality can occur in patients undergoing anatomic lung resection12. Although the rates have decreased in number with advances in surgical techniques over the years, post-operative complications still remain a challenge due to the increased number of such surgeries345, and accordingly, new parameters can be found to predict the risk.

Suzuki et al6 demonstrated previously that sarcopaenia is a poor prognostic factor in patients undergoing surgery for NSCLC. Post-operative morbidity and mortality can be observed in our hospital, where the focus is predominantly on the surgical treatment of lung cancer (85.1%). Mortality is often associated with non-surgical causes and occurs in the long term, whereas surgical mortality occurs during the hospitalization period or within 30 days of discharge13. In the present study, 6.3 per cent of the patients died during their stay in hospital, but none within 30 days of discharge. During the mean follow up period of 21 months, the three and five year survival rates were 69.4 and 56.1 per cent, respectively. In the present study, which included not only isolated NSCLC, but also all patients who had undergone anatomic lung resection, analysis was made of the survival of patients mostly with malignant diseases. In the current study, 85 per cent of the study patients had cancer, and survival data reported in the literature in general relates to patients operated on for cancer3. The survival rates (both 3 and 5 yr) for malignant neoplasm of the lungs were 70.3 and 50.8 per cent, respectively. For malignant disease, extended surgery and pneumonectomy may be necessary due to oncological principles. Therefore, pneumonectomy was performed and surgical mortality was 6.3 per cent. This may have been due to the difference in the ratio between the groups (85.1-14.9%), but the surgical mortality rate did not differ significantly between patients with benign and malignant diseases. This value indicated that patients with malignant diseases can be operated upon as safely as patients with benign diseases in this study, which mostly involved patients who underwent surgery due to malignant causes.

The fact that malignancy or the type of surgery is not associated with mortality demonstrated that surgery is safe. The present study found in particular that changes in the area of PEC minor were directly and proportionally correlated with survival. Psoas muscle density and PEC muscle area were seen to have an effect and determined mortality. The number of admissions and days in SICU and blood albumin and HBG were determined to be related to mortality. This indicates that sarcopaenia affects survival and surgical mortality, contrary to the findings of Miller et al7. Similarly, the lack of difference in PSM and PEC measurements according to the extent of resection (standard vs. extension) shows that these two are unrelated. In a study by Hervochon et al9, pneumonectomy was reported to be associated with high post-operative mortality and a low five-year survival rate. Similarly, 28.9 per cent of the patients that underwent pneumonectomy due to lung cancer and 19.6 per cent of the patients who underwent lobectomy died in the long term, which can be attributed to the advanced disease stage in patients undergoing pneumonectomy. While gender, malignancy or type of surgery is not associated with survival, a significantly lower area and density of PSM and PEC in female patients aged 65 yr and older is an expected finding due to the decreased anabolism above this age. Collins et al14 found that sarcopaenia becomes more evident with advancing age in males, that it affects morbidity in patients with lung cancer and that it serves as a better marker of morbidity than cachexia. Similar results were noted in the present study, although no significant effect of sarcopaenia on morbidity was found, contrary to expectations, most likely due to the small patient sample. Therefore, further studies on a larger patient group for whom only thoracic CT scans are available in order to investigate the effect of pectoral muscle loss on mortality. The finding of a lower total area of the pectoralis minor muscles in patients undergoing extended rather than standard surgery was thought to be incidental considering that the extent of surgery is determined by the oncology principles. This type of surgery is, however, known to be associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Parameters indicating morbidity, such as the number and duration of surgeries, blood transfusions, length of hospital stay, duration of follow up, and number of nutritional assessments did not differ to any significant degree. suggesting that the differences between the muscle groups had no effect on morbidity. Considering that the size of the pectoral muscles is rapidly affected by physical activity, it was decided that it would be more accurate to measure both muscle density and area. However, a lack of a direct association between the changes in the area and density of the muscle groups and the changes in hemoglobin and albumin values, expectedly associated with morbidity suggests that a linear relationship could exist between anabolic activity and the muscle groups. The finding that the pectoralis minor, which is relatively less affected by physical activity than the pectoralis major, had an effect on survival was an important finding in this study. The psoas muscle density measurements were lower in patients with malignant neoplasm of the main bronchus than in patients with haemoptysis, and unlike the other groups, the rate of extended surgery was lower in the pectoralis minor muscle group, although these differences, although not significant.

The mean density of PSM (48 HU) had a significant effect on survival, whereas other parameters of the PSM (right psoas, left psoas, psoas total) had no significant effect. In the pectoralis muscle group areas, the right pectoralis minor (3.50 cm2), and left pectoralis minor (3.66 cm2) had a significant effect on survival, whereas density measurements had no effect. This suggests that the PEC similar to the findings by McDonald et al10 is a better indicator of survival than PSM. There are studies which have generally investigated sarcopaenia in PEC, PSM and ESM71011. One of the two studies investigating the pectoral muscle groups on the same subjects was conducted by Miller et al7, in which only ESM was found to have an effect on survival. Furthermore, Hübner et al15 reported that a decrease in serum albumin levels was influential in the development of post-operative complications and morbidity. It is a remarkable finding of the present study that the changes in the measurements in the PEC were directly proportional to the serum albumin levels. The authors believe that this finding may suggest that PEC has an effect on morbidity. Patients who are to undergo lung resection and lymph node dissection, or extended surgery, should certainly undergo a pre-operative CT scan of the thorax16. Sarcopaenia detected in the area of PEC minors and SICU time were determined to have an effect on mortality, although no effect on morbidity was detected, and this effect was greater than the effect of the density of PSM. Hervochon et al9 suggested that body mass index (BMI) and PSM measurements can be useful in prognosis. While BMI evaluation was initially considered in the present study, this idea was later abandoned due to the unavailability of pre-operative weight or height measurements of the patients for which the upper abdominal CT scans were available. This may represent a limitation of the study.

Overall, the present study has shown in particular that the pectoral minor muscle groups are an indicator of survival and mortality over the psoas major muscle. The change in pectoral muscle mass being directly proportional to albumin levels suggests that it can also reflect morbidity. Therefore further studies on a larger group of patient aimed to study pectoral muscle groups and BMI in patients undergoing thoracic surgical procedures can demonstrate the relationship with both morbidity and mortality.

Financial support & sponsorship: None.

Conflicts of Interest: None.

References

  1. , , , , , , . Sarcopenia:European consensus on definition and diagnosis:Report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing. 2010;39:412-23.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . Ageing well:A review of sarcopenia and frailty. Proc Nutr Soc. 2015;74:337-47.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . Sarcopenia in resected NSCLC:Effect on postoperative outcomes. J Thorac Oncol. 2018;13:895-903.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , . Preoperative prediction of pulmonary complications following thoracic surgery. Chest. 1993;104:155-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , . Risk factors for morbidity after lobectomy for lung cancer in elderly patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:1093-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . Clinical implications of sarcopenia in patients undergoing complete resection for early non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2016;101:92-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , . Sarcopenia is a predictor of outcomes after lobectomy. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10:432-40.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , . Sarcopenia of the psoas muscles ıs associated with poor outcomes following lung transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;107:1082-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . Body mass ındex and total psoas area affect outcomes in patients undergoing pneumonectomy for cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103:287-95.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , . Quantitative computed tomography measures of pectoralis muscle area and disease severity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A cross-sectional study. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11:326-34.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , . Quantitative assessment of erector spinae muscles in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Novel chest computed tomography-derived ındex for prognosis. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13:334-41.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , . The 30-day mortality and hospital mortality after chest surgery described in the annual reports published by the Japanese Association for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;63:279-83.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , . Use of structured presentation formatting and NSQIP guidelines ımproves quality of surgical morbidity and mortality conference. J Surg Res. 2019;233:118-23.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , . The assessment and impact of sarcopenia in lung cancer:a systematic literature review. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e003697.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , . Postoperative albumin drop ıs a marker for surgical stress and a predictor for clinical outcome:A pilot study. Gastroenterol Res Pract 20162016:8743187.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , . Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:395-409.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections
Scroll to Top