Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
154 (
3
); 467-475
doi:
10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_48_19

Prevalence, pattern & correlates of hypertension among tribal population of Kashmir, India: A cross-sectional study

Department of Endocrinology, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir, India
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir, India
Department of Radio Diagnosis & Imaging, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir, India
Department of Clinical Research Laboratory, Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Science, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir, India
Department of Medicine, Government Medical College & Associated Hospital, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir, India
Department of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Department of Cardiac Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

For correspondence: Dr Mohd Ashraf Ganie, Department of Endocrinology, Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar 190 011, Jammu & Kashmir, India e-mail: ashraf.endo@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Background & objectives:

The prevalence of hypertension is increasing among all ethnic groups across the globe with only a handful of studies from India addressing the prevalence of hypertension among tribal population. In view of paucity of data, this study was aimed at estimating the prevalence of hypertension and associated risk factors among tribal population of Kashmir, India.

Methods:

This cross-sectional survey included 6808 tribals aged >20 yr (5695 Gujjars and 1113 Bakarwals) from five randomly selected districts of Kashmir. Modified WHO-STEPS surveillance questionnaire was used to collect relevant data. Hypertension was defined by Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of Hypertension (JNC 8) criteria.

Results:

The mean age of our study participants was 43.12 ± 15.69 years. Overall prevalence of hypertension [95% confidence interval (CI)] was 41.4% (39.9-42.9%) [men=46.7% (44.1-49.1%); women=37.9% (35.9-39.9%)]. The prevalence of prehypertension (95% CI) in our study was 35 per cent (33.7-36.6%). Higher age [adjusted odds ratio (OR) (95% CI): >70 yr-2.2 (1.9-2.4)], passive smoking [OR-1.3 (1.1-1.5)], family history of hypertension [OR-1.6 (1.4-1.7)] and obesity [OR-1.3 (1.1-1.6)] were significantly associated with hypertension. A weak positive correlation was observed between BP (systolic/diastolic) with haemoglobin, red blood cell count and haematocrit (P<0.05).

Interpretation & conclusions:

Gujjar and Bakarwal tribes of Jammu and Kashmir showed high prevalence of hypertension. Hence, urgent policies and reforms are needed to tackle this silent epidemic and further studies focusing on community-based interventions are required.

Keywords

Age
hypertension
Kashmir
prevalence
tribal population

Hypertension, a major modifiable metabolic risk factor for CVD was ranked as the leading cause of global burden of diseases in 2010 with four million deaths and seven per cent disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) lost worldwide due to its complications1.In India, hypertension [high systolic blood pressure (BP)] has been identified as one of the five major risk factors contributing to DALYs with an increase in the prevalence from 1990 to 20162. Since high BP hardly produces any symptoms, diagnosis of hypertension largely relies on screening programmes and incidental detection. Epidemiological studies in the last decade have reported varying prevalence of hypertension ranging from 17 to 47 per cent from different parts of India345 and a systematic review of epidemiological studies found overall prevalence of hypertension as 29.8 per cent with a significant urban–rural difference4. A large nationwide study (ICMR-INDIAB study) also reported the prevalence of hypertension as 26.3 per cent5.

In India, tribal population accounts for 104.3 million constituting 8.6 per cent of the total population as per 2011 census6. Epidemiological studies of hypertension among Indian tribes have been far and few. A meta-analysis of prevalence of hypertension in Indian tribes, which included around 20 studies published over three decades (1981-2011) showed the prevalence of only 16.1 per cent but with a significant increasing trend in prevalence with each passing decade7. This study also noted lower prevalence of hypertension among tribes from Himalayan and northeastern region as compared to other regions which was attributed to chronic hypoxic stress due to residence at higher altitude, leading to vasodilation and consequent fall in BP7.

Only a couple of studies have reported prevalence of hypertension from Kashmir valley, and these were mostly conducted on small samples89. However, there is no information on the prevalence of hypertension among tribal subjects of Kashmir who are quite unique compared to tribes from other parts of India because they live at high altitude and face prolonged and harsh winter season that lasts for almost half of the year. Their food and lifestyle habits are also different from other parts of the country. This study was aimed at estimating the prevalence of hypertension and its correlates among the indigenous tribal population of Kashmir across different districts of the valley. In addition, the prevalence of pre-hypertension was also assessed among the study population. Though pre-hypertension has not been recognized as a separate category of BP, it has been demonstrated to be an important risk factor for developing hypertension in the future in many studies10.

Material & Methods

This was a cross-sectional health survey conducted from January 2015 to December 2018 among the tribal population of the Kashmir Valley. Of the 12 districts of Kashmir valley housing tribal population [non-migratory tribes (Gujjars) and migratory tribes (Bakarwals)], five districts (Anantnag, Pulwama, Ganderbal, Kupwara and Srinagar) were selected randomly. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS), Srinagar. An informed written consent was obtained from all the participants. Individuals aged 20 yr or above residing in the selected study area who gave consent to participate in the study were included.

Study population: After random selection of districts (5/12), one tehsil followed by a block and then villages were selected based on multistage cluster sampling with probability proportional to size technique17. These villages were exclusively inhabited by tribal population, with a maximum cap of 1000 individuals per village. After liaising with village heads, panchayat members, local health authorities and religious leaders, awareness lecture about non-communicable diseases (NCDs) was organized to sensitize the target population. On the following day of the camp, the research staff approached the village residents by house-to-house survey starting randomly from one point. The individuals were handed a subject information sheet with the study protocol (in English or Urdu) that was explained to them by study team members in the presence of local volunteers who would help in interpretation. Those residing in the village for more than one year, aged 20 yr or above and furnished written informed consent were enrolled in the study. Those who refused to participate, was pregnant, could not give complete response due to physical or mental illness and in whom anthropometry or biochemical parameters could not be performed were excluded from the study.

Clinical assessment: Modified WHO-STEPS questionnaire12 for NCD risk factor surveillance was used to obtain socio-demographic information and to assess the risk factors of hypertension such as smoking (active or passive), indoor pollution, physical activities, housing condition, drinking water and alcoholism. The standardized English language questionnaire was translated to Urdu for easy understanding and validated. To administer the questionnaire, a face-to-face interview was conducted in local vernacular language by limited number of trained researchers proficient in tribal languages. Revised modified BG Prasad socio-economic classification scale was used to ascertain socio-economic class of the study population13. Education was categorized as high (secondary or high school, college or university) and low (primary education or no education)14.

The anthropometric measurements included measurement of weight, height and calculation of BMI as per the WHO guidelines15 and were classified as per the consensus Statement of the Association of Physicians of India16. The height in centimetre and weight in kilogram were taken as average of three readings using standard scales (SECA 213, Hamburg Germany). BP was measured on the left arm of each individual after being seated for five minutes without prior consumption of coffee or smoke using digital sphygmomanometer (OMRON Model HEM-7203). Three readings were taken 3–5 min apart, and the average of the readings was calculated and taken as the final BP measurement. A brief general physical examination was done to note any relevant findings.

Laboratory assessment: A fasting or random venous blood sample was obtained by trained phlebotomists for haemogram, liver and kidney function tests. Haemogram was measured using automated counter Swelab Alfa Autosampler (Boule Diagnostics, Sweden), while biochemical parameters were measured using fully automated biochemistry analyzer (DiaSys Respons® 910, Germany).

Definition and categorization of hypertension: Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of high BP (JNC 8)17 classification was used for diagnosing hypertension. All the participants with a systolic BP (SBP) ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP (DBP) ≥90 mmHg or who reported currently taking medication for the treatment of high BP were classified as having hypertension. Treatment of hypertension was defined as self-reported use of anti-hypertensive medication in the last two weeks. Control of hypertension was defined as pharmacological treatment of hypertension associated with SBP <140 mmHg and DBP <90 mmHg as per the definition issued by the World Hypertension League Expert Committee in 201418. As per JNC8, (i) stage 1 hypertension was defined as SBP 140-159 mmHg and/or DBP 90-99 mmHg; (ii) stage 2 hypertension was defined as SBP ≥160 mmHg and/or DBP ≥100 mmHg; (iii) isolated systolic hypertension was defined as SBP above the cut-off designed for hypertension with normal DBP, while isolated diastolic hypertension was defined as normal SBP with DBP above the cut-off defined for hypertension; and (iv) pre-hypertension was defined as SBP above 120 mmHg but less than the cut-off for hypertension and/or DBP between 80 and 89 mmHg in the absence of a diagnosis of hypertension or treatment with medication for high BP.

Categorization of haemogram: Haematological parameters were grouped as follows: total leucocyte count as 109/l–<4.0 (low), 4-11 (normal) and >11 (high); haemoglobin (Hb as g/dl)–<11 (low or anaemia), 11-14.99 (normal) and ≥15 (high); haematocrit (HCT as %)–<35 (low), 35-45 (normal) and>45 (high); red blood cell (RBC) count (1012/l)–<4 (low), 4-5.5 (normal) and >5.5 (high), platelet count (PLT as 109/l)–<150 (low) and 150-400 (normal) (reference range as per our laboratory).

Sample size was calculated using the prevalence of hypertension reported from Central Kashmir from a previous study8, which was 34.12 per cent. An absolute precision of two per cent was used to calculate sample size. Although 6808 individuals agreed to participate in the study and were enrolled, only 4038 with complete data were included for final analysis.

Statistical analysis: The data were entered in Microsoft excel and analysed using IBM-SPSS version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Chi-square’s test of significance was performed to find out significance of the study results. Frequencies and percentages were calculated to summarize qualitative data. Logistic regression was applied to identify the correlates for hypertension. The odds ratio (OR) was reported with 95 per cent CI.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics: Of a total of 6808individuals interviewed, 4038 had complete information for final analysis. The mean age of the participants was 43.12 ± 15.69 yr (ranging from 20 to 109 yr). The females were considerably younger than males (40.56±14.41 vs. 46.97±16.73 yr). The mean BMI was 21.9 ± 4.75 kg/m2 with female participants having a slightly higher BMI (22.26±5.08) than their male counterparts (21.34±4.15). Table I shows the socio-demographic, behavioural and clinical characteristics of the study participants. Odds of having hypertension were higher with increasing age, male sex, smoking and obesity.

Table I Relation of hypertension with various socio-demographic, behavioural and anthropometric risk factors with unadjusted odds ratio and adjusted prevalence odds ratio
Variables Total (n) HTN, n (%) P Unadjusted OR (95% CI) Adjusted prevalence OR (95% CI)
Age group (yr)
20-29 869 165 (19) <0.001 1.0 1.0
30-39 920 283 (30.8) 1.9 (1.5-2.4)* 1.3 (1.1-1.5)*
40-49 876 371 (42.4) 3.1 (2.5-3.9)* 1.7 (1.5-1.9)*
50-59 548 306 (55.8) 5.4 (4.2-6.9)* 1.9 (1.7-2.1)*
60-69 488 315 (64.5) 7.8 (6.0-10.0)* 2.1 (1.9-2.4)*
≥70 337 232 (68.8) 9.4 (7.1-12.6)* 2.2 (1.9-2.4)*
Gender
Male 1612 753 (46.7) <0.001 1.4 (1.3-1.6)* 1.0 (0.9-1.2)
Female 2426 919 (37.9) 1.0 1.0
Socio-economic class
Lower 3040 1295 (42.6) 0.007 1.3 (0.9-1.8) 1.2 (0.9-1.6)
Others 998 377 (37.8) 1.0 1.0
Education status
Low 3800 1611 (43.4) <0.001 2.1 (1.6-2.9)* 0.9 (0.7-1.1)
High 238 61 (25.6) 1.0 1.0
Occupation
Employed 3436 1372 (39.9) <0.001 1.0 1.0
Unemployed 602 300 (49.8) 1.5 (1.3-1.8)* 1.0 (0.9-1.2)
Active smoking
Yes 969 448 (46.2) <0.001 1.3 (1.1-1.5)* 0.9 (0.7-1.0)
No 3069 1224 (39.9) 1.0 1.0
Passive smoking
Yes 872 399 (45.8) 0.003 1.3 (1.1-1.5)* 1.3 (1.1-1.5)*
No 3166 1273 (40.2) 1.0 1.0
Family history of HTN
Yes 431 263 (61.0) <0.001 2.5 (2.0-3.0)* 1.6 (1.4-1.7)*
No 2369 919 (38.8) 1.0 1.0
BMI
Underweight 711 259 (36.4) <0.001 1.0 1.0
Normal 1964 757 (38.5) 1.1 (0.1-1.3) 1.1 (0.9-1.2)
Overweight 531 231 (43.5) 1.3 (1.1-1.7)* 1.1 (0.9-1.3)
Obese 832 425 (51.1) 1.8 (1.5-2.2)* 1.3 (1.1-1.6)*
WC-high risk
Yes 1755 759 (43.2) <0.001 1.1 (1.0-1.3) 1.0 (0.9-1.2)
No 2282 913 (37.9) 1.0 1.0
Dyslipidaemia
Yes 1423 627 (44.1) <0.001 1.4 (1.1-1.6)* 1.1 (0.9-1.2)
No 972 358 (36.8) 1.0 1.0

*P<0.05. HTN, hypertension; BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; OR, odd’s ratio; CI, confidence interval

Burden of hypertension: Overall prevalence of hypertension was 41.4 per cent [95% confidence interval (CI): 39.9-42.9%] with sex-specific prevalence as 46.7 per cent (95% CI: 44.1-49.1%) in men and 37.9 per cent (95% CI: 35.9-39.9%) in women. A total of 951 (23.6%) individuals had normal BP, whereas 1415 (35%) had pre-hypertension. Among the hypertensive individuals, 318 (19%) had isolated systolic hypertension, 415 (24.8%) had isolated diastolic hypertension, whereas 556 (33.25%) had combined hypertension. The mean SBP was 125.40±18.75 mmHg (ranging from a minimum of 86 to a maximum of 180 mmHg) and mean DBP was 81±11.97 mmHg (ranging from a minimum of 50 to a maximum of 126 mmHg). Table II shows age- and sex-wise distribution of categories of hypertension. Of the 1672 hypertensives in our study, 784 were aware of having hypertension, 577 were receiving treatment for hypertension at least for two weeks at the time of participation in the study and 255 participants had their BP controlled as per study definition with anti-hypertensive regimen. The prevalence of awareness, treatment and controlled BP in the study was 46.9, 34.5 and 15.3 per cent, respectively.

Table II Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) by age, gender and blood pressure categories
Age group (yr) n BP categories n (%) Mean±SD Under treatment, n (%)
Systolic BP Diastolic BP
Male
20-29 275 Normal 94 (34.2) 108.5±6.7 69.4±6.5 -
Pre-HTN 132 (48) 122.1±7.4 77.9±6.1 -
HTN 49 (17.8) 131.9±17.4 86.7±11.3 10 (20.4)
30-39 300 Normal 79 (26.3) 107.1±7.0 68.3±6.2 -
Pre-HTN 123 (41) 121±9.9 79.6±5.7 -
HTN 98 (32.7) 138.2±18.9 88.6±10.5 23 (23.5)
40-49 320 Normal 71 (22.2) 106.5±7.1 70.3±5.2 -
Pre-HTN 115 (35.9) 123.5±8.6 79.2±5.3 -
HTN 134 (41.9) 139.1±18.6 89.4±12 43 (32.1)
50-59 251 Normal 35 (13.9) 105.8±7.8 70.2±4.7 -
Pre-HTN 75 (29.9) 122.7±7.7 80.1±5.4 -
HTN 141 (56.2) 142.9±16.6 90.1±12.2 37 (26.2)
60-69 253 Normal 22 (8.7) 108.2±8.0 70.5±6.3 -
Pre-HTN 55 (21.7) 124.4±8.3 80.6±5.1 -
HTN 176 (69.7) 145±18.5 91.2±12.1 70 (39.8)
≥70 213 Normal 22 (10.3) 110.4±7.9 69.8±6.1 -
Pre-HTN 36 (16.9) 122.2±9.5 78.2±6.1 -
HTN 155 (72.8) 146.3±18.4 90.9±12.6 71 (45.8)
Overall 1612 128.6±19.5 82.3±12.2 254 (33.7)
Female
20-29 594 Normal 222 (37.4) 106.1±7.1 68.6±6.3 -
Pre-HTN 256 (43.1) 119.1±7.7 79.1±5.7 -
HTN 116 (19.5) 129.7±21.2 83.8±13.1 28 (24.1)
30-39 620 Normal 192 (31) 107.2±7.3 69.9±6.4 -
Pre-HTN 243 (39.2) 122.6±7.6 79.7±6.0 -
HTN 185 (29.8) 133.8±18.8 88.0±12.4 49 (26.5)
40-49 556 Normal `123 (22.1) 106.6±7.0 70.2±5.6 -
Pre-HTN 196 (35.3) 121.2±8.6 80.0±5.5 -
HTN 237 (42.6) 136.3±18.1 88±12.4 90 (38)
50-59 297 Normal 46 (15.5) 106.5±5.9 69.4±5.8 -
Pre-HTN 86 (29) 121.3±8.7 79.9±6.2 -
HTN 165 (55.5) 138.1±19.8 89.1±12.3 58 (35.2)
60-69 235 Normal 33 (14) 108.2±7.0 69.4±6.8 -
Pre-HTN 63 (26.8) 123.5±8.4 78.5±6.6 -
HTN 139 (59.2) 141.4±19.7 90.1±13.2 63 (45.3)
≥70 124 Normal 12 (9.7) 107.6±8.9 68.8±5.5 -
Pre-HTN 35 (28.2) 125.5±7.6 79.7±5.5 -
HTN 77 (62.1) 141.0±19.1 89.5±13.3 35 (45.5)
Overall 2426 123.3±17.9 80.2±11.7 323 (35.1)

SD, standard deviation; BP, blood pressure; HTN, hypertension

Higher age, male gender, lower socio-economic class, lower level of education and unemployment were the socio-demographic factors associated with hypertension. Active/passive smoking was the only behavioural risk factor associated with hypertension in our study apart from family history of hypertension. Among the clinical parameters, increased BMI (overweight or obese) and dyslipidaemia were associated with hypertension (Table I). Univariate analysis using binomial logistic regression method was performed to calculate unadjusted OR of risk factors of hypertension identified by Chi-square test. Multivariate analysis was performed to calculate adjusted OR with 95 per cent confidence interval (Table I). Increasing age [highest adjusted OR for >70 yr - 2.2 (1.9-2.4)], passive smoking [OR-1.3 (1.1-1.5)], family history of hypertension [OR-1.6 (1.4-1.7)] and obesity [OR-1.3 (1.1-1.6)] showed significant adjusted OR for developing hypertension. Adjusted prevalence ratio was also calculated for each risk factors using logistic model with random effects and conditional method of standardization19 (Table I).

Hb, RBC count and HCT showed significant association with BP. There was weak positive correlation between SBP with Hb (r=0.07, P=0.03), RBC count (r=0.084, P=0.01) and HCT (r=0.08, P=0.02). Similarly, there was a weak positive correlation between DBP with Hb (r=0.09, P=0.004), RBC count (r=0.102, P=0.003) and HCT (r=0.12, P=0.001).There was significant difference between the means of normotensives compared to hypertensives with regard to RBC count, red cell distribution width (RDW) and PLT (Table III).

Table III Comparison of haemogram parameters between hypertensive and normotensive subgroups
Parameter Normotensive group, n=951 Hypertensive group, n=1672
TLC (109/l) 7.13±1.94 7.09±2.14
Haemoglobin (g/dl) 12.76±2.25 12.93.1±2.35
MCH (pg) 26.34±3.5 26.4±3.15
MCHC (g/dl) 30.65±1.82 30.51±1.76
RBC (1012/l) 4.86±0.64 4.92±0.76*
MCV (fl) 85.93±10.64 86.64±10.52
HCT (%) 41.66±6.78 42.50±7.47
RDW (%) 28.13±25.39 29.89±27.75*
PLT (109/l) 155.9±72.92 147.43±63.03*
MPV (fl) 12.12±1.59 11.87±1.53

*P<0.05 compared to normotensive group. TLC, total leucocyte count; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; RBC, red blood cell; MCH, mean corpuscular haemoglobin; PLT, platelet count; RDW, red cell distribution width; HCT, haematocrit; MCHC, mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration; MPV, mean platelet volume

Discussion

The prevalence of hypertension in our study was 41.4 per cent which was higher than reports from various tribal populations from other parts of India (16-26%)720. This was also higher than the national figures quoted by the WHO in 2015 (23.5%)21. The results of survey conducted by The National Nutrition Monitoring Bureau (NNMB) in 2009 revealed that among the adult tribal population of India, the prevalence of hypertension was 25 per cent among men and 23 per cent among women, which was comparable to that reported for rural adults22. The altitude of villages included in our study ranged from 1585-2406 m above sea level. Although residence at higher altitude has been earlier attributed to account for lesser prevalence of hypertension7, a systematic review showed that higher altitude was associated with increased prevalence of hypertension23. In this study, the authors noted two per cent increase in prevalence of hypertension with every 100 m increase in altitude above sea level23. However, we found no correlation between altitudes of villages studied with the prevalence of hypertension from respective villages (data not shown).

Even though our study was conducted in tribal areas, the prevalence of hypertension reported was similar to the prevalence reported from urban areas in different parts of India and significantly higher than the prevalence reported from rural areas45242526. This could be due to rapid urbanization as well as the changing lifestyle of tribes. While smaller epidemiological studies of hypertension among general population from various regions of Jammu and Kashmir reported prevalence of hypertension to be around 34-57 per cent82728, no study to assess the prevalence among tribals of Kashmir has been conducted before. The prevalence of prehypertension in our study was 35 per cent (male – 33.3%, female – 36.2%) which was in accordance with the prevalence of prehypertension noted in most of the studies from other parts of India32025.

Men exhibited higher prevalence of hypertension than women in our study which was in accordance with most epidemiological studies of hypertension357101420242528. Age was found to be the most important risk factor for hypertension with the mean systolic and diastolic BPs showing linear increase with advancing age in both sexes. Prehypertension showed reverse trend with highest prevalence noted in youngest age group, i.e. 20-29 yr. Prehypertension is one of the established risk factors for developing hypertension10; young adults in our study may be at increased risk for developing hypertension in the near future. Similar results were noted in a few other studies2029 indicating that lifestyle diseases such as hypertension are no longer limited to elderly population.

Higher socio-economic status and higher level of education were associated with lesser prevalence of hypertension which was in accordance with results of previous studies30. Active and passive smoking were also found to be significantly associated with hypertension in our study. There was no association noted between alcoholism and hypertension which might be accounted by low prevalence of alcoholism among our study participants (1.7%).

Obese individuals and those with increased WHR had increased prevalence of hypertension. There was also progressive increase in the prevalence of hypertension with increasing class of BMI and dyslipidaemia. Similar findings were seen in most of the epidemiological studies of hypertension345814253132. There was a significant positive correlation between SBP/DBP with HCT, Hb and RBC count. Hypertensive individuals had a greater mean RBC count and RDW but lesser mean platelet count than normotensives. These findings were in accordance a previous study, but our study was not designed to assess the potential pathogenic or causal association between these haematological parameters and prevalence of hypertension.

The prevalence of awareness, treatment and controlled BP in our study was 46.9, 34.5 and 15.3 per cent, respectively. This was higher than the prevalence rate reported from rural India and comparable to the figures of urban dwellers in a meta-analysis which revealed the prevalence of awareness, treatment and control of BP as 25.3, 25.1 and 10.7 per cent, respectively, for rural Indians and 42.0, 37.6 and 20.2 per cent, respectively, for urban Indians4. Tribal population of Kashmir appeared to be doing well in this regard compared to the tribal population from rest of the country where awareness rate was as low as 8.4 per cent34.

The present study had some limitations. Majority of the study participants were illiterate which renders their response to the study questionnaire less reliable. No data were collected regarding the stress levels of participants, daily salt intake and urinary sodium excretion, all of which are important risk factors of hypertension. We also did not collect information regarding nature of treatment received by the participants who were being treated for hypertension in our study.

In conclusion, hypertension was found to be prevalent among Kashmiri tribals with high prevalence of prehypertension among the younger participants, placing them at higher risk for developing hypertension in future. Thus, urgent policies need to be devised to prevent emergence of risk factors among the tribal community of Kashmir valley, especially among the youth.

Financial support & sponsorship: This study was funded by the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India.

Conflicts of Interest: None.

References

Show Sections
Scroll to Top