Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Editorial
138 (
3
); 285-287

Potential for inhibition of bacterial efflux pumps in multidrug-resistant Vibrio cholera

Biology Department, Station 33, Eastern New Mexico University, Portales, NM, 88130, USA
QC Laboratory, Post Harvest Technology Department, Central Institute of Fisheries Education (CIFE), Seven Bungalows, Versova, Andheri (W), Mumbai 400 061, India
Department of Clinical Lab & Nutritional Sciences, 3 Solomont Way, Suite 4, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA 01854, USA

*For correspondence: Manuel.Varela@enmu.edu

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

The bacterium Vibrio cholerae is the causative agent of cholera, a severe gastrointestinal disease characterized primarily by the excretion of large amounts of the so-called rice water stool, which contains critical electrolytes and water. Cholera patients may succumb very quickly to the resulting severe dehydration producing significant morbidity and mortality rates. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), approximately 3-5 million cases of cholera occur each year with 100,000-120,000 yearly estimated deaths. Clearly, V. cholerae represents a critical public health concern1.

Key therapeutic efforts against cholera in humans include electrolyte replenishment, and for severe cholera cases, antimicrobial agents, such as tetracycline, furazolidone, ciprofloxacin, and trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole2. Though antimicrobials shorten the duration of illness and reduce faecal shedding of V. cholerae, prolonged antimicrobial use results in the development of antimicrobial resistance. Strains of V. cholerae have emerged that are resistant not only to each of these antimicrobial agents but also to multiple drugs, further confounding treatment efforts against cholera3.

Bacterial antimicrobial resistance mechanisms consist of enzymatic drug inactivation, drug target protection, reduced drug permeability into bacterial cells, biofilm protection, alteration of drug target, alteration of metabolite pathways, and active efflux of single and multiple drugs from cells3. Active multi-drug efflux is a major mechanism for bacterial pathogen drug resistance4. Efflux pumps are integral-membrane proteins that confer single - and multi-drug resistances by actively extruding drugs from bacterial pathogens45. We discovered a new multi-drug efflux pump, called EmrD-3, from V. cholerae O3956. EmrD-3 confers resistance in V. cholerae against linezolid, rifampin, ethidium bromide, minocycline, erythromycin, trimethoprim, chloramphenicol, and rhodamine 6G6. EmrD-3 and other multi-drug resistance mechanisms allow bacteria to survive in the presence of clinically useful antimicrobials, thus reducing the efficacy of infectious disease chemotherapy67. Bacterial genome sequencing and comparative genomics have recently become commonplace, and such molecular analyses are important for identifying genetic determinants that confer pathogenesis, including those determinants that confer drug and multidrug resistance8. Because of their overwhelming presence in bacterial pathogens, active multi-drug efflux mechanisms remain a major research area, so that measures may ultimately be discovered to inhibit multi-drug efflux9. Thus, modulation of multi-drug efflux may restore the clinical efficacy of chemotherapeutics against infectious diseases caused by multi-drug resistant bacterial pathogens.

There are three key energy-dependent solute transport systems. The first is primary active transport, in which ATP hydrolysis is the mode of energy for the entry of molecules into, or efflux from, cells10. Another system is the phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase system (PTS) in which a solute is phosphorylated as it is transported across the membrane1112. Lastly, secondary active transport systems use ion gradients as the energy-mode for transport of nutrients into cells13 or efflux of molecules from cells14. The ion may be a proton (H+) or a sodium ion (Na+). Secondary active efflux systems, although poorly understood, are energized by the translocation of the cation across the membrane down its concentration gradient into the cell and the concomitant transport of drug to the outside of the bacterium, a process known as ion/drug antiport14. Energy-dependent drug extrusion systems allow cells, including bacteria, to resist potentially lethal molecules like antibacterial agents, heavy metals, toxic metabolites, etc14. Efflux pumps may harbour a single drug-substrate conferring resistance to that drug715. An interesting property of other efflux pumps is that these intrinsically harbour multiple substrates, providing the advantage of resistance to multiple structurally-different drugs7. Such multi-drug efflux pumps in bacterial pathogens would make good targets for inhibitors, as reducing multi-drug efflux may restore the clinical efficacy of older drugs and prevent emergence of drug-resistant variants.

Inhibition of drug efflux pumps is a rapidly expanding field of interest, and many strategies have been invoked to do so. Early ‘uncouplers’ of solute transport, such as cyanide-containing compounds, were non-specific in nature and extremely toxic to hosts16. Such compounds were clearly not good for chemotherapy. One strategy sought to bypass the efflux pump directly using synthetic-derivatives of their substrates. A tetracycline-derivative, tigecycline, was not a good efflux substrate17. Other strategies include modulation of efflux pump assembly, expression, and energy-coupling18. Tremendous efforts are aimed at studying inhibitors that directly bind drug efflux pumps and inhibit transport. Reserpine, for instance, inhibits both primary and secondary active efflux19. Such modulators, called resistance modifying agents (RMAs), when used in combination with antimicrobial agents produce a synergistic reduction in drug resistance phenotypes.

Though many newer efflux pumps as wells as the homologues of existing ones are being reported from various bacteria, their clinical relevance remains to be definitively demonstrated. Studies should focus on those efflux pumps which have been shown to confer clinical levels of resistance to understand the molecular basis of antimicrobial efflux and to identify their inhibitors. Though mutagenic studies of some of highly conserved amino acid residues identified by comparisons with their well characterized homologues will provide important information on their functionalities, understanding the interactions of these amino acids with the drugs in three dimensional space is critical to identifying inhibitors with similar binding properties to the preferred drug substrates of the efflux pumps. Though the lack of structural data from protein crystallization or NMR studies is a serious hindrance, this to a great extent can be overcome using modern bioinformatics tools20. Takatsuka et al21 showed interactions of the AcrB drug-binding pocket with several substrates using computer docking tools, and reported that the AcrB protein has different binding pockets for different substrates within the main substrate-binding domain, a finding that needs critical consideration when efflux pump inhibitors are selected21. This observation of multiple substrate binding sites gains further strength from another study using the resistance-nodulation-division (RND) efflux pump inhibitor Phe-Arg-β-naphthylamide which inhibits levofloxacin efflux by MexAB-OprM, but is not effective against other substrates of the MexAB system such as ethidium bromide and carbenicillin22. The unique structural behaviours of efflux pumps such as changes in the transporter conformation following binding with the drug may not be predicted accurately by docking tools, and this discrepancy may result in an inhibitor identified by docking studies not showing any in vitro inhibition23. It remains to be understood whether putative inhibitors directly bind to and inhibit bacterial drug efflux pumps or if efflux modulation can occur through the regulation of gene expression or of pump assembly. Additionally, such efflux pump inhibitors would need to be demonstrated as non-toxic to humans in order to make this avenue for modulation of multidrug efflux valuable. Because reserpine directly binds and inhibits secondary active efflux pumps, such as Bmr and NorA2425, it may be advantageous to explore this area as well, when considering the efficacy of chemotherapeutic restoration. In any case, the vast array of new chemical compounds and naturally occurring agents predict that there are promising avenues for the discovery of novel agents that would inhibit or modulate bacterial drug efflux to help make antimicrobial therapy more effective against infectious disease caused by V. cholerae.

Acknowledgment

The studies in the authors’ laboratories were supported by the National Institute of General Medical Science of the National Institutes of Health, USA, under award number 8P20GM103451.

References

  1. , , . Cholera in the 21st century. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2011;24:472-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . Antimicrobials & cholera: are we stranded? Indian J Med Res. 2011;133:225-31.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , . Antibiotic resistance mechanisms of Vibrio cholerae. J Med Microbiol. 2011;60:397-407.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . Biochemistry of bacterial multidrug efflux pumps. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13:4484-95.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , . LmrS is a multidrug efflux pump of the major facilitator superfamily from Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:5406-12.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , . Identification, cloning, and functional characterization of EmrD-3, a putative multidrug efflux pump of the major facilitator superfamily from Vibrio cholerae O395. Arch Microbiol. 2009;191:903-11.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , . Active efflux mechanisms for antimicrobial resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992;36:695-703.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , . Genome sequence of non-O1 Vibrio cholerae PS15. Genome Announc. 2013;1:e00227-12.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , . In search of natural substrates and inhibitors of MDR pumps. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001;3:247-54.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , . The ABC family of multidrug transporters in microorganisms. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998;1365:31-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , . Cloning and molecular analysis of a mannitol operon of phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase (PTS) type from Vibrio cholerae O395. Arch Microbiol. 2011;193:201-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , . Maltose/maltodextrin system of Escherichia coli: transport, metabolism, and regulation. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998;62:204-29.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , . Molecular biology of the lactose carrier of Escherichia coli. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1996;1276:21-34.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , . Foundations of vectorial metabolism and osmochemistry. Biosci Rep. 1991;11:297-344.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , . Nucleotide and deduced protein sequences of the class D tetracycline resistance determinant: relationship to other antimicrobial transport proteins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993;37:1253-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , . Role of Na + and Li + in thiomethylgalactoside transport by the melibiose transport system of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1978;134:147-56.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , . Overview of tigecycline and its role in the era of antibiotic resistance. Braz J Infect Dis. 2006;10:203-16.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , . Bacterial efflux pumps involved in multidrug resistance and their inhibitors: rejuvinating the antimicrobial chemotherapy. Recent Pat Antiinfect Drug Discov. 2012;7:73-89.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , . Chemoresistance in breast tumors. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1991;12:359-73.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , . AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem. 2010;31:455-61.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , . Mechanism of recognition of compounds of diverse structures by the multidrug efflux pump AcrB of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:6559-65.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , , . Identification and characterization of inhibitors of multidrug resistance efflux pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: novel agents for combination therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45:105-16.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , . Broad-specificity efflux pumps and their role in multidrug resistance of Gram-negative bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2012;36:340-63.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , . Mutations affecting substrate specificity of the Bacillus subtilis multidrug transporter Bmr. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:2189-93.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , . The multidrug efflux transporter of Bacillus subtilis is a structural and functional homolog of the Staphylococcus NorA protein. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992;36:484-5.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    8

    PDF downloads
    8
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections
    Scroll to Top