Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Correspondence
140 (
3
); 438-440

Mosquito larvicidal properties of Mirabilis jalapa (Nyctaginaceae) against Anopheles stephensi, Aedes aegypti & Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae)

Unit of Vector Biology & Phytochemistry Department of Zoology, Annamalai University Annamalainagar 608 002, Tamil Nadu, India

* For correspondence:: drgovind1979@gmail.com

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Sir,

Mosquitoes are the most important single group of insects known for their public importance, since they act as vector for many tropical and subtropical diseases such as dengue fever, yellow fever, chikungunya, malaria, filariasis and encephalitis of different types including, Japanese encephalitis1. Larviciding is a successful way of reducing mosquito densities in their breeding places before they emerge into adults. Larviciding largely depends on the use of synthetic chemical insecticides – organophosphates (e.g. temephos and fenthion), insect growth regulators (e.g. diflubenzuron and methoprene), etc. Although effective, their repeated use has disrupted natural biological control systems and sometimes resulting in the widespread development of resistance. These problems have warranted the need for developing alternative strategies using eco-friendly products2. We undertook investigations of certain plant species traditionally used as insecticidal agents, as well as other endangered plant species, with the aim of identifying lead compounds for the development of new plant based insecticidal agents3.

Mirabilis jalapa Linn (Nyctaginaceae) is a perennial herb and is known as “Gulambasa” in Ayurveda. The presence of oxymethyl anthraquinone, trigonelline, arabinose, galactose, beta-sitosterol in leaves has been reported. It is used in the traditional system of medicine in the treatment of piles, abscess, boils and ulcers45. There is no information available on the larvicidal activity of M. jalapa against Anopheles stephensi, Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus. Therefore, the present study was carried out to determine the larvicidal efficacy of M.jalapa leaves extract against malaria, dengue and filariasis vector mosquitoes.

The leaves of M.jalapa were collected from in and around Gingee, Tamil Nadu, India, and were authenticated by a plant taxonomist from the Department of Botany, Annamalai University. A voucher specimen was deposited at the herbarium of Plant Phytochemistry Division, Department of Zoology, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, Tamil Nadu, India.

Cx. quinquefasciatus, Ae. aegypti and An. stephensi were reared in the Vector Control Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Annamalai University. The larvae were fed on dog biscuits and yeast powder in the 3:1 ratio. Adults were provided with 10 per cent sucrose solution and membrane feeding on goat blood. Mosquitoes were held at 28 ± 2°C, 70-85 per cent relative humidity (RH), with a photoperiod of 12 h light : 12 h dark. The dried leaves (1 kg) were extracted with four different solvents, namely, benzene, chloroform, ethyl acetate and methanol (500ml), individually and the extract was evaporated in a rotary vacuum evaporator. Standard stock solutions were prepared at 1 per cent by dissolving the residues in ethanol, which was used for the larvicidal bioassay.

The larvicidal activity of the plant crude extracts was evaluated as per the method recommended by the World Health Organization6. Batches of 25 third instar larvae were transferred to a small disposable paper cups, each containing 200 ml of water. The appropriate volume of dilution was added to 200 ml water in the cups to obtain the desired target dosage, starting with the lowest concentration (25-250 mg/l). Four replicates were set up for each concentration, and an equal number of controls were set up simultaneously using tap water. To this, 1 ml of ethanol was added. The LC50 (lethal concentration that kills 50 per cent of the exposed larvae) and LC90 (lethal concentration that kills 90 per cent of the exposed larvae) values were calculated after 24 h by probit analysis7

The results of the larvicidal activity of crude benzene, chloroform, ethyl acetate, and methanol solvent leaf extracts of M. jalapa against the larvae of three important vector mosquitoes, viz. An. stephensi, Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus are presented in the Table. Among extracts tested, the highest larvicidal activity was observed in leaf methanol extract of M. jalapa against An. stephensi, Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus with the LC50 and LC90 values as 57.55, 64.58, 84.53 ppm and 104.20, 120.28, 159.25 ppm, respectively (Table). Regression analysis showed that the mortality rate (Y) was positively correlated with concentration of exposure (X). The result of log probit analysis (95% confidence level) showed that LC50 values gradually decreased (benzene < chloroform < ethyl acetate < methanol).

Table Larvicidal activity of different solvent leaf extract of M. jalapa against An. stephensi, Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus

It is a well recognized fact that plant extracts and phytochemicals could be developed into products suitable for mosquito control, because many of these are selective, often biodegradable to non-toxic products, and may be applied to mosquito breeding sites in the same way as conventional insecticides. Our result showed that the crude benzene, chloroform, ethyl acetate and methanol solvent extracts of leaf of M. jalapa had significant larvicidal properties against three vector mosquitos viz. An. stephensi, Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus. This result was also comparable to our earlier reports of the LC50 values of benzene, hexane, ethyl acetate, methanol, and chloroform extract of Eclipta alba against early third-instar larvae of Ae. aegypti which were 151.38, 165.10, 154.88, 127.64, and 146.28 ppm, respectively8, and for the larvicidal efficacy of benzene, hexane, ethyl acetate, methanol, and chloroform leaf extract of Cardiospermum halicacabum against Cx. quinquefasciatus and Ae. aegypti, the LC50 values were 174.24, 193.31, 183.36, 150.44, and 154.95 and 182.51, 200.02, 192.31, 156.80, and 164.54 ppm, respectively9. The leaf oil extracts of Eucalyptus tereticornis showed 100 per cent mortality at 160 ppm against the larvae of An. stephensi10. The acetone extracts of Nerium indicum and Thuja orientelis have been studied with LC50 values of 200.87 and 127.53 ppm against III instar larvae of An. stephensi11. The isolated compound neemarin from Azadirachta indica exhibited LC50 and LC90 values of 0.35 and 1.81 mg/l for An. stephensi12. Compared with earlier reports, our results revealed that the experimental plant extracts were effective against An. stephensi, Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus and the plant M. jalapa exhibited larvicidal activity against three important vector mosquitoes. These results could encourage the search for new active natural compounds offering an alternative to synthetic insecticides from other medicinal plants.

References

  1. Management of vectors. In: , , eds. Pest and vector management in Tropics. London: English Language Book Society; . p. :265-80.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , . Chemical composition and larvicidal activites of the essential oil of Zanthoxylum armatum DC (Rutaceae) against three mosquito vectors. J Vector Borne Dis. 2007;44:198-204.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , . Adulticidal activity of Pithecellobium dulce (Roxb.) Benth against Culex quinquefasciatus (Say) Asian Pac J Trop Dis. 2012;2:124-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , . Three new phenolic compounds from a manipulated plant cell culture of Mirabilis jalapa. J Nat Prod. 2001;64:313-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , . Antimicrobial activity of medicinal plants from Baja California Sur (Mexico) Pharm Biol. 1998;36:33-43.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. . Guidelines for laboratory and field testing of mosquito larvicides. Communicable Disease Control, prevention and eradication, WHO Pesticide Evaluation Scheme. Geneva: WHO; . WHO/CDS/WHOPES/GCDPP/2005.13
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , . Probit analysis. London: Cambridge University Press; . p. :68-72.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , . Mosquito larvicidal and ovicidal properties of Eclipta alba (L.) Hassk (Asteraceae) against chikungunya vector, Aedes aegypti (Linn) (Diptera: Culicidae) Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2011;4:24-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , . Mosquito larvicidal and ovicidal activity of Cardiospermum halicacabum Linn.(family: Sapindaceae) leaf extract against Culex quinquefasciatus (Say) and Aedes aegypti (Linn) (Diptera: Culicidae) Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2011;15:787-94.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , . The use of Eucalyptus tereticornis Sm.(Myrtaceae) oil (leaf extract) as a natural larvicidal agent against the malaria vector Anopheles stephensi Liston (Diptera: Culicidae) Bioresour Technol. 2007;98:1856-60.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , . Larvicidal potential of Nerium indicum and Thuja oriertelis extracts against malaria and Japanese encephalitis vector. J Environ Biol. 2005;26:657-60.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , . Larvicidal activity of a neem tree extract (Neemarin) against mosquito larvae in the Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 2004;10:573-81.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    10

    PDF downloads
    11
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections
    Scroll to Top