Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Editorial
141 (
2
); 143-144

International Epilepsy Day - A day notified for global public education & awareness

Department of Neurology, Janakpuri Superspeciality Hospital New Delhi 110 058, India
Department of Pathology, Janakpuri Superspeciality Hospital New Delhi 110 058, India

This editorial is published on the occasion of International Epilepsy Day - February 9, 2015.

*For correspondence: mmehndi@hotmail.com

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Epilepsy is a common medical disorder that can have a psychological and emotional impact on people with this disorder and their caregivers. About 65 million people worldwide have epilepsy1 and nearly 80 per cent of the people with epilepsy (PWE) live in developing countries, where annual new cases occur between 40 to 70 per 100,000 people in the general population. The estimated proportion of the general population with active epilepsy at a given time is between 4 to 10 per 1000 people. However, some of the studies from developing countries suggest that the proportion is between 6 to 10 per 10002.

In the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010, of almost 14,000 people from a range of global settings, severe epilepsy was rated as having a disability adjusted life years (DALY) of 0.657 and total prevalent cases were 28,300,0003. Disease burden for epilepsy has been evaluated in economic terms by the European Brain Council for the European countries, with data from 200445 and 20106 and based on epidemiological and health economic data it amounts to 161 and 212 million €, respectively.

It is estimated that there are more than 10 million PWE in India. In an earlier study their prevalence was about one per cent in our population7. The prevalence was higher in the rural population (1.9%) as compared with urban population (0.6%)89. The overall prevalence of epilepsy in India has been estimated to be 5.59-10 per 1000791011.

Almost 70 per cent of newly diagnosed children and adults with epilepsy can be successfully treated with anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs). Drugs can be withdrawn in about 70 per cent of children and 60 per cent of adults without relapses after two to five years of successful treatment. Approximately three-fourth of PWE in developing countries may not receive the treatment they need due to treatment gap of up to 80 per cent. In many low- and middle-income countries it is difficult to access treatment due to low availability and unaffordability of AEDs2.

Epilepsy is a cost intensive disorder. In a multicentric study on the cost of epilepsy in India, the total annual cost per people amounted to ₹ 13,755 (USD 344). The total economic burden of epilepsy in India was found to be ₹ 68.75 billion (1.72 billion USD) which constituted 0.5 per cent GNP of India12. There are global disparities in the care of people with epilepsy between high- and low-income countries and between rural and urban settings. However, more than 70 per cent of patients who are treated achieve long-term remission or freedom from seizures, usually within five years of diagnosis13.

The treatment gap is over 75 per cent in most low-income countries and over 50 per cent in many lower middle and upper middle income countries when compared with high income countries where it is less than 10 per cent. Furthermore, treatment gaps are twice as high in rural areas compared to urban areas14. In a systematic review the treatment gap in developing countries has been reported as low as 56 per cent15. The magnitude of epilepsy treatment gap in India is high and is influenced by lack of access to or knowledge of anti-epileptic drugs, poverty, cultural beliefs, stigma, poor health delivery infrastructure, shortage of trained professionals, inequitable distributions of available resources in rural areas and high cost of treatment161718. Efforts need to be made to reduce the treatment gap in epilepsy. A substantial proportion of the current large treatment gap in epilepsy in the developing countries could be minimized by educating the primary care physicians about the diagnosis of epileptic seizures, cost-effective AED treatment, availability of specialist health professionals in low- and middle- income countries and need-based referral for specialized care19.

Epilepsy due to perinatal brain injury remains an important problem in developing countries and contributes significantly to the burden of epilepsy in the developing world. Predominant causes are perinatal asphyxia, neonatal hypoglycaemia, sepsis-meningitis, late haemorrhagic disease of the newborn and perinatal ischaemic arterial stroke, all of which are preventable20.

International Epilepsy Day is likely to improve public awareness and raise visibility of epilepsy globally which will ultimately lead to improved access to AEDs, provision of cost-effective treatment, improved funding for research activity in epilepsy and development of appropriate legislation to protect the rights of all people with epilepsy.

References

  1. , , , , , . Estimation of the burden of active and life-time epilepsy: a meta-analytic approach. Epilepsia. 2010;51:883-90.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. World Health Organization. Epilepsy Fact Sheet No. 999: key facts (2012) Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs999/en/
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , . The global burden of mental, neurological and substance use disorders: an analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0116820.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Cost of disorders of the brain in Europe. Eur J Neurol. 2005;12(Suppl 1):1-27.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , . Cost of disorders of the brain in Norway. Acta Neurol Scand. 2010;190(Suppl):1-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . Cost of disorders of the brain in Europe 2010. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011;21:718-79.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , . Prevalence and pattern of epilepsy in India. Epilepsia. 1999;40:631-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , . Epilepsy and rights. In: In: Atlas: epilepsy care in the world. Geneva: World Health Organization; . p. :72-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , . Prevalence of neurological disorders in Bangalore, India: a community-based study with a comparison between urban and rural areas. Neuroepidemiology. 2004;23:261-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , . Epidemiology of epilepsy. Curr Sci. 2002;82:664-70.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , . Comprehensive rural epilepsy surveillance programme in Uttarakhand state of India. Neurol India. 2009;57:355-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , . Economic burden of epilepsy in India. Epilepsia. 2001;42:1052-60.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , . The global burden and stigma of epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2008;12:540-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , . Global disparities in the epilepsy treatment gap: a systematic review. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88:260-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , . The epilepsy treatment gap in developing countries: a systematic review of the magnitude, causes, and intervention strategies. Epilepsia. 2008;49:1491-503.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , . ILAE Commission on the Developing World. The treatment gap in epilepsy: the current situation and ways forward. Epilepsia. 2001;42:136-49.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , . The treatment of epilepsy in developing countries: where do we go from here? Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79:344-51.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , . Challenges in the management of epilepsy in resource-poor countries. Nat Rev Neurol. 2009;5:323-30.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , . Primary care doctors’ management behavior with respect to epilepsy in Kerala, southern India. Epilepsy Behav. 2011;21:137-42.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , . Epilepsies due to perinatal brain injuries: focus on prevention. Neurol Asia. 2011;16(Suppl 1):17-9.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    14

    PDF downloads
    11
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections
    Scroll to Top