Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
142 (
2
); 211-215
doi:
10.4103/0971-5916.164260

Insecticide susceptibility of Phlebotomus argentipes & assessment of vector control in two districts of West Bengal, India

Department of Vector Biology & Control, Rajendra Memorial Research Institute of Medical Sciences (ICMR), Patna, India

Reprint requests: Dr Pradeep Das, Rajendra Memorial Research Institute of Medical Sciences (ICMR) Agamkuan, Patna 800 007, Bihar, India e-mail: drpradeep.das@gmail.com

Licence

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Background & objectives:

Kala-azar or visceral leishmanisis (VL) is known to be endemic in several States of India including West Bengal (WB). Only meager information is available on the vector dynamics of its vector species, Phlebotomus argentipes particularly in relation to control measure from this State. Hence, a pilot study was undertaken to assess the control strategy and its impact on vector in two endemic districts of WB, India.

Methods:

Two villages each from the two districts, Maldah and Burdwan, were selected for the study. Seasonal variation of sandflies was observed during pre-monsoon, post-monsoon and winter seasons. Susceptibility test of P. argentipes against DDT and bioassay on DDT sprayed wall and on long lasting insecticide nets (LN) Perma Net® 2.0 were conducted as per the WHO standard methods.

Results:

P. argentipes density was high during March to October. Susceptibility status of P. argentipes ranged from 40 to 61.54 per cent. Bioassay test showed 57.89 per cent mortality against LN PermaNet®-2.0. and 50 per cent against DDT on wall within 30 min of exposure.

Interpretation & conclusions:

Despite the integrated vector management approach, the sandfly population was high in the study area. The reason could be development of resistance in P. argentipes against DDT and low effectiveness of LN PermaNet®-2.0. The more pragmatic step will be to conduct large studies to monitor the susceptibility level in P. argentipes against DDT.

Keywords

Bio-assay
breading habitat
phlebotomus argentipes
susceptibility
visceral leishmaniasis

Kala-azar or visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is caused by protozoan parasites of the genus Leishmania, transmitted to a human host by the bite of an infected female sandfly Phlebotomus argentipes (Diptera-Psychodidae)12. The disease has been reported from 109 districts (Bangladesh 45, India 52 and Nepal 12)3. The success of previous vector control efforts was mainly related to the fight against malaria with 4 per cent DDT but the situation was further aggregated by the development of tolerance in P. argentipes against DDT4. However, within a few years after the end of the eradication efforts, VL returned to Bihar and West Bengal States in India and to Bangladesh5. Earlier reports67891011 pointed towards the development of resistance in P. argentipes against DDT. However, the selection of insecticide is imperative as propensity of sandflies is expected to fluctuate from one region to another depending on its history of spraying and frequency of spray121314. In India, VL is a serious problem in Bihar, Jharkhand, West Bengal and eastern Uttar Pradesh15. The levels of sandfly density and allocation of sandfly propensity to insecticides have not been considered in the endemic sites of West Bengal (unpublished observation). Therefore, to develop control measures against sandfly populations in relation to VL and to provide a cogent outline for selecting the suitable insecticide the present study was carried out in the two VL endemic districts, Maldah and Burdwan of West Bengal, India.

Material & Methods

The study was conducted in two villages each in Maldah and Burdwan districts. The villages were selected based on the last three years report of kala-azar cases collected from the public health centres (PHCs). Name of the villages in Maldah were Tapsahor (Habibpur, PHC), and Nimua (Muchia PHC). Similarly, in Burdwan district villages Barapolason tola (Barapolason PHC) and Mahishpur (Bitra PHC) were selected. In these districts, the average temperature in hot season remains about 32°C and at 19°C in the cold season. The annual average rainfall is 150 mm. The maximum precipitation occurs during the period from June to September. Relative humidity ranges from 70 to 90 per cent.

In Maldah and Burdwan districts for the control of kala-azar two rounds (April-May and November-December, 2010) of DDT spray were done and simultaneously long lasting insecticidal nets (LN) PermaNet® 2.0 [purchased from Vestergaard Frandsen, (India) Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, India] were provided to the households in the endemic villages.

Sandfly collection and identification: From the month of March 2011 to December 2012 Phelotomine and Sergentomyia sandflies were collected from both inside (e.g. human dwellings and cattleshed) as well as outside (adjacent peridomestic vegetated areas and abandoned houses). Collection was done with CDC light trap (John W. Hock Company, USA) and the density was estimated per trap per night16. Traps were installed randomly in selected habitat i.e. human dwelling, mixed dwelling (habitat for both human and livestock) and adjacent vegetation. The collected sandflies were sorted, identified, differentiated into different species by examining slides of head and genitalia under the microscope as per method described by Lewis17.

Bioassay on long-lasting insecticide-treated nets LN PermaNet® 2.0: Five sprayed households from each village (wards) were selected for residual efficacy of DDT by bioassay18. Bioassay was performed on the LN PermaNet® 2.0 provided by Vestergaard Frandsen, Switzerland (mesh size 156/inch2 with deltamethrin @ 55 mg/m2). Bioassay test was performed by exposing full fed female sandflies introduced into WHO plastic cones fixed on the insecticide treated surfaces for a period of 30 min after one week of indoor residual spray (IRS) (May 10, 2012). Only 20 sandflies were introduced into each cone. There were four replications of test on treated walls of the selected houses and there was a single test on untreated wall, served as a control. After exposing, the females were placed in WHO tube (10 per cup), with sucrose solution provided at screen and maintained climatic condition for 24 h at 25±2°C temperature and 80±10 per cent relative humidity. The mortality rate was recorded after 24 h. The test series having more than 20 per cent control mortality was cancelled.

Susceptibility test: Susceptibility test of P. argentipes against DDT was carried as per the WHO standard method19 on DDT impregnated paper (4% DDT) provided by the Vector Control and Research Unit, School of Biological Science, University Sains Malaysia (Penang, Malaysia). The observed mortality was corrected by Abbott's formula20.

Statistical analysis: All the statistical analysis such as mean, minimum, maximum, standard deviation were performed using the excel sheet-2007. Graph preparation and P-values estimation were done in SPSS software, version-16 (SPSS Inc., USA).

Results

Seasonal characteristics of sandfly: During the study period, in Maldah district two rounds of DDT spray were carried out, first in May and second round in December 2011. In 2012 only one round of DDT spray was carried out in April-May. In Burdwan district only one rounds of DDT spray each in April 2011 and December 2012 were carried out. Though the sandfly density (P. argentipes) was low in Burdwan, but the peak was similar i.e. one peak in March-April and other peak in September was observed (Fig. 1). In Maldah, in the month of November-December temperature was low, hence the collection was negligible.

Seasonal distribution of sandfly in Maldah and Burdwan districts (West Bengal, India) during the study period.
Fig. 1
Seasonal distribution of sandfly in Maldah and Burdwan districts (West Bengal, India) during the study period.

A total of 1,407 sandflies were captured during the study period. Of the collected sandflies, 69.59 per cent were P. argentipes (male: female ratio 1:1.15), 20.81 per cent were Sergentomyia (male: female ratio 1:1.11), and 9.60 per cent were P. papatasi (male: female ratio 1:0.74). The proportion of P. argentipes was significantly higher (P<0.001) compared with the proportion of Sergentomyia and P. papatasi in the study site. However, the highest density of P. argentipes was recorded in September and October 2011 (post-monsoon) compared with the P. argentipes density between March and April 2011 (pre-monsoon). The results also showed that the percentage of female P. argentipes was higher during the pre-monsoon and lower in the post-monsoon season. Similar results were obtained for P. papatasi and Sergentomyia. Fig. 2 shows the seasonal characteristic of abdomen stage of female P. argentipes. The highest percentages of fully gravid and unfed P. argentipes were recorded in post-monsoon (30.96%) and pre-monsoon (35.09%) seasons, respectively.

Abdomen stage of female P. argentipes recorded during the study period (i.e. pre-monsoon, post-monsoon and winter seasons) in Maldah and Burdwan districts (West Bengal, India).
Fig. 2
Abdomen stage of female P. argentipes recorded during the study period (i.e. pre-monsoon, post-monsoon and winter seasons) in Maldah and Burdwan districts (West Bengal, India).

Results of bioassay on LN PermaNet® 2.0: Bioassay results on LN PermaNet® 2.0 and DDT sprayed walls in Maldah district are presented in Table I. There was 60 per cent (mean±SD, 53.33±5.77) mortality in test against LN PermaNet® 2.0 within the 3 min of exposure time. The test against DDT on wall illustrated 50 per cent (mean±SD, 60.00±10.00) mortality of sandflies with 30 min time of exposure in the study area. LN PermaNet® 2.0 showed higher efficacy by having higher mortality with low does and exposure time compared with DDT. Knockdown was nil for LN PermaNet® 2.0 and DDT after 3 and 30 min, respectively.

Table I Bioassy test on LN PermaNet 2.0 and DDT against P. argentipes after 3 and 30 min of exposure, respectively, in the Maldah district, West Bengal, India.

Results of susceptibility test: The susceptibility test was carried out in the four sets against the 4 per cent DDT impregnated paper (Table II). Each set contained 10-15 P. argentipes. The corrected mortality derived from Abbot's formula of P. argentipes varied between 40 and 61.54 per cent (mean ± SD 53.71±4.91).

Table II Susceptibility status of P. argentipes against 4% DDT in Maldah district, West Bengal, India.

Discussion

The results showed high density of P. argentipes in the studied area of West Bengal from March to October. Picado et al21 reported high peak density in the months of May and November in Bihar. The difference may be due to climatic variations and also in IRS in the two States. In Maldah LN PermaNet® 2.0 was being used in all houses, but that also did not help in containing the sandfly density. Dinesh et al22 reported that PermaNet® 2.0 and Olyset nets did not reduce the female sandfly density. However, Picado et al16 reported 25 per cent reduction in P. argentipes population. In our study the result of bioassay with the LN PermaNet® 2.0 showed only 57.89 per cent mortality after 14-15 month of Net distribution. The results of bioassay test on the DDT sprayed surfaces demonstrated only 50 per cent mortality after two weeks of spray. In Burdwan district one round of DDT spray was done at the study sites in March 2011 and one round in June 2012. During the spot visit in March 2011 DDT mark was observed on the walls but spray was patchy. In our study, the results of the susceptibility status of P. argentipes against 4 per cent DDT indicated development of resistance in the vector species. The per cent corrected mortality ranged between 40-61.54 per cent. Earlier Sen23 has reported susceptibility of sandflies to 0.25 per cent DDT. Basak and Tandon24 have reported 100 per cent susceptibility to 4 per cent DDT impregnated papers. However, they also expressed their concern on the development of tolerance against DDT in the areas which were under regular insecticidal pressure. Hence, a large study covering the whole State with more number of P. argentipes is suggested to monitor the resistance in the vector species for the effective kala-azar control. For the breeding habitat the results indicated that P. argentipes preferred indoor breeding. In Maldah, most of the cattleshed located inside the houses provided favourable environment for breeding of P. argentipes. Resistance in P. argentipes against DDT has been reported in several parts of India810. Development of resistant in P. argentipes against 4 per cent DDT and low effectiveness of LN PermaNet® 2.0 in containing P. argentipes population are major concerns for the kala-azar control programme. To have suitable vector control strategies, regular assessment of insecticide vulnerability in kala-azar vector is desirable. The present strategy to control L. donovani transmission in the region relying on IRS with DDT should be elucidated in the light of the development of resistance in the targeted species to DDT and other insecticides. The present study indicates development of resistant in P. argentipes against 4 per cent DDT in the study area. Now the DDT is not as effective as observed in 1970s, when the kala-azar cases came down drastically from 1,00,000 to 11,120 in 198225. Therefore, it is a matter of concern that after the development of 100 per cent resistance in P. argentipes against DDT the situation may worsen further.

Acknowledgment

Authors thank Mr. N.K. Sinha, Mr. S.A. Khan, Mr. Ujwal Prakash, Mr. Virendra Kumar, Mr. B.B. Prasad for their technical support, and acknowledge the World Bank and National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme (NVBDCP), Delhi, for financial support.

References

  1. Control of communicable diseases manual. 2008
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Leishmaniasis: current situation and new perspectives. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004;27:305-18.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . Visceral leishmaniasis: elimination from Indian sub-continent. Proc Natl Acad Sci India. 2009;79:1-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. The leishmaniases. Report of a WHO Experts Committee. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1984;701:1-40.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. World Health Organization, South-East Asia Regional Office (WHO-SEARO). Update on the status of visceral leishmaniasis (kala azar) in the SEA region. New Delhi: WHO SEARO; .
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , . Effect of DDT on Phlebotomus sandflies in kala-Azar endemic foci in West Bengal. J Commun Dis. 1996;28:171-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , . Susceptibility status of Phlebotomus argentipes to insecticides in districts Vaishali and Patna (Bihar) J Commun Dis. 2003;35:49-51.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , . Susceptibility of Phlebotomus argentipes against DDT in endemic districts of North Bihar, India. J Commun Dis. 2004;36:41-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , . Status of insecticide resistance of malaria, kala-azar and Japanese encephalitis vectors in Bangladesh, Bhutan, India and Nepal (BBIN). Activity Report 129. Environmental Health Project, Contract HRN-I-00-99-00011-00. Office of Health Infectious Diseases and Nutrition, Bureau for Global Health, U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, DC. Available from: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf-docs/Pnacx375.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , . Insecticide susceptibility of Phlebotomus argentipes in visceral leishmaniasis endemic districts in India and Nepal. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4:e859.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , . Insecticide susceptibility status of Phlebotomus argentipes, a vector of visceral leishmaniasis in different foci in three states of India. J Vector Borne Dis. 2012;49:254-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Insecticide resistance and vector control. Thirteenth Report of the WHO Expert Committee on Insecticides. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1963;265:1-227.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , . Susceptibility of sand flies to selected insecticides in North Africa and the Middle East. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2001;17:23-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , . Insecticide resistance in the sandfly, Phlebotomus papatasi from Khartoum State, Sudan. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:46.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , . Epidemiology of visceral leishmaniasis in India. Natl Med J India. 1999;12:62-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , . Effect of village-wide use of long-lasting insecticidal nets on visceral leishmaniasis vectors in India and Nepal: a cluster randomized trial. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4:e587.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , . The phlebotomine sandflies (Diptera: Psychodidae) of the Oriental Region. Bull Br Mus Nat Hist Entomol. 1978;37:217.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. World Health Organization (WHO). Report of the Twelfth WHOPES. Working Group Meeting. WHO/HQ, Geneva. 8-11 December 2008. Available from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2009/who_HTM_NTD_whoPES_-2009_1_eng.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  19. World Health Organization (WHO). Instructions for determining the susceptibility or resistance of adult blackflies, sandflies and biting midges to insecticides. WHO/VBC, Document. Geneva: WHO; . p. :81-810.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , . A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol. 1925;18:265-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , , . Phlebotomus argentipes seasonal patterns in India and Nepal. J Med Entomol. 2010;47:283-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , , . Long-lasting insecticidal nets fail at household level to reduce abundance of sandfly vector Phlebotomus argentipes in treated houses in Bihar (India) Trop Med Int Health. 2008;13:953-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , . Studies on insecticide resistance in insects of public health importance in West Bengal, India. Indian J Malariol. 1959;13:19-33.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , . Observations on susceptibility status of Phlebotomus argentipes to DDT in district South 24-Parganas, West Bengal. J Commun Dis. 1995;27:196-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , . A new strategy for elimination of kala-azar from rural Bihar. Indian J Med Res. 2007;126:447-51.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections
Scroll to Top