Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review Article
148 (
Suppl 1
); S10-S14
doi:
10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_636_18

Infertility & assisted reproduction: A historical & modern scientific perspective

Division of Reproductive Biology, Maternal & Child Health, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India
Department of Environmental Studies, Satyawati College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India

For correspondence: Dr Radhey Shyam Sharma, Division of Reproductive Biology, Maternal & Child Health, Indian Council of Medical Research, V. Ramalingaswami Bhawan, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi 110 029, India e-mail: head.rbmh@gmail.com

Licence

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Infertility has always been considered as a social stigma and has often been treated as socially, mentally and physically damaging experience for the childless women rather than man. Fatherhood was more a social rather than biological concept, thereby making childlessness a legitimate ground for divorce and a matter of disgrace for women. Every country has its own set of customs and traditional beliefs for the relief of childlessness. While introducing a second wife was one way to overcome the predicament of childlessness, divorce was also an available choice. There were several myths that contemplated the human concerns and their needs during ancient times. It is evident that types of the infertility and their treatment in the modern era have some historical background and different representations in the ancient civilizations. The present review discusses the historical and modern perspectives of infertility and assisted reproduction and their importance in different cultures.

Keywords

Assisted reproductive technology
childlessness
cryopreservation
culture
fecundity
fertilization
history
in vitro fertilization
infertility
surrogacy

Introduction

Affirmations from the present day modern science managing cells, molecules, genes, DNA and on assessing ancient Indian Vedic literature, it appears that parenthood is an instinct-driven physiological experience123. It is also evident that there is inherent and deep-seated desire in all adult females to have a child. Instinct of parenthood is the most powerful desire that exists in all the living beings that include all the creatures and people123.

Reproduction is unique in many ways, and it performs a very important role in the process of immortality. Inability to have children, in general, is considered as a personal failure and tragedy around the world. The infertility does not end the life of a person but it incurs wrecking impact on the life of that person for not full filling the biological role of parenthood. The historical perspective and modern scientific knowledge described the intricacy of infertility, and in this review, efforts have been made to highlight these intricacies.

Historical perspective

The ancient era (3500 BC-500 AD)45

This era marks the beginning of the advancement of civilizations from Indus Valley to Vedic Civilizations. During this period, the tradition of Niyoga pratha or Levirate6 was prevalent to produce the child. It was also evident from the Vedic literature that the general population during that time was familiar with the idea of artificial insemination (AI) which involved the manual injection of semen into the reproductive tract of the women7. Enchantment mixtures (’Magic potions’) created by the sages for the queen of childless kings to make them pregnant was a typical practice during this era7. Thus, the people during that time were aware about the ideas of assisted conception and gamete manipulation8.

The common era (c.300 CE-c.400C)45

During this time, bareness was typically presented as a problem for women. It was considered as a tragedy for a woman in the ancient east since the barren wife was likely to be despised by her husband, family and society9. The value of the women during Common Era was determined by her purity and after marriage by her reproducibility10. Although the introduction of a second wife was a way of avoiding childlessness, divorce was also an option. In the Common Era, the marriage agreement was thought to be completed not at consummation but with child birth11. One of the major causes of divorce during that time was women's infertility; as mentioned in majority of the Egyptian marriage contracts, polygamy was very common and the reason for a man opting for more than one wife12.

The medieval period to the middle ages (ca. 500-1500)45

The suffering of women for not bearing the child continued from the medieval period to middle ages. Wide range of religious views on infertility, existed from the late medieval period to the middles ages where the concepts of gender equality came into existence; the necessity of procreation was understood as important carrier of lineage ahead for the continuity and extension of the family13. Although religious discourse about infertility in those times focused mainly on women, men also were considered as culprits for not producing the child. Polygamous marriage was an ancient and long-standing solution to infertility in the Middle East. Sometimes, the spouse was sought to make a temporary alliance only for the purpose of obtaining a child from them1415.

Modern scientific perspective

The extension of the Middle Ages to modern history was the Renaissance period, during which the scientific progress was made in the field of modern medicine including the infertility treatment. The practice of modern medicine originated in Greece about 7th century B.C. Ancient Greeks believed in the conventional methods of treatment that were based on the religion, magic and superstitions; eventually after the beginning of medical science, the physicians and surgeons disregarded the time-honoured elements of superstition and magic and were more in favour of the factual medicine16. Later on, the famous physician Hippocrates evolved a system of scientific reasoning based totally on rational thinking17. Infertility was recognized as a medical problem requiring diagnosis and treatment. Hippocrates during that time had formulated various treatment options for the infertile couples. While treatment in modern medicine focuses more on pharmacological and surgical procedures, Hippocratic therapies were primarily based on lifestyle changes.

The development of techniques for the treatment of infertility can be traced back to the period when physicians began to think scientifically about the reasons of infertility. In 1677, Antonie Philips van Leeuwenhoek18 first discovered spermatozoa through microscope. He named them as animalcules and claimed their importance in the formation of embryos. After the discovery of spermatozoa, advancements were made in modern medicine to understand the reproductive physiology, process of gamete interaction and to treat and resolve infertility problems19.

Evolution of infertility treatment

Artificial insemination

In 1779, the essentiality of spermatozoa for fertilization was demonstrated by an Italian priest and physiologist named Lazzaro Spallanzani who proved that a spermatozoon contained a nucleus and cytoplasm through a laboratory experiment16. It was established for the first time that the embryo develops as a result of physical contact between the egg and the sperm20. With this new discovery, Spallanzani successfully inseminated dogs21. He also performed an experiment to show that the spermatozoa could be inactivated by cooling and reactivated later22. Another important discovery was that of Carl Ernst Von Baer who in 1827 discovered the mammalian ovum and made significant contribution to embryology16. Pioneering efforts by Ivanow (1922)23 to establish AI as a practical procedure had begun in Russia. This development by Ivanow led to further advancement in the techniques and stimulated research outside Russia to other western countries23. But while the AI of animals quickly became an industry, it took several years to use this technology to humans. Eleven years after Spallanzani's experiment, the first successful attempt of AI was made in a woman. First documented report of application of AI was by a Scottish surgeon Dr John Hunter in late 1770s24. The real beginning of assisted reproductive technology (ART) started almost a century later when the first report on human AI was published by Guttmacher (1943)25. Since then, AIs have been reported for many years only in cases of physiological and psychological dysfunction. Around 190926, donor insemination - another aspect of AI gained popularity. While the procedure of AI was gaining popularity throughout the world, in India Sampat Kumaran reported the first AI in Halliker cows at Palace Dairy Farm Mysore in 193927.

Concept of cryopreservation

The continued development in the field of AI provided impetus for improved methods of collection of semen and its preservation. The development in the cryopreservation protocols for future use culminating into the modern techniques of sperm preservation was a natural outcome of the progression of AI. Until mid 1800s, the efforts to actually freeze sperm did not start. Later in 186628, Mantegazza became the first to visualize the need of banks for frozen human sperm. Around 150 years later, when the servicemen who were capable and without a doubt opted to freeze and store specimens of their sperm before leaving for battle during the Gulf war crises in 199229, the vision of Mantegazza's turned into reality. The substantial groundwork of Polge with glycerol laid the foundation for the cryopreservation of human sperm30. In 1953, Sherman froze human sperms using glycerol with slow cooling of sperm and dry ice as refrigerant. He further established that on thawing of frozen sperm samples, the thawed sperm retained their fertilizing potential and induced normal development of the egg24 which led to the first successful human pregnancy with frozen sperm. As a result of these improvements, the concept of sperm banking came into existence.

In vitro fertilization (IVF) revolution

The upsurge from AI to IVF was a massive one, both experimentally and publically. Semen preparation techniques were developed and intrauterine insemination became popular, being more safe and painless. During 1920-1930s, the role of hormones in reproduction and conception was substantially examined; this led to the use of synthetic hormone substitutes in the 1940s which today form an essential part of all infertility treatments. The history of early attempts of IVF dates back to 1890 when Prof. Walter Heape reported the first case of embryo transplantation in rabbits in Cambridge university31. By the end of the 18th century, the concepts of reproduction became clear and fertilization was described as the fusion of nuclei of male sperm and the female egg32, and embryo thus created in vitro laid a significant milestone due to its potential ability to progress to blastocyst stage, getting implanted and be carried out to full-term gestation. Around 80 years, later Robert G. Edwards and Patrick Steptoe performed the successful IVF in human leading to birth of Louise Joy Brown, the first test tube baby on July 25, 197833.

In vitro fertilization - The Indian scenario

The history of IVF in India for infertility treatments has come a long way. Just 69 days after the birth of Louise Brown, Dr. Subhas Mukherjee - an Indian scientist from Kolkata announced the birth of Kanupriya alias Durga following an IVF procedure using cryopreserved embryo on October 3, 1978, world's second and India's first test tube baby. Unfortunately, his work could not be published in the absence of scientific evidence. The detailed work of Subhash Mukherjee was later submitted in the form of a report to the Government of West Bengal, India, his significant work in IVF was also presented at the Indian Science Congress in 1978 and was also published in 197834. Dr Mukherjee developed novel and relatively unknown techniques at that time such as use of gonadotropins for ovarian stimulation, cryopreservation techniques, freezing, storing and thawing the embryos3536.

In 1982, the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) a pioneering Indian organization in the field of Biomedical Sciences took initiative realizing the importance of treatment of infertility and initiated a project (led by T.C. Anand Kumar and Indira Hinduja) at its Institute for Research in Reproduction (now ICMR-National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health) at Mumbai. As a result, India's first fully scientifically documented test tube baby, ‘Harsha’, was born on August 6, 198637. Due to ever increasing demand for management of infertility in country led to the mushrooming of the IVF clinics in the country. ART in India is facing major safety concerns and risks that need to be evaluated at a large scale since in the absence of any regulations, the services offered by the ART clinics are questionable. To regulate these clinics the ICMR developed the National Guidelines for Accreditation, Supervision and Regulation of ART Clinics in India in 200538 which were later translated into Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Bill, 201739 and Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill, 201640.

Conclusion

The rapid evolution of ART for the treatment of infertile couple was among one of the extraordinary restorative accomplishments all through the world. Infertility has remained a social taboo since ages; with changing times and rapid developments taking place in the field of modern science, our philosophies have evolved eventually but the desire of the child, a family successor continues to be a major concern. The researchers continued to make dynamic advances in the journey that probably began centuries ago, and led to improvements in the modern medicine giving a ray of hope to the millions of infertile couples towards finding suitable treatment options for them. Thus extensive refinement of techniques in the field of assisted reproductive technology open up opportunities finding solutions to fertility problems for wider population, which in the ancient times were considered impossible to overcome.

Financial support & sponsorship:

None.

Conflicts of Interest:

None.

References

  1. , . Mother nature: Maternal instincts and how they shape the human species. Texas, USA: Ballantine Books; .
  2. , . Researchers link maternal instincts. Virginia, USA Today: Tots' Smiles; Virginia. USA Today 2008 July 7
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , . Maternal instinct. In: Women's studies encyclopedia. Vol 2. Santa Barbara, California, USA: Greenwood Publishing Group; . p. :896-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Preceden. History of Major Religions. Available from: https://www.preceden.com/timelines/48775-history-of-majorreligions
  5. Ancient History Encyclopedia. Religion Timeline. Available from: https://www.ancient.eu/timeline/religion/
  6. , , , . Hinduism and reproduction in contemporary India: Vedic learnings. In: Faith and fertility: Attitudes towards reproductive practices indifferent religions from ancient to modern times. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; . p. :111-36.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , . The Mahabharata and reproductive endocrinology. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2016;20:404-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , . Understanding male infertility through clinical experience - An ayurvedic approach. . AYUR SURABHI. Available from: http://www.sjsach.org.in/wp-content/ uploads/2015/01/Ayursurabhi-Jul-Aug-2014.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , . The social position of women. In: Women in Ugarit and Israel: Their social and religious position in the context of the ancient Near East. Leiden, Netherland: Koninklijke Brill NV; . p. :43-454.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , . Infertile women of the bible. In: Infertility: A survival guide for couples and those who love them. Birmingham, Alabama: New Hope Publishers; .
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , . The woman in ancient sumer: Gleanings from sumerian literature. In: La Femme dans le Proche-Orient Antique compte rendv de la XXXIIIe recontre assyriologique international (paris 7-10 juliet 1986). . p. :109.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , . Hannah's ordeal of childlessness: Interpreting 1 samuel 1 through the prism of a childless African woman in a Polygynous family. Old Testam Essays. 2015;28:581-605.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. An Introduction to Polygamy in Islam. . The Religion of Islam. Available from: https://www.islamreligion. com/articles/325/an-introduction-to-polygamy-in-islam/
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , . Infertility and surrogacy in Islamic society: Socio-cultural, psychological, ethical, and religious dilemmas. Open Psychol J. 2013;6:54-60.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , . Polygamy and Islam. Available from: http://www. muslim-library.com/dl/books/English_Polygamy_and_Islam. pdf
  16. , . The history of human infertility. Fertil Steril. 1963;14:261-72.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , . Hippocrates: Timeless still. J R Soc Med. 2013;106:288-92.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , . de natis e` semine genital animalculis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 1678. ;12:1040-3.
  19. , , , . Spermatozoa: A Historical perspective. Int J Fertil Steril. 2018;12:182-90.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , (Transed), . Dissertations relative to the natural history of animals and vegetables. Vol 2. London: J. Murray; .
  21. , , , , , , . FRII-03 Lazzaro Spallanzani (1729-1799): The first successful artificial insemination experiments. J Urol. 2016;195(4 Suppl):e521.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , . The history of artificial insemination: Selected notes and notables. J Anim Sci. 2002;80:1-10.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , . On the use of artificial insemination for zootechnical purposes in Russia. J Agric Sci. 1922;12:244-56.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , . Artificial insemination history: Hurdles and milestones. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2015;7:137-43.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , . The role of artificial insemination in the treatment of human sterility. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1943;19:573-91.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , . The impregnators. Fertil Steril. 1965;16:130-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , . Reproductive biotechnologies in Indian cattle. Vet Sci Res. 2018;3:000149.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , , . The history of sperm cryopreservation. In: Sperm banking: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; . p. :1-10.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. , . Assisted reproduction: historical background. Glob Bioeth. 2001;14:69-74.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , . Revival of spermatozoa after vitrification and dehydration at low temperatures. Nature. 1949;164:666.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. , . Walter heape, FRS: A pioneer in reproductive biology. Centenary of his embryo transfer experiments. J Reprod Fertil. 1991;93:173-86.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. , , . Discovery of the nature of the process of fertilization and of the role of nuclear structures in this process (on the centenary of the discovery) Tsitologiia. 1976;18:655-67.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. , , . Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet. 1978;2:366.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. , , , . The feasibility of long term cryogenic freezing of viable human embryos – A brief pilot study report. Indian J Cryogenics. 1978;3:80.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. , , eds. Architect of India's first test tube baby: Dr. Subhas Mukherjee. Kolkata: Dr. Subhas Mukherjee Memorial Reproductive Biology Research Centre; .
  36. , . Architect of India's first test tube baby: Dr. Subhas Mukerji (16 Jan, 1931 to 19 July, 1981) Curr Sci 1997. ;72:526-31.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. , , , , , , . In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in India. ICMR Bull. 1986;16:41-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. , , , , . National guidelines for accreditation, supervision & regulation of ART clinics in India. New Delhi: Indian Council of Medical Research; .
  39. Indian Council of Medical Research. Draft: The Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Bill-2017. New Delhi: Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India; .
  40. Indian Council of Medical Research. Draft: The Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill, 2016. New Delhi: Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India; .
Show Sections
Scroll to Top