Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Commentary
134 (
3
); 253-255

Genetic polymorphism of drug refractory epilepsy

Center for Advanced Research in Pharmacogenomics, Department of Pharmacology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry 605 006, India
Genomics & Molecular Medicine, Institute of Genomics & Integrative Biology, Mall Road, Delhi 110 007, India

+For correspondence: adithan@yahoo.com

Read COMMENTARY-ARTICLE associated with this -

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder affecting over 50 million people worldwide with distinct symptoms, aetiology and prognosis. In India, it is estimated that there are 55,00,000 persons with epilepsy and prevalence rate of epilepsy is 5.59 per 1,000 population1. Current treatment regimens for epilepsy focus on seizure suppression or prorogation. Although epileptic seizures can be effectively controlled with anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) in up to 70-80 per cent of patients, about one third of patients are drug-refractory despite optimal AED treatment2.

An important characteristic of drug resistant epilepsy is that many patients are resistant to several, if not all anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs). Based on several studies it was reported that patients who fail to respond to first-line or second-line AED therapy will develop drug resistance, even on using AEDs acting via diverse mechanisms3. Drug-resistant epilepsy affects individual health and the quality of life, with heavy burden on society. Studies have shown that drug refractory epilepsy imposes serious threats to patient's life which include neuropsychological illness, psychiatric and social impairment, reduced marriage rates and decreased life span4. Further, only a subgroup of refractory patients responds to surgery or other specialized treatments and make them seizure free but others will continue to have seizures2. Identifying the factors that contribute to drug resistance is, therefore, a major challenge, with a potentially significant impact on clinical practice.

The plausible factors for drug resistance could be environmental and seizure related causes. But, there are reports conferring running of epilepsy among families, indicating a possible genetic cause for the disease. Genetic causes have gained attention for both epilepsy as well as drug resistance. For various cases, the causes and response to treatment are closely related. This holds true for various sodium channel mutations implicated in disease and also acting as novel targets for various AEDs. Identification of predictive markers for drug resistance may revolutionize the existing treatment strategies. There are reports about the associations between many genetic variations and clinical drug resistance; however, none of these associations has been unequivocally replicated5. Two separate studies done in south and north Indian patients were also not able to find any evidence for association67. Therefore, further exhaustive studies about the influence of genetic variations on drug resistance may be valuable.

The two well known hypotheses for understanding the biological mechanism underlying multidrug resistance are the target and transporter hypotheses38. In target hypothesis, epilepsy-induced alterations in specific drug targets (reduction in sensitivity) such as sodium channels have also been a major cause for pharmacoresistant epilepsy9. Transporter hypothesis suggests that increased expression of efflux transporter p-glycoprotein (P-gp), encoded by ATP binding cassette (ABCB1) gene, leads to decreased bioavailability and limited brain access of antiepileptic drugs that may result in drug resistance. As we know, AEDs are lipophilic in nature and P-gp transporters have a wide variety of specificity for lipohilic molecules10 but still, most commonly used anticonvulsants namely carbamazepine and sodium valproate were not found to be a substrate to P-gp1112. Phenytoin was shown to be a weak substrate of P-gp and non-ABC transporter such as RLIP76 may also be involved in transporting this drug in blood brain barrier13. Thus, there may be alternative mechanisms behind the development of drug resistance to these specific drugs which needs to be explored11.

Recently, CYP2C19 a polymorphic drug metabolizing enzyme (DME) was shown to be associated with clobazam response14. The responder rate was significantly greater in CYP2C19 poor metabolizers and CYP2C19 heterozygous extensive metabolizer than in CYP2C19 homozygous extensive metabolizers. However, studies are sparse which demonstrate the association between multiple AEDs resistance and drug metabolizing enzymes. A study by Ufer et al15showed that heterozygous CYP2C9*3 were under-represented among non-responders to AEDs in Caucasians epileptic patients.

In this issue, Lakhan et al16 explored the possible association between CYP2C gene polymorphisms and resistances to AEDs in Indian epileptic patients. Authors have shown the distribution of variant genotypes of CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 in patients with drug resistance and responder to AEDs. They observed CYP2C9*3 variant allele frequency was under-represented in drug resistant patients compared to responder patients. They did not find any significant association between variants of CYP2C19 in drug resistance/responder. Hence, it was suggested that the carrier of CYP2C9*3 may contribute towards lower risk for developing multiple drug resistance in epileptic patients. In Indian population, the frequency of CYP2C9FNx013 was 8 per cent17. A recent study by Kesavan et al18 demonstrated the association of CYP2C9*3 in development of phenytoin-induced neurological toxicity in Indian population. However, the clinical significance of these studies should be carefully interpreted. Multicentric studies in large number of samples involving all major ethnic groups in India are needed to confirm these findings. If we find positive association with high degree of statistical significance, screening for CYP2C9*3 genotype may help the clinicians in predicting the responders and non-responders for AEDs as well as risk for developing phenytoin toxicity.

The database for variant alleles of genes encoding for drug metabolizing enzymes, transporters and channels (CYP1A2, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP3A4, EPHX1, UGT1A1, UGT2B7, MDR1, SCN1A, SCN1B, and SCN2A) are available for healthy volunteers171920 as well as for Indian epileptic patients21. This information may be useful for future studies of drug resistance in epilepsy. Not only the candidate gene studies but also whole exome sequencing (WES), transcriptional studies in surgery-resected brain tissue from patients with drug-resistant epilepsies, gene expression studies and multidisciplinary approaches, including neuropathology and imaging are important to understand their mechanisms.

References

  1. , , . Prevalence and pattern of epilepsy in India. Epilepsia. 1999;40:631-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . Genetic association studies in epilepsy pharmacogenomics: lessons learnt and potential applications. Pharmacogenomics. 2006;7:731-45.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . Epilepsy pharmacogenetics. Pharmacogenomics. 2009;10:817-36.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , . The consequences of uncontrolled epilepsy. CNS Spectr. 2004;9:98-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , . Genetics of drug resistance. Epilepsia. 2005;46:33-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . No association of ABCB1 polymorphisms with drug-refractory epilepsy in a north Indian population. Epilepsy Behav. 2009;14:78-82.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , . Analysis of genotype and haplotype effects of ABCB1 (MDR1) polymorphisms in the risk of medically refractory epilepsy in an Indian population. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2009;24:255-60.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , . Intrinsic severity as a determinant of antiepileptic drug refractoriness. Epilepsy Curr. 2008;8:127-30.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . Multidrug resistance in epilepsy and polymorphisms in the voltage-gated sodium channel genes SCN1A, SCN2A, and SCN3A: correlation among phenotype, genotype, and mRNA expression. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2008;18:989-98.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , . Drug resistance in epilepsy: putative neurobiologic and clinical mechanisms. Epilepsia. 2005;46:858-77.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , . Carbamazepine is not a substrate for P-glycoprotein. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;51:345-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , . Mechanisms of drug resistance in epilepsy: relevance for antiepileptic drug discovery. Expert Opin Drug Discovery. 2009;4:23-32.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , . RLIP76, a non-ABC transporter, and drug resistance in epilepsy. BMC Neurosci. 2005;6:61.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , . Impact of CYP2C19 polymorphisms on the efficacy of clobazam therapy. Pharmacogenomics. 2008;9:527-37.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , . Non-response to antiepileptic pharmacotherapy is associated with the ABCC2 -24C>T polymorphism in young and adult patients with epilepsy. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2009;19:353-62.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , . Possible role of CYP2C9 & CYP2C19 single nucleotide polymorphisms in drug refractory epilepsy. Indian J Med Res. 2011;134:295-301.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , . CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms: frequencies in the south Indian population. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2005;19:101-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , . Influence of CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms on phenytoin-induced neurological toxicity in Indian epileptic patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;66:689-96.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , . Allele and genotype frequency of MDR1 C3435T in Tamilian population. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2006;21:506-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , . Genetic polymorphisms of drug-metabolizing phase I enzymes CYP2E1, CYP2A6 and CYP3A5 in South Indian population. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 2011 101111/j1472-8206201000917x
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , , . Genetic profile of patients with epilepsy on first-line antiepileptic drugs and potential directions for personalized treatment. Pharmacogenomics. 2010;11:927-41.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    13

    PDF downloads
    9
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections
    Scroll to Top