Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
143 (
5
); 633-635
doi:
10.4103/0971-5916.187112

Frequency of Mia antigen: A pilot study among blood donors

Department of Transfusion Medicine, Molecular Biology & Transplant Immunology, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi, India

Reprint requests: Dr R.N. Makroo, Department of Transfusion Medicine, Molecular Biology & Transplant Immunology, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, Sarita Vihar, New Delhi 110 076, India e-mail: makroo@apollohospitals.com/ raj_makroo@hotmail.com

Licence

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

The Miltenberger (Mi) classes represent a group of phenotypes for red cells that carry low frequency antigens associated with the MNSs blood group system. This pilot study was aimed at determining the Mia antigen positivity in the blood donor population in a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi, India. The study was performed between June to August 2014 on eligible blood donors willing to participate. Antigen typing was performed using monoclonal anti-Mia antiserum by tube technique. Only one of the 1000 blood donors (0.1%) tested was found to be Mia antigen positive. The Mia antigen can, therefore, be considered as being rare in the Indian blood donor population.

Keywords

Miltenberger
Mia antigen
MNSs blood group

The Miltenberger (Mi) classes represent a group of phenotypes for red cells that carry low frequency antigens associated with the MNSs blood group system. The Mia antigen is expressed on several glycophorin variants that are hybrids between the usual forms of glycophorin A and B1. Anti-Mia was first described in 1951 by Levine and co-workers2 in the serum of Mrs. Miltenberger, who developed this antibody in response to immunization from her antigen positive foetus. The corresponding antigen was named after her2. The incidence of the blood group antigen Mia among most populations is low345. Higher frequencies of occurrence are, however, noted in the Chinese and South East Asians678. Anti-Mia is also frequently reported among the South East Asians especially the Chinese9101112.

The antigen frequencies in Indian population have not been documented. This pilot study was aimed at determining the Mia antigen positivity in blood donor population attending a tertiary care hospital in north India.

This study was carried out in the department of Transfusion Medicine, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi, India, between June and August 2014, on apparently healthy blood donors, after being approved by the institutional Ethical Committee. All donors coming to the department for blood donation during the study period were assessed as per the screening criteria laid down by the Drug and Cosmetics Act, 194013. Donors found fit to donate blood after initial screening were informed about the Mia antigen testing. The first 1000 donors giving written informed consent to participate in the study were included.

Blood donation was taken as per the departmental protocols. Blood samples (4 ml) collected in tubes containing EDTA (ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid) were subjected to Mia antigen testing using monoclonal anti Mia-antiserum (Immucor Inc. Norcross, GA, USA). The tests were performed using “tube technology” by adding two drops of anti-Mia antiserum to one drop of 2-4 per cent red cell suspension. The tubes were incubated for 15 min at room temperature and centrifuged. The haemagglutination reaction was read thereafter. Positive and negative controls using known Mia antigen positive and negative cells were run along with each batch of tests.

Of the 1000 donors tested, only one was found to be Mia antigen positive. The Mia positive donor was a 42 yr old Hindu male. The overall frequency of Mia antigen in this pilot study was 0.1 per cent.

The Miltenberger is a series of relatively rare phenotypes associated with the MNSs system, related to each other through the overlapping specificities of a number of low frequency alloantigens1. As the series became more complex with the incorporation of several new variants, a terminology based on glycophorins (Glycophorin. Vw, Glycophorin. Hop, etc.) was suggested by Tippett and co-workers in 19923. This new terminology has been widely accepted and has replaced the original concept of ‘Miltenberger subclasses’.

Since, the Mia antigen is present on red cells of many Miltenberger phenotypes, the existence of Mia antigen as an independent entity was questioned until Chen et al in 200114 reported the first monoclonal anti-Mia, thereby confirming the existence of the Mia antigen.

The frequency of Mia has been reported to be less than one per 1000 among Caucasians, Negro and Japanese people345, but in South-East Asia, the frequency in Chinese blood donors in Hong Kong was 6.28 per cent15, 88 per cent in the Ami, mountain people of Taiwan7 and 9.6 per cent in Malaysian blood donors16.

Anti-Mia is regarded as clinically significant and has been reported in high frequency in the South East Asians9101112. It has been reported as the most frequently detected alloantibody in immunized patients in Malaysia17 as well as in Taiwan9. The frequency of Mia antigen observed in this pilot study in the Indian population was comparable to that reported in literature for Caucasians and other populations345, however, it was much lower than reported in the Chinese and other South-East Asian populations71516. At a frequency of 0.1 per cent, Mia can be considered a low frequency antigen and incorporation of regular screening for corresponding antibodies during the pre-transfusion testing may not be necessary. However, considering the expansion in medical tourism in India and an influx of patients from various Asian and African countries, the need for screening for anti-Mia needs to be further evaluated. Besides, this being a pilot study of only 1000 subjects, a larger study is required to accurately determine the frequency of Mia antigen in the Indian population.

Acknowledgment

Authors thank Immuncor Inc., USA for providing reagents for performance of the tests.

Conflicts of Interest: None.

References

  1. , . Human blood groups (2nd ed). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; .
  2. , , , , . A new human blood factor of rare incidence in the general population. Proc Soc Exp Biol. 1951;77:402-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . The Miltenberger subsystem: is it obsolescent? Transfus Med Rev. 1992;6:170-82.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , . Incidence of the blood group antigen Mia in the Caucasian and Negro populations of Western New York. Transfusion. 1961;1:392-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , . The blood group antigen Mia in Japanese. Vox Sang. 1963;8:430-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , . Immunohematology in Taiwan. Transfus Med Rev. 1998;12:56-72.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , . The distribution of the MiIII (Gp.Mur) phenotype among the population of Taiwan. Transfusion Med. 1996;6:145-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , . The blood group antigen facts book. (2nd ed). London: Academic Press; .
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , . Incidence of alloantibodies in transfused patients in Eastern Taiwan. Tzu Chi Med J. 2009;21:66-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , . The incidence and significance of anti-Mia in Taiwan. Transfusion. 1994;34:349-52.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , . Serologic characteristics and clinical significance of Miltenberger antibodies among Chinese patients in Hong Kong. Vox Sang. 1998;74:59-60.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , . Prevalence and specificity of clinically significant red cell alloantibodies in Chinese women during pregnancy-a review of cases from 1997 to 2001. Transfus Med. 2003;13:227-31.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Part XIIB. Department of Health Schedule F. The Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945, as amended up to 30th June. . Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. New Delhi: Government of India; :326. Available from: http://www.cdsco.nic.in/DrugsandCosmeticAct.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , . Direct evidence for the existence of Miltenbergera antigen. Vox Sang. 2001;80:230-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , . The MiIII phenotype among Chinese donors in Hong Kong: immunochemical and serological studies. Transfus Med. 1991;1:169-75.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , . Red cell phenotyping of blood from donors at the National blood center of Malaysia. Asian J Transfus Sci. 2012;6:3-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , . Incidence of red cell alloantibody among the transfusion recipients of Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2013;29:65-70.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    12

    PDF downloads
    6
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections
    Scroll to Top