Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Editorial
158 (
2
); 101-105
doi:
10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_1574_23

Evidence-based traditional medicine for transforming global health & wellbeing

Journal of Ayurveda & Integrative Medicine, Ramkumar Rathi Patanjali Yoga Chair, School of Health Sciences, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, S-VYASA Yoga University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
AYU Journal, Institute of Teaching & Research in Ayurveda, Jamnagar, Gujarat, India
International Journal of Ayurveda Research, All India Institute of Ayurveda, New Delhi, India
Journal of Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, New Delhi, India
Journal of Drug Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, New Delhi, India
Journal of Ayurveda, National Institute of Ayurveda, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
External Advisory Group for the WHO Traditional Medicine Global Summit, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
TCI Unit, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
Journal Editors Endorsing Editorial, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
Department of Family & Community Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
Complementary Therapies in Medicine, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
United Nations University International Institute for Global Health, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Traditional & Complementary Medicine Division, Ministry of Health, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Institute of Thai Traditional Medicine, Nonthaburi, Thailand
Department of Medicine & Primary Care, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Department of Persian Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Department of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Oncology & Hematology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin
Journal of Complementary & Integrative Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen Chair of Complementary & Integrative Medicine, Essen, Germany
Health Promotion Forum, Auckland, New Zealand

*For correspondence: bpatwardhan@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

In the current Anthropocene epoch, characterized by intensified, human-induced environmental crises, natural disasters the interconnectedness of human health and the health of the planet has become more evident with the resulting responsibility to promote healthy living conditions1. In our interconnected world, health challenges transcend borders, and addressing them necessitates comprehensive solutions that consider the complex interplay of factors influencing health outcomes. The COVID-19 pandemic has shown that current healthcare systems have limitations and vulnerabilities. This highlights the importance of adopting preventive and health promoting strategies that go beyond national boundaries. Concepts such as planetary health and One Health are emerging as integrated, unifying strategies to optimize the health of people, animals, plants, and the planetary ecosystem.

To address the complex global challenges of the 21st century including: geopolitical conflicts, economic crises, environmental disasters, and pandemics, it is crucial to rethink healthcare. This reimagining is essential for successfully reaching the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and creating a better and more sustainable future for everyone. It is critical to carefully address the social and environmental determinants of health beyond conventional notions of healthcare limited to sick care is critical. Agreeably, healthcare must prioritize explicitly the wellbeing and prosperity of individuals and communities looking more broadly at social policies impacting health such as agriculture and food, transportation, city planning, housing, racism, sexism, gun safety, criminal justice, war and peace. Embracing principles such as Universal Health Coverage (UHC), preventive healthcare, multi-sectoral collaborations, social justice, environmental responsibility, and digital technology innovations can pave the way for more equitable and resilient societies.

Governments and agencies worldwide recognize the need for transformative reforms through conducive policies and declarations. The Declaration of Astana 2018, the Helsinki Declaration 2020, and the Geneva Charter for Well-being 2021, developed by the World Health Organization (WHO), advocate a wellbeing economy with a primary focus on primary healthcare to achieve equity, social justice, and community empowerment. Moreover, the Shanghai Declaration 2016 and WHO Traditional Medicine Strategy acknowledge the growing importance of Indigenous Knowledge (IK) and Traditional Medicine (TM) in advancing health goals. There is a growing consensus to decolonize the restrictive idea of IK/TM and expand its vision to include traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine and health systems.

For centuries, TM has been an integral resource for health in households and communities. The WHO recognizes the value and diversity of the cultures of Indigenous Peoples and local communities, along with their traditional knowledge. To attain the health related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the WHO’s Triple Billion Targets, which aim to ensure universal health coverage, protection from health emergencies, and improved wellbeing for over one billion people, concerted efforts are being made. The WHO is committed to exploring ways to integrate evidence-based traditional and complementary medicine services, particularly for primary healthcare, to achieve UHC and ensure healthy lives and wellbeing for all. The WHO global report on Traditional and Complementary Medicine 2019 and the WHO Traditional Medicine Strategy: 2014-2023 remain valuable resources for governments, system planners, and health practitioners2. In this editorial, we use the broader concept involving IK and Traditional, Complementary, and Integrative Medicine (hereinafter referred to as TCIM) as a holistic system for planetary health and wellbeing.

Numerous health seeking behaviour studies indicate that over 80 per cent of people from both low- and high-income countries want to use TCIM for their health related problems. The WHO has received requests from member States to integrate TCIM with conventional healthcare and provide evidence and data to inform policies, standards, and regulations for its safe, equitable, and cost-effective use. Consequently, the 76th World Health Assembly in May 2023 resolved to develop a new WHO Global Strategy for Traditional Medicine 2025-2034, recognizing the benefits of TCIM demonstrated in managing various health conditions including the COVID-19 pandemic.

Traditional, Complementary, and Integrative Medicine (TCIM) for global health

In the current healthcare scenario, the experiential wisdom of IK/TCIM systems can be a valuable ally in providing a holistic and culturally sensitive approach to healthcare. Integrating TCIM into conventional healthcare systems has the potential to promote universal well-being, affordability, access, and equity in line with the principles of planetary health. TCIM systems encompass a diverse range of traditional healing practices, including: Indian Ayurveda, Yoga, Unani, Siddha, Sowa Rigpa, Naturopathy, Homeopathy, and herbal medicine; and various other indigenous healing systems worldwide such as African, European, American aboriginal, Australian Bush, Indonesian Jamu, Malay, Māori, Persian, Tibetan, Thai, and Traditional medicine of East Asia (Japanese Kampo, Korean and Traditional Chinese medicine) just to mention a few. By embracing the diversity of traditional healing practices, we can create a more inclusive and equitable healthcare system that values the experiential wisdom and knowledge of different cultures and societies.

TCIM focuses on prevention and lifestyle interventions aligning with the SDGs’ targets on health promotion and disease prevention. Herbal medicine, fasting, forest and nature-based therapies, and practices like Yoga, Tai Chi, Qigong, and mindfulness meditation have been used for centuries to strengthen the body’s resistance and enhance resilience. Prioritizing prevention empowers healthy living, good nutrition, coping with stress reducing chronic diseases, and enhancing wellbeing. In contrast to the typically reductionist approach of conventional medicine, TM emphasizes the interconnectedness of mind, body, and spirit, taking into consideration the relationship between the planetary environment and the social and political systems in which we live.

Mainstreaming TCIM into primary healthcare systems can bridge access gaps, making healthcare more inclusive, culturally sensitive, and equitable. This, in turn, can foster sustainable development by empowering local communities, supporting traditional healers, and promoting eco-friendly healing practices. TCIM also supports local herbal medicine industries, traditional healing centers, and wellness tourism, thus stimulating economic growth in rural and marginalized areas, and contributing to sustainable development and poverty reduction.

Evidence-based integration

Evidence-based integration is vital in bridging the gaps in conventional healthcare which is more about symptomatic care based on the diagnose-dispense-refer model. More attention should be given to patient education and addressing the root causes of illness which might have historical, social, nutritional, and environmental origins. TCIM approaches can facilitate the shift from a reactive sick-care approach to proactive preventive measures, leading to better health outcomes in the long run. Conventional medicine demonstrates proficiency in areas such as: in diagnostics, emergency care, surgeries, infection management, and symptomatic relief through powerful pharmaceutical drugs. On the other hand, TCIM distinguishes itself with its person-centered approach, emphasizing a holistic view that considers the interplay of mind, body, and environment. It focuses on building natural resilience, adaptability, and managing non-communicable and psychosomatic chronic conditions. Combining the strengths of both systems enables a more comprehensive and personalized approach to healthcare.

TCIM integration supports cultural preservation, acknowledging the importance of traditional knowledge and wisdom. TCIM systems also offer additional tools to address emerging health challenges, including antimicrobial resistance and emerging infectious diseases. Building global partnerships and sharing best practices in TCIM can foster cross-cultural understanding and collaboration, leading to a more inclusive and culturally sensitive approach to healthcare. It is possible that by embracing the principles of TCIM and integrating them into mainstream healthcare, we can promote affordability, accessibility, and better health outcomes for all. It is time for a paradigm shift from a disease-oriented approach to a holistic healthcare model that respects the diversity of healing traditions and empowers individuals and communities to take charge of their health and wellbeing. With evidence based integration and collaborative efforts, TCIM can lead to a healthy and sustainable future for the next generations.

Undoubtedly, the TCIM systems play a crucial role in global public health, planetary health, holistic wellbeing, and equitable healthcare. To ensure successful integration, research using appropriate methods is imperative. Equally important are fair mechanisms for protecting intellectual property rights, benefit sharing, and promoting equitable access to TCIM. Initiatives such as Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL) from the Government of India (GoI) remain useful in this direction.

Collaborations between TCIM practitioners, conventional medical professionals, and researchers can pave the way for evidence based integration. While the integration of TCIM holds immense promise, it also presents challenges that need to be addressed. Along with evidence of efficacy, assurance of safety, quality, standardization of practices, products, training of practitioners, pharmacovigilance, regulatory controls, and ethical considerations are key areas requiring attention among others. Collaboration and dialogue between governments, healthcare professionals, and local communities on policy frameworks for integration of TCIM is necessary.

WHO Global Center for Traditional Medicine

In this context, we commend the WHO leadership, particularly Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, for his unwavering commitment to engaging all stakeholders, including governments, experts, and civil society organizations (CSOs) in meaningful consultations. Dr. Tedros’ acknowledgment of Traditional Medicine’s deep-rooted knowledge and resources in communities reinforces TCIM’s integral role within health systems worldwide, providing vital support to millions of people. Recognizing the growing global interest in TCIM, the WHO, with the generous support of the GoI, has established the Global Centre for Traditional Medicine (GCTM) in Jamnagar, Gujarat, India. Aligned with the Indian philosophy of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam (One World-One Family-One Future), the GCTM aims to be a beacon of knowledge, combining ancient wisdom with modern science to catalyze transformative progress for the health and prosperity of humanity and the planet3. Its multidimensional approach focuses on evidence and learning, data and analytics, sustainability and equity, and innovation and technology to underpin global health and sustainable development.

As a noteworthy stride towards achieving health and wellbeing for all, the GCTM is organizing the first WHO Traditional Medicine Global Summit (TMGS) on August 17-18, 2023, in Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India. Co-hosted by the WHO and the Government of India, and co-branded with the G20 Ministers meeting, this landmark event will serve as a platform for policymakers and stakeholders to share best practices, innovations, data, and scientific evidence on the invaluable contributions of TCIM to global health, wellbeing, and sustainable development. The Summit will set a precedent for international health discourse, fostering cooperation among nations and transcending geographical boundaries. With a focus on advancing traditional medicine to the forefront of healthcare strategies, the Summit will forge new partnerships, ignite innovative ideas, and cultivate a shared commitment to achieving health and wellbeing for all.

As the GCTM embarks on a mission and strategic plan towards a healthier and more sustainable future, we express gratitude to the WHO and the Ministry of Ayush, GoI, for their leadership and generous support in establishing this transformative force for global good. Together, as a global family, we honour the legacy of ancient wisdom and acknowledge its impact on our present and a pivotal role in shaping our future. The establishment of the GCTM and the Summit is a milestone exhibiting reinforcement of our commitment to scientific development in TCIM systems for global health and wellbeing.

Pivotal recommendations

At this historical juncture, the WHO Expert Advisory Group proposes five pivotal recommendations: First, harness the contribution of TCIM to advancing planetary health and wellbeing at all ages by ensuring regional and culturally appropriate nutrition and lifestyle for a sustainable environment and promoting a wellbeing economy framework recognizing the value of indigenous knowledge that stood the test of time. Second, encourage more transdisciplinary research, develop appropriate methods, and enhance research funding to TCIM for innovation, technology, and translation commensurate with public demand and use. Third, strengthen strategies for information, education, and communication to create more awareness about the importance of scientific evidence, and promote understanding and trust among all stakeholders in multisectoral partnerships to co-develop international standards and accreditation systems for practice, regulation, and to advance knowledge from TCIM. Fourth, redefine laws, policies, and health services to enable holistic, informed, seamless choices with a transformative focus on prevention, primary care, planetary health, and wellbeing rather than simply distributing integrated cure services and interventions. Fifth, shift political and economic models beyond mere profits to promote equity of access, rights, shared benefits, financial protection, and incentives to make TCIM a driving force in achieving health related SDGs, planetary health, and wellbeing for all.

Towards planetary health and wellbeing

The evolution in medical systems over the past few decades has led from eminence-based medicine to evidence-based medicine, and transmuting to increasingly patient-centered medicine. With more focus on preventive and resource oriented medicine considering the entirety of humans and the ecosystem in the sense of One Health, planetary health, and wellbeing, TM offers approaches for the promotion of health and wellbeing. In several regions, experiences of evidence-based integration of TCIM with conventional healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic have been encouraging4. This is the time to break pathy-based silos to transgress from the EGO system to the ECO system prioritizing mutual respect, public needs, and global good5. We may envisage the integration of TCIM and conventional medicine as a modern healthcare system in the future.

We are confident that the WHO GCTM and the first TMGS will stimulate cross-cultural, transdisciplinary, intellectual dialogue converging into a pathbreaking declaration. The Summit can also enable the global community to a resilient health system integrating evidence-based, patient-centered healthcare systems for more inclusive, culturally sensitive, and equitable healthcare. With concerted efforts and a shared vision, we can harness the immense potential of time-honored healing traditions to transform lives and our planet.

Author contributions: Bhushan Patwardhan conceptualized and created the first draft. All the Members of the WHO External Advisory Group for TMGS endorsed the idea and the final manuscript. L Susan Wieland, Anchalee Chuthaputti, Roshanak Ghods, Goh Cheng Soon, Georg Seifert, Sione Tu’itahi, Ricardo Ghelman, Shyama Kuruvilla, Kim Sung Chol, and Kathi Kemper critically reviewed the draft, added content, and offered valuable suggestions for improvement. Participating Editors reviewed, endorsed and agreed to publish it online/in print.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Acknowledgment:

We thank the WHO and the Government of India especially the Ministry of Ayush for their kind encouragement and support. We also thank publishers Elsevier, Mary Ann Liebert, Medknow (Wolters Kluwer Health), Council for Scientific and Industrial Research and Indian Council of Medical Research, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, Government of India for participating in this joint publication initiative in the larger interest of public health. Our thanks to Chunyu Wei for her contributions as a member of the External Advisory Group for the WHO Traditional Medicine Global Summit. We also thank Dr. Peush Sahni, Editor National Medical Journal of India and Dr. Samiran Panda, Editor Indian Journal of Medical Research for their valuable comments and support.

This editorial was first published in Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaim.2023.100790, on 8th August 2023, and has been re-published in this journal with permission and agreement of all the authors as well as the Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine. In accordance with the ICMJE guidelines, this article can be re-published in other journals in the larger public health interest. This is an open-access article distributed under CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 licence, which allows other journals to reproduce the work. This editorial will be published in Complementary Therapies in Medicine, Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine, Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, AYU, International Journal of Ayurveda Research, Journal of Ayurveda, Journal of Drug Research in Ayurveda Sciences, Journal of Research in Ayurvedic Sciences. The editors of these journals are co-authors of the article. The editorial is also being published in the Indian Journal of Medical Research and the National Medical Journal of India. This editorial may also be published in other journals agreeing to join in the future

References

  1. , , , , , , . Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: Report of the Rockefeller Foundation Lancet Commission on planetary health. Lancet. 2015;386:1973-2028.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. . Global report on traditional and complementary medicine. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/978924151536
  3. . Global center for traditional medicine; 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/initiatives/who-global-centre-for-traditional-medicine
  4. , . The journey with COVID-19: Initiatives by Ministry of AYUSH. J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2021;12:1-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . Transiting from pathy-based to people-centered holistic healthcare. J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2020;11:A1-3.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections
Scroll to Top