Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Book Reviews
148 (
2
); 245-246
doi:
10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_85_17

Evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants

Food Safety and Standards Authority of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India New Delhi 110 002, India
Licence

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

This publication is the 80th Report of the Joint FAO (Food Agricultural Organization of the United Nations)/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) held in Rome in June 16 to 25, 2015. This 80th meeting of JECFA was convened on the basis of the recommendation made by the 79th report of JECFA.

In this Report, the committee provided its views on the safety of five food additives for the first time and also re-evaluated the safety of one other. The dietary exposure to one previously evaluated food additive was also evaluated, and nine food additives were considered for revision of specifications.

The committee carried out exposure assessment of benzoate. Based on the reported use levels from industries and analytical measurements from literature, the committee noted that the levels were lower than the limit given in Codex General Standard for Food Additives which was 600 mg/l. It was also noted that the mean per capita benzoate exposure was below the upper bounds of the acceptable daily intake (ADI) for benzoates which is 0-5 mg/kg body weight (bw) expressed as benzoic acid.

For lipase from Fusarium heterosporum expressed in Ogataea (Hansenula) polymorpha, the committee established an ADI (acceptable daily intake) ‘not specified’ when used as per good manufacturing practices. Similarly, for maltotetrahydrolase from Pseudomonas stutzeri expressed in Bacillus licheniformis, the committee established an ADI ‘not specified’ when used as per good manufacturing practices. These two enzymes, however, would fall in the category of products derived from genetically modified organisms.

For mixed glucanase, cellulose and xylanase from Rasamsonia emersonii, also referred to as Penicillium emersonii, the committee established an ADI ‘not specified’ when used as per good manufacturing practices; for magnesium stearate and palmitate, an ADI ‘not specified’; however, with a warning that a combined high exposure may result in a laxative effect in the latter combination.

On polyvinyl alcohol-polyethylene glycol graft copolymer, the committee decided not to establish an ADI ‘not specified’, in view of the impurities, ethylene glycol and diethylene glycol present in the copolymer.

A revision of the specifications was recommended for advantame and annatto (solvent-extracted bixin and solvent-extracted norbixin) extracts, calcium silicate, amorphous silicon dioxide and sodium aluminium silicate. The committee decided to withdraw the tentative specifications for aluminium silicate and calcium aluminium silicate and also glycerol ester of gum rosin because it did not receive any relevant information on their technical specifications.

In addition to the above additives, the committee also evaluated two contaminants in the food chain. For contaminants in the category non-dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls, the persistent organic chemicals that accumulate in the environment and humans and associated with a broad spectrum of health effects, the committee recommended further toxicological studies. Regarding pyrrolizidine alkaloids naturally present in many plant species, the committee could not complete the toxicological evaluation because of the data gaps that were identified.

The report also contains the recommendations for future work of the committee. Overall, the book provides useful technical information to the academicians involved in toxicological research, the industry involved in food production and the food regulators on the status of the safety of certain food additives used in food industry, and assessment of the risk of certain newly identified contaminants in the human food chain.


    Fulltext Views
    13

    PDF downloads
    7
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections
    Scroll to Top