Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Commentary
135 (
4
); 454-455

Elevated blood pressure & effectiveness of comprehensive risk reduction programme

Department of Cardiology, Christian Medical College & Hospital, Vellore 632 004, India

Read COMMENTARY-ARTICLE associated with this -

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Worldwide the non communicable diseases are on the rise across all continents and irrespective of income status. These non communicable diseases now account for 60 per cent of deaths worldwide, and 80 per cent of these deaths occur in low or middle income countries where the effect is devastating because it affects someone in the prime of his life1. A recent report from World Health Organization2 identified six risk factors for death within the non communicable diseases. These risk factors are: high blood pressure, smoking, high blood glucose levels, physical inactivity, overweight and high cholesterol. Of these, hypertension is responsible for death of 7.5 millions and accounts for nearly 12 per cent of total deaths in the world. Data from INTERHEART3 and INTERSTROKE4 studies showed that Indian patients enrolled also place hypertension as a major risk factor that we need to worry about to prevent the disability due to cardiac related mortality and morbidity. The population attributable risk - PAR for hypertension was 17.9 for hypertension in the INTERHEART study and 34.6 in the INTERSTROKE study. Added to this is the fact that these risk factors are increasing in our country in both urban and rural populations5.

In this issue, the burden of elevated blood pressure in a nation-wide study on more than 10,000 individuals is published6. The authors need to be congratulated for the enormous work that was done to get this information. Now we have a reliable data on the epidemiology of hypertension. Isolated hypertension was observed in 2.6 per cent of middle age group and hypertension was seen clustering with other risk factors in another 12.3 per cent individuals in our country. This study is noteworthy because risk factor clustering has not been studied before in India. This is interesting because our methods for prevention will be useful multifold because of this clustering. Also is the fact that the clinicians should screen for the multiple risk factors together for maximum benefit.

The effect of age in clustering of risk factors is significant. Persons above the age of 40 yr and males had more clustering; 40 per cent of participants above the age of 40 yr had 3 or more risk factors.

The study6 also had some major limitations that the population studied did not represent the group of general population. The persons enrolled were industry group, likely to be more motivated for health care and likely to be of higher socio-economic status. Another major limitation was the fact that this study did not include ageing population - the elderly, namely persons above the age of 60 yr. These risk factors are more likely to have higher prevalence with increasing age.

This study provides data about hypertension and clustering of important risk factors in a group of persons in our country, and fills in the significant gap that exists in the epidemiology of risk factors of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in our country. The next step is to take this kind of study further to get the CVD mortality data as well. This is one area we are lacking completely. It is interesting to note that even in US7 and Europe8 these mortality data differ from region to region. So what we need is to take these types of studies forward in two ways. One is to introduce an interventional group to see the effects of risk reduction in the long run and secondly to study the effects of these risk factors on mortality on all India basis.

References

  1. , , , , , , . Grand challenges in chronic non communicable diseases. Nature. 2007;450:494-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. World Health Organization. Global health risks: mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks 2009
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . Risk factors for early myocardial infarction in south Asians compared with individuals of other countries. JAMA. 2007;297:286-94.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , . Risk factors for ischemic and intracerbral hemorrhagic stroke in 22 countries.A case control study. Lancet. 2010;376:112-23.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , . Incidence, types, risk factors and outcome of stroke in developing country. Trivandrum stroke registry. Stroke. 2009;40:1212-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . Impact of comprehensive cardiovascular risk reduction programme on risk factor clustering associated with elevated blood pressure in an Indian industrial population. Indian J Med Res. 2012;135:485-93.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. . Estimated country-level prevalence of diabetes and obesity United States 2007. MMWR. 2009;58:1259-63.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , . Age, period, cohort and geographic area effects on the relationship between risk factors and coronary heart disease mortality. 15 year follow up of the European cohorts of seven countries study. J Chronic Dis. 1986;39:229-42.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    12

    PDF downloads
    10
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections
    Scroll to Top