Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Editorial
143 (
4
); 389-391
doi:
10.4103/0971-5916.184278

Diabetes - An ancient disease, epidemic & an economic burden for the present era

Dr M. Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre & MV Hospital for Diabetes, Royapuram, Chennai 600 013, Tamil Nadu, India

* For correspondence: drvijay@mvdiabetes.com

Licence

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

This editorial is published on the occasion of World Health Day - April 7, 2016.

Diabetes was first recognized by ancient Egyptians around 1500 B.C., who defined it as a rare condition in which a person urinates excessively and loses weight. Aretaeus, a Greek physician, somewhere between 80 to 138 C.E., described the sweet nature of urine excreted by diabetic individuals1. Much of the current knowledge about diabetes and its treatment were highlighted by a Dr Joslin, a U.S physician, considered as a pioneer in diabetes2. Currently, as per the statistics available by International Diabetes Federation, there are about 415 million people suffering from diabetes in the world and for upcoming year of 2040, the number of people affected will approximately be, 642 million3. For the year 2000, people suffering from diabetes in India were 31.7 million4, and India recorded the maximum number of diabetic patients in the world followed by China and USA5. If the current condition prevails and nothing much is done in near future, then by the year 2030, number of individuals affected by diabetes in India would raise up to 79 million4.

The battle to curb diabetes

Several programmes initiated by the Government of India, have been trying to curb down the rising prevalence of diabetes. In 1987 National Diabetes Control Programme was launched. The Programme was initially started in the States of Jammu and Kashmir, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka, but was not carried further due to paucity of funds6. However, it gave rise to another pilot project by government of India, The National Programme for Prevention and Control of Diabetes, Cardiovascular Disease, and Stroke (NPCDCS), launched in January, 20086. This Programme has completed its pilot phase in 10 States and now aims to expand it in all the other States of India. The Programme intends to provide early diagnosis, appropriate management of diabetes and risk reduction associated with it6. Rapid urbanization leading to lifestyle changes, genetic predisposition to diabetes, central obesity, higher insulin resistance in Asian Indians are some of the major factors predisposing type II diabetes in Indian population7. Apart from this, other aggravating factors are poor diabetes screening, preventive services, non-adherence to diabetes management guidelines, and long distance travel to health services mainly in rural sector, disparities in diabetes management between urban and rural areas5. Furthermore, the awareness of people for diabetes in India is low as compared with the western world. The Chennai Urban Rural Epidemiology Study (CURES) has stated that approximately 25 per cent of the Indian population is unaware of diabetes6. Moreover, the knowledge for risk factors associated with diabetes was even lesser. Only 11.9 per cent of study subjects acknowledged that obesity and physical inactivity were the predisposing factors for diabetes6.

Socio-economic status and diabetes - An economic burden

It has been evident that certain risk factors contributing to diabetes are well correlated with socio-economic status (SES)8. SES and its fundamental elements, are distinctly known determinates of health. Among these, low income is one of the contributing factors which accounts for high prevalence of diabetes. Diabetes is two folds more widespread in low income population as compared with their higher income counterparts9. Saydah and Locher10 demonstrated education and income as the major socio-economic gradients related with diabetes mortality in a U.S. Population based study. Further, co-morbidities associated with diabetes exerts a huge economic burden both at individual and national level. The increased cost of expenditure in diabetes is due to long term complications of kidney failure, blindness, heart disease and foot complications, which further lead to economical and other social consequences11. Additionally, health care services are extensively provided by private sector in India. These include high end corporate hospitals, charitable institutions, nursing homes, individual practitioners and even unqualified providers. Seventy per cent of diabetes patients are treated by private health providers, spending four times more when compared with the cost of treatment provided by the government facilities12. The estimated cost of diabetes treatment could range from 1230 billion ($25.5 billion) to 1837.3 billion ($38.0 billion)13. There is a huge variation in the quality of care provided by health sector. Lack of national guidelines and treatment protocols for health services is making monitoring and quality assessment difficult14. Thus, diabetes epidemic in India is a consequential loss to national productivity and exchequer at social level12.

Prevention strategies

Much has to be done to improve the present condition from prevention side. The key issue to be addressed is to generate an awareness regarding risk factors associated with diabetes. These include lifestyle modification, balanced diet, control for obesity, lower stressful working condition, etc. From the policy point of view, increased accessibility to health services, affordability of drugs for every person, quality of service and focus on research could improve the present situation. Focus on behaviour modification in children from the school level is another important element6. Study conducted in schools revealed the effectiveness of structured behaviour intervention programmes among school kids. This study focused on improving physical activities and dietary modification to combat childhood obesity in schools15.

To conclude, a definite need to strengthen health care system is an important dimension to reduce diabetes and diabetes related complications. Ineffective management for diabetes is due to barrier between patients and provider health services. Improving self management abilities of general population is one of the essential measures for diabetes control14. Overall, there is an immediate need to improve health care delivery system and to generate awareness among people. Early detection, cost-effective management and rehabilitation of diabetic patient, focusing more towards lower SES could improve the present scenario12.

References

  1. , . The past 200 years in diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1332-40.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Joslin Diabetes Center. Available from: https://www.joslin.org/about/elliot_p_joslin_md.html
  3. International Diabetes Federation (IDF). IDF diabetes atlas (7th ed). Brussels, Belgium: IDF; .
  4. World Health Organization (WHO). Country and regional data on diabetes. Geneva: WHO; .
  5. , , . The current state of diabetes mellitus in India. Australas Med J. 2014;7:45-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , . India towards diabetes control: Key issues. Australas Med J. 2013;6:524-31.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , . Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: the Indian scenario. Pract Diab Int. 1997;14:93.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , . Diabetes prevalence and socioeconomic status: a population based study showing increased prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in deprived areas. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000;54:173-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . Association of socio-economic status with diabetes prevalence and utilization of diabetes care services. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:124.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , . Socioeconomic status and risk of diabetes-related mortality in the U.S. Public Health Rep. 2010;125:377-88.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , . The costs of treating long term diabetic complications in a developing country: A study from India. J Assoc Physicians India. 2013;61:102-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , . Socioeconomic factors relating to diabetes and its management in India. J Diabetes. 2015;8:12-23.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , . The socioeconomics of diabetes from a developing country: A population based cost of illness study. Diabetes Res Clin Prac. 2010;89:334-40.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , . Challenges in diabetes management with particular reference to India. Int J Diab Dev Ctries. 2009;29:103-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , . Effect of structured behavior intervention program on childhood obesity. IJTDH Int J Trop Dis Health. 2016;11:1-8.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections
Scroll to Top