Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review Article
141 (
2
); 172-174

Current advances related to Clostridium difficile infection

Institute for Digestive Research, Digestive Disease Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Gumi Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Gumi, South Korea
Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, South Korea

Reprint requests: Dr Byung Ik Jang, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, South Korea e-mail: jbi@med.yu.ac.kr

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) can trigger various responses, ranging from asymptomatic carriage to fulminant colitis. Hard-to-cure CDI, such as severe CDI, multiple recurrences of CDI, refractory CDI, and hypervirulent strains of C. difficile, require new treatments, although antibiotics such as metronidazole and vancomycin are the treatment of choice for initial and first relapsing CDI. Active immunization with C. difficile toxins and faecal microbiota transplantation deserve special attention. Here we describe these strategies for difficult-to-treat CDI.

Keywords

Clostridium difficile infection
Clostridium difficile vaccine
faecal microbiota transplantation

Introduction

Clostridium difficile is an anaerobic, Gram-positive, spore-forming bacillus that is the major cause of diarrhoea and colitis associated with antibiotics. C. difficile infection (CDI) can trigger various responses, ranging from asymptomatic carriage to fulminant colitis and recurrent C. difficile-associated diarrhoea. The reasons for the variability of this disease are not clear. However, it is generally accepted that host factors are more important than bacterial virulence factors.

The initial treatment of CDI is well-established and includes withdrawing any precipitating antibiotics when possible, providing supportive care by administering fluids and electrolytes as required, and using antibiotics such as metronidazole or vancomycin12. Cases of relapsing colitis are treated with either further metronidazole or vancomycin or prolonged vancomycin treatment using ‘pulsed-tapered’ protocols3. After the first post-treatment recurrence, the rate of a second recurrence is as high as 40 per cent. However, relapsing CDI and treatment failure are not associated with resistance to metronidazole or vancomycin4.

Several investigators have reported increasing rates and severity of CDI5. In addition, the appearance of a hypervirulent strain and treatment failure with current medication was reported56. These reports reinforce the need for methods of improving host factors, such as faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and optimizing immune responses to C. difficile toxins.

Optimizing the immune respose

C. difficile infection results from disruption of the normal bacterial flora of the colon, colonization with C. difficile, and the release of toxins that lead to mucosal damage and inflammation. After colonization, the organism releases two protein exotoxins into the colon lumen: Toxins A and B, which cause diarrhoea and colitis. Toxin A is an enterotoxin that allows Toxin B to enter cells. The binding of the toxins to membrane receptors has toxic effects; both Toxins A and B result in mucosal inflammation and cause the secretion of a protein-rich exudate that contains neutrophils and monocytes. In addition, both toxins lead to peeling off of enterocytes and activation of cytokine release from monocytes.

In a Quebec study conducted between 1991 and 2003, vancomycin had fewer complications than metronidazole7. However, between 2003 and 2006, vancomycin was not found superior to metronidazole6. These results suggest that a hypervirulent strain, which produces more toxin, has spread in Quebec. The increased toxin level quickly saturates the binding sites in the colon before vancomycin can reduce the production of C. difficile toxins. Therefore, new treatment strategies that reduce the toxicity of already-bound toxin, or prevent toxin binding to the colon, are needed.

Lowy et al8 examined the safety of monoclonal antibodies and their effects on the initial episode of C. difficile-associated diarrhoea (CDAD). The combined administration of monoclonal antibodies against toxin A (CDA1) and B (CDB1) significantly reduced recurrent CDAD. Active immunization with C. difficile toxins could also be a promising strategy for treating CDAD9 and is at present undergoing phase III trials.

Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT)

Eiseman et al10 first reported the use of FMT in CDI, in 1958. Subsequently, many case series of FMT in CDI have been reported, and many researchers have found a valid rationale for FMT in CDI. Antibiotic use disrupts the normal bacterial flora of the colon, and antibiotic damage to the normal microbiota permits invasion by C. difficile11. In healthy control subjects and initial CDI patients, Fumigatus and Bacteroidetes spp. are relatively abundant in the faecal material. However, recurrent CDI patients had a different faecal microbiota12. Khoruts et al13 reported that the faecal bacterial composition of the recipient after FMT was similar to that of the donor and was dominated by Bacteroides spp. strains. A systemic review of FMT in CDI reported excellent cure rates (92%) and a protective effect against relapsing CDI (the relapse rate was 4%)14. Finally, a recent randomized controlled trial showed that FMT was significantly more effective for treating recurrent C. difficile infection than was vancomycin15. Consequently, FMT is now a recommended treatment for the third recurrence of CDI3.

Generally, the donor for FMT is a member of the patient's family. However, donor identification and work-up increases cost, which can delay FMT. Moreover, it is difficult to identify suitable donors for some patients. Hamilton et al16 reported the efficacy of a frozen preparation from a universal donor16. In the near future, a simplified, standardized product, such as encapsulated FMT oral therapy, will be available.

Conclusions

Antibiotics, particularly metronidazole and vancomycin, are the treatment of choice for the initial therapy and first recurrence for most patients with mild-to-moderate CDI. However, hard-to-cure CDI, such as severe CDI, multiple recurrences of CDI, refractory CDI, and hypervirulent strains of C. difficile, need new treatment options. Research on optimizing immune responses and FMT must continue, as these strategies will likely become mainstream treatments for hard-to-cure CDI.

References

  1. , , , . Treatment of Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(Suppl 1):S32-42.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , . Past, present, and future therapies for Clostridium difficile-associated disease. Ann Pharmacother. 2006;40:2155-63.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Clostridium difficile infections. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:478-98.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , . ESCMID study group for Clostridium difficile, EU member states; European centre for disease prevention and control. Emergence of Clostridium difficile-associated disease in north America and Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006;12(Suppl 6):2-18.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , . Clostridium difficile-associated disease: changing epidemiology and implications for management. Drugs. 2007;67:487-502.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , . Outcomes of Clostridium difficile-associated disease treated with metronidazole or vancomycin before and after the emergence of NAP1/027. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:2781-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , . Clostridium difficile infection in hospitals: a brewing storm. Can Med Assoc J. 2004;171:27-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , . Treatment with monoclonal antibodies against Clostridium difficile toxins. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:197-205.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . Clostridium difficile toxoid vaccine in recurrent C. difficile-associated diarrhea. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:764-70.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , . Fecal enema as an adjunct in the treatment of pseudomembranous enterocolitis. Surgery. 1958;44:854-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , . Targeted restoration of the intestinal microbiota with a simple, defined bacteriotherapy resolves relapsing Clostridium difficile disease in mice. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:e1002995.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , . Decreased diversity of the fecal Microbiome in recurrent Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. J Infect Dis. 2008;197:435-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , . Changes in the composition of the human fecal microbiome after bacteriotherapy for recurrent Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010;44:354-60.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , . Clostridium difficile detection: identification of colonization, subclinical and overt disease. J Hosp Infect. 2012;82:138-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , . Duodenal infusion of donor feces for recurrent Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:407-15.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , . Standardized frozen preparation for transplantation of fecal microbiota for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:761-7.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections
Scroll to Top