Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review Article
133 (
2
); 207-211

Cross-reactivity of outer membrane proteins of Campylobacter species with cholera toxin

Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Jabriya, Kuwait

Reprint requests: Dr M. John Albert, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, PO Box 24923, Safat 13110, Kuwait e-mail: john@hsc.edu.kw

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Campylobacter jejuni is a foodborne pathogen and a leading cause of diarrhoea worldwide. It is believed that a cholera toxin-like toxin (CTLT) produced by C. jejuni may mediate watery diarrhoea. However, the production of a CTLT by C. jejuni is controversial. A cholera toxin gene (ctx) homologue has not been identified in Campylobacter species. We investigated the identity of the CT cross-reactive antigen from Campylobacter species previously and the results are reviewed here. Filtrates of C. jejuni grown in four different liquid media, reported to promote CTLT production, were tested by Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell elongation assay for functional toxin and for reactivity with CT antibody using GM1 ganglioside ELISA (GM1 ELISA) and immunoblotting. Protein sequence of the CT antibody-reactive band was determined by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI TOF-TOF). Non-jejuni species (C. coli, C. lari, C. foetus, C. hyointestinalis and C. upsaliensis) were investigated by CHO cell assay and immunoblotting. Filtrates from seven C. jejuni reference strains reported to produce CTLT and from 80 clinical strains were negative in the CHO cell assay. However, filtrates from three reference strains and 16 clinical strains were positive by GM1 ELISA. All strains irrespective of GM1 ELISA reactivity, possessed a 53-kDa protein which reacted with CT antibody by immunoblotting. This band was identified as the major outer membrane protein (PorA) of C. jejuni. CT antibody reacted with a C. jejuni recombinant PorA on immunoblotting. All non-C. jejuni strains were negative by CHO cell assay, but the common 53-kDa proteins reacted with CT antibody on immunoblots. The cross-reactivity of PorAs of Campylobacter species with CT may lead to the erroneous conclusion that Campylobacter species produce a functional CTLT.

Keywords

campylobacter
cholera toxin
like toxin
GM1 ELISA
PorA

Introduction

Campylobacter jejuni a foodborne pathogen, is a leading cause of bacterial diarrhoea worldwide1. It causes mostly inflammatory diarrhoea in individuals in developed countries, but watery diarrhoea in individuals in developing countries2. A cholera toxin-like toxin (CTLT) produced by C. jejuni was thought to mediate watery diarrhea3. However, CTLT production by C. jejuni is controversial. While some investigators reported it, others did not3. A cholera toxin gene (ctx) homologue has not been found in C. jejuni3. There are also reports of CTLT production by non-C. jejuni species, especially C. coli, C. lari and C. hyointestinalis45. We recently reexamined the question of CTLT production by C. jejuni and other species and identified the antigen that cross-reacts with CT antibody68. This article summaries many findings on this line of research.

Experimental details

We studied a number reference and clinical isolates. Reference C. jejuni cultures that had been reported to produce CTLT included the following strains: CCUG 8731, CCUG 6951, CCUG 6968 and CCUG 8680 (received from the University of Goteborg culture collection, Goteborg, Sweden); 180 ip and 189 ip (kindly provided by G. Ruiz-Palacios, National Institute of Medical Science and Nutrition, Mexico Districto Federal, Mexico); and CJ0094400 (kindly provided by A. Lee, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia). A ctx gene negative, fully sequenced C. jejuni strain NCTC 11168 was obtained from B. W. Wren (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom). Clinical C. jejuni strains included 10 strains from the International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh (kindly provided by M. Rahman) and 70 strains from patients treated at Mubarak Al-Kabeer Hospital, Jabriya, Kuwait. Two strains each of C. coli, C.lari, C. foetus, C. hyointestinalis and C. upsaliensis were provided by G. Hogg (University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia). An enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) strain, H10407, producing heat-labile toxin (LT) served as a positive control for enterotoxin production. It is well known that the NH2-terminal regions of LT and CT exhibit the highest degree of homology (91%), while the COOH-terminal region, containing the sole cystine residue in each toxin is less conserved (~52%).

All strains were screened in Casamino Acids–yeast extract (CAYE) broth supplemented with 1.0 μg/ml ferric chloride (CAYEF medium) for functional CTLT production. In addition, selected C. jejuni strains were screened in (i) Brucella broth supplemented with 0.25 per cent each of L-asparagine, L-serine and L-glutamic acid (BASG broth), (ii) BASG broth supplemented with 0.05 to 0.5 per cent L-cysteine, corn starch, yeast extract and dextrose, and (iii) G-C medium supplemented with 0.1 per cent IsoVitalex (GCIV medium). The effect of polymyxin B on release of CTLT from periplasmic space was studied with cultures grown in GCIV medium. Cultures were grown microaerobically under shaking or stationary conditions at 42°C for 24-48 h.

Selected C. jejuni strains were passaged multiple times through the intestinal loops of Sprague-Dawley rats and the secreted intestinal fluids were tested for the presence of functional toxin. Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell elongation assay was used for the detection of functional CTLT. Serial doubling dilutions of bacteria-free culture supernatant were used with a starting dilution of 1:2. In some cases, filtrates were concentrated to 50X by lyophilisation followed by reconstitution and dialysis before testing. Elongation of >50 per cent of the monolayer at a filtrate dilution of ≥1:4 was considered positive for CTLT production.

Serological testes used for the detection of CT crosss-reactive material in the culture filtrates were (i) ganglioside GM1 ELISA in which ELISA plate coated with GM1 ganglioside was reacted with culture supernatant and rabbit polyclonal CT antibody, (ii) direct ELISA in which ELISA plate was directly coated with bacterial sonicate and reacted with CT antibody, and (iii) immunoblot assay in which bacteria-free culture filtrate, crude outer membrane protein (OMP), or sarcosyl-purified OMP was separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membrane and probed with rabbit anti-CT antibody.

The amino acid sequence of the CT cross-reactive band was analysed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI TOF-TOF). The protein identified was further confirmed by immunoblot analysis in which a recombinant C. jejuni PorA protein (fusion protein, GST-PorA expressed from porA gene of C. jejuni strain C31) was checked for its reactivity with rabbit CT polyclonal antibody and vice-versa in which rabbit antibody to recombinant porA was checked for its activity against CT.

Results

None of the filtrates of bacteria grown in different media was positive for CTLT production by the CHO cell assay. Fifty times concentrated culture filtrates from a Swedish strain and the Australian strain tested in this assay were negative. The control ETEC strain used in this assay was positive. The Australian strain and a Kuwaiti strain gave a fluid to loop-length ratio of 0.3 after four rat ileal loop passages. However, the ileal loop fluids did not cause CHO cell elongation. In the GM1 ELISA, CAYE filtrates from two Swedish strains, the Australian strain and 16 Kuwaiti strains were positive7.

Numerous strains (both GM1 ELISA positive as well as negative) and the NCTC 11168 strain (a known CT-negative strain) yielded two prominent bands of 78.6 kDa and 53 kDa size on immunoblot with rabbit anti CT antibody. However, when blots were probed with normal rabbit serum, the 78.6 kDa band only was visible. This suggested that the 53 kDa band was specifically recognized by the anti CT-antibody. This 53 kDa specific protein was subsequently identified as the MOMP (porA) of C. jejuni, by MALDI TOF-TOF analysis. The identity of the protein was further confirmed when the recombinant PorA protein expressed as GST-porA from the porA gene of C. jejuni strain (C31) reacted with rabbit anti-CT antibody on immunoblot assay. However, a rabbit polyclonal antibody raised against the GST-PorA failed to react with-CT in the immunoblot. This suggested that the reaction was a one-way reaction7.

Direct ELISA was performed to check for CT cross-reactivity with sonicated extracts from all 7 reference strains from Sweden, Mexico and Australia, CT-negative strain, NCTC 11168, 5 Kuwait strains from among 16 GM1 ELISA positive strains and 5 GM1 ELISA negative Kuwaiti strains. All strains were positive in the direct ELISA for CT cross-reactivity. Since the cross-reacting material is PorA, it is present in sufficient quantity in bacterial sonicates used in the direct ELISA for all strains to be positive. However, in the GM1 ELISA where culture filtrates were used, only some strains would have shed the membrane protein to be positive in the assay7.

Two strains each of C. coli, C. lari, C. foetus, C. hyointestinalis and C. upsaliensis were negative for CTLT production when culture filtrates from CAYE medium were tested in the CHO cell assay. Immunoblot analysis of crude OMPs revealed a common 53 kDa band for all species and several additional bands (six for C. foetus). When reacted with normal rabbit serum, a common non-specific band of 79 kDa for all species with two additional higher molecular weights for C. upsaliensis were visible. Apart from the 79 kDa non-specific band, the other six bands for C. foetus appeared to be specific. When Sarkosyl-purified OMPs were allowed to react with anti-CT antibody in immunoblot assays, all species (except C. foetus) produced the unique single band of 53 kDa. The purified OMP preparation from C. foetus produced several bands in a ladder-like pattern (C. foetus is known to possess an S-layer OMP which separates into a ladder-like pattern on electrophoresis), as did the crude membrane preparation. However, the nonspecific band of 79 kDa that reacted with normal rabbit serum was absent. When Sarkosyl-purified OMPs were allowed to react with normal rabbit serum in immunoblot assays, no band from any species was visible8.

Discussion

There are reported similarities in PorA across many Campylobacter species at genetic and amino acid sequence levels. Therefore, the 53 kDa protein from non-C. jejuni species that cross-reacted with anti CT antibody is likely to be PorA.

Evidence for the production by C. jejuni of an enterotoxin that is structurally and biologically related to CT and LT was based on the following observations: (i) C. jejuni causes morphological alteration and raises intracellular level of cAMP in CHO and Y-1 cells49; (ii) the effects on morphology and cAMP levels in CHO and Y-1 cells are neutralised by antiserum to CT49; (iii) C. jejuni induces fluid secretion in rat ileal loop assay910; (iv) children infected with C. jejuni produce serum antibodies that cross-react with CT and LT1113; (v) culture filtrates reacted in GM1 ganglioside ELISA with antiserum to CT or LT1415; and (vi) galactoside, ganglioside or CT antibody affinity purified material from culture filtrates caused morphological alteration and raised cAMP levels in sensitive cells or reacted in GM1 ganglioside ELISA1517.

However, a careful appraisal of the literature suggests that there are problems with the assays which gave rise to these findings. For morphological assay using CHO cells, no standard criterion was set for interpreting positive results. Several studies defined elongation of any number of cells (ranging from a few to <50%) as positive for the presence of an enterotoxin41820. In other studies, either undiluted culture filtrate or filtrate at a dilution of <1:2 was used42122. In all these studies, the amount of toxin reported to be produced by the isolates was very small. This is contrary to V. cholerae and enterotoxigenic E. coli infections, where the organisms produce large amounts of enterotoxins that result in profuse watery diarrhoea, which is not seen in C. jejuni infection2. We believe an accepted criterion for positive test would be a culture filtrate dilution of >1:4 affecting > 50 per cent of the cells. This should rule out nonspecific effects of components in the media, since undiluted or lower dilutions of the media were shown to give false positive results23. By this criterion, all strains tested by us were negative. Filtrates of cultures produced in different media that were reported to promote enterotoxin production failed to yield positive results.

Another factor to be considered is the confounding effect of cytolethal distending toxin (CLDT) in the CHO cell assay. Both CT and CLDT cause elongation of cells after 24 h of incubation, but the toxins are distinguished on further incubation of cells. Whereas CLDT causes progressive distention and cytotoxicity of cells over the next four days, such effects are not seen with CT5. Many reports on the production of CTLT by C. jejuni appeared before the existence of CLDT was known92024. It is quite likely that the effect of CLDT would have been confused with that of CTLT.

The amount of cAMP reported to be produced by the C. jejuni isolates in cells is small in comparison to that produced by CT or LT49. There is only partial abrogation or no abrogation of the effect of the toxin by anti-CT and anti-LT sera on morphological assay using cell cultures418. However, the effect of normal serum on neutralisation of morphological change in these studies is not known. CLDT also induces modest increase in cAMP levels5. However, CT and CLDT are antigenically distinct5. As reported by others910, two of our isolates induced fluid accumulation in rat ileal loop assay, but only after repeated passage. However, as observed in another study25, the secreted fluid did not induce elongation of CHO cells, a finding consistent with the notion that fluid secretion was not due to CTLT production. It could be due to other mechanisms such as via inflammatory mediators of secretion26.

The evidence put forward to support the production of enterotoxin by C. jejuni was the development of serum antibodies to CT in children in Mexico13 and Central African Republic12 who suffered from C. jejuni diarrhoea. However, other studies failed to demonstrate such antibodies2728 or demonstrated a weak antibody response only11. It is possible that children showing antibody responses were concomitantly infected with enterotoxigenic E. coli28. The reported purification studies of a postulated enterotoxin from C. jejuni have produced confusing results10151629. These studies used ammonium sulphate precipitation, followed by purification with affinity chromatography using galactose, gangliosides or CT antibodies. The purified fractions had either a single band of ~ 70 kDa1517 or multiple bands of 68-, 54- and 43-kDa1630. In another study, the molecular masses of bands that reacted with anti-CT antibody were > 90 kDa and 50 kDa29. Some bands had biological activity1516 while others did not1630. It is thus difficult to reconcile the findings from different studies. In our immunoblot studies with CT antibody, two bands of 78.6 kDa and 53 kDa were visible. However, the high molecular weight band was due to a non-specific reaction with normal rabbit serum.

Conclusions

We have screened numerous, freshly isolated clinical local strains and also control strains of C. jejuni from various laboratories, which reportedly produced an enterotoxin. In spite of using several media that were reported to promote enterotoxin production by C. jejuni, none of the strains produced any enterotoxin in our hands. Thus our findings are similar to those of several other groups11232728. Other Campylobacter species also did not produce a functional enterotoxin by CHO cell assay in this study. One of the reasons that contributed to the conclusion that C. jejuni and other species produce an enterotoxin resembling CT was the reactivity of culture filtrates with anti-CT antibody in GM1 ELISA. Our results show unequivocally that Campylobacter species possess an antigen that reacts with anti-CT antibody. That antigen is the major outer membrane protein, PorA.

The work reviewed in this article was supported by Kuwait University grants (M i0 04/00 & MI02/01) and an Australian Research Council grant ([CE] 562063). Author thanks all coauthors of the papers in which the original work was reported.

References

  1. , . Campylobacter jejuni: a review of its characteristics, pathogenicity, ecology, distribution, subspecies characterization and molecular methods of detection. Food Biotechnol. 2007;21:271-347.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . Campylobacter jejuni. In: , , , , , eds. Infections of the gastrointestinal tract. Raven Press: New York; . p. :825-48.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , . Toxin production by Campylobacter spp. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997;10:466-76.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . Cytotoxic and cytotonic factors produced by Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter laridis. J Clin Microbiol. 1986;24:275-81.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . A new heat-labile cytolethal distending toxin (CLDT) produced by Campylobacter spp. Microb Pathog. 1988;4:115-26.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , . PorA protein of Campylobacter jejuni is not a cytotoxin mediating inflammatory diarrhoea. Microbes Infect. 2005;7:853-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , . Identification of a Campylobacter jejuni protein that cross-reacts with cholera toxin. Infect Immun. 2007;75:3070-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , . Major outer membrane proteins from many Campylobacter species cross-react with cholera toxin. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2008;15:859-62.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . Cholera-like enterotoxin produced by Campylobacter jejuni: characterisation and clinical significance. Lancet. 1983;30:250-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , . Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for virulence properties of Campylobacter jejuni clinical isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 1986;23:1039-43.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , . Serum antibodies reacting with Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin in sera of patients suffering from Campylobacter jejuni infection. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1986;36:53-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , . Antibody response to Campylobacter coli in children during intestinal infection and carriage. J Clin Microbiol. 1988;26:1421-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , . Serum antibodies to heat-labile enterotoxin of Campylobacter jejuni. J Infect Dis. 1985;152:413-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , . Properties of crude Campylobacter jejuni heat-labile enterotoxin. Infect Immun. 1984;45:314-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , . Production of cholera-like toxin by Campylobacter jejuni/coli. Lancet. 1984;i:448-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , . Partial purification and characterization of the enterotoxin produced by Campylobacter jejuni. Infect Immun. 1990;58:2414-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , . Campylobacter jejuni and C.coli production of a cytotonic toxin immunologically similar to cholera toxin. J Food Prot. 1984;47:943-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , . Enterotoxin-like activity produced by Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolated from patients and healthy controls in Algeria. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1988;51:25-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , , . Differentiated Caco-2 cells as a model for enteric invasion by Campylobacter jejuni and C.coli. J Med Microbiol. 1992;37:319-25.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , . Demonstration of cholera-like enterotoxin production by Campylobacter jejuni. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1985;29:73-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , . Production of enterotoxin and cytotoxin in Campylobacter jejuni strains isolated in Costa Rica. J Med Microbiol. 1992;37:22-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , , . Enterotoxigenicity and frequency of Campylobacter jejuni, C. coli and C. laridis in human and animal stool isolates from different countries. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1990;54:163-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , . Examination of multiple isolates of Campylobacter jejuni for evidence of cholera toxin-like activity. In: , , , eds. Campylobacter jejuni: current status and future trends. Washington DC: American Society for Microbiology Press; . p. :193-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , . Effect of iron concentration on toxin production in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. Can J Microbiol. 1986;32:395-401.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , , , . Pathological changes in the rabbit ileal loop model caused by Campylobacter jejuni from human colitis. J Med Microbiol. 1993;38:316-21.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , , , . Roles of leukotriene B4, prostaglandin E2, and cyclic AMP in Campylobacter jejuni-induced intestinal fluid secretion. Infect Immun. 1993;61:4885-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , , , , . Clinical and immunologic significance of cholera-like toxin and cytotoxin production by Campylobacter species in patients with acute inflammatory diarrhea in the USA. J Infect Dis. 1989;160:460-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , , . Lack of evidence of enterotoxin involvement in pathogenesis of Campylobacter diarrhea. In: , , , eds. Campylobacter jejuni: current status and future trends. Washington DC: American Society for Microbiology Press; . p. :184-92.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , , , , . A cytotonic, cholera toxin-like protein produced by Campylobacter jejuni. Comp Biochem Physiol B. 1992;103:299-303.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. , , . Purification of Campylobacter jejuni enterotoxin. Lancet. 1984;i:1123-4.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections
Scroll to Top