Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
View Point
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
View Point
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Perspective
154 (
1
); 19-23
doi:
10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_4370_20

Connecting the dots to strengthen malaria elimination strategies in India: A Malaria Elimination Research Alliance - India initiative

Division of Epidemiology and Communicable Diseases, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi 110 029, India
MERA-India Office, National Institute of Malaria Research, Dwarka, New Delhi 110 077, India

*For correspondence: directornimr@gmail.com

Licence

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Despite a substantial decline in the burden of malaria, the world continues to battle this scourge with 228 million cases and 24,000 deaths occurring each year as reported in 20181. India shares 85 per cent of the malaria cases of South-East Asia and almost half of global Plasmodium vivax cases. India has reported 338,494 cases and 77 deaths in 2019 across 36 States and Union Territories as per data from the National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW), India, in 20192. Responding to the World Health Organization (WHO)’s goal, India launched National Framework of Malaria Elimination in 2016 with the overall aim of zero indigenous malaria cases in the country by 20303. India has performed well so far in reducing the burden of malaria and was the only other country besides Uganda which recorded a decline in the number of cases1. Elimination of malaria in India requires conscientious efforts not only from nodal government national programme but also from all partners in the field of malaria, including research bodies, educational institutes, private sector and community. As India marches towards elimination with an impressive decline, it is critical to identify the roadblocks and also to find tangible solutions.

Understanding that malaria elimination will require concerted research efforts focussed on operational and implementation research, the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) launched Malaria Elimination Research Alliance (MERA)-India in 2019 on the eve of World Malaria Day (April 24, 2019), in the presence of various stakeholders4. The stakeholders consultation coupled with the launch of MERA-India was held on April 24, 2019. The stakeholders the MoHFW, WHO-South-East Asia Regional Office (WHO-SEARO), Directorate of National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme, Armed Forces viz. Army, Navy, Air force, Para-Military Forces like BSF, CRPF, ITBF etc, Department of Biotechnology, Department of Science and Technology, international partners, Gates Foundation, Public Health Foundation of India, State governments, ICMR institutes and others.

The national programme articulated the challenges impeding the success of malaria elimination efforts. Concerted and focussed discussions took place on the identified barriers and the ways to address them. Since MERA-India is focussed on studies in a mission mode, which will directly feed into elimination efforts of the country, the national programme broadly identified the areas which required research evidence to support the proposed interventions. These broad areas were threadbare discussed in the expert group meetings subsequently held to set the priorities for research in different domains of malaria. The ICMR initiative was appreciated by the WHO-SEARO and the MoHFW, Government of India, during the World Malaria Day commemoration on April 25, 2019. The WHO-SEARO pledged all support and partnership in this endeavour. The MERA-India, under the leadership of Director General, ICMR, steered by the ICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research (ICMR-NIMR), New Delhi, aims to strengthen the research ecosystem of the country for malaria elimination from India by 20305. In particular, MERA-India is a platform for malariologists, researchers and organizations working in the different realms of malaria. The aim is to bring them together and share knowledge, resources, ideas and funding opportunities6. MERA-India’s newsletter shares the updated information and latest literature via its website. The presence on social media such as Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn and YouTube connects MERA-India with the global scientific community and general public.

Nonetheless, MERA-India has moved forward in 2020 and has made great strides. We report here the progress of this initiative in the first year and reveal its organizational and scientific vision.

Soon after its launch in April 2019, the think tank of MERA-India decided to conduct priority setting meetings of different thematic working groups (TWGs) covering various domains of malaria, namely epidemiology, parasite biology and vector control. The TWGs comprise eminent experts in different domains of malaria in addition to the programme managers. Consequently, in July and September 2019, the priority setting exercise was completed and the TWGs provided the recommendations based on gap analysis of multiple facets of malaria. Their major recommendations are summarized here: (i) facilitate studies on the dynamics of P. vivax malaria in the domains of clinical biology, pathophysiology, epidemiology, transmission, Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) testing, anti-relapse therapy and primaquine compliance issues, (ii) launch studies on low-density malaria infections and their impact on transmission, (iii) initiate studies on monitoring of drug resistance - especially artemisinin tolerance, (iv) facilitate studies on the movement of human populations in vulnerable areas and the overall impact of such migrations on malaria, (v) address issues with community behaviour, accessibility, utilization of health services and vector control measures, (vi) research vector bionomics in context of changing behaviour of vectors, (vii) study insecticide resistance and especially in residual malaria districts, and (viii) start studies on residual, forest, urban and industrial malaria. Research proposals were invited based on the above recommendations from researchers across different disciplines and domains. An overwhelming response was received with more than 175 proposals from across the country (Fig. 1) and abroad (1 from Beijing and 1 from San Diego). These were subsequently screened and reviewed thoroughly.

Map showing the distribution of the proposals received in the first call under MERA-India.
Fig. 1
Map showing the distribution of the proposals received in the first call under MERA-India.

There proposals were categorized in the following thematic areas: (i) low-density infections and transmission potential, (ii) vector biology and control, (iii) community behaviour, (iv) geographical information system, (v) migration, and (vi) use of artificial intelligence in malaria. An investigator-centric brainstorming meeting was held in the early 2020 with an aim to discuss broad themes of MERA-India, to create networks among malariologists and encourage cross-talk amongst researchers and to provide a platform for discussions. This meeting came up with draft concept notes on these thematic areas.

Among the thematic areas listed above, i-iv were taken forward in 2020. The themes of migration and artificial intelligence were dropped. As a result, shortlisted proposals in the four thematic areas, viz. low-density infections, vector biology, community behaviour and geographical information systems, were considered and developed further for deployment at seven different sites across India (selected using criteria of malaria epidemiology, types of parasite and vector prevalence) in consultation with the subject experts. More geographical sites of importance from malaria endemicity point of view would be included in the next round. The selected sites were Bareilly in Uttar Pradesh; Jodhpur and Bikaner in Rajasthan; Kokrajhar, Udalguri in Assam; South Tripura in Tripura; Chennai, Ramanathapuram, Kanyakumari and Dharmapuri in Tamil Nadu; North and South Goa in Goa; Raipur in Chhattisgarh and Nadiad and Surendra Nagar in Gujarat. The studies in various themes are intended to address various dimensions of malaria ranging from low parasitaemia to behavioural barriers of the community. The current diagnostic tools such as rapid diagnostic tests and microscopy have their own limitations in terms of level of detection of parasites. In the elimination phase, more sensitive tools would be required. Therefore, moving in this direction, one of the themes is detection of low-density infection among the population, and the studies have been developed at seven sites across the country keeping in consideration the endemicity, types of parasites and their preponderance, vector biology and other situational factors. After several meetings with the experts and investigators, it was decided to use real-time PCR method (with same brands of commercial kits) across all the sites. The investigators from different disciplines were from medical colleges/universities and ICMR and non-ICMR institutes (Fig. 2).

Map showing the participating institutes and the geographical sites of approved studies being rolled out in the first year.
Fig. 2
Map showing the participating institutes and the geographical sites of approved studies being rolled out in the first year.

Senior experts from each of the four domains were appointed as coordinators of each theme. These in turn have extended tremendous support to MERA India. During the course of shortlisting the subjects and proposals received, standard common protocols were developed with the support of subject experts. These protocols served as templates for the investigators to develop their site-specific proposals ensuring quality, uniformity and robustness. Moreover, the development of protocols was a participatory process taking along the investigators and hence also acted as a capacity building process. Several operational issues/barriers were identified which were site-specific, and therefore, the solutions were also tailored according to the site needs.

Standard protocol also includes standard reporting formats and digital data reporting by all sites. This would ensure near real-time reporting, prompt analysis and data communication to local health authorities. A digital data integration platform has been proposed for India which will encourage different stakeholders including private sector and allied government sector to report malaria related data on a single digital dashboard7.

The principal investigators, mentored and guided by coordinators, developed well-defined and robust proposals. These were reviewed by an independent peer-review committee and sent for funding. Besides, the 24 studies being funded in the above four themes, six independent studies on specific subjects have also been supported under MERA-India. It is expected that these research studies will fill the gaps in our understanding of malaria and provide solutions wherever possible. The studies, once rolled out, would be closely monitored by MERA-India during the entire duration of funding. We are cognizant of the fact that COVID-19 presents its own challenges in the deployment of field-based research studies and thus provisions for precautionary measures would be ensured. At the same time, it is to be appreciated that mitigation programmes against COVID-19 in various countries have provided valuable lessons for malaria control, be it strong leadership, prompt response, real-time reporting of cases, easy access to epidemiological data, digital dashboards, sharing of resources and the involvement of multiple stakeholders in coherence8. Similarly, malaria control programmes can provide a platform to launch COVID-19 control programmes, as and when commenced in the afflicted countries9.

During its first year, MERA-India has identified several areas where more attention is required. The crucial gap areas were identified with the subject experts in the field of parasitology, vector biology and control and epidemiology. The alliance will try to cover all the areas in the next and future calls for proposals. For example, focussing on advanced tools such as artificial intelligence and data science and inclusion of more significant sites in addition to those mentioned in seven sites is planned.

As we moved into the second year of MERA-India, it became important to formulate a transparent pathway of deliverables from first year and themes for second year. We decided to focus on the gaps in the malaria elimination efforts with identification of the drivers of continuous transmission in certain areas of high malaria incidence. The MERA-India would be focussing on artificial intelligence and surveillance, data science, border malaria studies and pan-India vector mapping themes in the subsequent calls of proposals. There is a need to delineate the bottlenecks in malaria control in highly afflicted districts and then provide economical scientific solutions. Once again, investigators would be invited to brainstorm in-depth with subject experts from multiple domains. One of the major mandates of the programme will be addressed which involves virtual outreach meetings conducted by MERA-India staff members at ground level to spread awareness among people about the objectives. The Alliance also plans for robust public engagement and outreach programmes for the lay audience and schoolchildren. The establishment of similar alliance to tackle infectious and non-communicable diseases in India is also proposed, and the ICMR will again take the lead in this.

Financial support & sponsorship: The first author (SKS) is sponsored by JC Bose Fellowship of the Science & Engineering Research Board (SERB No. SB/S2/ JCB-04/2013) of the Ministry of Science & Technology, Government of India. The second author (VU) is a Junior Research Fellow in the Department of Molecular Medicine at Jamia Hamdard University, Delhi, supported by Dr SK Sharma through SERB JC Bose Fellowship.

Conflicts of Interest: None.

Financial support & sponsorship: This study was supported by the Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.

Conflicts of Interest: None.

References

  1. . World Malaria Report. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications-detail/world-malaria-report-2019
  2. . Available from: https://nvbdcp.gov.in/WriteReadData/l892s/4763116151601880632.pdf
  3. . Directorate General of Health Services. Ministry of Health &Family Welfare, Government Of India. National framework for malaria elimination in India (2016–2030) Available from: https://nvbdcp.gov.in/WriteReadData/l892s/National-framework-for-malaria-elimination-in-India-2016%E2%80%932030.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  4. . Available from: https://main.icmr.nic.in/sites/default/files/press_realease_files/Mera_india.pdf
  5. . Available from: http://meraindia.org.in/
  6. , , , , , , . MERA India:Malaria elimination research alliance India. J Vector Borne Dis. 2019;56:1-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , . For malaria elimination India needs a platform for data integration. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5:e004198.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , . COVID-19 mitigation steps provide a blueprint for malaria control and elimination. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020;103:28-30.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , . Overlaying COVID-19 mitigation plans on malaria control infrastructures. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2021;115:1-3.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    10

    PDF downloads
    4
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections
    Scroll to Top