Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
142 (
6
); 742-746
doi:
10.4103/0971-5916.174567

Comparing the effects of Bentonite & Calendula on the improvement of infantile diaper dermatitis: A randomized controlled trial

Department of Nursing, Khonein Faculty of Medical Sciences, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, IR, Iran
Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing & Midwifery, Kashan, Kashan, IR, Iran
Department of Pediatrics, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Khomein, Markazi Province, Iran

Reprint requests: Dr Mohsen Adib-Hajbaghery, Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing & Midwifery, Kashan, Kashan, IR. Iran e-mail: adib1344@yahoo.com

Licence

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Background & objectives:

Infantile diaper dermatitis is a common, acute inflammatory reaction of the skin around diaper among infants. This study was undertaken to compare the effect of topical application of Bentonite and Calendula creams on the improvement of infantile diaper dermatitis.

Methods:

This double blind randomized controlled trial was undertaken on 100 patients of infantile diaper dermatitis. The 100 participants were randomly assigned into two groups of 50 each, and were prescribed the coded medicine. The mothers were trained to apply the cream and level of improvement was judged by observing the affected area on the first visit and then after three days of receiving treatment.

Results:

The mean age of infants was 6.45±5.53 months in Calendula group and 7.35±6.28 months in Bentonite group. Overall, 88 per cent of lesions in the Bentonite group started improving in the first six hours while this rate was 54 per cent in Calendula group (P<0.001). The risk ratio for the improvement in the first six hours was 2.99 folds in the Bentonite group. Also, lesions in 86 per cent infants in the Bentonite group and 52 per cent in the Calendula group were completely improved in the first three days after treatment (P<0.001).

Interpretation & conclusions:

Our results showed that in comparison with Calendula, Bentonite had faster healing effect and was more effective on the improvement of infantile diaper dermatitis (IRCT ID: IRCT 2012112811593N1).

Keywords

Bentonite
Calendula
diaper dermatitis
infants
treatment

Infantile diaper dermatitis (DD) or diaper rash is a common skin problem among infants who wear diapers1. It is an acute inflammatory reaction of the skin around diaper2 that may be caused by frequent and prolonged contact of the skin with the urine, stool and moisture, and exacerbated by Candida infection and abrasion23. This may be characterized with erythema, flaking, papules and lesions in the areas such as buttocks, thighs, scrotum and mons pubis4.

The routine treatments for DD include changing the diaper and washing the genital area frequently, applying petrolatum or zinc oxide, and corticosteroids. A topical antifungal agent may also be used if fungal infections occurred56. Calendula may also be effective in non-complicated cases7. Bentonite is a kind of mineral which is in the form of aluminum phyllosilicate and is also called as mineral or formal soap in pharmacy industries. It can absorb several folds of water as its own volume, and makes a jellified, plastic and viscous form. This material is used as moisturizer, skin protector and water absorbent8. In a previous study Bentonite was found to be effective in the treatment of chronic hand dermatitis9. Bentonite has no side effects and of low cost and has not been systematically evaluated for the treatment of DD. The present study was thus performed to compare the effects of Bentonite and Calendula for the treatment of infantile DD.

Material & Methods

This double blind randomized controlled trial was undertaken during February and May 2013 on 100 infants referred to the outpatient paediatric clinics of Imam Khomeini hospital and a healthcare centre in Khomein city, Iran. Sample size was calculated based on a previous study in which the per cent of severe DD was 33.3 and it decreased to 6.3 after using Calendula in intervention group7. The sample size calculated was 50 each in the experimental and control groups with a power of 0.8 and the type I error probability of 0.05.

Infants in the age range of 1 to 24 months, and having mild to moderate DD were included in the study. Also, those not having infantile eczema, diarrhoea, and urinary tract infection, fungus dermatitis (based on the physician's diagnosis), and not using corticosteroids for present lesions were also selected. Exclusion criteria were not following the researchers recommendations and exacerbation of the lesions and developing diarrhoea during the study.

Before the study, a grading system was developed for grading the lesions. Panahi et al7 categorized the DD into four categories of mild, moderate, severe and extreme. We clubbed the categories of moderate and severe and modified this grading system into three categories of mild (erythema with or without satellite papules, with maceration and chafing), moderate (erythema with papulopustules and maceration) and severe (erythema with erosions or ulceration). Only mild and moderate cases were included in the study.

Data collection: The study process was explained to the parents and their written informed consent was obtained for participation in the study. A skin test was performed on the infant's arm to ensure not having allergic reaction. To do this, one fingertip of Bentonite and Calendula was applied on the internal surface of the infant's arm (1×1 cm) and observed for redness or any other allergic reactions after 20 min. Random numbers 1-100 were generated and entered in the data sheet. We randomly assigned 100 participants into the two conditions (a or b). Each condition was representative of one group with 50 participants. The numbers in each group were sorted and passed to the doctor and he prescribed the medication with code “a” for one group and medication with code “b” to the second group. A consort flow diagram of this study presented in the Figure.

Flow diagram showing the study design.
Figure
Flow diagram showing the study design.

To produce Bentonite 50 per cent, the mineral was squashed and turned into powder, sterilized in an oven, mixed with water (50 g Bentonite was mixed with 50 ml of distilled water) and poured in sterile cans and prepared in the form of Bentonite 50 per cent cream in 30 g cans by a pharmacist. To produce Calendula, two 15 g creams of Calendula 1.5 per cent (produced by Dineh Company, Iran) were poured in the similar 30 g sterile cans. Calendula and Bentonit were prepared in cans with similar shape and weight and then all cans were coded as “a” or “b” by the pharmacist.

To gather the data, a checklist was prepared and its content validity was assessed by 10 faculty members in Kashan and Arak Universities of Medical Sciences. The reliability of the checklist was assessed through inter-observers reliability with a rate of agreement of 0.93. The checklist included the characteristics of the infants (age, gender, weight), and mother (education level, age, job), type of feeding (breastfeeding, formula milk, cow's milk or combined) history of DD and drugs used in the previous episodes of the disease. Also there was a question for recording the frequency of changing diaper in a day and a question for grading the severity of DD. A Table was made for recording the effects of treatment including onset of recovery in the first six hour (yes, no), and improvement in the first, second and third day (yes/no), and time of the complete recovery (hours after the start of treatment). For judgment on the level of improvement, digital photographs were recorded of the affected areas of each infant at the first visit and the third day after receiving the treatment.

Checklists were completed for each infant and then the physician (who was unaware of the cans cods) prescribed one of the two creams. All mothers were trained to apply the cream on the affected area four times a day after changing the diaper.

The process of applying the cream was done under supervision for the first time and the effect of treatment was followed up three times a day by phone. Also, every other day (up to 3 times), the infants were visited and assessed by the physician and additional cream was given to the parents if needed. The effect of treatment (improvement or non-improvement) was documented based on the physician's decision.

The study protocol was approved by the Research Council and the Human Research Ethics Committee of Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Statistical analysis: The data were analyzed through SPSS software, version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Independent sample T test was used to compare quantitative variables (i.e. age, weight), and chi square, risk ratio, and Fisher's exact test were used to compare qualitative variables between the two groups such as improvement.

Results

The mean age of infants was 7.35±6.28 months in Bentonite group and 6.45±5.53 months in Calendula group. In Bentonite group 19 were males (38%) and 31 were females (62%) and in Calendula group, there were 22 males (44%) and 28 females (56%), (Table I).

Table I Demographic and clinical characteristics of the infants and their mothers

In total, 88 per cent of the lesions in the infants in Bentonite group started recovering in the first six hours while this rate was 54 per cent in Calendula group, and the rate of improvement in the Bentonite group was significantly higher than the Calendula group (P<0.001) (Table II). Also, the risk ratio for the start of improvement in the first six hours was 2.99 folds in the Bentonite group than in Calendula group (95% CI=1.43 - 6.25). Significantly higher numbers (P<0.001) of infants (86%) in the Bentonite group were improved completely in the first three days compared to 52 per cent in the Calendula group (Table II). Also, the risk ratio for the complete improvement in the first three days was 3.31 folds in Bentonite group than in Calendula group (95% CI=1.66, 6.56). The mean times of recovery in Bentonite and in Calendula groups were 44.14±23.95 and 86.34±24.13 hour, respectively (P<0.001; 95% CI: 32.65-51.74).

Table II The onset of improvement in the first six hours and complete improvement in the first three days after treatment

Discussion

The present study results showed that the onset of improvement in the first six hours was about three folds in Bentonite group than in Calendula group. Also the complete improvement in the first three days was more than three folds in Bentonite group. In an experimental study on rats, two centimeters lesions were made on the mature rats’ skin and Bentonite was reported to be effective in healing of these lesions10. Fowler11 has also assessed the effectiveness of Bentonite on the improvement of chronic hand dermatitis in human subjects and reported that using the moisturizer cream containing Bentonite for an eight weeks period significantly accelerated the improvement of chronic hand dermatitis.

In some studies the effects of some herbal products have been assessed on the improvement of DD1213. Fotouhi et al14 compared the effects of Calendula and Betamethasone in the prevention of acute radiation dermatitis and reported that both had the same effects in the palliation of the disease severity.

In the current study, the rate of improvement in Bentonite group was greater than the mentioned studies. Panahi et al7, compared the effects of Aloe vera and Calendula on children younger than three years with DD and reported that Calendula was more effective than Aloe vera in a 10 day period. Our study showed that Bentonite was not only more effective than Calendula on the improvement of DD, but it also accelerated the speed of improvement. No side effects were observed in the two groups. However, the study sample in the present study was small, and it is recommended to conduct similar studies with a larger sample. Also, the present study was conducted on the samples with mild to moderate DD, so it is recommended to conduct multicenter studies on severe DD.

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge the parents of children who consented to participate in this study. The study was financially supported by a grant from Kashan University of Medical Sciences.

Conflicts of Interest: None.

References

  1. , , , . Diaper dermatitis. Hautarzt. 2011;62:699-708.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , . Contact dermatitis in children. Ital J Pediatr. 2010;36:2.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , . Characterization of diaper dermatitis in the United States. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;154:943-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , . Emerging fungal infections among children: a review on its clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and prevention. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2010;2:314-20.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Canadian Paediatric Society Statement. Antifungal agents for common paediatric infections. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2008;19:15-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , . Practical management strategies for diaper dermatitis. Skin Ther Lett. 2006;11:1-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , . A randomized comparative trial on the therapeutic efficacy of topical Aloe vera and Calendula officinalis on diaper dermatitis in children. Scientific World Journal 2012 2012 810234
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , . Calendula officinalis: an important herb with valuable therapeutic dimensions - an overview. J Global Pharma Technol. 2010;2:14-23.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , . Mineralogy of shampoo-clay deposit in Tafresh area, central province. GeoSci. 2007;16:180-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , . Effect of Bentonite on skin wound healing: experimental study in the rat model. Acta Med Iran. 2006;44:235-40.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , . A skin moisturizing cream containing Quaternium-18-Bentonite effectively improves chronic hand dermatitis. J Cutan Med Surg. 2001;5:201-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , . Clinical and mycological benefits of topical application of honey, olive oil and beeswax in diaper dermatitis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005;11:160-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , . The effect of daily treatment with an olive oil/lanolin emollient on skin integrity in preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Dermatol. 2008;25:174-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , . Topical Calendula and Betamethasone Valerate in the prevention of acute radiation dermatitis: a randomized prospective trial. Tehran Univ Med J. 2007;65:23-9.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections
Scroll to Top