Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
132 (
6
); 728-730
pmid:
21245622

Attenuation of oxidative stress & DNA damage in varicocelectomy: Implications in infertility management

Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Reprint requests: Dr Rima Dada, Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110 029, India e-mail: rima_dada@rediffmail.com

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Sperm DNA integrity is of vital importance for foetal development and birth of healthy offspring. Oxidative stress and consequent DNA damage are the major cause of decline in semen quality in men with varicocele. A preliminary study was conducted on 11 men with clinical varicocele who also had high levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), to assess DNA damage in sperms and ROS levels before and after varicocelectomy. Varicocelectomy resulted in rapid (1 month) significant (P<0.001) decline in free radical levels and slow (3-6 months) significant decline in DNA damage levels. Thus men undergoing varicocelectomy should try concieving only 6 months following surgery.

Keywords

Infertility
oxidative stress
semen
varicocelectomy

Varicocele is one of the commonest surgically reversible causes of infertility and affects about 40 per cent males with primary infertility and 70-80 per cent males with secondary infertility. The pathophysiology of varicocele induced infertility remains unknown. One of the mechanisms by which it causes a decline in semen quality is increased testicular temperature due to dilation and tortuosity of pampiniform plexus of veins1. In addition, a number of men with varicocele harbour genetic abnormalities like Yq microdeletions2. However, it is unknown whether these are causally related or simply an incidental finding because of the high prevalence of varicocele among infertile men.

Supraphysiological reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels have been reported in men with varicocele and is one of the potential aetiological factors in varicocele mediated deterioration in sperm concentration, motility and morphology35. Agarwal et al6 reported that sperm dysfunction is multifactorial in varicocele but oxidative stress is the main cause. Oxidative stress can cause an alteration in the dynamics of testicular microvascular blood flow, endocrine signaling and germ cell apoptosis7.

We conducted a preliminary study at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, from January 2009 to January 2010 on 11 men (age 31.09 ± 2.8 yr) with clinical varicocele (cytogenetically normal, no Yq microdeletion, non smokers, non alcoholic, normal basal metabolic index, no history of testicular or systemic infection), who came for follow up for 3 and 6 months post-varicocelectomy. All men had significantly high ROS levels in washed and neat semen (3,121,725.65 and 142,897.704 RLU per 20 million sperm/min respectively) as compared to fertile age matched healthy controls (n=15) (800-1800 and 400-800 RLU per 20 million sperm/min). The fertile controls were men attending the clinic for vasectomy. One month after varicocelectomy, there was a significant (P<0.001) decline in ROS levels to 159,001.838 and 10,776.736 RLU per 20 million sperm/min in washed and neat semen respectively. Three months post-varicocelectomy the ROS levels further reduced to 98,971.081 and 6,456.249 RLU per 20 million sperm/min in washed and neat semen respectively. ROS levels were measured by chemiluminiscence method using luminol as probe8. The study protocol was approved by the Institute Ethics committee. The statistical comparison was done by Student’s t test.

DNA damage in sperms was assessed before and after varicocelectomy (3 months) by comet assay9 (single cell gel electrophoresis) in all 11 patients and showed no significant difference in DNA damage levels at 3 months post-varicocelectomy (despite significant decline in ROS levels). Pre-varicocelectomy the mean DNA content in comet head was 39.18 ± 7.12 per cent which showed non-significant improvement to 41.21 ± 5.21 per cent one month after varicocelectomy and 44.02 ± 6.12 per cent three months post-varicocelectomy (quantity of DNA in comet head is directly proportional to DNA integrity).

Six of the 11 men came for follow up after 6 months of varicocelectomy. The ROS levels had declined further to 45,234.926 and 4,528.593 RLU per 20 million sperm/min in washed and neat semen respectively. At this point, these patients showed a significant improvement in the sperm DNA integrity and the mean DNA content in the comet head increased to 67.42 ± 6.12 per cent, as compared to 44.02 ± 2.54 per cent at three months post-varicocelectomy.

Oxidative stress is a major cause of both nuclear and mitochondrial DNA damage8, and thus decline in ROS levels may also lead to decrease in DNA damage. DNA integrity improved significantly only 6 months after surgery. This may be because the spermatogenic cycle lasts for 64-72 days and at least one full cycle will need to be completed before the beneficial effects are evident. This finding is of clinical significance as men with varicocele may be counselled to try conceiving approximately 6 months post varicocelectomy.

Oxidative stress also induces mitochondrial DNA mutations, nuclear DNA breaks/nicks and nucleotide modification and thus reduces sperm functional competence by altering its membrane permeability and fluidity910. Sperm oxidative stress also causes pronuclear block, slows cleavage and sperm DNA damage, leads to pre- and post-implantation failure, increased risk of major and minor congenital malformations, genetic and epigenetic defects and cancer in off spring1113.

Oxidative stress and oxidative stress induced DNA damage appear to be major factors which adversely affect semen quality and lead to infertility. Use of such sperm for ART may adversely affect fertilization, embryogenesis and may have lifelong implications on foetal health. Results of this pilot study highlight that infertile men should be counselled to try conceiving only 6 months following varicocelectomy. Varicocelectomy may be beneficial in reducing the ROS levels, oxidative stress induced DNA damage with an overall improvement of functional competence of sperm.

References

  1. , , , . Molecular and other predictors for infertility in patients with varicoceles. Fron Biosci. 2009;1:3641-72.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , . Azoospermia factor deletions in varicocele cases with severe oligozoospermia. Indian J Med Sci. 2007;61:505-10.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . ROS: Causal role of DNA damage in varicocele. Asian J Androl. 2009;11(5 Suppl):156.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , . Seminal reactive oxygen species-antioxidant relationship in fertile males with and without varicocele. Andrologia. 2009;41:125-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , . Increased levels of oxidants and reduced antioxidants in semen of infertile men with varicocele. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:1531-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . Role of oxidative stress in pathogenesis of varicocele and infertility. Urology. 2009;73:461-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , . Oxidative stress: a common factor in testicular dysfunction. J Androl. 2008;29:488-98.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , . Clinical significance of reactive oxygen species in semen of infertile Indian men. Andrologia. 2009;41:251-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . DNA integrity and semen quality in men with low seminal antioxidant levels. Mutat Res. 2009;665:29-36.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , . Mitochondrial DNA mutations in etiopathogenesis of male infertility. Indian J Urol. 2008;24:150-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , . Fertilizing ability of DNA-damaged spermatozoa. J Exp Zool. 1999;284:696-704.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , . Incomplete nuclear transformation of human spermatozoa in oligo-astheno-teratospermia: characterization by indirect immunofluorescence of chromatin and thiol status. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:259-70.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , . Paternal levels of DNA damage in spermatozoa and maternal parity influence offspring mortality in an endangered ungulate. Proc Biol Sci. 2010;277:2541-6.
    [Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
10

PDF downloads
8
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections
Scroll to Top