Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Correspondence
133 (
3
); 341-342
pmid:
21441692

Anti-nucleosome antibody in sclerodema patients

Evangelic University Hospital Medicine Department, Clinical Hospital, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
Laboratory of Immunopathology, Clinical Hospital, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil

+For correspondence: Dr Thelma L. Skare, Rua João Alencar Guimarães, 796, 80310 420 Curitiba PR, Brazil tskare@onda.com.br

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Sir,

Nucleosomes are considered to be the basic element of chromatin. These are formed by 200 ± 40 base pairs segment of DNA wrapped around the (H2A-H2B, H3-H4)2 histone octamer with histone H1 bound on the outside1. These may become immunogenic, triggering the production of autoantibodies under particular conditions such as presence of drug interactions or infections1.

Even though nucleosomes are considered to be the main antigens in the pathophysiology of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), some investigators have also found these in systemic sclerosis (SSc). This finding has been an interesting point of discussion because of the discrepancies in results. Wallace et al1 observed high frequencies of these autoantibodies in scleroderma patients with limited and diffuse form of this disease. Amoura et al2 detected these in 45.9 per cent of 37 scleroderma patients and Quattrocchi et al 3 in 36.3 per cent of 11 patients. On the other hand, Hmida et al 4 studying 49 SSc patients found only one positive patient similar to Cervera et al 5 who showed one positive in 10 SSc patients. These discrepancies have been attributed to different detection methods used. Binding of anti-Scl-70 to chromatin6 and the patient’s ethnic background may also account for these differences.

We studied anti-nucleosome antibodies in 54 consecutive SSc patients in a cross-sectional study at Evangelic University Hospital, Parana, Brazil during February to December 2009 was approved by the local Ethical Research Committee. All 54 investigated patients fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) preliminary criteria for SSc7. In this group, 40 (7.4%) had limited form, 10 (18.6%) had generalized and 4 (74%) had PM-SSc (scleroderma-polimyositis) form. Patients with lupus mixed features (n=2) were excluded. Four patients were males and 50 female with mean age of 49.2 ± 12.7 yr. Interstitial lung disease was documented in 17 of 52 (32.7%). Anti-Scl-70 antibodies were found in 7 patients (13.4%).

After written consent, blood (5 ml) was collected from each patient. Samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 10000 g and serum separated, aliquoted and stored at -80°C until used. The detection of anti-nucleosome antibodies was done by ELISA using nucleosomes extracted from calf thymus chromatin as antigen (Inova Diagnostics Inc, USA). The cut-off point was of 20.0 U/ml, in accordance with manufacturer instructions. Data were analyzed through frequency tables and contingency tables using χ2 and Fisher tests with help of the software Graph Pad Prism, version 4.0 and adopting significance of 5 per cent.

Of the 54 patients tested, five (9.2%) were anti-nucleosome positive. Of these five, one was with PM-SSc form and four with limited form and none in the diffuse form. Values ranged between 36 to 151 UI/ml (mean 67 ± 38.8). No association was found between the presence anti-nucleosome antibodies and lung fibrosis or with presence of Scl-70.

In conclusion, our findings show that scleroderma should be considered a possibility while searching for the exact diagnosis of a connective tissue disease in a patient positive for anti-nucleosome antibodies. More research will be necessary to clarify the role of finding these autoantibodies in SSc.

References

  1. , , , , . Antibodies to histone (H2A-H2B)-DNA complexes in the absence of antibodies to double stranded DNA or to H2A-H2B) complexes are more sensitive and specific for scleroderma-related disorders than for lupus. Arthritis Rheum. 1994;37:1795-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , . The key role of nucleosome in lupus. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42:833-43.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . The role of anti-nucleosome antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus. Results of a study of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and other connective tissue diseases. Reumatismo. 2005;57:109-13.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Failure to detect antinucleosome antibodies in scleroderma: comment on the article by Amoura et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46:280-2.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , . Anti-chromatin antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus: a useful marker for lupus nephropathy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003;62:431-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , . Nucleosomes in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2004;30:529-58.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , . Improving the sensitivity of the American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for systemic sclerosis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007;25:754-7.
    [Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
13

PDF downloads
9
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections
Scroll to Top