Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Correspondence
147 (
3
); 315-317
doi:
10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1236_16

A possible need for routine screening for Strongyloides stercoralis infection in Indian haemophilia patients

Department of Hematology, ICMR-National Institute of Immunohaematology, Mumbai, India
Department of Hematology, Seth GS Medical College & KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
Surat Raktadan Kendra & Research Centre, Regional Blood Transfusion Centre, Surat, India

*For correspondence: shrimatishetty@yahoo.com

Licence

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Sir,

Strongyloidiasis caused by Strongyloides stercoralis, a human pathogenic parasite, is one of the most common and globally distributed but still one of the most neglected parasitic infections of clinical importance. There are limited reports from India on the prevalence of this parasite, and most are limited to hospital-based data1234. The route of transmission may be through faecal-oral or through penetration of Strongyloides filariform larvae through skin. The most eccentric characteristic of this parasite is its ability to persist within the host and replicate for years with no or minimal symptoms such as intermittent gastrointestinal problems. However, in immunocompromised patients it has the capability of being life-threatening, leading to a spectrum of clinical complications5.

India harbours the second highest number of patients with haemophilia globally, majority belonging to the poverty-stricken section6. The haemophilia patients are known to suffer from immunosuppression due to repeated transfusion with plasma-derived products, often with corticosteroid treatment in those who are positive for inhibitors7. Routine testing of HIV, hepatitis C virus (HCV) and HBV is regularly done in these patients as their prevalence in haemophilia patients is substantially high due to multiple transfusions8. However, the prevalence of other infections in this population is less well known.

The objective of this preliminary study was to determine the percentage of haemophilia patients from different regions in India infected with S. stercoralis. Such a study would help us determine whether screening haemophilia patients for this infection should be done routinely for the better care of haemophilia patients in regions where this infection is common. Stool examinations including direct faecal smear, formalin-ethyl acetate concentration, Harada-Mori filter paper culture, and agar plate culture are usually used for routine screening of S. stercoralis infection9. However, as plasma samples were transported appropriately from different regions, we detected the S. stercoralis IgG antibodies. From December 2013 to December 2015, a total of 161 congenital haemophilia patients along with age-matched 44 controls [a few (n=16) were patient relatives not affected with haemophilia (staying in the same locality) and others were volunteers (n=28) were from the institute] were screened by an indirect ELISA for S. stercoralis IgG antibodies (Diagnostic Automation, United States) (Table I) at the ICMR-National Institute of Immunohaematology (NIIH), Mumbai, India. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the institute. A written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Of these, 139 were haemophilia A (112 were severe haemophilia and 27 were moderate) and 22 were haemophilia B. Only 12 cases were positive for inhibitor against factor VIII. Both patients and controls were ≥15 yr of age; the age range being from 15 to 48 yr, median age: 24 yr.

Table I Details of patients and controls from different regions of India

The coagulation tests and ELISA for S. stercoralis of all the patients were performed. The diagnosis of haemophilia was confirmed. Patients who were transfused with factor replacement products at least five days before were included in the study. Of these, patients whose prothrombin time and thrombin time were deranged were excluded. The place for sample collection for the patients of different regions varied. The patients of West India were referred to KEM Hospital, Mumbai, for treatment and sample collection was done at NIIH, Mumbai. In all the other places, haemophilia patients were called at the regional hospitals and citrated blood was collected and centrifuged and plasma samples were transported appropriately. For transport, the aliquots were stored at −20°C temporarily and transported in dry ice.

The statistical analysis was conducted using the GraphPad Software Prism 5 (GraphPad Software Inc., CA, USA). All P values were calculated with two-tailed Fisher's exact test.

Thirty three (20.4%) haemophilia patients were found to be positive for the parasitic S. stercoralis infection; the maximum percentage positivity, i.e. 25 per cent seen in patients of North India region (Table II). By the indirect ELISA, positive patients were found to have an IgG concentration ranging from 4 to 64 μg/ml plasma against Strongyloides antigen. No association was seen between Strongyloides infection and inhibitor positivity in patients, although the number of inhibitor positive samples was small. Samples with Optical density (OD) greater than 0.7 were considered strong positive and those with OD of 0.3-0.6 were considered moderate positive. Among controls, n=6 (13.6%) were found positive for the infection. When compared to controls (13.6%), overall (n=33) 20.4 per cent haemophilia patients were positive for this parasitic infection (P<0.05).

Table II Prevalence of Strongyloides stercoralis in haemophilia patients

Limitations of this study were that only the ELISA test was performed and the possible cross-reactivity of S. stercoralis and Wuchereria bancrofti was not excluded along with other helminth infections, such as Ascaris lumbricoides infection, hookworm infection and schistosomiasis9. However, of the 33 positive patients, complete blood count and other details could be acquired only for 15 patients; five patients had a high eosinophil count (>600/μl) and few of them (n=8) suffered from minor gastrointestinal problems.

Strongyloidiasis is one of the most clinically important but ignored infections because of its asymptomatic behaviour. However, in conditions where immunity is suppressed, the infective larvae penetrate the mucosa, enter the bloodstream and further spread to multiple organs; sometimes leading to meningitis, sepsis and mainly hyperinfection or dissemination10. Humid and warm temperature in combination with poor sanitation and lower socio-economic status have been found associated with an increased prevalence of strongyloidiasis in the tropics11, due to faecal contamination of soil.

The prevalence of this infection in general population in other countries has been reported earlier; in Peninsular Malaysia (1.2-1.7%), Thailand (2.3-28.9%), Cambodia (10.3-21%), China (11.7%) and Japan (5-10%)12. Although our data were preliminary with a low sample size, yet a high percentage positivity for S. stercoralis infection was seen in both controls and haemophilia patients. Haemophilia patients with this infection, who already suffer from internal bleeds, joint swelling, etc., may be at risk of hyperinfection and dissemination. The treatment of strongyloidiasis if detected early before the patient is immunocompromised is not difficult. For strongyloidiasis, a single dose of ivermectin, for one or two days or two courses of albendazole administered 10 days apart, is generally prescribed13. However, in immunocompromised patients with infection who develop hyperinfection or dissemination, the treatment may require repeating doses of ivermectin. Our preliminary results indicate multi-transfused haemophilia patients may be screened by the routine stool test for this not so uncommon infection specifically in tropical countries like India. However, a more comprehensive study including the stool tests and a larger sample size is required to confirm these findings.

Financial support & sponsorship: The authors thank the Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India, for funding the study

Conflicts of Interest: None.

References

  1. , , , , , , . Risk factors for acquiring Strongyloides stercoralis infection among patients attending a tertiary hospital in South India. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2011;29:147-51.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , . Strongyloidiasis in Assam, India: A community-based study. Trop Parasitol. 2011;1:30-2.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . Strongyloides stercoralis: Global distribution and risk factors. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7:e2288.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Chronic diarrhoea in HIV patients: Prevalence of coccidian parasites. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2008;26:172-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , . Strongyloidiasis - the most neglected of the neglected tropical diseases? Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2009;103:967-72.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , . Epidemiology & social costs of haemophilia in India. Indian J Med Res. 2014;140:19-31.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , . Mechanisms of transfusion-associated immunosuppression. Curr Opin Hematol. 1994;1:457-61.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , . HIV and HCV coinfection in haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2004;10:1-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , . Diagnosis of Strongyloides stercoralis infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33:1040-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , . Intestinal strongyloidiasis and hyperinfection syndrome. Clin Mol Allergy. 2006;4:8.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , . Intestinal strongyloidiasis: A diagnosis frequently missed in the tropics. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2009;103:242-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , . Epidemiological characteristics of strongyloidiasis in inhabitants of indigenous communities in Borneo Island, Malaysia. Korean J Parasitol. 2016;54:673-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , . Manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment of Strongyloides stercoralis infection. Ann Pharmacother. 2007;41:1992-2001.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    10

    PDF downloads
    9
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections
    Scroll to Top