Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Correspondence
135 (
6
); 917-919

A multiplex PCR assay for the simultaneous identification of virulent & avirulent Bacillus anthracis targeting genes of plasmids & chromosomal DNA

Division of Biotechnology, Defence Research & Development Establishment, Gwalior 474 002, India
Division of Microbiology, Defence Research & Development Establishment, Gwalior 474 002, India

+For correspondence: drksanjay78@gmail.com

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Sir,

Bacillus anthracis, the aetiological agent of anthrax, is responsible for a serious and often fatal disease of mammalian livestock and humans1. Its spore-forming capability and highly pathogenic nature have made it one of the most effective bioterrorism agents. Animals are infected by contact with soil borne spores. Humans become infected only incidentally when brought into contact with diseased animals or their waste products.

Identification of B. anthracis has traditionally been determined by using phenotypic differences between B. anthracis and the rest of the B. cereus group (i.e., lack of motility and haemolysis, susceptibility to penicillin, typical colony morphology, and susceptibility to lysis by gamma phage); however, these methods are slow and require at least 24 h for completion. The main characteristic used to distinguish B. anthracis from closely related soil-borne Bacillus is the presence of two virulent plasmids pXO1 and pXO2. For B. anthracis, the main targets for development of such assays, primarily PCR-based, have been and continue to be genes encoding its virulence factors: a tripartite exotoxin and an antiphagocytic capsule25. Plasmid-located virulence genes seem to be restricted to B. anthracis, giving the plasmid-based assays a high degree of specificity6. However, strains of B. anthracis that lack these plasmids have also been reported27. Further, the pX02 plasmid has been transferred into other bacillus species, and genes from the pX01 plasmid have been successfully expressed in other bacteria8. Consequently, an assay focused on a specific stable chromosomal target for detection of avirulent and plasmid cured B. anthracis, as well as those that potentially could have been genetically engineered, is essential. The amplification of multiple rather than a single B. anthracis DNA targets provides an increased assurance of specificity9. Several chromosomal markers were tested for B. anthracis detection, such as the vrrA gene10, Ba813 marker11. Most of these assays are monoplex PCR which rely on the amplification of a single target. Moreover, these lack internal amplification control (IAC), which has now become almost mandatory in diagnostic PCRs.

In the present study, multiplex PCR (mPCR) was used to determine the presence of four plasmids genes viz., protective antigen (pag), lethal factor (lef), oedema factor (cya), capsule (cap) for the differentiation of virulent and avirulent strains of B. anthracis. Three chromosomal markers which include S-layer (sap), gyrase B (gyrB) and Ba813 marker have been targeted to confirm the B. anthracis species. IAC was incorporated to check the presence of inhibitor, if any, in the PCR mixture. We have also successfully evaluated the mPCR employing 25 B. anthracis known clinical isolates obtained from Christian Medical College (CMC), Vellore, and two isolates from 25 soil samples derived by us from different anthrax endemic regions in 200912. This study was aimed at the genotype determination targeting virulence and chromosomal marker genes in clinical and environmental isolates of B. anthracis using multiplex PCR. The study was conducted in Microbiology Division of Defense Research and Development Establishment, Gwalior, India.

The primers for cya and Ba8137; cap and sap13; gyrB14; pag, lef, and IAC12 were used in the present study. IAC was constructed as per the method described earlier14. Multiplex PCR was performed in a 25-μl reaction volume containing 1× PCR buffer, 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 2.0 mM MgCl2, primers (100nM protective antigen (Pa)-F and-R; 200 nM S-layer-F and –R; edema factor (Ef)-F and-R; lethal factor (Lf)-F and-R; 300 nM R1 and -R2; 350 nM BA1 and -BA2r; 500 nM Cap-F and -R;), 2.0 μl (~500 pg) of template DNA, and 1 U of Taq polymerase. Various concentrations of IAC DNA were tried before choosing 104 copies per reaction. Amplification consisted of initial denaturation at 94 °C for 4 min, 30 cycles of amplification with denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 51 °C for 40 sec, extension at 72 °C for 30 sec, and final extension of the incompletely synthesized DNA at 72 °C for 5 min in a Bio-Rad myCycler thermal cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA). The PCR products were analyzed in 2.5 per cent agarose gels containing 0.5 μg/ml of ethidium bromide and subjected to electrophoresis in a 1× Tris base acetic acid, EDTA (TAE) buffer.

To verify and evaluate the specificity of the primers used, PCR was performed employing template DNA prepared from B. anthracis as well as different bacterial strains (Source: MTCC, Chandigarh and DRDE, Gwalior) namely, B. cereus (n=8), B. thuringienis (n=5), B. licheniformis (n=3), B. megaterium (n=2), B. subtilis (n=2), B. sphaericus, B. circulans, B. pumilus, Escherichia coli, Proteus vulgaris, P. mirabilis, Shigella flexneri , S. sonnei, S. boydii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes and Yersinia enterocolitica. The primers produced amplicons of 719, 639, 929, 373, 152, 245 and 846 bp for pag, sap, cya, lef, Ba813, gyrB and cap genes, respectively. The primers did not amplify any product from any bacterial species other than B. anthracis. Moreover, PCR was performed to determine the presence of all the 7 genes in 27 isolates of B. anthracis. B. anthracis Sterne strain as well as recombinant B. anthracis pYS5 was also checked by mPCR. All the 27 isolates of B. anthracis used in this study showed the specific amplifications of all the seven genes (Fig.). No amplification of the cap gene was observed in the Sterne strain of B. anthracis, which lacks the plasmid pXO2 (Fig.). There was no amplification of the cap, lef, and cya genes, but the amplification of pag, sap, Ba813, and gyrB in recombinant B. anthracis pYS5 was evident (Fig.), which was originally deficient of both pXO1 and pXO2 plasmids, but has the pag gene inserted into a shuttle vector, pYS515. This shows that mPCR targeting both plasmid and chromosomal genes could unambiguously identify virulent and avirulent strains of B. anthracis and can easily distinguished ‘anthrax like’ strains from other B. cereus group bacteria.

Multiplex PCR showing amplification of DNA from B. anthracis isolates and IAC (552 bp). Lane M, Molecular weight marker (GeneRuler DNA Ladder-MBI Fermentas); lanes 1-4, B. anthracis DRDE isolates; lane 5, B. anthracis Sterne strain (lacking cap gene indicated by yellow arrow); lane 6, Recombinant B. anthracis pYS5 (lacking cap, lef, and cya gene indicated by red arrows); lane 7, B. cereus ATCC 13061; lane 8, B. thuringiensis ATCC 10792; lane 9, B. licheniformis ATCC 12759; lane 10, B. megaterium ATCC 14581.
Fig.
Multiplex PCR showing amplification of DNA from B. anthracis isolates and IAC (552 bp). Lane M, Molecular weight marker (GeneRuler DNA Ladder-MBI Fermentas); lanes 1-4, B. anthracis DRDE isolates; lane 5, B. anthracis Sterne strain (lacking cap gene indicated by yellow arrow); lane 6, Recombinant B. anthracis pYS5 (lacking cap, lef, and cya gene indicated by red arrows); lane 7, B. cereus ATCC 13061; lane 8, B. thuringiensis ATCC 10792; lane 9, B. licheniformis ATCC 12759; lane 10, B. megaterium ATCC 14581.

To investigate the sensitivity of mPCR detection, serial 10-fold dilutions of the genomic DNA samples were prepared from B. anthracis cell suspension. An aliquot of 2.0 μl of each dilution was added to five separate PCR tubes in the presence of 104 copies of IAC DNA. The PCR reactions were carried out as described above. The detection limit of mPCR was 1 pg with genomic DNA. The method is rapid, taking less than 2.5 h after picking up an isolated colony from an agar plate. IAC was included in the mPCR to increase the confidence of the assay by pinpointing false-negatives that may be the result of assay failure, and/or reaction inhibition51416. The IAC was co-amplified with target DNA and showed an amplification of 552 bp in all the DNA samples isolated from bacterial cultures.

This study demonstrates that the mPCR assay with an IAC is simple and easy to perform and represents a highly specific approach for the identification of B. anthracis. All the 27 isolates of B. anthracis from clinical and environmental samples contained all the 7 genes. Finally, this method will contribute significantly in reducing the risk of laboratory acquired infection and the multiplex format of the PCR assay will reduce reagent cost and staff time making this technique a very useful tool for confirmation of B. anthracis.

References

  1. , , . Anthrax. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2001;55:647-71.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , . Bacillus anthracis but not always anthrax. J Appl Bacteriol. 1992;72:21-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . Direct detection of Bacillus anthracis DNA in animals by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:547-51.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , . Detection of anthrax spores from the air by real-time PCR. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2001;33:237-40.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , . Fluorescent detection techniques for real-time multiplex strand specific detection of Bacillus anthracis using rapid PCR. J Appl Microbiol. 1999;87:218-23.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , . Bacillus anthracis pXO1 plasmid sequence conservation among closely related bacterial species. J Bacteriol. 2002;184:134-41.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , . Identification and characterization of Bacillus anthracis by multiplex PCR analysis of sequences on plasmids pXO1 and pXO2 and chromosomal DNA. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1996;145:9-16.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , . Optimization of the cell wall microenvironment allows increased production of recombinant Bacillus anthracis protective antigen from B. subtilis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68:227-34.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , . Laboratory facilities, protocols and operations. In: , , eds. PCR-based diagnostics in infectious disease. Boston: Blackwell Scientific Publications; . p. :19-43.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , . Characterization of the variable-number tandem repeats in vrrA from different Bacillus anthracis isolates. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63:1400-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , . Isolation of a specific chromosomic DNA sequence of Bacillus anthracis and its possible use in diagnosis. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 1996;15:223-31.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , . Detection of virulence-associated genes in clinical isolates of Bacillus anthracis by multiplex PCR and DNA probes. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;19:1475-81.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , . Guidelines for the surveillance and control of anthrax in humans and animals (3rd ed). Geneva: World Health Organization; .
  14. , , , , . Cloning and nucleotide sequence analysis of gyrB of Bacillus cereus, B. thuringiensis, B. mycoides, and B. anthracis and their application to the detection of B. cereus in rice. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65:1483-90.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , . A deleted variant of Bacillus anthracis protective antigen is non-toxic and blocks anthrax toxin action in vivo. J Biol Chem. 1989;264:19103-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , . Making internal amplification control mandatory for diagnostic PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:5835.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    12

    PDF downloads
    8
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections
    Scroll to Top