Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Correspondence
155 (
5-6
); 510-511
doi:
10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_494_22

Care for cancer during COVID-19 pandemic

Public Health Specialist, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, New Delhi 110 011, India
Licence
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Sir,

The article by Sahoo et al1 is appropriate in the context of sustaining routine healthcare during the pandemic. While the study was limited to 49 cancer patients only, with other non-communicable diseases (NCDs), the overwhelming fact was still evident - the pandemic deteriorated the care received by cancer patients. To re-emphasize, cancer is responsible for 8.3 per cent of deaths in India2. During the pandemic, on the one hand, there was a fear of contracting COVID-19 and higher vulnerability due to immunosuppressive state, and there were lockdown and other restrictions on the other hand3. Limited availability of telemedicine restricted the care-seeking behaviour of chronic patients, particularly cancer. Unlike diabetes and hypertension, where home-based monitoring was a feasible option, cancer patients needed to depend on tertiary care hospitals for their care. If we add financial uncertainties imposed by social restrictions, the balance probably got tilted towards out-of-pocket expenditure. Shifting a major portion of working doctors towards COVID-19 would, for obvious reasons, reduce the number of doctors looking after cancer and chemotherapy. The unwanted delay in care possibly resulted in chemotherapy received irregularly, postponement in the initiation of therapy and resultant advancement of cancer from a curable stage to an incurable one, in some cases which might potentially change a curative approach to a palliative one3-6.

To summarize, there is a need for an in-depth study, preferably pan-national, to understand the magnitude of the problems faced by cancer patients during this pandemic. It would help us in identifying the areas where we could improvise and provide better care if similar situation arises in the future.

Conflicts of Interest: None.

References

  1. , , , , . Non-communicable diseases care during COVID-19 pandemic:A mixed-method study in Khurda district of Odisha, India. Indian J Med Res. 2021;153:649-57.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. . India: Health of the Nation's States –The India State-level disease burden initiative. New Delhi, India: ICMR, PHFI, and IHME; .
  3. . COVID-19:Global consequences for oncology. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:467.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , . Breast cancer survivorship care during the COVID-19 pandemic within an urban New York Hospital System. Breast. 2021;59:301-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , . Impact of nationwide lockdown on cancer care during COVID-19 pandemic:A retrospective analysis from western India. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2021;15:102131.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . Mitigating the impact of COVID-19 on oncology:Clinical and operational lessons from a prospective radiation oncology cohort tested for COVID-19. Radiother Oncol. 2020;148:252-7.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    14

    PDF downloads
    8
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections
    Scroll to Top