Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
155 (
1
); 66-72
doi:
10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1811_19

Leptospirosis in central & eastern Uttar Pradesh, an underreported disease: A prospective cross-sectional study

Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
Department of Microbiology, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
Department of Medicine, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

For correspondence: Dr Vineeta Mittal, Department of Microbiology, Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow 226 010, Uttar Pradesh, India e-mail: vineetamittal@yahoo.co.in

Licence
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Background & objective:

Leptospirosis is a zoonotic disease associated with potentially fatal consequences and a grossly underreported disease in Uttar Pradesh. However, only a few studies are available which report the prevalence of leptospirosis in this State. Hence, this study was undertaken to know the status of the disease in central and eastern Uttar Pradesh.

Methods:

A total of 143 serum and urine samples were collected from patients with acute febrile illness from July 2017 to March 2019. All the serum samples were tested for Leptospira by rapid IgM antibody card and IgM ELISA and urine samples were tested by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to detect Leptospira DNA. All positive and 10 per cent negative sera from ELISA and RT-PCR (all rapid test positive were also ELISA positive) were sent to the ICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Port Blair for microscopic agglutination test (MAT).

Results:

Thirty eight (26.6%) out of 143 samples were positive for leptospirosis either by ELISA or RT-PCR. Positive results were eight (6%) by Rapid card, 32 (22%) by IgM ELISA, 10 (7%) by MAT, 10 (7%) by RT-PCR. In MAT, the most common serovar was Lai followed by Hebdomadis, Bangkinang and Pomona.

Interpretation & conclusions:

Leptospirosis was found to be one of the important causes for acute febrile illness in the central and eastern parts of Uttar Pradesh. The results of the present study suggest that it is necessary to increase diagnostic facility and awareness in clinicians for the screening of leptospirosis in acutely febrile patients to decrease morbidity and mortality associated with this disease.

Keywords

IgM ELISA
leptospirosis
microscopic agglutination test
rapid test
real-time polymerase chain reaction
Uttar Pradesh

Leptospirosis is a worldwide zoonosis and has been documented in India since 19311. In the recent years, its incidence has been widely reported from southern, central, eastern and western India due to heavy monsoon, animal rearing practices and unplanned urbanization12. Furthermore, leptospirosis has long been recognized as one of the leading causes of acute febrile illness in these parts of the country3. Central and eastern Uttar Pradesh (UP) encounters similar conditions and animal tending practices, but there are hardly any reports on the prevalence of this disease in this region456. Lack of awareness, clinical suspicion and active surveillance about the infliction of leptospirosis could be the probable reasons of under-reporting. There is a wide spectrum of clinical presentations for leptospirosis. Most of the patients with Leptospira infection present only with mild fever or flu-like symptoms and recover without any complications and a small proportion develops various complications due to involvement of multiple organ systems. Clinical manifestations and complications can affect most organ systems, including the liver, kidneys, lungs, and central nervous system. Timely diagnosis and specific therapy can reduce the severity of illness and, in turn, mortality7. The accuracy of a clinical diagnosis of leptospirosis is poor because the clinical features are similar to those of a range of other common infectious diseases, which in the tropical setting includes rickettsial infection, dengue and malaria, typhoid and viral hepatitis8. The diagnosis is confirmed by laboratory tests, but only a few tertiary care hospitals have leptospirosis diagnostic facilities and no facility is present at primary and secondary care hospitals in UP, so leptospirosis is neglected and under-diagnosed in UP.

As leptospirosis is under-reported from all over India especially from central and eastern UP, this study was undertaken to estimate the prevalence of the disease in these regions. Furthermore, this study was also the first in this region for the detection of Leptospira by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in urine samples.

Material & Methods

This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary care institute in central Uttar Pradesh over a period of two years from July 2017 to June 2019 after approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee. A written informed consent was taken from all the patients or their family members included in the present study.

A total of 143 patients attending in and outpatients of various departments of the institute were enrolled for the study.

Inclusion criteria: The inclusion criteria were the patients with acute febrile illness with any symptoms including headache and body aches associated with severe muscle tenderness, haemorrhages including sub-conjunctival haemorrhage, jaundice, cough, breathlessness and haemoptysis, oliguria or signs of meningeal irritation. Scoring was given to each presentation according to the modified Faine scoring including clinical and epidemiological parameters9 as shown in Table I. Only those patients who had a score >15 with suspected leptospirosis were included in the study.

Table I Scoring system using the modified Faine’s criteria (with amendment) 2012 for the diagnosis of leptospirosis9
Study parameter Score
Part A: Clinical
Headache 2
Fever 2
Fever >39°C 2
Conjunctival suffusion 4
Meningism 4
Myalgia 4
Conjuctival suffusion + meningism + myalgia 10
Jaundice 1
Albuminuria/nitrogen retention 2
Haemoptysis/dyspnoea 2
Part B: Epidemiological
Rainfall 5
Contact with contaminated environment 4
Animal contact 1
Part C: Bacteriological and laboratory findings
Isolation of Leptospira spp. in culture-diagnosis certain
PCR 25
Positive serology
ELISA IgM positiveb 15
SAT positiveb 15
Other rapid testsa,b 15
MAT-single positive in high titerb 15
MAT-rising titer/seroconversion (paired sera) 25

Presumptive diagnosis of leptospirosis: Part A or Part A and Part B score: 26 or more; Part A, B, C (total): 25 or more; Possible diagnosis of leptospirosis: Score between 20 and 25. a Other rapid tests-Latex agglutination test/leptodipstick/lepto tek lateral flow/lepto tek dri dot test; b Any one of the tests only should be scored. PCR, polymerase chain reaction; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; SAT, slide agglutination test; MAT, microscopic agglutination test

Sample processing: Two blood samples of about 3-5 ml were collected one-week apart from all the participants10, and universal precautions for sample collections with aseptic barriers were followed. Blood samples obtained by vein puncture were allowed to clot at room temperature (20 - 25°C) and then centrifuged. The serum was separated as soon as possible. Furthermore, 10 ml of urine sample was collected in a sterile universal screw-capped urine container of the same study participants on day one. The separated sera and urine samples were stored at a temperature of −20°C. Serum samples were used for various serological tests and urine samples were used for molecular tests.

Serological testing for leptospirosis:

Rapid test for IgM antibodies to leptospira: Rapid test for detection of IgM antibodies for Leptospira was performed using a commercial kit (Leptocheck WB; Tulip Diagnostic Pvt. Ltd., India) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

ELISA for IgM antibodies to leptospira: ELISA tested serum samples for specific anti-Leptospira IgM antibodies for Leptospira was also detected using a commercial kit (PanBio Leptospira IgM; Alare, Australia) and interpreted according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Microscopic agglutination test (MAT): In-house testing facility for MAT, which is considered as a gold standard was not available. Hence, all samples which tested positive on either of the tests (ELISA and RT-PCR as all rapid card positive tests were also positive by ELISA) and 10 per cent negative samples from all tests as negative control were sent for MAT evaluation to Regional Medical Research Centre, Indian Council of Medical Research, Port Blair, India. The result of MAT was obtained with the panel of eleven serovars used. Leptospira interrogans serogroups Australis serovar australis, Autumnalis serovar bankinang, Canicola serovar canicola, Grippotyphosa serovar grippotyphosa strain CK31 and Moskva V, Hebdomadis serovar hebdomadis, Icterohaemorrhagiae serovar icterohaemorrhagiae, serovar lai like, Pomona serovar pomona, Pyrogenes serovar pyrogenes, Sejroe serovar hardjo.

Molecular testing for leptospirosis: Isolate of Leptospira interogens serogroup Pomona serovar pomona from ICAR-Indian veterinary Research Institute, Bareilly, were obtained for standardization of RT-PCR.

DNA Extraction and RT-PCR: DNA was extracted from urine using HiPurATM Urine Bacterial Genomic DNA Purification Kit (HiMedia Laboratories, Mumbai, India), as per manufacturer’s instructions with minor modification of sample preparation (three times wash of urine sample at 12000 rpm for 10 min at room temperature with the same protocol). RT-PCR was performed using primers and fluorescent labelled probe (Eurofins Scientific, Bengaluru, India) as described previously11.

The RT-PCR detection kit [GoTaq® Probe qPCR Master Mix (Promega biotech India Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India)] was used as per standard protocol with requisite modification in DNA quantity for better yields of the test. The final volume of the reagents in 20 µl reaction mixture was as, master mix 10 µl; primers 1 µl; hydrolysis probe 1 µl; template DNA 5 µl; nuclease-free water 2 µl. An initial denaturation at 95°C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of amplification was done. Each cycle consisted of denaturation at 95°C for 3 sec, annealing at 60°C for 30 sec, and extension at 60°C for 30 sec.

Statistical analysis: All the statistical analyses was performed using the SPSS for Windows, Version 20.0 (Statistical Package for the Social Science software, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and Microsoft Office Excel 2010. The data analysis was summarized as mean±standard deviation presented as frequency and proportion. Categorical groups were associated using Chi-square test. Using MAT as the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values was calculated for each sample by Chi square test. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Out of 143 suspected cases of leptospirosis, 38 (26.6%) were found to be positive for Leptospira spp. by any of the test (rapid card, ELISA or RT-PCR). In serology testing, only eight (6%) patients detected positive for leptospirosis by rapid IgM antibody card test and these eight samples were also positive by ELISA while, 32 (22.4%) participants tested positive using IgM ELISA. On molecular testing using RT-PCR in urine samples, 10 (7%) samples were found positive. By MAT only 10 (7 %) samples were positive. In this study, ELISA showed maximum positivity for leptospirosis (n=32) as compared to PCR (n=10) and rapid IgM card test (n=8). Although 90 per cent of positive cases by RT-PCR from urine samples, were also positive by ELISA, only 31.3 per cent of ELISA-positive cases showed RT-PCR positivity. Majority of PCR-positive cases (80 %) having fever of greater than or equal to seven days duration signify leptospiriuric phase of illness.

ELISA showed 80 per cent sensitivity and PCR showed 20 per cent sensitivity with MAT as a gold standard as shown in Table II.

Table II Comparison of serological and molecular tests with microscopic agglutination test (gold standard)
Test TP FP 95% CI
Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) Diagnostic accuracy (%)
Rapid (n=8) 0 8 0.00 100.00 0 93.01 93.01
ELISA (n=32) 8 24 80.00 81.95 25.00 98.20 81.82
PCR (n=10) 2 8 20.00 93.98 20.00 93.98 88.81

CI, confidence interval; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; TP, true positive; FP, false positive

The serovars of Leptospira interrogans most commonly associated with leptospirosis were found to be Lai (80%), followed by Hebdomadis (20%) and Bangkinang (10%), and Pomona (10%) each as tested by MAT. More than one serovar were found in two patients with the same titers for both serovars.

In this study, out of all patients from 26 districts of east and central Uttar Pradesh, all positive patients were from 14 districts and maximum seropositivity (9; 23.7%) found in patients from Lucknow followed by four (10.5%) from Barabanki, three each (7.9%) from Bahraich, Ayodhya (Faizabad), Basti, Sultanpur and Gorakhpur, two each (5.3%) from Unnao, Sitapur, Raebareli and Gonda, one each (2.6%) from Santkabirnagar, Ambedkar nagar and Maharajganj, as shown in the Figure.

Distribution of positive patients in central and eastern Uttar Pradesh. Outline of map depicting districts from census 2011 adapted with permission from http//www.indiagrowing.com
Figure
Distribution of positive patients in central and eastern Uttar Pradesh. Outline of map depicting districts from census 2011 adapted with permission from

Clinical presentations in all the positive leptospirosis patients were fever associated with headache and muscle pain. Unexplained breathlessness, bleeding tendency including sub-conjunctival haemorrhage and albuminuria was present in 29 (76.3%), 23 (60.5%) and 20 (52.6%) of patients, respectively. Deranged liver function tests and the sign of meningeal irritation were present in 22 (57.9%) and 18 (47.4%) patients. Albuminuria, bleeding tendency including sub-conjunctival haemorrhage and deranged liver function tests were found to be statistically significant as shown in Table III.

Table III Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of patients
History and symptoms Total cases (n=143), n (%) Positive (n=38), n (%) χ2 P
Epidemiological parameters
H/O rainfall 128 (90) 32 (84.2) 0.875 0.350
H/O contact with contaminated environment 123 (86) 34 (89.5) 0.198 0.657
H/O animal contact 119 (83) 30 (78.9) 0.323 0.570
Clinical parameters
Headache 143 (100) 38 (100) 0.002 1.000
Fever 143 (100) 38 (100) 0.002 1.000
Muscle pain 143 (100) 38 (100) 0.002 1.000
Cough with haemoptysis 39 (27) 3 (7.9) 0.003 0.832
Unexplained breathlessness 107 (75) 29 (76.3) 0.001 0.977
Bleeding tendency including sub-conjunctival haemorrhage 54 (38) 23 (60.5) 10.130 0.002**
Deranged liver function tests 47 (33) 22 (57.9) 4.078 0.044*
Sign of meningeal irritation 61 (43) 18 (47.4) 0.244 0.621
Albuminuria 100 (70) 20 (52.6) 7.365 0.007**

P* <0.05, ** <0.01

Major epidemiological factors associated with occurrence (>80%) of leptospirosis were heavy rainfall, contaminated environment and animal contacts as shown in Table III. The subset analysis demonstrated that positive cases were common between July to October in both 2017 and 2018 (monsoon and immediately thereafter) and it was found to be significantly high in September in both years.

According to the demographic data of the participants, most of the patients (64%) were found to be in their 2nd, 3rd and 4th decades of life. The mean age of all the participants was 42 yr including 40 yr for males and 44 yr for females. Out of the 143 cases included in the study, leptospirosis was found positive in 66 per cent males and 34 per cent female patients (male:female ratio of 2:1).

The geographical distribution of the participants was 76 (53%) urban and 67 (47%) from the rural area. It was found that positive cases 23 (61%) were 1.5-fold more from urban dwellings as compared to rural areas 15 (39%).

Discussion

Leptospirosis is a zoonotic disease with a widespread distribution including in Southeast Asia. Its occurrence is reported from various regions of India with higher incidence in tropical and coastal regions. In clinical practices, testing for leptospirosis is not routinely done unlike other diseases presenting with similar complaints such as dengue, malaria, and typhoid. The reason may be a lack of awareness among the physicians about the prevalence of this disease. There are only a few studies reported from this region on the prevalence of leptospirosis456.

In this study, an attempt has been made to evaluate the prevalence of leptospirosis in the region of eastern and central UP on patients who presented with acute febrile illness. This study revealed that the overall prevalence of leptospirosis was 26.6 per cent. This indicates that the increasing trends of leptospirosis in Uttar Pradesh as in a prospective study in the year 2004; a seroprevalence of seven per cent was reported in a study conducted in Lucknow4. A seroprevalence of 14 per cent was reported in patients with prolonged febrile illness in north UP in a study conducted at Aligarh (2018)5. Chaurasia et al6 reported a sero-prevalence of 24 per cent in a study conducted at Lucknow. The ascendance in prevalence may be due to an increased incidence of waterlogging in this area, which enhanced direct and indirect contact with animals (mice, rabbits, rodents, etc.). Indirect contact with contaminated water during recreational exposure and deteriorating environmental conditions also contribute to facilitating the spread of serovars.

In the present study, ELISA was found to be the most sensitive test, easy to perform with minimum infrastructure so this test should be recommended in all hospital settings. MAT is gold standard but has some limitations that require two samples and less sensitive in the early phase of the disease, as microscopic agglutinating antibodies usually appear in the blood at a detectable level during the end of the first week or early second week of the infection. It is labour intensive and complicated procedure also as there is a need to maintain Leptospira strain for preparing live antigen7.

In this study, we found Leptospira interrogans serovar Lai as the most common serovar followed by Hebdomadis, Bangkinang, and Pomona in MAT positive cases. These results were different from serovar prevalent in south India12. When antibodies to multiple serovars were detected in the same patient, the serovar with the higher antibody titre was considered as the infecting serovar13. Multiple serovars in the same patients have also been reported from previous studies14. In this study also, two samples had two serovars with the same titres (Table III).

Vaccines currently in use confer serovar-specific immunity. Presumptive information on local circulating serovars should guide the formulation of effective vaccines12. There is not a single study in Uttar Pradesh for determining the prevalent serovars in the State, so our study is a first to provide knowledge of the prevalent serovar in the State for the formulation of a better vaccine for the same.

In this study, maximum seropositivity was found in adult males. These findings correlate with the study published by Sethi et al15, who observed that majority of the patients of leptospirosis were males in the age group 26-40. The occurrence of leptospirosis more commonly in adult males in the present study (age group 30-40) may be because of their occupational exposure (animal handling, agriculture, fisheries) also and due to exposure during outdoor and recreational activities.

In this study, seasonal variation of leptospirosis infection was also found. Maximum positivity was found during the months of September followed by October i.e. monsoon and immediate post-monsoon periods which was most probably due to waterlogging and stagnant infected water with an increased chance of contact during this period. These findings correlate with the study published by Pawar et al16.

It has also been reported in various studies that rural areas have relatively more positive cases for leptospirosis as compared to the urban, however; the findings of our study suggested otherwise. This may be due to more patients from the urban setting included in the study. The higher positivity in general in the urban population may also be multifactorial such as increased awareness and health consciousness leading to early reporting to speciality clinics. Rapid urbanization, contact with contaminated water, consumption of street food and beverages facilitate easy contact with serovars. There are case reports on the spread of leptospirosis from cold drinks and beverage cans contaminated with rat’s urine17. Urban construction, which is spreading with rampant pace, provides easy shelter for rodents that are carriers of Leptospira. An urban concentration in slums and hutments along the culverts/pool waters bodies used both by animals and human is the most possible cause of higher infection in this population. Moreover, lesser positivity in rural areas may also be attributed to the non-reporting of patients to hospitals, lack of awareness, paucity of speciality clinics and laboratory testing facilities.

In this study, non-specific flu-like symptoms such as fever, headache and myalgia were observed in almost all patients. Bleeding tendency, the sign of meningeal irritation, unexplained breathlessness jaundice and albuminuria were more commonly associated with positive patients. Association of leptospirosis with bleeding tendency including sub-conjunctival haemorrhage, Jaundice and albuminuria was observed to be statistically significant (P <0.5).

In this study, epidemiological factors associated with positive cases included rainfall, contact with contaminated environment as well as animals. All of which are in favour of the transmission of leptospires.

The study was not without some limitations, the main one being small sample size. Also this was hospital based study, so significant samples from each district of eastern and central UP could not be included.

Overall, leptospirosis was found to be an important and common cause of acute febrile illness in the central and eastern part of UP. It is therefore necessary to add screening of leptospirosis as a differential diagnosis in acutely febrile patients along with other routine testing to decrease morbidity and mortality associated with this disease. Diagnostic facilities for leptospirosis must be available at the primary or secondary health centres of rural and urban areas of districts of central and eastern UP.

Financial support & sponsorship: None.

Conflicts of Interest: None.

References

  1. , , , , . Leptospirosis in India and the rest of the world. Braz J Infect Dis. 2003;7:178-93.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Epidemiological patterns in leptospirosis. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2006;24:310-11.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , . Leptospirosis laboratory, Madras Medical College:Review of our experience (|y2004-2006) Indian J Med Microbiol. 2008;26:206-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , . Frequency of leptospirosis in patients of acute febrile illness in Uttar Pradesh. J Assoc Physicians India. 2004;52:623-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , . Leptospirosis:Seroprevalence, risk factors, and diagnostic view in a tertiary care center in North India. Int J Health Allied Sci. 2018;7:171-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . Serological and molecular approaches for leptospirosis at a tertiary care centre in northern India. Int J Res Med Sci. 2018;6:3084-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. . Leptospirosis Laboratory Manual. RMCR-ICMR and WHO. Available from: https://apps.searo.who.int/PDS_DOCS/B2147.pdf
  8. , , , , , , . Acute undifferentiated fever in India:A multicentre study of aetiology and diagnostic accuracy. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17:665.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , . , ed. Indian guidelines for the diagnosis and management of human leptospirosis, Vol. 18. India: Medicine Update; . p. :23-9.
  10. , , . Leptospirosis diagnosis:Competancy of various laboratory tests. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8:199-202.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , . Detection of pathogenic Leptospira spp through Taq Man polymerase chain reaction targeting the LipL32 gene. Diag Microbial Infec Dis. 2009;64:247-55.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , . Serovar prevalence of Leptospira in semirural India and the development of an IgM-based indirect ELISA. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2017;11:234-41.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , . Interpretation of microscopic agglutination test for leptospirosis diagnosis and seroprevalence. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2014;4:S162-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , . Investigation on predominant Leptospira serovars and its distribution in humans and livestock in Thailand, 2010-2015. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11:e0005228.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , . Leptospirosis in northern India:A clinical and serological study. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2003;34:822-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , . Seasonality of leptospirosis and its association with rainfall and humidity in Ratangiri Maharashtra. Int J Health Allied Sci. 2018;7:37-40.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , . Cold drink cans contaminated with rat urine can kill. Indian J Microbiol. 2009;49:294.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections
Scroll to Top