Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
150 (
5
); 508-511
doi:
10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_787_18

Status of adult immunity to hepatitis A virus in healthcare workers from a tertiary care hospital in north India

Department of Internal Medicine, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
Department of Microbiology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
Department of Microbiology, Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

For correspondence: Dr D. Himanshu, Department of Internal Medicine, King George's Medical University, Lucknow 226 003, Uttar Pradesh, India e-mail: dr.himanshu.reddy@gmail.com

Licence

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Background & objectives:

Humans are considered to be the principal host for hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection. In India, heterogeneous groups of susceptible individuals coexist in different regions. There has been a decline in antibody titres to HAV among young adults which may pose a major public health problem. The objective of this study was to assess the IgG anti-HAV level among healthcare workers (HCWs) in the age group of 20-60 yr and its association with the socio-demographic variables.

Methods:

Blood sample (2 ml) was collected under aseptic conditions from each participant followed by the preparation of serum and storing at −20°C. ELISA-based kits were used for the determination of IgG antibodies to HAV in the human serum samples.

Results:

Two hundred and fifty four HCWs were enrolled. IgG anti-HAV antibodies were detected in 97.2 per cent of the samples analyzed. No differences were observed in the levels of IgG anti-HAV antibody and education, income, occupation and socio-economic classes of the HCWs. A seropositivity rate of over 90 per cent was seen amongst all the socio-economic classes.

Interpretation & conclusions:

High levels of IgG protective antibodies were seen among the studied HCWs, hence HAV vaccination may not be required. It will be advisable to do a cost-benefit analysis of vaccination for HAV.

Keywords

Anti-hepatitis A virus antibody
healthcare workers
hepatitis A virus
north India
prevalence
vaccination

The hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection occurs throughout the world, and humans are thought to be its principal host. The virus replicates in the liver and is transported through the bile to the stool, and shedding of virus starts one to three weeks before the onset of illness and continues for around two weeks after onset of jaundice1. The virus is transmitted from person to person through faeco-oral route. Nearly 70 per cent of infections in children younger than six years of age are asymptomatic, whereas more than 75 per cent of adults with hepatitis A infections are symptomatic23. Though most patients recover completely and uneventfully, the potential seriousness of hepatitis A in adults is under appreciated. Coagulopathy, encephalopathy, renal failure, relapse and prolonged duration of illness are its complications.

The overall incidence of fulminant hepatic failure due to hepatitis A is less than one per cent, and it occurs commonly in individuals over 50 yr of age4. The same holds true for relapse. Several factors have contributed to the decline in infection rate, including rising incomes, access to clean drinking water, improved socio-economic status and sanitation facilities5. However, healthcare workers (HCWs) remain in the category of high-risk for HAV infection.

In India and China, many high endemicity areas for HAV infection coexist with other areas of low endemicity67. Thus, the declining antibody titres among young adults may pose a major public health problem in the years to come.

Data on vaccination strategies emerging from the developing nations such as India suggest a decline in seroprevalence of anti-HAV antibodies, especially in the adult population8. The Indian Academy of Paediatrics (IAP) 2016 Immunization Schedule recommends hepatitis A vaccination at 12 months of age9. The aim of the present study was to see the level of anti-HAV antibody levels in HCWs (20-60 yr of age) from a tertiary care hospital in north India and to study the various socio-demographic factors influencing it.

Material & Methods

This cross-sectional observational study was conducted at the King George's Medical University (KGMU), Lucknow, India, from December 2016 to December 2017. The participants were HCWs employed in KGMU. A total of 254 HCWs were selected in the age group of 20-60 yr, under four categories (20-29; 30-39; 40-49; 50-60 yr).

Written informed consent was obtained from each participant and the study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee, KGMU.

The data for socio-demographic and clinical variables were obtained from the participants on a predesigned questionnaire. The socio-demographic variables included were education, income and occupation. Socio-economic status was determined as per the Modified Kuppuswamy Scale10. All healthcare workers with the previous history of hepatitis A vaccination, age more than 60 yr or less than 20 yr, were excluded from this study.

A venous blood sample (2 ml) was taken by peripheral venipuncture with proper aseptic precautions. The serum was separated by standard techniques and stored at −20° C. ELISA-based kits (DIA.PRO Diagnostic BioProbes Srl, Italy) were used for the determination of IgG antibodies to HAV in the human serum samples. Pre Assay controls and operations were checked and matched. The test results were calculated by means of a cut-off value determined as per the manufacturer's instructions.

Results & Discussion

Of the 254 apparently healthy HCWs tested, anti-HAV IgG antibodies were detected in 247 (97.2%) samples. Only seven participants tested negative for anti-HAV IgG. Table I shows the distributions according to age groups studied. There was a consistent seropositivity for IgG anti-HAV of nearly 95 per cent in all the age groups studied. No significant differences were observed in the levels of anti-HAV IgG amongst participants. A seropositivity rate of over 90 per cent was seen amongst all socio-economic classes (Table II).

Table I Anti-hepatitis A virus IgG positivity in healthcare workers of various age groups
Age group (yr) IgG HAV status Total
Positive, n (%) Negative, n (%)
20-29 89 (96.73) 3 (3.26) 92
30-39 62 (98.41) 1 (1.58) 63
40-49 59 (98.33) 1 (1.66) 60
50-59 37 (94.87) 2 (5.12) 39
Total 247 (97.24) 7 (2.75) 254

n, number of healthcare workers in the specified age; HAV, hepatitis A virus

Table II Anti-hepatitis A virus IgG level and socio-economic variable in healthcare workers
Socio-economic factor Number of patients Total
Male Female
Positive (%) Negative (%) Total Positive (%) Negative (%) Total
Education
Profession/honours 3 (100) - 3 1 (100) - 1 4
Graduate/post-graduate 64 (96.96) 2 (3.03) 66 24 (96) 1 (4) 25 91
Intermediate/post-high school diploma 35 (97.22) 1 (2.77) 36 41 (97.6) 1 (2.38) 42 78
High school 21 (91.30) 2 (8.69) 23 5 (100) - 5 28
Middle school 14 (100) - 14 5 (100) - 5 19
Primary school 5 (100) - 5 7 (100) - 7 12
Literate 7 (100) - 7 15 (100) - 15 22
Total 254
Occupation
Professional 53 (96.36) 2 (3.63) 55 47 (95.91) 2 (4.08) 49 104
Semi-professional 14 (93.33) 1 (6.66) 15 4 (100) - 4 19
Clerical/shop owner 20 (90.90) 2 (9.09) 22 8 (100) - 8 30
Skilled worker 34 (100) - 34 1 (100) - 1 35
Semi-skilled worker 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unskilled 19 (100) - 19 29 (100) - 29 48
Unemployed 9 (100) - 9 9 (100) - 9 18
Total 254
Income (₹)
41,430 43 (93.47) 3 (6.52) 46 23 (95.83) 1 (4.16) 24 70
20,715-41,429 23 (92) 2 (8) 25 17 (100) - 17 42
15,536-20,714 14 (100) - 14 9 (100) - 9 23
10,357-15,535 33 (100) - 33 26 (96.29) 1 (3.70) 27 60
6214-10,356 36 (100) - 36 21 (100) - 21 57
2092-6213 0 0 0 2 (100) - 2 2
<2091 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 254
Socio-economic class
Upper 35 (92.10) 3 (7.89) 38 22 (95.65) 1 (4.34) 23 61
Upper middle 47 (95.91) 2 (4.08) 49 34 (97.14) 1 (2.85) 35 84
Lower middle 42 (100) - 42 16 (100) - 16 58
Upper lower 25 (100) - 25 26 (100) - 26 51
Lower 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 254

Of the 254 participants, 30 had a history of jaundice; of these three were tested positive for anti-HEV IgM and of these two were tested positive for anti-HAV IgG. The remaining 27 HCWs with past history of jaundice were also tested positive for anti-HAV IgG. Among the 247 HCWs who were tested positive for anti-HAV IgG, 27 gave prior history of jaundice (10.93%). The overall anti-HAV IgG positivity was found to be >95 per cent and no significant differences were observed across the various age groups. No differences were observed in the seropositivity rates and the socio-economic class of the HCWs, with 93.4 per cent positivity in the upper class (Modified Kuppuswamy score 26-29) and 100 per cent positivity in the upper lower class (Modified Kuppuswamy score 5-10). The seven HCWs tested negative belonged to the upper and upper-middle socio-economic class; however, they only constituted for 4.8 per cent of the total participants tested in these classes.

In a study conducted in New Delhi, India, the seropositivity of anti-HAV IgG in 500 healthy controls was found to be 71.2 per cent; the positivity in participants over 35 yr of age (92%) was significantly higher than that in participants less than 35 yr (57%). This showed a decreasing prevalence of IgG anti-HAV, in the age group between 16 and 35 yr11. This was also corroborated by another study conducted by Dhawan et al12 who also obtained a seroprevalence rate of 78 per cent. In another study undertaken in New Delhi, to assess whether the proportion of adults with acute HAV infection has been increasing over the years and to analyze the seroprevalence of IgG anti-HAV antibodies in young adults above the age of 15 yr, it was found that the frequency of HAV infection among adults increased (3.4-12.3%)13. These findings were in contrast to a previous study done by Arankalle et al14, who reported a seroprevalence of nearly 95 per cent. This difference was said to be due to a rapid increase in the number of non-immune individuals over the past few years.

The high seropositivity level of anti-HAV-IgG antibodies in HCWs indicated exposure of HAV. Therefore, they may not need to be vaccinated against HAV. However, it will be advisable to do a cost-benefit analysis of vaccination for HAV elimination.

Financial support & sponsorship: The study was supported by intramural funding from the King George's Medical University, Lucknow.

Conflicts of Interest: None.

References

  1. , . Hepatitis A: Old and new. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001;14:38-58.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , . Hepatitis A in the era of vaccination. Epidemiol Rev. 2006;28:101-11.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . Worldwide epidemiology of hepatitis A virus infection. JHepatol. 1993;18(Suppl 2):S11-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . Hepatitis A. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2000;14:605-15.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . Infectious risks for health care workers. Annu Rev Public Health. 1995;16:141-64.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , . Hepatitis A: Epidemiology and prevention in developing countries. World J Hepatol. 2012;4:68-73.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , . Hepatitis A virus seroprevalence by age and world region, 1990 and 2005. Vaccine. 2010;28:6653-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , . Hepatitis A: Epidemiology and prevention in developing countries. World J Hepatol. 2012;4:68-73.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . Indian Academy of Pediatrics (IAP) Advisory Committee on Vaccines and Immunization Practices (ACVIP) Recommended Immunization Schedule (2018-19) and update on immunization for children aged 0 through 18 years. Indian Pediatr. 2018;55:1066-74.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , . An updated Kuppuswamy's socio-economic classification for 2017. Int J Health Sci Res. 2017;7:365-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , . Increasing trend of acute hepatitis A in North India: Need for identification of high-risk population for vaccination. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;21:689-93.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , . Seroprevalence of hepatitis A virus in Mumbai, and immunogenicity and safety of hepatitis A vaccine. Indian J Gastroenterol. 1998;17:16-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , . The changing epidemiological pattern of hepatitis A in an urban population of India: Emergence of a trend similar to the European countries. Eur J Epidemiol. 2000;16:507-10.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , . Age-specific prevalence of antibodies to hepatitis A and E viruses in Pune, India, 1982 and 1992. J Infect Dis. 1995;171:447-50.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections
Scroll to Top