Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Correspondence
145 (
1
); 144-146
doi:
10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1570_15

Opportunistic cervical cancer screening of women visitors at a trade fair in India

Division of Clinical Oncology, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
Division of Cytopathology, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
National Programme for Prevention and Control of Cancer, Diabetes, CVD and Stroke (NPCDCS), Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, New Delhi, India
NCD Section, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, New Delhi, India
South Asia Program Director, Center for Global Health (US National Cancer Institute), New Delhi, India

*For correspondence: roopaicmr@gmail.com

Licence

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Sir,

India is facing an epidemiological transition with non-communicable diseases (NCDs) emerging as the new threat in the country1. One of the most dangerous aspects of this group of diseases is that these may be symptomless during the course of the disease. People often do not realize that they have the disease until it reaches an advanced stage when the management becomes difficult. This puts a huge load on the already overburdened health system of the country. Some of these NCDs are preventable if appropriate screening and early diagnosis measures are adopted. Cervical cancer is one such disease which is the second most common malignancy among women in India2. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) estimated 123,000 new cases and 67,500 deaths due to cervical cancer in India in the year 20122.

An awareness campaign was organized by National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research (NICPR), Noida, India, at the India International Trade Fair, Pragati Maidan, New Delhi, India, with the aim of educating the public about risk factors and symptoms of some of the NCDs, using innovative methods to enhance the campaign efficiency from November 14-27, 2014. The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee and the participation was voluntary with informed written consent. A total of seven health camps were set up. Of these, five were devoted to common NCDs and the sixth was exclusively for three most common cancers. The seventh camp was set up for oral health and oral cancer.

A total of 338 women were screened for cervical cancer by Pap smear. The demographic data, presenting complaints and findings on per speculum examination were recorded on a predesigned proforma. The Pap smears were sent on the same day to the NICPR laboratory at Noida for processing and reporting. Women with positive results were invited to the NICPR for further evaluation by colposcopy at a later date.

The demographic and clinical details are given in the Table. A total of four epithelial cell abnormalities were detected in Pap smear cytology: three pre-neoplastic [one each of atypical squamous cells-undetermined significance (ASC-US), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and atypical glandular cells (AGC)] and one malignant (squamous cell carcinoma) (Figure). The women with epithelial cell abnormalities were followed up. The woman diagnosed with malignancy refused further evaluation/treatment. Despite rigorous counselling and apprising her of the consequences of refusing treatment, she was unwilling to undergo any sort of intervention and so her nearest kin were informed about the situation. The woman diagnosed with ASC-US underwent colposcopy and the finding of leopard skin appearance was suggestive of Trichomonas vaginalis infection. She was treated with metronidazole and a repeat Pap smear done after three months was normal. The woman diagnosed with HSIL underwent colposcopy at a private hospital and was reported as normal. She underwent a repeat Pap smear after three months which was within normal limits. The woman with AGC was persistently advised to undergo colposcopy but she did not comply. The rate of Pap positivity during the present screening was found to be 1.2 per cent. The positivity rate using Pap test in previous community-based studies ranged from 2.8 to 8 per cent34. The low positivity rate in our study could be attributed to the urban setting of the screening programme, and also the sample size of women covered in the present screening programmes was small making the estimate less precise.

Table Demographic and clinical profile of women (n=338) attending the camp
Flow diagram summarizing the results of Pap smear cytology. NILM, negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy; ASC-US, atypical squamous cells-undetermined significance; AGC, atypical glandular cells; HSIL, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma.
Figure
Flow diagram summarizing the results of Pap smear cytology. NILM, negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy; ASC-US, atypical squamous cells-undetermined significance; AGC, atypical glandular cells; HSIL, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma.

Asymptomatic women are usually not screened for cervical cancer even once in their lifetime in India5. The implementation of opportunistic screening programmes becomes very important in such circumstances to reduce the country's burden of cervical cancer6. At present, opportunistic screening in India is practiced only at tertiary care centres where Pap smear is offered to women with symptoms related to reproductive tract infections. These programmes could be more effective if conducted at a large scale.

As per the WHO guidelines for Cervical Cancer Prevention 20137, the recommended screening methods are any of the following three tests: human papillomavirus (cut-off level ≥1.0 pg/ml), cytology (cut-off level ASC-US+) and visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA). Though VIA has been used as a primary screening tool in many low-resource settings8, it has the limitation of being practicable only in women whose transformation zone is visible (typically in those younger than 50 yr of age) while Pap test has no such limitation, and screening coverage using Pap test can be extended up to 65 yr of age.

Opportunistic screening of women attending health services should be carried out in medical colleges and tertiary care institutions to spread awareness and increase coverage. All women in the target age group who visit a facility for any reason should receive information on cervical screening and should be encouraged to get them screened. The goal of a screening programme should be to reach a larger proportion of women at risk with quality screening strongly linked to treatment as also recommended in the guidelines for screening and early detection of common cancers in India9.

In conclusion, mass gatherings provide an opportunity for public education to create awareness about screening for cervical cancer which is an initial step towards reducing its burden in our country.

Conflicts of Interest: None.

References

  1. , . An overview of the burden of non-communicable diseases in India. Iran J Public Health. 2012;4:1-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , . . GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC Cancer Base No. 11. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr
  3. , , , , , , . A multicountry evaluation of careHPV testing, visual inspection with acetic acid, and papanicolaou testing for the detection of cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014;24:576-85.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , . Single visit approach for management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by visual inspection & loop electrosurgical excision procedure. Indian J Med Res. 2012;135:614-20.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , . The present scenario of cervical cancer control and HPV epidemiology in India: an outline. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12:1107-15.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , . Effectiveness and efficiency of opportunistic cervical cancer screening: Comparison with organized screening. Med Care. 2004;42:600-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. . WHO guidelines: Screening and treatment of precancerous lesions for cervical cancer prevention. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/94830/1/9789241548694_eng.pdf
  8. , , , . Effective screening programmes for cervical cancer in low- and middle-income developing countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79:954-62.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . Recommendations for screening and early detection of common cancers in India. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:e352-61.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    13

    PDF downloads
    11
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections
    Scroll to Top