Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Editorial
149 (
3
); 309-312
doi:
10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_579_19

What is new in the WHO consolidated guidelines on drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment?

Department of Molecular Medicine, Jamia Hamdard Institute of Molecular Medicine, Jamia Hamdard (Deemed-to-be-University), New Delhi, India
Departments of General Medicine & Respiratory Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College (JNMC), Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Science, Wardha, India
Department of Medicine & UCT Lung Institute, Division of Pulmonology, Centre for Lung Infection & Immunity, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
Department of Immunology & Infection, Faculty of Infectious & Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK

This editorial is published on the occasion of World Tuberculosis Day - March 24, 2019

*For correspondence: keertandheda@uct.ac.za

Licence

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

The burden of isoniazid-resistant tuberculosis (Hr-TB) and multidrug- and/or rifampicin mono-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) is increasing worldwide, and the high TB burden countries are the worst affected12. Ideally, early identification and treatment of Hr-TB is important to prevent progression to MDR-TB, poly-drug resistant (DR) TB, extensively drug-resistant (XDR) TB and worse treatment outcomes3. The term XDR-TB will likely need to be re-defined in view of the injectables no longer being recommended as the frontline treatment for MDR-TB4. Although both solid and liquid culture methods are invaluable tools for the laboratory diagnosis of DR-TB, they are time-consuming to detect drug resistance and drug susceptibility. Rapid molecular methods such as GeneXpert and/or first-and second-line line probe assay (SL-LPA), when performed in tandem, can provide valuable information about early diagnosis and drug susceptibility testing (DST)-guided treatment of DR-TB35. In this context, it is also essential to offer universal DST to all TB patients at baseline and during follow up. For this, national TB control programmes must have adequate laboratory infrastructure, trained healthcare workers and quality-assured laboratory DST reporting for both first-and second-line drugs to facilitate DST-guided treatment. As annual national DR-TB surveys are time-consuming and expensive, national surveys should be carried out periodically to ascertain trends in DR-TB.

The WHO recommends, albeit based on weak evidence, substitution of isoniazid with levofloxacin (Lfx) for the treatment of laboratory-confirmed Hr-TB (rifampicin-susceptible) and use of the drug regimen consisting of ERZ (ethambutol, rifampicin, pyrazinamide)-Lfx for a duration of six months without a split of intensive and continuation phases6. It further advises against the addition of streptomycin or any other injectable agent in the regimen. Treatment may be extended up to nine months depending upon the clinical, radiological and microbiological response and especially in extrapulmonary TB involving bone, brain/meninges and/or miliary TB. Substitution of a drug in case of additional drug resistance or intolerance can be effected by, in order of preference with linezolid (Lzd), clofazimine (Cfz) or cycloserine (Cs). High-dose isoniazid (15-20 mg/kg/day) may not be useful in Indian patients with Hr-TB since the katG gene mutation conferring high-dose INH resistance is present in >90 per cent of isolates7. According to the first National Anti-Tuberculosis Drug Resistance Survey (NDRS) in India, resistance to any fluoroquinolone (FQ) was found in about eight per cent of Hr-TB and resistance to Lzd was uncommon in MDR/RR-TB and even less in H mono/poly-DR-TB (personal communication with RNTCP). Cultures should be done at the end of 2-3 months and thereafter as expropriate8.

Although Mfx may arguably be more potent than Lfx9, the main advantage of the latter is less QTcF prolongation, which has obvious advantages when combined with other QTcF-prolonging agents, such as bedaquiline (Bdq) and Cfz in regimen. Peak plasma concentration and exposure to Mfx significantly decreases with concurrent administration of rifampicin9; this is another advantage of using Lfx, which does not require dosage adjustment. Unlike Mfx, Lfx requires dose modification in patients with advanced stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD).

The recently published consolidated guidelines on MDR/RR-TB9 are based on evidence synthesized from a recently completed Phase III clinical trial of delamanid (Dlm)1011, an individual patient data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) of longer12 and 9-12-month shorter MDR-TB regimens1314 and efficacy and pharmacokinetic data from Dlm and Bdq-related clinical trials15. There are no changes in the timing of antiretroviral drugs administration in people living with HIV (PLHIV) with MDR/RR-TB, use of surgery and models of MDR-TB care (ambulatory care/hospitalization)16.

A new feature in the guidelines is that the second-line anti-TB drugs used for designing individualized MDR-TB regimens have been re-grouped into A, B and C and the drug ranking is based on their estimated efficacy profiles9. The group A drugs include FQ, Lfx or Mfx; Bdq and Lzd; group B includes Cfz and Cs or terizidone and group C contains ethambutol (E), Dlm, pyrazinamide, imipenem-cilastatin (Imp-Cln) or meropenem (Mpm), amikacin (Am) or streptomycin (S), ethionamide (Eto), or prothionamide and p-aminosalicylic acid (PAS). Lack of efficacy in the Dlm phase III study has resulted in its classification as a group C drug though this was based on a six-month culture conversion outcome1011.

While designing the individualized longer (18-20 month) MDR-TB regimen, a strong recommendation has been made to include all three drugs from group A, and to complete the regimen, the fourth drug should be from group B (and if it is not possible, then the fourth drug may be selected from the group C). A fully oral long-term regimen is the preferred option and the injectable agents, kanamycin and capreomycin, are no longer recommended because these were associated with higher treatment failure, relapse rates and mortality and toxicity9. The long-term Bdq-containing drug regimen should have at least four drugs for initial six months and subsequently three drugs to be continued for rest of the duration of treatment. Although the optimal number of drugs for the regimen is uncertain, we recommend a minimum of four but ideally five likely effective drugs12. The individualized, longer MDR-TB regimen is to be administered for a total duration of 18-20 months, and the duration is primarily based on patient's response to treatment or 15-17 months after culture conversion. However, the optimal treatment duration remains unclear. The WHO recommendations have emphasized monthly sputum cultures along with smear microscopy9.

Pyrazinamide is to be used for MDR/RR-TB only when DST reveals susceptibility9 (though this is not readily available and is technically challenging). Every dose of Imp-Cln or Mpm is administered with clavulanic acid (available only as amoxicillin clavulanic acid) and this combination is counted as single drug. In selected patients where a regimen cannot be constructed because of resistance profiles or drug-specific toxicity, Am or streptomycin is to be used only in patients >18 yr of age, and when high-quality audiometry monitoring for hearing loss is available. Am is to be substituted with streptomycin only if it is not available or some other contraindication exists, and when DST confirms susceptibility to streptomycin (phenotypic DST is required for streptomycin as molecular DST with SL-LPA does not detect it)9.

It should be noted that thiacetazone, gatifloxacin and high-dose isoniazid were not included in the IPD-MA for longer regimens because of an inadequate number of patients12 (both gatifloxacin and thioacetazone are no longer available). Evidence on the safety and efficacy of the following drugs was insufficient for review: use of Bdq beyond six months and below the age of six years and Dlm use beyond six months and below the age of three years; concomitant use of Bdq and Dlm. It was observed that the use of Lzd for at least six months showed increased efficacy and using it for the entire duration would likely be better12; however, one needs to balance this against the high rates of drug toxicity with prolonged use.

The new WHO guidelines has left open the option of using the longer 18-20 month group A-based regimen or the standardized shorter MDR-TB regimen containing an injectable which is given for 9-11 months9. Which regimen should preferably be used? In the recently published STREAM trial, the shorter injectable containing 9-11 month regimen was found to be non-inferior to the conventional 18-20 month older WHO regimen (also contained an injectable)14. However, bacteriologic outcomes were worse with the shorter regimen and there was a trend to worse outcomes in HIV-infected persons in both arms. Given these considerations, the toxicity and tolerability profiles (including months of painful injections), our personal recommendation is that the longer pan-oral regimen is preferable and that the standardized shorter MDR-TB regimen containing an injectable should only be used as an exception (for example, if drugs are not readily accessible) and provided (i) there is no proven or likely resistance to any component of the regimen (except isoniazid), (ii) there is access to baseline and longitudinal monitoring for hearing loss, (iii) FQ and second line injectable drug (SLID) resistance has been excluded, and (iv) patients have been counselled about the risks of this regimen and agree to receive it. There should be clear plans within the programme or provider setting to transition to an all-oral group A-based regimen because the shorter WHO injectable-based regimen is likely to be an inferior one from an efficacy and mortality point of view (though there are no head-to-head trials yet), and Am is toxic and associated with chronic painful injections driving poor adherence.

Active TB drug-safety monitoring and management (aDSM)17 should be an integral part of MDR-TB management as several drugs have additive toxicities. Bdq, Dlm, FQ (Mfx>Lfx) and Cfz have the potential to prolong QTcF. It is advised that deficiencies of potassium, calcium and magnesium should be corrected first, and if QTcF >500 ms persists, then the likely offending drug(s) should be stopped. Similarly, several drugs (Lzd, ethambutol and INH) in the regimen, when given in combination, can produce optic neuropathy17.

Lzd is a potent drug with potential toxicity when used on long-term basis in MDR-TB regimens18. Haematological toxicity occurs early, whereas peripheral and optic neuropathy occurs late18. Lactic acidosis is a rare complication. Pyridoxine (100 mg daily) can be administered to decrease the risk of haematological toxicity. Lzd is very rarely associated with serotonin syndrome when administered with selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors and other medicines known to increase serotonin concentration in the central nervous system1920. In this specific context, patients should be instructed to avoid foods and liquids rich in tyramine concentration.

Proposed Indian recommendations for the fully oral longer regimen include five drugs in the intensive phase and four drugs in the continuation phase [Bdq(6 months) Lfx Lzd Cfz Cs]. After the drug procurement, implementation will start in a phased manner. If resistance to the FQ class is detected on the SL-LPA, then preferably two drugs (or at least one) from group C, e.g. Dlm and/or PAS, should be added to the regimen. In some cases high-dose Mfx (Mfxh) could be useful provided there is no resistance to Mfxh (1.0 μg)21 on LC-DST17 [though specific mutations of the SL-LPA, i.e. A90V, S91P, D94A (gyrA) suggest low level Mfx resistance in many settings]. Baseline SL-LPA should be performed for all patients with MDR/RR-TB to clarify whether there is additional FQ class resistance, which varies from 10 to 40 per cent in India (personal communication with RNTCP). A fully oral Bdq-containing shorter regimen remains a good prospect for the treatment of MDR-TB in future.

Acknowledgment:

The first author (SKS) is supported by the JC Bose National Fellowship (SB/S2/JCB-04/2013) of the Department of Science & Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India, New Delhi. The second author (KD) is supported by the South African MRC (RFA-EMU-02-2017) and the EDCTP (TMA-2015SF-1043 & TMA-1051-TESAII).

Conflicts of Interest: The first author (SKS) is a member of the National Technical Expert Group on treatment of TB, Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme, Central TB Division, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India. The second author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. . Global Tuberculosis Report 2018. Geneva: WHO; .
  2. , , , , , , . The epidemiology, pathogenesis, transmission, diagnosis, and management of multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant, and incurable tuberculosis. Lancet Respir Med 2017 pii: S2213-2600(17)30079-6
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . Long-term outcomes of patients with extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa: A cohort study. Lancet. 2014;383:1230-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , . The devil we know: Is the use of injectable agents for the treatment of MDR-TB justified? Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2017;21:1114-26.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. . Central TB Division. Guidelines on programmatic management of drug resistant TB (PMDT) in India. Revised national tuberculosis control programme. New Delhi: Directorate-General of Health Services, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India; Available from: https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&level=2&sublinkid=4781&lid=3306
  6. . . WHO treatment guidelines for rifampicin- and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, 2018 update. Geneva: WHO; Available from: https://www.who.int/tb/areas-of-work/drug-resistant-tb/treatment/gdg-meeting-mdrrr-tb-treatment-2018-update/en/
  7. , , , . Drug-resistant tuberculosis: Is India ready for the challenge? BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3:e000971.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India. Report of the first national anti-tuberculosis drug resistance survey: India 2014-16. . Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India. Available from: https://tbcindia.gov.in/showfile.php?lid=3315
    [Google Scholar]
  9. . WHO consolidated guidelines on drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment. Geneva: WHO; .
  10. . . WHO position statement on the use of delamanid for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Geneva: WHO; Available from: https://www.who.int/tb/publications/2018/Position_Paper_Delamanid/en/
  11. , , , , , , . Efficacy and safety of delamanid in combination with an optimised background regimen for treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group phase 3 trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2019;7:249-59.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , . Treatment correlates of successful outcomes in pulmonary multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: An individual patient data meta-analysis. Lancet. 2018;392:821-34.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , . Effectiveness and safety of standardised shorter regimens for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: Individual patient data and aggregate data meta-analyses. Eur Respir J. 2017;50 pii: 1700061
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , . A trial of a shorter regimen for rifampin-resistant tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1201-13.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , . Bedaquiline- versus injectable-containing drug-resistant tuberculosis regimens: A cost-effectiveness analysis. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2018;18:677-89.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. . WHO treatment guidelines for drug-resistant tuberculosis: 2016 update. Geneva: WHO; .
  17. . . Active tuberculosis drug-safety monitoring and management (aDSM). Framework for implementation. Geneva: WHO; Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/204465/1/WHO_HTM_TB_2015.28_eng.pdf
  18. , , , , , . Linezolid interruption in patients with fluoroquinolone- resistant tuberculosis receiving a bedaquiline-based treatment regimen. Int J Infect Dis 2019 pii: S1201-9712(19)30199-7
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , . Linezolid-associated peripheral and optic neuropathy, lactic acidosis, and serotonin syndrome. Pharmacotherapy. 2007;27:1189-97.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , . Serotonin syndrome after concomitant treatment with linezolid and citalopram. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36:1197.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. . Technical manual for drug susceptibility testing of medicines used in the treatment of tuberculosis. Available from: http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/275469

    Fulltext Views
    11

    PDF downloads
    7
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections
    Scroll to Top