Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Clinical Image
147 (
4
); 427-429
doi:
10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1886_16

An older male with fever-induced Brugada Syndrome

Department of Cardiology, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, PR China
Patient's consent obtained to publish clinical information and images.

*For correspondence: fengxiangfei@xinhuamed.com.cn

Licence

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

An 81 yr old male was referred to the department of Cardiology, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, PR China, in February 2016 because of two episodes of syncope over the past week. The patient denied a history of coronary artery disease and family history of structural heart disease or sudden death but reported a previous hospitalization for investigation of fever two years ago, and a routine electrocardiography (ECG) demonstrated Type 1 Brugada pattern (Fig. l). The temperature at the time of ECG recording was 101.8 °F. Repeated ECG after resolution of fever was near normal (Fig. 2).

Twelve-lead electrocardiography (ECG) when febrile. Note the pseudo-right bundle branch pattern and ‘coved’ ST-segment elevations in V1, V2 leads (arrows) consistent with a Type 1 Brugada pattern.
Fig. 1
Twelve-lead electrocardiography (ECG) when febrile. Note the pseudo-right bundle branch pattern and ‘coved’ ST-segment elevations in V1, V2 leads (arrows) consistent with a Type 1 Brugada pattern.
Twelve-lead ECG when afebrile. Repeated ECG after resolution of fever was near normal, especially ST segment in V1, V2 leads (arrows).
Fig. 2
Twelve-lead ECG when afebrile. Repeated ECG after resolution of fever was near normal, especially ST segment in V1, V2 leads (arrows).

The physical examination and the computed tomography of coronary angiogram were unremarkable. The 12-lead ECG at admission revealed a Type 2 Brugada pattern (Fig. 3). Programmed electrical stimulation could induce ventricular fibrillation (Fig. 4).

Initial ECG on presentation several hours after syncope. Note the pseudo-right bundle branch block (solid black arrow) and the saddleback ST-segment elevation in V2 lead (hollow arrow) consistent with a Type 2 Brugada pattern.
Fig. 3
Initial ECG on presentation several hours after syncope. Note the pseudo-right bundle branch block (solid black arrow) and the saddleback ST-segment elevation in V2 lead (hollow arrow) consistent with a Type 2 Brugada pattern.
Electrocardiography of induced ventricular fibrillation. Note the ventricular fibrillation (arrow) could be induced by vigorous programmed stimulation (S1S2S3S4, 500/300/300/250 ms) from the right ventricular apex. Defibrillation with 200 joules was successful.
Fig. 4
Electrocardiography of induced ventricular fibrillation. Note the ventricular fibrillation (arrow) could be induced by vigorous programmed stimulation (S1S2S3S4, 500/300/300/250 ms) from the right ventricular apex. Defibrillation with 200 joules was successful.

The patient was initiated on cilostazol 50 mg twice a day per os administration and received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). During the six-month follow up period, ECG was normal (Fig. 5), and the patient was uneventful, without recurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmia at ICD controls.

Twelve-lead ECG during the follow up period. During the follow up period, repeated ECG was normal like, especially ST segment in V1, V2 leads (arrows).
Fig. 5
Twelve-lead ECG during the follow up period. During the follow up period, repeated ECG was normal like, especially ST segment in V1, V2 leads (arrows).

Conflicts of Interest: None.


    Fulltext Views
    14

    PDF downloads
    9
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections
    Scroll to Top