Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review Article
144 (
1
); 21-31
doi:
10.4103/0971-5916.193279

A structural, epidemiological & genetic overview of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPCs)

Molecular Diagnostics & Biomarkers Laboratory, Global Hospitals, Hyderabad, India
Department of Academics & Research, Global Hospitals, Hyderabad, India

Reprint requests: Dr V. Sritharan, Molecular Diagnostics & Biomarkers Laboratory, Global Hospitals, 6-1-1-70/1-4, Lakdi-ka-pool, Hyderabad 500 004, Andhra Pradesh, India e-mail: venkataraman.sritharan@gmail.com

Licence

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPCs) are plasmid encoded carbapenem hydrolyzing enzymes which have the potential to spread widely through gene transfer. The instability of upstream region of blaKPC accelerates emergence of different isoforms. Routine antibiotic susceptibility testing failed to detect KPC producers and some commercial kits have been launched for early identification of KPC producers. Notable among the drugs under development against KPC are mostly derivatives of polymixin; β-lactamase inhibitor NXL104 with combination of oxyimino cephalosporin as well as with ceftazidime; a novel tricyclic carbapenem, LK-157, potentially useful against class A and class C enzymes; BLI-489-a bicyclic penem derivative; PTK-0796, a tetracycline derivative and ACHN-490. Combination therapy might be preferable to control KPC infections in immediate future. Clinicians are likely to opt for unconventional combinations of antibiotics to treat KPC infections because of unavailability of alternative agents. The KPCs have become endemic in many countries but there is no optimal treatment recommendation available for bacteria expressing KPCs. Reports of outbreaks involving KPCs have focused mainly on laboratory identification, empirical treatment outcomes and molecular epidemiology. This review includes information on the emergence of KPC variants, limitations of phenotyping methods, available molecular methods for identification of the KPC variants and treatment options highlighting the drugs under development.

Keywords

blaKPC
carbapenamase
carbapenem resistance
KPC

Introduction

Emergence of multi-drug resistance (MDR) among Enterobacteriaceae is a threat observed in the last two decades. The most important and common therapeutic challenge posed by Enterobacteriaceae is resistance to carbapenems. Carbapenems are broad spectrum antibiotics structurally very similar to penicillin but contain a sulphur group at C1 position. Several Gram-negative pathogens have become resistant to these by acquiring any one or more of the following mechanisms: structural alterations in drug targets like penicillin binding proteins (PBPs), porin loss, upregulation of efflux pumps and expression of carbapenemases1. One of the most commonly observed mechanism among Gram-negative pathogens is production of carbapenem inactivating enzymes, called carbapenemases2. All carbapenemases are β-lactamases but not all β-lactamases are carbapenemases. These periplasmic enzymes hydrolyze beta lactam antibiotics either by alteration in the target site of the antibiotic that reduces its binding capacity or modification of the antibiotic so that it is no longer recognized by the target. Carbapenemases are broadly divided into two major types based on the amino acid sequences: metallo β-lactamases (Class B) containing zinc at the active site whereas serine β-lactamases (Classes A, C and D) containing serine at the active site. The Klebsiella pneumonia carbapenemases (KPC) along with other members like SME, IMI, NMC, GES constitute the class A13. Among these, the carbapenemase is more important than others due to its prevalence and transmissibility through plasmids4. Class C enzymes are chromosomally encoded, which were mostly found in several Gram-negative pathogens such as Acinetobacter spp., Aeromonas spp. and Enterobacter spp. The combination of class A and class C β-lactamases is highly potent as these confer resistance to most cephamycins, penicillins, cephalosporins and are not inhibited by clinically used inhibitors such as clavulanic acid5. Most common type of carbapenemases seen in Acinetobacter baumannii is oxacillanases. The class B enzymes include IMP, VIM, SPM, GIM, NDM and SIM families detected primarily in Pseudomonas aeruginosa1. This review provides information on one of the class A carbapenemase called KPC named after the organism in which it was first identified67. Later, it was detected in various other Gram-negative bacteria like Enterobacteriaceae (Escherichia coli, K. oxytoca, Enterobacter spp., Serratia spp., Salmonella spp., and Citrobacter freundii) and Pseudomonadaceae (Pseudomonas aeurignosa)289101112. Class A carbapenemase production has become a progressively common mechanism of resistance across the world313141516171819. The KPCs are encoded on a conjugative plasmid, carried in Tn3 (Tn4401) based transposon91920. Though class A enzymes and Bush's 2f type of hydrolases21 are comparable in many characteristics, the KPC enzymes have two unique features: (i) these are borne on transferable conjugative plasmids, and (ii) capable of hydrolyzing advanced derivatives of cephalosporins like cefotaxime122. Tazobactam and clavulanic acid are partial inhibitors of class A enzymes whereas boronic acid acts as complete inhibitor1923. Thirteen variants of KPC (blaKPC 1-13) have been identified till date, which differ from each other by non-synonymous mutations1224. These variants also show differences in their substrate (carbapenem) profile and affinity. So, there is a need for specific identification of these KPC variants in such Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) that would allow clinicians make early treatment decisions for nosocomial infections7.

Epidemiology

Initially KPC producing organisms were restricted to sporadic outbreaks, but the situation became difficult because of global explosion and endemicity in both developed and developing countries8182526. From 2001 till date, 13 KPC subtypes have been found among Gram-negative organisms in different geographical regions3410111619262728293031. Dissemination of variants occurs through acquisition of stable genetic elements by gene transfer mechanisms. Genotyping and sequence characterization of KPC by pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST), conducted in different countries including India, have reported that all KPC expressing strains harbour a single complex clone C11 which further indicates the origin of KPC from the same323334. The major clone belongs to a sequence type called ST258 which is possibly responsible for all endemic outbreaks of KPC and also of international dissemination3. Other sequence types of KPC were also identified, for example, ST14 in Midwest United States6. Interestingly, ST11 is the predominant type of K. pneumonia associated with KPC production in China, which is closely related to ST258 and the latter is found more commonly elsewhere in the world2535. The overall mortality rate associated with KPC producing organisms is 50 per cent36. The awareness of the incidence of resistance to carbapenems from India is increasing3738394041. Gupta et al42 reported 17-22 per cent of hospital acquired infections among Gram-negative pathogens, while Wattal et al43 reported 13-51 per cent prevalence of carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE).

Genetics of the KPC variants

Genes encoding versatile carbapenemases not only reside on chromosomes and but are also found on extrachromosomal DNA and transposons. Chromosomally encoded carbapenem inactivating enzymes evolved as defense mechanism in these bacteria also have a role in regulation of cell wall synthesis12244. The expression of these plasmid encoded enzymes gets upregulated by various interacting bacterial factors like (i) intrinsic hydrolytic activities shown by KPC variants, (ii) the genetic relatedness and control of carbapenemase production, and (iii) the presence or absence of other broad-spectrum β-lactamases and porin mutations145. It is necessary to establish how the bacterium is able to show resistance to all classes of antibiotics and the mutations that are responsible for resistance. The cause of rapid disseminatin of blaKPC is the presence of transposable element Tn4401 transposon which can integrate into various plasmids of non-clonally related organisms. Tn4401 is found at various loci on plasmids, which differ in size and incompatibility group. Tn4401 is approximately 10 kb in size characterized by the terminal two 39 bp imperfect inverted repeat sequences, harbours insertion sequences ISKpn6 and ISKpn7 and a set of site specific transposase and resolvase genes for insertion and excision of transposon946. It can integrate into different plasmids and evolve as isoforms. Three isoforms, a, b, and c of Tn4401, have been described by Naas et al9, differing by a 99-215 bp sequence upstream of blaKPC, while isoforms with 68 bp and 255 bp (Tn4401 e) deletions have also been reported46. A 5.3 kb region consisting of insertion sequence ISKpn7 and partial tnpA gene and more than half of the blaKPC gene has been deleted from the transposon Tn4401. This novel truncated transposon was named as Tn4401d by Chen et al46. Tn4401 can transpose with 5 bp target site duplication without any target site specificity (Fig. 1). Mobility and plasticity of Tn4401 lead to genetic diversity of plasmids and to the spread of KPC. Several studies have concluded81946 that blaKPC gene has variable upstream region due to heterogeneous genetic environment and conserved downstream region. Genetic environment of each variant shows that instability in the upstream region of blaKPC may be involved in variations of KPC. Several studies were conducted to elucidate the changes in non-conserved variable regions which were involved in the evolution of variants and the consequent changes in the spectrum of enzyme activity946. The enzyme activity decreases if the change is due to insertion sequences and increases if there are deletions19. Inconsistencies in detection of KPC variants may be due to acquisition of genes from other sources or due to indiscriminate mutational events. KPC genes are endowed with all molecular features such as transposon, self-transferable plasmids, competent Sequence Types (STs) which are responsible for their propagation between members of Enterobacteriaceae and other Gram-negative members. Phylogenetic tree for KPC subtypes was constructed (Fig. 2) which showed that most of the members were scattered throughout the phylogenetic tree and they were not grouped under single genetic lineage. This indicates that the distribution of KPC is through horizontal gene transfer (HGT) and not by clonal spread4447.

Schematic diagram of Tn4401b and other isoforms on plasmids of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. IRR and IRL are inverted repeats (black triangles), flanked by 5 bp target site duplications (TSD). Insertion sequences: ISKpn6, ISKpn7; Transposase: tnpA, resolvase (tnpR). Dark triangles: deletions in isoforms a, c; Tn4401d truncated isoform with 5.3 kb deletion (flower bracket); Tn4401e: 255 bp deletion (entire putative promoter and transcription start site in upstream region91946.
Fig. 1
Schematic diagram of Tn4401b and other isoforms on plasmids of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. IRR and IRL are inverted repeats (black triangles), flanked by 5 bp target site duplications (TSD). Insertion sequences: ISKpn6, ISKpn7; Transposase: tnpA, resolvase (tnpR). Dark triangles: deletions in isoforms a, c; Tn4401d truncated isoform with 5.3 kb deletion (flower bracket); Tn4401e: 255 bp deletion (entire putative promoter and transcription start site in upstream region91946.
Circular phylogenetic tree of currently known KPC enzymes, showing common ancestry (KPC-2) of all other variants. Amino acid sequences of KPC enzymes (GenBank- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) aligned with Clustal W (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalw2/) using default parameters. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA 5.16.0 and the NJ (Neighbor Joining) method and the vertical bar in between KPC-13 - KPC-4 indicates measure for amino acid sequence diversity.
Fig. 2
Circular phylogenetic tree of currently known KPC enzymes, showing common ancestry (KPC-2) of all other variants. Amino acid sequences of KPC enzymes (GenBank- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) aligned with Clustal W (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalw2/) using default parameters. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA 5.16.0 and the NJ (Neighbor Joining) method and the vertical bar in between KPC-13 - KPC-4 indicates measure for amino acid sequence diversity.

Characteristics of KPC variants

Life threatening nosocomial infections are associated with these KPC producing Gram-negative pathogens. KPC-2 is considered as the ancestral variant and it is observed mostly among the clinical isolates11. All variants arose from KPC2, which differ from one another by one or two point mutations45. Mostly these changes have been noticed frequently at four conserved amino acid positions, namely nucleotides 147, 308, 716, and 814 which encode for different amino acids1112024. Nucleotide changes in KPC-2 in comparison with other variants are compiled with the help of EMBOOS tools (www.http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/emboss/) (Table I). Single amino acid substitutions allow lactamases to increase their substrate profile and gradually alter the ability of lactamases to hydrolyze lactams before they reach their target sites (Table II). Structural analysis has revealed that the characteristic feature of class A enzymes is that they possess S-X-X-K, S-D-N and K-T-G motifs at positions 70, 130 and 234, respectively in the protein which are responsible for efficient carbapenem hydrolytic activity compared to other classes1. The bicine buffer molecule of KPC-2 interacts through its carboxyl group to conserved active site residue of K234. Within the class A group, KPC enzymes evolved through various modalities including variation in primary sequence, selective pressure by β-lactam antibiotics, mutation rates, changes in three dimensional structure and protein stability11149. Inhibitor profiling of KPC could help in accurate identification of the variants and hence an effective treatment strategy. Overall features of all KPC variants have been assembled and presented (Table III)1732.

Table I Results of pair-wise alignment (Emboss) between KPC enzymes
Table II Substrate profile for variants of blaKPC
Table III Biochemical characteristics of KPC variants identified till date

Methods for KPC identification

The dissemination and emergence of KPC producers is a serious threat to public health because it drastically limits the treatment options2050. It not only confers resistance to carbapenems, but also to almost all other β-lactams. Production of these enzymes could be confirmed by several phenotypic tests (e.g. modified Hodge tests) whereas genotypic methods such as multiplex PCR are being used to conform blaKPC genes. Identifying KPCs is still a challenge for many clinical microbiology laboratories because bacteria expressing KPC do not always show high minimum inhibitory concentration (MICs), on the contrary, many isolates remain within susceptible or intermediate levels, frequently missed by technicians. Several methods have been developed so far for identification but each has its own limitations. A novel microtitre plate based chromogenic method called Carba NP has been developed and reported as one of the screening tests for carbapenemases5152. Several phenotypic and molecular methods have been introduced for KPC identification but phenotypic methods are known to be time consuming. Though automation has reduced the time to report and enabled easy handling of multiple samples simultaneously, many such systems frequently yield false positive/false negative results due to errors in identification of carbapenamase production53. For phenotypic identification of KPC, diffusion of meropenem disk with aminophenylboronic acid, dipicolinic acid and cloxacillin was developed54. Broth microdilution method (BMD) is one of the accurate and reliable methods for the identification of KPC-mediated carbapenem resistance5155. Among impienem, meropenem and ertapenem based automated systems like Microscan and Vitek-2, ertapenem based automated system proved to be more reliable and rapid for the detection of carbapenemases51. When compared with other phenotypic methods CHROMagar™ method showed 98 per cent efficiency in the detection of carbapenamases (KPC, VIM, NDM, etc.)11. In antimicrobial susceptibility tests higher MICs of the antibiotic used could be due to increased levels of expression of these enzymes and low penetration of drug into periplasmic space. In India, resistance to available carbapenems among K. pneumonia was reported as 43.6 per cent (meropenem), 32 per cent (imipenem), 20.3 per cent (ertapenem) and 60 per cent (colistin)2740. Ertapenem resistance has been shown to be more accurate for detection of KPC producers. This heterogeneous expression of carbapenemases by microorganisms makes it difficult to give uniform values for phenotypic methods53. Modified Hodge test (MHT) one of the phenotypic methods to identify carbapenemase producers among Enterobacteriaceae, demonstrated high levels of sensitivity and specificity for detection of KPC activity51. However, MHT is prone to give false positive results particularly with strains producing CTX-M extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and AmpC β-lactamase47495153. Hence, in geographical areas where ESBL is frequently reported, alternative methods are warranted. Melt curve analysis in real time PCR gives accurate results but requires high expertise and is also expensive2456. Though few commercial kits are available for the identification of KPC directly from the clinical samples, but discrepancies exist among these kits57585960. Real time PCR is being explored as a platform for rapid identification of blaKPC variants57585960.

Emerging treatment options and clinical outcomes

Nearly 89 per cent of nosocomial infections are caused mainly by K. pneumonia and its foremost site for infection is blood (52%), secondary respiratory related problems comprise 30 per cent, whereas urinary tract infections (UTI) contribute 10 per cent of infections in both acute care as well as tertiary care facilities37. Specific factors which play a role in pathogenesis have not yet been identified in KPC producing organisms. Major risk factors for infections are (i) long term hospital stay, (ii) mechanical ventilation, and (iii) previous antibiotic therapy and other factors20. Treatment failures occur due to intrinsic (genetic factors) and external factors interfering with proper identification of KPC gene. Resistance to other antibiotics includes fluoroquinolones, trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole and aminoglycosides. Current options for treatment of KPC include tigecycline and colistin. However, each of these drugs and polymixin B as monotherapy results in frequent failures in treatment compared to combination therapy. Therapeutic options under development against KPC are mostly derivatives of polymixin (e.g. NAB739, NAB740); others include β-lactamase inhibitor NXL104 with combination of oxyimino cephalosporin as well as with ceftazidime461. A novel tricyclic carbapenem LK-157 has emerged as a potential drug against class A and class C enzymes62. BLI-489 is a bicyclic penem derivative which has shown inhibitory effect against several enzymes though has not been extensively tested on KPC producing microbes63. Two other antibiotic derivatives are under development against KPCs, one is a tetracycline derivative called PTK-0796 and other is aminoglycoside derivative ACHN-490 called neoglycoside46164. Clinicians are likely to opt for unconventional combinations of antibiotics to treat KPC infections because of unavailability of alternative agents. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a promising agent Doribax (doripenem) which has broad spectrum activity65. In Greece, one cohort study reported that 88 per cent of the patients who underwent combination therapy, almost 22 per cent showed failures6. Improvements in combination therapy might be preferable for control of KPC infections for immediate future66.

Conclusion

KPC producing Enterobacteriaceae members have become a major concern causing serious health problems worldwide. Accumulation and transfer of KPC resistance determinants rapidly through horizontal gene transfer leads to an increase in mortality and morbidity. Variations in resistance determinants add to the complication in identification of blaKPC gene. The reduced susceptibility to carbapenems makes it necessary to add inhibitors to carbapenemases like clavulanic acid in the treatment regimen or include inhibitors like EDTA in culture characterization. Evaluation and characterization of Tn4401, plasmids and transposons may help in identification of natural reservoir for blaKPC which might facilitate to control the dissemination of resistance. Further research is required to understand the genetic relatedness among variants. There is also a need to explore the heterogeneity in the genetic environment of blaKPC and to implement accurate detection methods. It is essential that hospitals strictly administer screening and implement control measures for reducing emergence and spread of carbapenem resistant bacteria.

Conflicts of Interest: None.

References

  1. , , . Carbapenemases: the versatile β-lactamases. Clin Microbiol. 2007;20:440-58.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , . An update on newer beta-lactamases. Indian J Med Res. 2007;126:417-27.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . Worldwide diversity of Klebsiella pneumoniae that produces β-lactamase blaKPC-2. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:1349-56.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , . The KPC type -lactamases: new enzymes that confer resistance to carbapenems in Gram-negative bacilli. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2009;47:537-43.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . Carbapenem resistance in Gram negative pathogens: emerging non-metallo -carbapenemases. Res J Microbiol. 2006;1:1-22.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . Emergence of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing bacteria. South Med J. 2011;104:40-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , . Outbreak of Klebsiella pneumonia carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae: A systematic review. Am J Infect Control 2016 In press
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , . Overview of the epidemiology and the threat of Klebsiella pneumonia carbapenemases (KPC) resistance. Infect Drug Resist. 2012;5:133-41.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , . Role of ISKpn7 and deletions in blaKPC gene expression. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;56:4753-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , . Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Klebsiella pneumoniae across a hospital system: impact of post-acute care facilities on dissemination. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65:1807-18.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , . Phenotypic and enzymatic comparative analysis of the novel KPC variant KPC-5 and its evolutionary variants, KPC-2 and KPC-4. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:557-62.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , . ”Stormy waters ahead”: global emergence of carbapenemases. Front Microbiol. 2013;4:48.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , . Outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in Puerto Rico associated with a novel carbapenemase variant. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31:476-84.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , . Using nucleic acid microarrays to perform molecular epidemiology and detect novel β-lactamases: a Snapshot of extended-spectrum β-lactamases throughout the World. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:1632-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , . Genetic structures at the origin of acquisition of the β lactamase blaKPC gene. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:1257-63.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , . Detection of KPC in Acinetobacter spp in Puerto Rico. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:1354-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , . Plasmid-mediated, carbapenem-hydrolysing β-lactamase, KPC-2, in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003;51:711-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , , . Klebsiella pneumoniae producing KPC carbapenemase in a district general hospital in the UK. J Hosp Infect. 2011;78:293-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , . Functional characterization of Tn4401, a Tn3-based transposon involved in blaKPC gene mobilization. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;55:5370-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , . Draft genome of multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae 223/14 carrying KPC-6, isolated from a General Hospital in Malaysia. J Genomics. 2015;3:97-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , . A functional classification scheme for β-lactamases and its correlation with molecular structure. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:1211-33.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , , . Carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: a major clinical challenge. Med J Aust. 2016;204:277-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , . Inhibitor-based methods for the detection of KPC carbapenemase producing Enterobacteriaceae in clinical practice by using boronic acid compounds. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65:1319-21.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , , . Multiplex real-time PCR assay for detection and classification of Klebsiella pneumonia carbapenemase gene (blaKPC) variants. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:579-85.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , , , . Characterization of blaKPC-containing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates detected in different institutions in the Eastern USA. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009;63:427-37.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , , . First report of KPC-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Brazil. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:4990.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , , , , . Susceptibility of Klebsiella pneumonia isolates from intra-1 abdominal infections, and molecular characterization of ertapenem-resistant isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:3917-21.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , , , , . KPC-9, a novel carbapenemase from clinical specimens in Israel. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:6057-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. , . The multiple roles of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance in nature. Front Microbiol. 2013;4:255.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , , . Antibiotic resistance and substrate profiles of the class A carbapenemase KPC-6. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:6006-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , , . Emergence of novel blaKPC-13 among carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Thailand. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2014;44:568-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. , , , , , , . Outbreak of Klebsiella pneumonia producing a new carbapenem-hydrolyzing class A beta-lactamase, KPC-3, in a New York Medical Center. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:4793-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. , , , , , , . Molecular epidemiology of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumonia isolates in the United States: clonal expansion of multilocus sequence type 258. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009;53:3365-70.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. , , , , , . Molecular characterization of newly emerged blaKPC-2 -producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in Singapore. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:475-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. , , , , , , . Molecular characterization of clinical multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2014;13:16.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. , , , , . Emergence of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumonia hypervirulent clone of capsular serotype K1 that belongs to sequence type 11 in Mainland China. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;85:192-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. , , . Teatment of Klebsiella pneumonia carbapenemase (KPC) infections: a review of published case series and case reports. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2012;11:32.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. , , , , , , . Increasing incidence of multidrug resistance Klebsiella pneumoniae infections in hospital and community settings. Int J Microbial Res. 2012;4:253-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. , , . Prevalence of antimicrobial drug resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae in India. Int J Biosci Biochem Bioinforma. 2011;1:211-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. , , , . Emerging carbapenem resistance among nosocomial isolates of Klebsiella pneumonia in south India. Int J Pharm Biol Sci. 2010;1:1-11.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. , , . Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of Klebsiella pneumoniae causing urinary tract infection and issues related to the rational selection of antimicrobials. J App Med Sci. 2013;1:395-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. , , , , , , . Emerging resistance to carbapenems in a tertiary care hospital in north India. Indian J Med Res. 2006;124:95-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. , , , , , , . Surveillance of multidrug resistant organisms in a tertiary care hospital in Delhi, India. J Assoc Physicians India. 2010;58:32-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. , , , , , , . Molecular epidemiology of carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Valle d’Aosta region, Italy, shows the emergence of KPC-2 producing Klebsiella pneumoniae clonal complex 101 (ST101 and ST1789) BMC Microbiol. 2015;15:260.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. , , , , , , . Dissemination and molecular epidemiology of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae collected in Puerto Rico Medical Center Hospitals during a 1-year period. Epidemiol Res Int 2011 2011:8 pages. Article ID 698705
    [Google Scholar]
  46. , , , , , , . Partial excision of blaKPC from Tn4401 in carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumonia. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;56:1635-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. , , , , , , . Novel carbapenem-hydrolyzing β-lactamase, KPC-1, from a carbapenem-resistant strain of Klebsiella pneumoniae. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001;45:1151-61.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. , , , , , . Kinetics study of KPC-3, a plasmid-encoded class A carbapenem-hydrolyzing β-lactamase. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49:4760-2.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. , , , , , , . Subsrate selectivity and a novel role in inhibitor discrimination by residue 237 in the KPC-2 beta-lactamase. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:2866-77.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. , , , , , , . Effect of a metallo antibiotic produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa on Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2016;17:389-97.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. , , , , , , . Evaluation of methods to identify the Klebsiella pneumonia carbapenemase in Enterobacteriaceae. J ClinMicrobiol. 2007;45:2723-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. , , , . Spectrophotometry based detection of carbapenamase producers among Enterobacteriaceae. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;44:88-90.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. , , , , , , . Emergence of KPC-possessing Klebsiella pneumonia in Brooklyn, New York: epidemiology and recommendations for detection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49:3018-20.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. , , , , , , . A sensitive and specific phenotypic assay for detection of metallo-blactamases and KPC in Klebsiella pneumoniae with the use of meropenem disks supplemented with aminophenylboronic acid, dipicolinic acid and cloxacillin. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17:552-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. , , , , , , . Risk factors for KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: Watch out for surgery. J Med Microbiol. 2016;65:547-53.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. , , , , , , . Rapid detection of blaKPC carbapenemase genes by Real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:2879-83.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. , , , , , , . Evaluation of the New NucliSENS EasyQ KPC test for rapid detection of Klebsiella pneumonia carbapenemase genes (blaKPC) J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:2783-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. DiaPlexC™ CRE Detection Kit. Available from: http:// www.solgent.com/english
  59. , , , , , . Outcomes of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection and the impact of antimicrobial and adjunctive therapies. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29:1099-106.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Klebsiella pneumoniae: KPC detection kit and genotyping, Hy-KPC PCR detection kit (KI 5040-I). Available from: http:/www.hylabs.co.il/
  61. , , , . The real threat of Klebsiella pneumonia carbapenemase producing bacteria. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009;9:228-36.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. , , , , , . In vitro activity of LK-157, a novel tricyclic carbapenem as broad spectrum {beta}- lactamase inhibitor. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:505-11.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. , , , , , , . Establishment of in vitro susceptibility testing methodologies and comparative activities of piperacillin in combination with the penem β-lactamase inhibitor BLI-489. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:370-84.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. , , , , , , . ACHN-490, a neoglycoside with potent in vitro activity against multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:4504-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. , , , . Doripenem (Doribax), a new carbapenem antibacterial agent. PT. 2008;33:134-80.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. , , . Detection and Treatment options for Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPCs): an emerging cause of multi drug resistant infection. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65:1119-25.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections
Scroll to Top