Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Viewpoint
143 (
4
); 398-400
doi:
10.4103/0971-5916.184299

Deleting the ‘neglect’ from two neglected tropical diseases in India

Sr Adviser-Infectious Diseases Public Health Foundation of India Gurgaon 122 002, Haryana, India
This is author's personal viewpoint, without any link with the institutions the author was/is associated with earlier/now.
Licence

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

India has demonstrated exemplary leadership, motivation, and political will in becoming polio-myelitis free1. It is time to repeat the feat by eliminating two neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) from the country latest by 2020 - visceral leishmaniasis (VL, kala-azar) and lymphatic filariasis (LF, elephantitis). India has committed itself for control/elimination of these diseases. It is a signatory to the World Health Assembly (WHA) resolutions on leishmaniasis2, lymphatic filariasis3, and also Resolution on Neglected Tropical Diseases4. For various reasons India has, in past, missed the date for elimination of both VL and LF.

By signing these resolutions, India became a part of the global community in its fight against NTDs. There is a renewed global push for control/elimination/eradication of the 17 NTDs championed by the World Health Organization (WHO). In its stewardship role the WHO has enunciated strategies and policies to combat neglected tropical diseases in its Global Plan 2008-20155, followed by a medium term strategic Plan 2008-20136, and finally in 2012 a road map to guide the implementation of the strategies/policies enunciated in the Global Plan7. It set bold targets for control/elimination/eradication of the 17 NTDs. The diseases identified for elimination and the period in which this should be accomplished have been arrived at by carefully assessing the current level of understanding of the epidemiology of the diseases and tools available in the armamentarium for their elimination. Global elimination of LF, and regional elimination of VL as public health problem from the Indian Sub-continent have been targeted by the WHO for 2020. To assist the member countries of the Region in elimination of VL from the South-East Asia the Regional Office of the WHO has also prepared a Regional Strategic Framework8. In epidemiological terms elimination translates into occurrence of less than one case per 10,000 population at Primary Health Centre (block) level.

Inspired by the WHO's bold initiative, a coalition of diverse partners came together under the banner ‘Uniting to Combat NTDs’9 pledging their commitment in a document called the ‘London Declaration on NTDs’ to provide support towards attaining the WHO road map targets for ten NTDs which include VL and LF10. India is a signatory to this declaration also. The ‘Uniting to Combat NTDs’ has set up a ‘Stakeholders Working Group’ which among other tasks tracks the progress towards the elimination and compiles a score card.

In addition to being on the watch-list of the Working Group, there are other compelling reasons for India to accelerate progress towards elimination. Since India contributes a significant proportion to global burden of these diseases (for VL it is 50%11, for LF 40%12), reduction in India would substantially impact global burden. Elimination of LF and VL will significantly reduce illness and death and will contribute to the Sustainable Development Goals. Reduction of days lost due to ill health will improve the healthy life and subsequent drop in the financial burden of ill health will help to pull families out of poverty. Ensuring the availability of various interventions for VL and LF will improve access to Universal Health Care.

In 2005, India signed a Tripartite Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Bangladesh, and Nepal to eliminate kala-azar from the South-East Asia Region by 2015. A renewed MoU signed in 2014 between these three countries and Bhutan and Thailand has re-energized the political commitment and elimination efforts. The new target year is 201713. India has launched a campaign ‘Swatchh Bharat Abhiyan’ (Clean India Mission) in 201414. Linking the elimination programmes with this Mission and other programmes connected to provision of safe water, waste disposal, basic sanitation will make the elimination sustainable. Inadequate water supply, limited access to sanitation facilities and poor hygiene are major contributing factors to the spread of several diseases. Specifically, areas with stagnant water are breeding grounds for insects that transmit LF; poor housing, domestic sanitary conditions such as lack of waste management and open sewerage may increase sandfly breeding.

In India, the Kala-azar Elimination Programme and the Filariasis Elimination Programme are operated under the aegis of the National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme (NVBDCP). Kala-azar is endemic in eastern States of India namely Bihar, Jharkhand, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal. Overall, 54 districts are endemic (sporadic cases reported from a few other districts). An estimated 130-165 million population is at risk in these four States. Indigenous cases of lymphatic filariasis have been reported from about 255 districts in 21 States/Union Territories12. An estimated 550-600 million people are at risk of lymphatic filariasis in these districts. The people who suffer from VL and LF are mostly poor socio-economic groups of population primarily living in rural areas. The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare has constituted a Core Group within the Ministry for guidance and oversight of progress towards VL elimination. Based on global, regional and local evidence a National Road Map for VL elimination has also been prepared in 201412. These programmes, among others, have been reviewed by the Joint Missions of the WHO and several areas for strengthening have been identified15. Earlier the ICMR has assessed the National Filariasis Control Programme several times16. A common observation has been that there are operational problems in efficient implementation of the programmes. Very little operational research has been done; if it has been conducted, the impact of that research is not visible.

Proposed twin-track approach

To ensure that elimination of VL and LF is not lost sight of, it is suggested that the Prime Minister's office (PMO) sets up an Independent Monitoring Board (IMB) on the progress being made on elimination of VL and LF. This Board would have eminent persons - national and international as members. The Board would assess the progress and pitfalls towards the attainment of elimination of VL and LF. If during its meetings the Board concludes that any of the process indicators are at-risk or missed, the relevant State and the NVBDCP would be engaged to establish corrective measures. The IMB would report to the PMO and the reports would also go to the NVBDC, the State Government, and the Minister of Health & Family Welfare. Creation of this Board may elevate the visibility of elimination programme several notches up.

The second track would be to encourage and make funds available for research especially operational variety. Policy Cures’ recent report on ‘Neglected Diseases Research & Development: Emerging Trends’17 provides options for additional funds. The report focuses on product areas for these diseases, including drugs, vaccines, diagnostics, and vector control products. The Government of India emerges as one of the top global funders of neglected diseases R&D. Total public sector funding in India for neglected diseases R&D in 2013 was USD 50 million, making it the world's fifth largest government funder behind the US, the UK and the European Commission and France17.

According to another report from Policy Cures18 majority of Government of India funding is directed towards basic and early-stage research. Despite the impressive amounts of funds being spent on R&D, there are very few examples of Indian organizations being originators of new products be it vaccines, drugs, diagnostics or devices. If need be, some of this fund could be diverted towards programme related research. India should develop a coherent strategic direction towards research in diseases for which it has signed up for elimination. A concerted research strategy is needed to assist the elimination efforts. A more robust framework for bridging the gap between evidence to policy and implementation should become operative.

India has challenges and opportunities. Challenge is to demonstrate that elimination of poliomyelitis is not an exception. Challenge is to maintain the focus on the NTDs in an environment where burden of non-communicable diseases is increasing. Opportunity lies in evolving image of India. India has become the new economic icon of emerging powers. At predicted GDP (gross domestic product) growth at 7.8 per cent in 2016, India is becoming a fastest growing economy in the world19. Opportunity is for India to play a much larger role on the world stage, and show that it delivers.

Conflicts of Interest: None.

References

  1. WHO. India records one year without polio cases. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2012/polio_20120113/en/
  2. . WHO. Control of leishmaniasis. Sixtieth World Health Assembly. WHA 60.13. Available from: http://www.who.int/neglected_diseases/mediacentre/WHA_60.13_Eng.pdf
  3. . WHO. Elimination of lymphatic filariasis as a public health problem. Fiftieth World Health Assembly. WHA 50.29. Available from: http://www.who.int/lymphatic_filariasis/resources/WHA_50%2029.pdf
  4. . WHO. Neglected Tropical Diseases. Sixty-sixth World Health Assembly. WHA 66.12. http://www.who.int/neglected_diseases/mediacentre/WHA_66.12_Eng.pdf
  5. WHO. Global plan to combat neglected tropical diseases 2008-2015. World Health Organization, Geneva 2007 (WHO/CDS/NTD/2007.3). Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/69708/1/WHO_CDS_NTD_2007.3_eng.pdf
  6. . WHO. Medium-term strategic plan 2008–2013 [amended draft] and Proposed programme budget 2010-2011. World Health Organization, Geneva. Available from: http://apps.who.int/gb/e/e_amtsp3.html
  7. WHO. Accelerating work to overcome the global impact of neglected tropical diseases - A roadmap for implementation. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2012. (WHO/HTM/NTD/2012.1). Available from: http://www.who.int/neglected_diseases/NTD_RoadMap_2012_Fullversion.pdf
  8. WHO. Regional Strategic Framework for Elimination of Kala-Azar from the South-East Asia Region (2005-2015). Department of Communicable Diseases, World Health Organization Regional Office for South-East Asia, New Delhi, January 1, 2005. Available from: http://apps.searo.who.int/pds_docs/b0211.pdf
  9. Uniting to Combat NTDs. Available from: http://unitingtocombatntds.org/
  10. The London Declaration. Uniting to Combat NTDs. Available from: http://unitingtocombatntds.org/resource/london-declaration
  11. , , , , . The economic burden of lymphatic filariasis in India. Parasitol Today. 2000;16:251-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. . Directorate of National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme (NVBDCP). National road map for kala-azar elimination. Directorate General of Health Services Minister of Health & Family Welfare. August. Available from: http://nvbdcp.gov.in/Doc/Road-map-KA_2014.pdf
  13. . WHO. Health Ministers commit to eliminating kala-azar. Available from: http://www.searo.who.int/mediacentre/releases/2014/pr1581/en/
  14. . National Vector Borne Diseases Control Programme. Report on the Joint Monitoring Mission. Available from: http://www.searo.who.int/india/publications/en/
  15. Vector Control Research Centre. Lymphatic filariasis. Available from: http://www.vcrc.res.in/forms/modulelist.aspx?lid=2134&mid=25
  16. , , , , , , . Neglected Diseases Research & Development: Emerging Trends. Policy Cures, Australia. December. . Available from: http://www.policycures.org/downloads/Y7%20GFINDER%20full%20report%20web%20.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , . The Role of ‘Team India’ in Global Health R&D. Policy Cures, Australia. March. . Available from: http://policycures.org/downloads/Indian%20Report.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  18. The World Bank. Global Economic Prospects. Forecast Table. Available from: http://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/global-economic-prospects/summary-table

Fulltext Views
18

PDF downloads
8
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections
Scroll to Top