Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Correspondence
142 (
5
); 619-619
doi:
10.4103/0971-5916.171302

Aetiology of childhood viral gastroenteritis in Lucknow, North India

Department of Paediatrics, Al-Kindy College of Medicine, Baghdad University, Baghdad, Iraq
Licence

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Sir,

I have two comments on the interesting study by Gupta et al1. First, the author stated that rotavirus (RV) was the leading cause of viral gastroenteritis (GE) with a positivity rate of 16.6 per cent in the hospitalized children and 8.3 per cent in non-hospitalized children1. This seems worrisome considering the significant morbidity and mortality of RVGE as well as the economic burden on Indian families. Apart from improving sanitary standards and access to the healthcare services, the following two points need to be considered by policy makers to contain the sizable magnitude of RVGE in India. (i) Data from developed and developing countries have shown that RV vaccine substantially reduces morbidity and mortality among children. Implementation of RV vaccine has resulted in 70-100 per cent reduction in emergency department visits and hospitalizations of children with RVGE2. To the best of my knowledge, RV vaccine is not yet incorporated into the routine immunization schedule in India. However, an indigenously produced RV vaccine (ROTAVAC, Bharat Biotech International Limited of India) has been recently developed3. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, it has been shown to be effective in preventing severe RVGE in Indian children3. The introduction of RV vaccine into the Universal Immunization Programme is solicited to be shortly implemented in India. (ii) Since RV strains circulating in the Indian population are diverse4, continuous surveillance for the prevalence and monitoring of the circulating genotypes is needed to assess the disease burden and evaluate the efficacy of RV vaccine.

Second, though norovirus (NoV) was reported in low prevalence in the hospitalized children (1.2%) in this study1, it is now considered the dominant aetiological agent of acute GE, and with the recent introduction of RV vaccines in many developing and developed countries, this is likely to remain the case. NoV has a significant impact on human wellbeing in terms of morbidity, economic costs, and mortality. There are six genotypes of NVs (GI-GVI), but only GI, GII, and GIV are known to infect humans, with GII being the most prevalent, causing >95 per cent of human infections5. Despite the recently published single center study in south India has revealed that NoV GII infections is an important cause of paediatric GE and genetic diversity of circulating strains6, regular surveillance for the NoV genotypes affecting paediatric population in India is still crucial to determine the foreseeable burden of NoV infection on one side and guide the potential development and introduction of NoV vaccine at the national level on the other.

References

  1. , , , , , , . Aetiology of childhood viral gastroenteritis in Lucknow, north India. Indian J Med Res. 2015;141:469-72.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Effectiveness of rotavirus vaccine in preventing severe acute gastroenteritis in children. Can Fam Physician. 2012;58:270-1.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . India Rotavirus Vaccine Group. Efficacy of a monovalent human-bovine (116E) rotavirus vaccine in Indian infants: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2014;383:2136-43.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , . Rotavirus diversity among diarrheal children in Delhi, India during 2007-2012. Vaccine. 2014;32(Suppl 1):A62-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , . Evolution of norovirus. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20:741-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . Norovirus genogroup II gastroenteritis in hospitalized children in South India. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013;89:1019-22.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    12

    PDF downloads
    7
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections
    Scroll to Top