Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
141 (
3
); 315-321

Evaluation of procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6 & serum amyloid A as diagnostic biomarkers of bacterial infection in febrile patients

Center of Infectious Disease, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China

Reprint requests: Dr Xiaoju Lü, Centre of Infectious Disease, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Lane, Chengdu 610 041, PR China e-mail: Lvxj3369@163.com

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Background & objectives:

Early identification of bacterial infection in patients with fever is important for prompt treatment. However, the available parameters such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and leukocyte counts are not very specific. This study was aimed to assess the diagnostic value of procalcitonin (PCT), CRP, interleukin-6 (IL-6) and serum amyloid A (SAA) for bacterial infection in febrile patients.

Methods:

Serum samples were collected from febrile patients between January and December 2012 and processed for blood cultures. PCT, IL-6, CRP and SAA levels were measured. The patients were divided into three groups according to the final diagnosis: bacteraemia group (group1), bacterial infection with negative blood culture (group 2) and non-bacterial infection group (group 3).

Results:

There were significant (P<0.05) difference in the levels of PCT, CRP, IL-6 and SAA among the three groups. The PCT levels of patients with Gram-positive bacterial infections were lower than Gram-negative bacterial infections (0.53 vs 2.13, P < 0.01). The best cut-off value to detect bacterial infections was 0.26 ng/ml for PCT. PCT, CRP, IL-6 and SAA had areas under the curve of 0.804, 0.693, 0.658 and 0.687, respectively.

Interpretation & conclusions:

Our results showed PCT as a valuable marker of bacterial infections in febrile patients. PCT was superior to CRP, IL-6 or SAA in the early identification of bacterial infection. More prospective and large scale studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Keywords

C-reactive protein
fever
infection
interleukin-6
procalcitonin
serum amyloid A

Promp identification of early bacterial infection in fever is very important, since appropriate aetiological treatment and avoidance of unnecessary antimicrobial therapy could not only reduce the morbidity, mortality and costs to patients, but also can reduce the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. The traditional diagnostic tools, such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and leukocyte count, are not specific enough for differentiating bacterial infections from viral infections and systemic inflammation12. Microbiologic culture requires at least 24-48 h, and negative cultures do not exclude the presence of infection3. Moreover, only 5-10 per cent of blood cultures performed in hospitals show microorganisms4. Therefore, there is an obvious need for more specific biomarkers of bacterial infections in febrile patients.

Procalcitonin (PCT), the precursor of the hormone calcitonin, is produced by C-cells of the thyroid gland or neuroendocrine cells in the lung or intestine5, and its level in blood of healthy people is less than 0.01 ng/ml. Levels of PCT rise dramatically during bacterial infections, whereas low levels were detected during viral infections or non-infectious febrile conditions67. Many studies showed the diagnostic property of PCT superior to CRP68910. Despite many studies, it remains unclear whether PCT adds significantly to the discriminative properties of the already used set of diagnostic biomarkers, and further studies need to be done to determine the specific diagnostic cut-off value. Though the negative cut-off value for PCT is generally believed to be < 0.5 ng/ml, it is not consistant since “negative” PCT value has been observed in some patients with bacterial infection11. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is an important proinflammatory cytokine in the early phase of inflammation, which increases in local and blood circulation after stimulus such as infection, surgery and trauma12. Serum amyloid A (SAA) is an acute phase response protein and produced by activated macrophages and fibroblasts after stimulus such as IL-1, IL-6 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF), which, similar to CRP, is a sensitive index for early inflammatory disease13. Therefore, the detection of PCT, CRP, IL-6 and SAA may be a better combination to identify early bacterial infection in febrile patients. We, therefore, undertook this study to compare the diagnostic properties and assess the optimum cut-off values of PCT, CRP, IL-6 and SAA to detect bacterial infections early in febrile patients presenting to the Infectious Diseases department.

Material & Methods

Study design and settings: The study was conducted between January and December, 2012, in the Center of Infectious Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, PR China. The Ethics Committee for Research and Clinical Practice in West China Hospital approved the protocol for this research. Written informed consent was obtained from every enrolled patient.

Patients: All adult patients (aged 18 to 85 yr) with fever (temperature >38.0°C) in the Infectious Diseases department of West China Hospital, Sichuan University within 24 h after admitting to the ward were enrolled. Exclusion criteria were temperature < 38.0°C, absence of informed consent, pregnancy, thyroid tumour, discharge diagnosis for fever of unknown origin (FUO) and fungal infection. Some cases of fever of unknown origin (FUO) who remained unsolved at the time of discharge, were also excluded.

Measurement: Clinical data were collected, routine laboratory measurements were performed. Blood samples (20 ml) were aseptically collected for aerobic and anaerobic blood cultures. Bacterial culture was done in clinical microbiology laboratory of our hospital. All samples were collected within 24 h after registration to the department of Infectious Diseases. MicroScan WalkAway-96 System (Siemens, USA) was used to identify the bacterial species. PCT levels were detected by a chemiluminescence sandwich immunoassay and were measured by the Roche Elecsys E170 electrochemiluminescence analytical instruments (Roche Diagnostics Gmbtt Mannheim, Germany). The lower limit of detection of the assay was 0.05 ng/ml. The concentration of CRP in serum was determined by IMMAGE 800 specific protein analysis system (Beckman Coulter company, USA). IL-6 levels were measured by the Roche Elecsys E170 electrochemiluminescence analytical instruments. The concentration of SAA in serum was determined by BN II System (Dade Behring Marburg GmbH, Germany).

Group classification: The patients were divided into three groups according to the final diagnosis. The patients with bacterial infection were divided into two groups (groups 1 and 2) according to the result of blood culture. Group 1 represented patients with bacteraemia defined by a positive blood culture. Group 2 represented patients with bacterial infections but with negative blood culture. The patients in group 3 had no bacterial infection. The groups were comparable in age and sex. Groups 1 and 2 were pooled against group 3 prior to drawing ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curves.

Statistical analysis: Data were analyzed by SPSS version 17.0 software package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). The Shapiro-Wilk normality test was performed for all quantitative variables14. In the presence of non-normally distributed data, non-parametric statistical methods were used. Significance testing was carried out using the Kruskal-Wallis H test and Wilcoxon two-sample test. The association between PCT and CRP or SAA was tested based on Spearman's rank correlation. ROC curves were analysed with the Medcalc software version 11.5.1.0 (Medcalc software bvba, Belgium). ROC curves were plotted for PCT, CRP, IL-6 and SAA. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by calculating the areas under the ROC curves (AUC). ROC curve analysis was carried out using the method of DeLong et al15 An AUC of > 0.9 was considered excellent; 0.8-0.9, very good; 0.7-0.8, good; 0.6-0.7, average; < 0.6, poor16. The best cut-off point is the point where sum of specificity and sensitivity is maximum, when equal weight is given to both17. A two-tailed P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

A total of 326 febrile patients (mean age: 45.26 ± 19.03 yr; 179 male) were included in this study. Demographic and laboratory characteristics of patients with fever in this study are listed in Table I. Bacteraemia was confirmed in 58 patients (17.79%), bacterial infection was excluded in 50 patients (15.34%). The final diagnoses are shown in Table II, most common diagnosis was bacterial pneumonia (128/326, 39.26%). Of the 276 patients with bacterial infection, there were 161 cases (58.33%) of hospital acquired infection and 115 cases (41.67%) of community acquired infection. There were significant differences in the levels of PCT, CRP, IL-6 and SAA among the three groups (P < 0.001) (Table I). The correlation between PCT and CRP was moderate (r = 0.532), and those between PCT and SAA (r = 0.331) or IL-6 (r = 0.419) were weak.

Table I Demographic and laboratory characteristics of enrolled patients (n=326) with fever
Table II Final diagnosis of enrolled patients (n=326) with fever

The pathogens isolated from cultures are shown in Fig. 1. The most frequently isolated pathogen was Escherichia coli (25/276, 9.06%), followed by Acinetobacter baumannii/calcoaceticus (21/276, 7.61%). PCT, CRP, IL-6 and SAA concentrations according to pathogens in patients with bacterial infection are shown in Table III. The PCT levels in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial infections were 0.53 ng/ml and 2.13 ng/ml, respectively, with the levels significantly higher in Gram-negative bacterial infections (P < 0.01).

Bacterial pathogens isolated from the enrolled febrile patients.
Fig. 1
Bacterial pathogens isolated from the enrolled febrile patients.
Table III Differences of PCT, CRP, IL-6 and SAA concentrations based on gram-positive and gram -negative bacterial infections

The ROC curves of PCT, CRP, IL-6 and SAA concentrations for discrimination between patients in the bacterial infection group and non-bacterial infection group are shown in Fig. 2. The best cut-off value to detect bacterial infection was 0.26 ng/ml for PCT. The AUC values for the studied biomarkers are listed in Table IV. PCT was better than CRP (P < 0.05), IL-6 (P < 0.001) and SAA (P < 0.01) for detecting bacterial infection.

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve demonstrating sensitivity as a function of one-specificity for distinction between patients in the bacterial infection groups (group 1 and 2) and patients in the non-bacterial infection group (group 3) based on procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and serum amyloid A (SAA) levels. PCT, CRP, IL-6 and SAA had areas under the ROC curve of 0.804, 0.693, 0.658 and 0.687, respectively.
Fig. 2
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve demonstrating sensitivity as a function of one-specificity for distinction between patients in the bacterial infection groups (group 1 and 2) and patients in the non-bacterial infection group (group 3) based on procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and serum amyloid A (SAA) levels. PCT, CRP, IL-6 and SAA had areas under the ROC curve of 0.804, 0.693, 0.658 and 0.687, respectively.
Table IV Area under the curves (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) for procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), serum amyloid A (SAA) and the best cut-off values to detect bacterial infection from febrile patients in the infectious diseases department

Discussion

Early identification of bacterial infection in patients with fever is important for the therapy, however, laboratory parameters, such as CRP level and leukocyte counts have less value for early diagnosis. Many previous studies have shown that PCT level can be used to identify bacterial infections in patients with sepsis181920 and in patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs)20 or the emergency department (ED)821.

Our study suggested PCT as a valuable biomarker in detecting bacterial infection in febrile patients. This observation is consistent with the findings of previous researches68910 and may be explained by the fact that interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) inhibits IL-1 beta-induced calcitonin mRNA expression and PCT secretion, so serum PCT levels increase less in viral infections as compared with bacterial infections22. Besides, CRP and IL-6 were also found to be of value in detecting bacterial infection in febrile patients. Previous studies have also used CRP level to identify bacterial infections in febrile patients2324 and PCT was superior to CRP in identifying bacterial infection68910. Though CRP is the most commonly measured acute parameter in infection and sepsis, it is not a reliable marker in identifying bacterial infection because of its low sensitivity and specificity. There was no study using SAA as a marker for distinction between infectious and non-infectious fever. SAA has the same initial kinetics as CRP in the acute phase response. This study showed that SAA might not be a valuable biomarker of identifying bacterial infection in patients with fever. A previous study showed IL-6 as a better prognostic marker of bacterial infection than CRP in patients with febrile neutropenia25. This inconsistency may be due to different testing time. In addition, there was no significant association between PCT and CRP or SAA or IL-6, which also might be related to the different peak time and plasma half-life of different biomarkers after a stimulus. In bacterial infections, IL-6 levels rise 2h after endotoxin administration, and then gradually decline26. PCT is probably synthesized in the liver or monocytes, in response to cytokines such as IL-6 and TNF-α2728. PCT increases in blood six hours after a stimulus, reaches a plateau between 12 and 48 h, and then decreases if the stimulus stops. CRP increased four hours later than PCT7. In general, biomarker measurement has some disadvantages. Probably the combination of biomarkers would lead to a better sensitivity and specificity to predict bacterial infections.

In our study Acinetobacter baumannii/calcoaceticus was isolated from 21 patients, as reported in previous studies also1129. Our hospital is a large general hospital, many elderly patients hospitalized in other departments or other hospitals, if suffer from fever during their hospitalization and with a suspicion of infection are then admitted to the Infectious Diseases department. Therefore, there were some patients with hospital acquired infection and some isolated pathogens were not common community acquired pathogens.

Our study showed that PCT levels in Gram-negative bacterial infections were significantly higher than that in Gram-positive bacterial infections, consistent with results of previous studies3031. The TNF-α plays a pivotal role in the cytokine response to Gram-negative bacteria, and also in the release of PCT from various cells in bacterial infection30. Previous experiment showed that PCT peak value was significantly higher in rats stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a component of the outer membrane of the Gram-negative bacteria, than in those stimulated with muramyl dipeptide, a component of the outer membrane of the Gram-positive bacteria32. Therefore, the PCT level was possibly related to the characteristics of the pathogen.

There were some limitations concerning this study. Firstly, the study was based on a large hospital (4300 ward beds) statistics and not on a specified population in a region, which might have caused selection bias. Second, the cut-off values from ROC curves are based on sensitivity and specificity which are sensitive to prevalence of a disease and the same is not known.

In conclusion, PCT may be a valuable biomarker of bacterial infections in febrile patients, with greater predictive value than CRP and other biomarkers of infection. SAA may not be a valuable marker of identifying bacterial infection. More prospective and large scale studies are needed to better define the usefulness of PCT in identifying the causes of fever and guiding the rational use of antibiotics.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank the nurses at the Center of Infectious Disease, West China Hospital, Sichuan University for clinical assistance.

References

  1. , , , . C-1. reactive protein: ligands, receptors and role in inflammation. In: Clin Immunol. Vol 7. . p. :104-11.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Biomarkers of sepsis: clinically useful? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2005;11:473-80.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , . Clinical laboratory differentiation of infectious versus non-infectious systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Clin Chim Acta. 2005;351:17-29.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , . Update on detection of bacteremia and fungemia. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997;10:444-65.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , . Procalcitonin as a marker of the systemic inflammatory response to infection. Intensive Care Med. 2000;26:1193-200.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . Procalcitonin-guided antibiotic use vs a standard approach for acute respiratory tract infections in primary care. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:2000.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , . The diagnostic role of procalcitonin and other biomarkers in discriminating infectious from non-infectious fever. J Infect. 2010;60:409-16.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , . Additional value of procalcitonin for diagnosis of infection in patients with fever at the emergency department. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:457-63.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . Prognostic value of mortality in emergency department sepsis score, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein in patients with sepsis at the emergency department. Shock. 2008;29:322-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , . Serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein levels as markers of bacterial infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:206-17.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , . Utility of procalcitonin as an early diagnostic marker of bacteremia in patients with acute fever. Yonsei Med J. 2011;52:276-81.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , . Regulation of the acute phase response by cytokines. Perspect Biol Med. 1993;36:611-22.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , . Serum amyloid A, the major vertebrate acute-phase reactant. Eur J Biochem. 1999;265:501-23.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , . Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2012;10:486-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , . Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837-45.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , . ROC analysis of the accuracy of Noncycloplegic retinoscopy, Retinomax Autorefractor, and SureSight Vision Screener for preschool vision screening. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:9658-64.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , . Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for medical researchers. Indian Pediatr. 2011;48:277-87.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , . Procalcitonin for early diagnosis and differentiation of SIRS, sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2000;26(Suppl 2):S148-52.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , , . Usefulness of procalcitonin serum level for the discrimination of severe sepsis from sepsis: a multicenter prospective study. J Infect Chemother. 2008;14:244-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , . Calcitonin precursors are reliable markers of sepsis in a medical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:977-83.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , , . Procalcitonin as a potent marker of bacterial infection in febrile Afro-Caribbean patients at the emergency department. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011;30:831-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , , . In vitro and in vivo calcitonin I gene expression in parenchymal cells: a novel product of human adipose tissue. Endocrinology. 2003;144:5578-84.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , , . Pitfalls in using serum C-reactive protein to predict bacteremia in febrile adults in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30:562-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , , . Role of C-reactive protein velocity in the diagnosis of early bacterial infections in children after cardiac surgery. J Intensive Care Med. 2012;27:191-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , , , . Markers of bacteremia in febrile neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies: procalcitonin and IL-6 are more reliable than C-reactive protein. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004;23:539-44.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , , , . Procalcitonin increase after endotoxin injection in normal subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;79:1605-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , , , , . Procalcitonin expression in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells and its modulation by lipopolysaccharides and sepsis-related cytokines in vitro. J Lab Clin Med. 1999;134:49-55.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , . Procalcitonin as an acute phase marker. Ann Clin Biochem. 2001;38:483-93.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , , , , . Predictive model for bacteremia in adult patients with blood cultures performed at the emergency department: a preliminary report. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2011;44:449-55.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , , , , . Serum procalcitonin elevation in critically ill patients at the onset of bacteremia caused by either Gram negative or Gram positive bacteria. BMC Infect Dis. 2008;8:38.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , , , , . Evaluation of procalcitonin, neopterin, C-reactive protein, IL-6 and IL-8 as a diagnostic marker of infection in patients with febrile neutropenia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2008;49:1752-61.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. , , , , . Circulating inflammatory mediators during start of fever in differential diagnosis of Gram-negative and Gram-positive infections in leukopenic rats. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2005;12:1085-93.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections
Scroll to Top