Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Commentary
133 (
5
); 464-466
pmid:
21623028

Endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) variants in cardiovascular disease: pharmacogenomic implications

Department of Biochemistry, University College of Science, Osmania University, Hyderabad 500 007, India
Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

The DNA-based information provided by the Human Genome Project, International HapMap Project and the Human Variome project gave an impetus to understanding the nature and consequences of human genetic variations, specifically in conferring susceptibility to common multifactorial diseases13. Approximately 20 million sequence variants have been identified by extensive genotyping of common variations among ethnically diverse human populations. The most common human sequence variations are differences in individual base pairs, termed single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Researchers have discovered many associations between genetic variants in the relevant candidate genes and clinical outcome in diseases such as diabetes, hypertension and cancer45. Genome-wide association studies by the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium (WTCCC) highlighted the association of SNP markers on chromosome 9p21.3 with coronary artery disease6. This was the most significant association seen across the genome for this disease and has been independently replicated in different populations. A number of genetic association studies examined SNPs as these are considered as the primary genetic determinants of the inter-individual variability in susceptibility to disease, response to treatment (pharmacogenetics) and clinical outcomes79.

Human cardiovascular disease (CVD) comprises a group of complex diseases which claim over ten million lives annually world wide1011. CVD includes multifactorial heterogenous conditions such as hypertension, coronary heart disease, stroke, and congestive heart failure. Marked variation in CVD pattern and susceptibility is observed in different populations which can be attributed to genetic and environmental factors. Ethnic differences in responses to cardiovascular drugs such as β-blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have been recognized for several decades, and in some cases ethnicity is used in drug therapy decision-making. Studies have reported differential effects of commonly used cardiovascular medications, such as lipid-lowering agents and antihypertensives based on individual variation. Association of polymorphisms in the cytochrome P450 CYP2C9 with warfarin dose requirement is well documented across a variety of ethnic populations. Genetic variation can influence both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic mechanisms underlying variation in drug response. Using a candidate gene approach researchers have identified genetic polymorphisms that influence the pharmacodynamic determinants of antihypertensive response. Polymorphisms that have been shown to influence the BP response to diuretics have been identified in candidate genes encoding alpha-adducin (ADD1), subunits of G-proteins (GNB3 and GNAS1), endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), and ACE1214.

Vascular endothelial dysfunction is a common characteristic of various cardiovascular diseases. The maintenance of regular vascular tone substantially depends on the bioavailability of endothelium-derived nitric oxide (NO) synthesized by eNOS. The essential role of NO, as the elusive endothelium-derived relaxing factor (EDRF), was the topic of research that won the 1998 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine1517. The eNOS gene, as a candidate gene in the investigations on hypertension genetics, has attracted the attention of several researchers because of the established role of NO in vascular homeostasis. The eNOS variants located in the 7q35-q36 region have been investigated for their association with CVD, particularly hypertension1819. Considering the functional roles, relatively high occurrence of minor alleles in different ethnic groups and clinical relevance, three variants, viz., (i) G894T substitution in exon 7 resulting in a Glu to Asp substitution at codon 298 (rs1799983), (ii) an insertion-deletion in intron 4 (4a/b) consisting of two alleles (the a*-deletion which has four tandem 27-bp repeats and the b*-insertion having five repeats), and (iii) a T786C substitution in the promoter region (rs2070744), have been extensively studied2022. Individual SNPs often cause only a modest change in the resulting gene expression or function. It is, therefore, the concurrent presence of a number of SNPs or haplotypes within a defined region of the chromosome that determines susceptibility to disease development and progression, particularly in case of polygenic diseases23.

In the current issue, Shankarishan et al24 analysed for the first time the prevalence of eNOS exon 7 Glu298Asp polymorphism in tea garden community of North Eastern India, who are a high risk group for CVD. This study also included indigenous Assamese population and found no significant difference between the distribution patterns of eNOS exon 7 Glu298Asp variants between the communities. They have rightly mentioned that for developing public health policies and programmes it is necessary to know the prevalence and distribution of the candidate genes in the population, as well as trends in different population groups. They have also observed that the eNOS exon 7 homozygous GG wild genotype (75.8%) was predominant in the study population followed by heterozygous GT genotype (21.5%) and homozygous TT genotype (2.7%). The frequency distribution of the homozygous GG, heterozygous GT and homozygous mutant TT genotypes were comparable to that of the north Indian and south Indian population. However, the prevalence of GG genotype was found to be low in the study population when compared with other Asian populations. The prevalence of GT genotype was highest among the Italian population (51.8%) and the lowest among the Chinese population (8.3%) and the ‘T’ allele frequency was found to be relatively higher among the Caucasians and lower among Asian populations24. Although this polymorphism is associated with several diseases, indicating its impact on eNOS function and subsequent NO production, its functional significance remains to be better understood. As glutamate and aspartate are conservative replacements, this polymorphism is thought to be a marker for a functional locus elsewhere in the gene. Moreover, there is no consensus on impact of this polymorphism on the enzyme function. Some studies have showed that the Asp variant is more susceptible to inactivation by proteolytic cleavage, possibly due to a tighter turn of the alpha helix, suggesting that homozygosity for this variant may result in impaired catalytic function of eNOS25. Conversely, some studies obtained no evidence for altered enzyme function associated with this polymorphism26. Therefore, the haplotype analysis considering other polymorphisms within the gene will give better understanding on the implication of this gene as a marker for cardiovascular diseases27.

Polymorphisms in the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene have been associated inconsistently with cardiovascular diseases. Varying distribution of eNOS variants among ethnic groups may explain inter-ethnic differences in nitric oxide mediated vasodilation and response to drugs28. Different population studies showed association of eNOS polymorphisms with variations in NO formation and response to drugs2930. Cardiovascular drugs including statins increase eNOS expression and upregulate NO formation and this effect may be responsible for protective, pleiotropic effects produced by statins31. With respect to hypertension, studies have reported interactions between diuretics and polymorphisms in eNOS gene. Particularly, the Glu298Asp polymorphism made a statistically significant contribution to predicting blood pressure response to diuretics3233. Further progress in this line of research may lead to development of cardiovascular drugs that provide individual based treatment for each patient and the disease mechanism that applies to that patient rather than on the basis of symptoms or in a population based manner.

References

  1. , . The Human Genome Diversity Project: past, present and future. Nat Rev Genet. 2005;6:333-40.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , . The patterns of natural variation in human genes. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2005;6:287-312.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . The future of genetic studies of complex human diseases. Science. 1996;273:1516-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , . Haplotype variation and linkage disequilibrium in 313 human genes. Science. 2001;293:489-93.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , . A HapMap harvest of insights into the genetics of common disease. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:1590-605.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. WTCCC. Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature. 2007;447:661-78.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , . To a future of genetic medicine. Nature. 2000;409:822-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , . The importance of race and ethnic background in biomedical research and clinical practice. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1170-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , . Ethical perspectives on pharmacogenomic profiling in the drug development process. Nat Rev Drug Discovery. 2002;1:300-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , . Biomarkers and bioassays for cardiovascular diseases: Present and future. Biomark Insights. 2008;3:293-302.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , . Epidemiology of sudden cardiac death: clinical and research implications. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2008;51:213-28.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , . Pharmacogenetics of antihypertensive drug responses. Am J Pharmacogenomics. 2004;4:151-60.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , . Ethnic differences in cardiovascular drug response: rotential contribution of pharmacogenetics. Circulation. 2008;118:1383-93.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , . Association of polymorphisms in the cytochrome P450 CYP2C9 with warfarin dose requirement and risk of bleeding complications. Lancet. 1999;353:717-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , . Nobel Prize for NO research. Nat Med. 1998;4:1215.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , . Nitric oxide synthase: role in the genesis of vascular disease. Annu Rev Med. 1997;48:489-509.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , . The regulation and pharmacology of endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2006;46:235-76.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , , . Hypertension in mice lacking the gene for endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Nature. 1995;377:239-42.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , . Endothelial function and dysfunction: testing and clinical relevance. Circulation. 2007;115:1285-95.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , . Endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphisms and cardiovascular disease: a HuGE review. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;164:921-35.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , . Polymorphisms in endothelial nitric oxide synthase and atherogenesis: John French Lecture 2000. Atherosclerosis. 2001;154:521-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , . Endothelial NO synthase gene polymorphisms and hypertension: a meta-analysis. Hypertension. 2006;48:700-10.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , . Association study designs for complex diseases. Nat Rev Genet. 2001;2:91-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , . Prevalence of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) gene exon 7 Glu298Asp variant in North Eastern India. Indian J Med Res. 2011;133:487-91.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , , , . Intracellular processing of endothelial nitric oxide synthase isoforms associated with differences in severity of cardiopulmonary diseases: cleavage of proteins with aspartate vs.glutamate at position 298. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:2832-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , , , . Acidic hydrolysis as a mechanism for the cleavage of the Glu(298)!Asp variant of human endothelial nitric-oxide synthase. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:26674-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , . Modulation of nitric oxide formation by endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene halotypes. Free Radic Biol Med. 2007;43:987-92.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , . Effects of ethnicity on the distribution of clinically relevant endothelial nitric oxide variants. Pharmacogenetics. 2001;11:719-25.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , . Nitric oxide donors and cardiovascular agents modulating the bioactivity of nitric oxide: an overview. Circ Res. 2002;90:21-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , , , , . Glu298Asp endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphism interacts with environmental and dietary factors to influence endothelial function. Circ Res. 2002;90:1153-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , . A pharmacogenetics-based approach to reduce cardiovascular mortality with the prophylactic use of statins. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2010;106:357-61.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. , , , , . Effects of endothelial nitric oxide synthase, alpha-adducin, and other candidate gene polymorphisms on blood pressure response to hydrochlorothiazide. Am J Hypertens. 2003;16:834-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. , , , . Endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene: prospects for treatment of heart disease. Pharmacogenomics. 2007;8:1723-34.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    13

    PDF downloads
    8
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections
    Scroll to Top