Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Correspondence
138 (
6
); 1029-1030

Facts about journal publishing in open access policy

Department of Occupational Therapy School of Allied Health Sciences Manipal University Manipal 576 104, India
Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Sir,

I read with interest the editorial by Satyanarayana where he mentions that open access (OA) of journals is one of the changing aspects of journal publishing in modern day1. This system is a blessing for scientific communities because it is easily available in digital form and allows user to read, download, copy, distribute, and print23 without any barrier, thus increases impact of the published material. The progress of scientific knowledge in any field depends on retrieval and accessibility of relevant literature2 and in this regard archiving4 and access5 of OA literature plays a major role. In self archiving, the author can upload preprint or postprint versions in OA digital platform256 and use personal website, institutional archive, departmental archive, inter- and intra-disciplinary archive for this purpose26. Self-archiving can be Green OA26 which allows uploading postprint version and Pale Green2 OA which allows uploading preprint version of scholar work. Open access journals are another source of OA literature and provide postprint or copy edited version2 of a published article. When publishers allow immediate OA to all published material, it is known as Gold OA257. Sometimes publishers make scholarly article available after an embargo period, identified as delayed open access7. When subscription based journals allow OA to a limited number of scholarly articles, it is known as hybrid open access7. Open access in digital platform allows free access and reduced expenses for printing and distribution5 unlike traditional printing and subscription based journals. But to host a digital platform by using modern technology and archive in cyber space increase expenditure of journal publishing5 and put additional economic burden to OA publication35. Economically sustainability is one of the main supports for long lasting of any journal3 and it comes from either authors pay model or from external supports like public funding, membership fees, users consortia, advertising, institutional subscriptions and service sales3. In OA publication except public funding and advertising there are less chances to generate revenue from any author external sources to fulfill publication cost. Advertising generates small revenue3 and public funding sources like universities, research laboratories pay for their organization member publication35. In this scenario, the only feasible option left for OA journal is to generate revenue through authors pay model. According to Subar2, most of the OA journals do not charge authors but most of conventional and non OA journals do and usually authors’ fee for publication is paid by author sponsors or waived off2. Now-a- days fraud publishers use this authors pay model to generate money in dishonest way as termed as “Cash Cow” model in the editorial1. This is one of the biggest threats in the era of OA journals for scientific communities. Due to pressure for publication scholars fall in their traps. They should be careful about these fake journals because now-a-days quality of publication is more acceptable than quantity of publication8. Though there are no foolproof methods to find out fake journals in open access platform, but scholars can take certain measures to avoid these kind of counterfeit journals. First, they should check scope of the journal as most of these fake journals publish articles from different fields of science9 within a short period of time910, which is usually not possible for a normal regular journal. Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association(OASPA) clearly mentions in their code of conduct that an OA journal should have editorial boards or other governing bodies consisting of recognized specialists from the field(s) that constitute the scope of the journal8. OASPA also suggested that there should be some form of peer review and it should be clearly mentioned on the journal or publisher's website8. The authors should also check the details of the editorial board members or reviewers available in journal home page like phone number with ISD codes which help to identify countries they belong to, institutes they work in and their details like websites from where scholars can obtain information. Regarding publication fee OASPA has clearly stated in the code of conduct that the publication fee or charges in the OA journal should be clearly mentioned on the home page and should be easily located by potential authors8. Finally, scholar should check contact details of the publisher provided in the journal or publisher's home page as most of the time it is an internet based invoice110 and does not have any postal code and phone number and bank account details available, which can help to identify the publishing place and thus are strong indicators of “Predatory Publishers”.

All OA publishers are not predatory publisher9 but this situation can create many problems for authors and readers. This problem may be solved when open access becomes free for authors like its users6. This is an ideal OA and termed as Diamond or Platinum OA6 and will give a new direction of OA publication.

References

  1. , . Journal publishing: the changing landscape. Indian J Med Res. 2013;138:4-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Open Access Overview - Focusing on open access to peer-reviewed research articles and their preprints. . Open Access Repositories: Capacity Strengthening Programmed for Africa. Available from; http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , . Challenges for open access journals: quantity, quality and economic sustainability. Available from: http://www.upf.edu/hipertextnet/en/numero-10/challenges-for-open-access-journals-quantity-quality-and-economic-sustainability.html
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . Conflict of interest in open-access publishing. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:491.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , . Open but not free - publishing in the 21st century. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:787-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , . The dark side of open access. Prespacetime J. 2013;4:91-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Open database: Open access. Available from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_access
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association. Available from: http://oaspa.org/membership/code-of-conduct
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , . The downside of open-access publishing. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:791-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , . Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature. 2012;489:179.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    16

    PDF downloads
    5
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections
    Scroll to Top