Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
133 (
4
); 401-406
pmid:
21537093

Transient cytotoxicity of 131I beta radiation in hyperthyroid patients treated with radioactive iodine

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Cochin, India
Department of Biotechnology, Karpagam Academy of Higher Education, Karpagam University, Coimbatore, India
Department of Zoology, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, India

Reprint requests: Dr P. Shanmuga Sundaram, Head, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Elamakkara Post, Cochin 682 026, India e-mail: ssundaram@aims.amrita.edu

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Background & objectives:

Radioiodine (131I) or radioactive iodine in low doses is used worldwide as the first line of management in the treatment of hyperthyroidism. Information is available on the extent and severity of cell damage after a high dose radioiodine (131I) therapy for thyroid cancer, but information is scanty on its cellular effects, its extent and severity of cell damage after a low dose 131I therapy. The present investigation was aimed to study the cytotoxic effects of a low dose 131I therapy in varying doses as is normally being used in routine clinical practice in the treatment of various forms of hyperthyroidism.

Methods:

Peripheral blood lymphocytes were analyzed in 32 hyperthyroid patients. All of them received 131I in the form of sodium iodide solution orally. Blood lymphocytes were studied for the presence of chromosomal aberrations (CA) and micro nucleus (MN) using micronucleus assay. Blood samples of these patients were drawn prior to the treatment, on 7 thand 30 thdays after the treatment.

Results:

The results indicated a positive relationship between 131I dose, CA and MN frequency. A statistically significant increase in CA and MN frequency in day 7 post- therapy and a decrease in mean levels of CA and MN on day 30 post-therapy were observed when compared to pre-therapy.

Interpretation & conclusions:

This study showed that the cytogenetic damage induced by 131I in low doses i.e., less than 555MBq was minimal and reversible. Patients can be motivated to undertake this safe and easy procedure as a first line of therapy in the treatment of hyperthyroidism.

Keywords

chromosomal aberrations
hyperthyroidism
low dose 131I therapy
micronucleus assay

The use of radioiodine 131I has continued to remain as mainstay of therapy for hyperthyroidism including Graves′ disease, toxic multinodular goiter and autonomous toxic nodule. Despite the advantages of beta radionuclide therapy in destroying the over-functioning thyroid tissue with 131I, side-effects can also occur in these patients because normal tissues are simultaneously exposed to beta radiation. In all hyperthyroid patients treated with 131I, the optimal outcome is obviously euthyroidism without post ablative hypothyroidism but one cannot reliably accomplish this goal considering the number of variables affecting the outcome, including characteristics of the patient (i.e., age, gender, and gland size); severity and duration of the underlying autoimmune thyroid stimulus; radiation delivered to the gland (i.e., 131I fractional uptake, homogeneity of distribution, and effective half-life); and preceding antithyroid drug therapy. There is an almost linear relation between the amount of administered radioiodine and the development of subsequent hypothyroid disease. Administration of smaller amounts of Iodine-131, however, increases the chances of treatment failure and the need for repeated radioiodine administration. Because most treated patients with Graves’ disease (regardless of treatment used) ultimately become hypothyroid, it is better to tell patients to expect this as an acceptable late result of treatment1. Complications of radioiodine therapy for hyperthyroidism are transient, minimal and usually related to gastrointestinal disturbances like altered taste, nausea and vomiting. The growing awareness of subtle short- and long-term consequences of this therapy outweighs the potential therapeutic benefit of this one time therapy.

131I is a reactor-produced radioisotope with a physical half-life of 8.02 days. It has both beta and gamma radiation components which can be harmoniously used for therapeutic and diagnostic benefit. On oral administration it is rapidly and completely absorbed from stomach. The beta emission from radioiodine disrupts chemical bonds throughout the cell, inflicting devastating damage on the DNA molecule and triggering cellular dysfunction and ultimately death of thyroid follicular cells23. It produces chromosomal aberrations like breaks, deletions through its beta emitting properties. Asli et al4 studied the cytogenetic effects in patients exposed to Technetium during cardiac imaging and radioiodine during thyroid cancer therapy and found the cellular changes to be statistically insignificant. 131I treatment takes advantage of the fact that thyroid cells have the ability to absorb iodine after oral administration due to the presence of an active sodium iodide symporter. There is normal physiological uptake of 131I in salivary, lacrimal gland, nasopharynx and lactating breast also.

The cellular effects of low levels of ionizing radiation can be studied using cytogenetic assays56. Peripheral blood lymphocytes are best suited for studying the effects of radiation as these are the most sensitive cells to ionizing radiation78. The present study was planned with the objective of estimating the cytogenetic effects of a low dose 131I therapy in the treatment of various forms of hyperthyroidism in varying doses.

Material & Methods

Samples: The study included a total of 32 hyperthyroid patients (M: F = 14: 18), age range between 23-61 yr, mean 49 ± 7 yr who were under evaluation in Endocrinology department of Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Cochin, Kerala. Clinically hyperthyroid patients were sent to Nuclear medicine department of the same Institute where a Technetium thyroid scan was performed. Patients were selected consecutively from June 2007 to December 2008. Based on the thyroid scan findings of Graves′ disease, toxic multinodular goiter and autonomous toxic nodule empirical 131I dosage was decided as per the standard treatment protocol9. All patients were clinically and biochemically evaluated prior to Technetium thyroid scan by the endocrinologist. Basic blood tests along with serum free T4, T3 and TSH estimations were performed on their initial presentation to the endocrinologist. Control groups i.e., volunteers (who came for routine health checkup) (20 in number) were enrolled for this study. All of them were clinically normal with normal thyroid function tests and Technetium thyroid scan. They were not administered 131I and their blood samples were kept as control. All subjects were informed of the objective of the study and gave their consent. The institutional ethical committee approved the research procedures used in this study.

Inclusion criteria: Clinical, biochemical and scintigraphic confirmation of hyperthyroidism as Graves’ disease, toxic multinodular goiter and autonomous toxic nodule. Scintigraphic confirmation was done by Technetium thyroid scintigraphy in patients who were off antithyroid drugs for atleast five preceding days.

Exclusion criteria: (i) Scintigraphic diagnosis of subacute viral thyroiditis, (ii) pregnant women and those breastfeeding who could not wean off baby for eight weeks post-treatment with radioiodine, (iii) patients with free T4 levels > 5 ng/ml at the time of treatment were excluded as 131I administration may lead to a medical crises called thyroid storm with excess release of preformed hormones into circulation and (iv) patients with Graves’ ophthalmopathy.

The treatment consisted of 131I administration orally as an adjuvant radiation dose to destroy thyroid follicular cells. All patients recruited for this study were explained the details of the treatment, radiation safety measures to be followed for 10 days after the treatment. They were also instructed to stop iodised salt, seafoods and iodide containing medications atleast 3 weeks prior to this treatment. Antithyroid medications like carbimazole was stopped a week prior to the date of therapy.

Based on the trapping function of thyroid gland established by Technetium scan, patients were divided for empirical 131I dosage into 185 – 370 MBq, 370 – 555 MBq and above 555 MBq of 131I. Twenty five patients with Graves′ disease (GD), received a dose of 185 –370 MBq, five patients of toxic multinodular goiter (TMG) received between 370 – 555 MBq and remaining two patients of autonomous thyroid nodule (ATN) were administered more than 555 MBq of 131I therapy. Five ml of heparinised blood were collected from all these patients just before administering 131I low dose. Subsequent blood samples were collected from each patient one week and 30 days after the therapy to look for DNA changes.

Chromosomal analysis: RPMI1640 (Gibco, USA) foetal calf serum (Gibco) phytohaemagglutinin – M (Gibco) dimethyl sulphoxide 5 μl /ml (E.Merk, India) colchicines 0.20 μg/ml (Micro lab) and cytochalasin – B (Sigma, USA) were used for this analysis.

Peripheral blood cultures were prepared1011. Blood sample (0.5 ml) was inoculated under aseptic conditions into a culture vial containing 5.0 ml of culture medium, 1.0 ml of AB serum (Antibodies Inc. Washington, DC) and 0.2 ml of phytohaemagglutinin. The cultures were incubated at 37°C for 72 h. The dividing cells were arrested at the metaphase stage by adding 0.05 ml of colchicines solution (0.01%) 30 min before harvesting the culture. The contents of the vials were centrifuged at 200 g for 10 min at the end of colchicine treatment. The supernatant was discarded and 6 ml of hypotonic solution was added to the test tube after disturbing the cell button. The contents of the test tubes were incubated for 7 min and freshly prepared fixative (Methanol: glacial acetic acid 3:1v/v) was added and centrifuged at 200 g for 10 min. Later the supernatant was discarded and two or three changes of fixative were given to obtain colourless cell pellet. The slides bearing chromosome spreads were treated with 0.25 per cent trypsin for 3 to 10 sec and were stained in 4 per cent buffered Giemsa solution for 3 min. At least 100 metaphases were examined for the occurrence of different types of abnormality i.e., gaps, fragments, breaks, etc. Criteria to classify the different types of aberrations were in accordance with the recommendation of Environmental Health Criteria 46 for environmental monitory of human population12.

Micronucleus analysis: The lymphocytes were cultured according to the method of Fenech and Morley13. Pokeweed mitogen (Gibco BRL, USA) was used to stimulate the lymphocytes to proliferate in culture. A solution of cytochalasin B (Aldrich Chemical Co., India) was added 44 h after the commencement of the culture. The cultures were terminated 72 h after initiation. Scoring of MN was limited to bi-nucleated lymphocytes with preserved cytoplasm according to the criteria proposed by Countryman and Heddle14. The following are the criteria used for scoring the cell inclusions: (i) only cells with a distinct cytoplasm and distinct binucleation were analyzed for the presence of MN, (ii) only MN entirely inside the cytoplasm, separated from the main nucleus and with a diameter <1/3 of the size of the main nucleus were scored, and (iii) only MN staining the same as or lighter than the nucleus were scored. The suggested criteria for identifying MN were; (i) rounded smooth perimeter suggestive of a membrane; (ii) less than a third the diameter of the associated nucleus, but large enough to discern shape and colour; (iii) Feulgen positive, i.e., pink in bright field illumination; (iv) staining intensity similar to that of the nucleus; (v) texture similar to that of nucleus; (vi) same focal plane as nucleus; and (vii) absence of overlap with, or bridge to, the nucleus. The results are expressed as the average percentage of micro nucleated cells per binucleated cells.

Metaphases were scored for CAs and included chromatid gaps, isochromatid gaps, breaks, fragments, etc. Gaps are true discontinuities of the chromosome structure15 and in this study metaphases were studied with and without gaps (Figs 13).

Binucleate cell with no micronuclei in a patient of Graves’ disease treated with 10 millicurie of 131I.
Fig. 1
Binucleate cell with no micronuclei in a patient of Graves’ disease treated with 10 millicurie of 131I.
Micronucleus in a binucleate cell of a patient with toxic multinodular goitre treated with more than 10 millicurie of 131I.
Fig. 2
Micronucleus in a binucleate cell of a patient with toxic multinodular goitre treated with more than 10 millicurie of 131I.
Chromosomal aberrations seen in a patient with autonomous toxic nodule treated with 15 millicurie of 131I.
Fig. 3
Chromosomal aberrations seen in a patient with autonomous toxic nodule treated with 15 millicurie of 131I.

Statistical analysis: Various statistical methods (Student’s t-test, Mann–Whitney test, Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and Pearson′s rank correlation analysis) were used depending on the nature of the data and the type of analysis needed. SPSS 11.01 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) was used for the calculation of the results obtained.

The association of the frequency of micronuclei with the age and sex of subjects was tested with Pearson’s rank correlation analysis.

Results

In our study, female hyperthyroid patients were able to tolerate symptoms and signs for 1 to 2 years when compared to males, who had lower tolerance levels of around 6 months to 1 year. The predominant symptoms were weight loss followed by increased appetite, tremors, increased sweating, palpitations and mental disturbances.

In cytogenetic study, there was a moderate increase in chromosomal aberrations (CA) in day 7 post 131I therapy blood samples when compared to the pretreatment samples. A significant decrease of the same was observed in the day 30 post 131I therapy samples (Table I). Lymphocytes of control groups showed fewer MN and CA when compared to sample I (185-370 MBq).

Table I Frequency of chromosomal aberrations (CA) in control population and in 131I-treated hyperthyroid patients 7 and 30 days after therapy
Treatment dose (MBq) Number of subjects (N=20) Abnormal metaphases
Chromosome aberrations
Number Frequency Gaps
Fragments and breaks
Number % Number %
Control 20 2 0.10 1 0.15 0 0
Sample I
  185-370 25 5 0.60 2 0.25 5 2.09
  370- 555 5 7 0.53 3 0.98 6 1.98
  >555 2 6 0.66 3 1.00 6 2.00
Sample II
  185-370 25 4 1.24 2 1.03 4 1.68
  370- 555 5 6 2.03 2 0.56 4 1.67
  >555 2 6 2.64 2 0.54 4 1.46
Sample III
  185-370 25 4 1.00 2 1.03 4 1.68
  370- 555 5 6 1.67 2 0.56 4 1.67
  >555 2 6 2.85 2 0.54 4 1.46

Sample I, Pre-therapy control groups for 3 subsets of patients; Sample II, day 7 post-therapy; Sample III, day 30 post-therapy

In MN analysis, a moderate increase in micronuclei was observed in patients treated with higher dose of 131I. Similarly there was a transient increase in the number of MN (Table II). in day 7 compared to day 30 post-therapy samples. Patients receiving higher dosage of 131I showed both MN and abnormal metaphases in their blood samples. However there was no clear correlation between the micronuclei frequency and the therapeutic 131I dose used. In addition, age and sex did not show any influence on micronuclei frequency in either patients or control population (r=0.04, P>0.05).

Table II The Frequency of Micronuclei (MN) observed in 131I treated hyperthyroid patients- 7 & 30 days after therapy
Disease Particulars Age in years (Mean ± SD) Frequency of Micronuclei (Mean ± SD)
7 days after 131I therapy 30 days after 131I therapy
GD (n= 25) 46.32 ± 6.68 2.36 ± 1.380 1.88 ± 0.175*
TMG (n=05) 55.00 ± 8.24 4.60 ± 0.96 3.30 ± 0.97*
ATN (n=02) 53.5 ± 6.36 6.00 ± 0.00 4.25 ± 0.35*
Values insignificant at 5% level; GD, graves’ disease; TMG, toxic multinodular goiter; ATN, autonomous thyroid nodule.

Both MN and abnormal metaphases seen in hyperthyroid patients treated with 131I was insignificant when compared to control group.

Discussion

The results revealed that low dose 131I therapy induce chromosomal abnormalities in the form of increased CA and MN as early as 7 days after treatment. Similar observations on chromosomal abnormalities and structural aberrations in 131I hyperthyroid subjects have been reported earlier16. Ramirez et al17 reported a 1.8 fold increase in the frequency of 17p breaks after iodine-131 therapy in hyperthyroid patients. There is a minimal cytogenetic damage in the peripheral blood lymphocytes of 131I treated hyperthyroid patient in comparison with controls in their study. Similar results were observed by Guitizeez et al18.

Micronuclei are small nuclei like particles seen apart from the nucleus in an irradiated cell. These enclose acentric fragments or whole chromosomes that have not been included in the main nuclei at cell division and in the cytoplasm19. Therefore, the presence of micronuclei can indirectly denote chromosome breakage or impairment of the mitotic spindle. It has been shown that ionizing radiation induces micronuclei in human lymphocytes and, in spite of the variability of dose-response relations; there is a quantitative relationship between radiation dose and frequency of micronuclei, which can be used for biological dosimetry. The sensitivity of cytokinesis blocked micronuclei assay is well established20.

In our study, it was observed that the increase in micronuclei after therapy, was not statistically significant which is explained by the fact that the amount of radiation induced to cells may be minimal. Watanebe et al21 in their study reported an increase in MN after 131I therapy and they found that number of MN peaked at 3 days after 131I administration and gradually decreased.

Radiation induced ionization may act directly on the cellular component molecules indirectly or water molecules causing formation of water derived radicals. Radicals react with nearby molecules in a very short time resulting in breakage of chemical bonds or oxidation of the affected molecules. The DNA is a major target for radiation damages because DNA distraction can kill or mutate human cells. Double strand DNA breaks may play a major role in these biological effects822. The relatively low frequency of chromosomal aberrations and MN induced by 131I in vivo supports the contention that cytogenetic damage of this therapy in hyperthyroid patients was minimal transient and reversible.

To conclude, human peripheral blood lymphocytes are sensitive to ionizing effects of radiation, and low dose 131I therapy induces transient chromosomal abnormalities in the form of increased CA and MN in patients with hyperthyroidism as early as 7 days after treatment, which (P>0.5) reduces 30 days following therapy. These patients can be motivated to undertake this safe and easy procedure as a first line of therapy in the treatment of hyperthyroidism.

References

  1. , , . Radioiodine-131 in the diagnosis and treatment of metastatic well differentiated thyroid cancer. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1990;19:685-718.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , . Determination of the optimal minimum radioiodine dose in patients with Graves’ disease: a clinical outcome study. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001;28:1489-95.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , . Patient-specific dosimetry for 131 I thyroid cancer therapy using 124 I PET and 3-dimensional-internal dosimetry (3D-ID) software. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:1366-72.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , . Chromosome aberrations after high dose I 131 and 99mTc MIBI administration. Nucl Med Commun. 2010;134:307-10.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , . Chromosomal findings in patients treated with small doses of iodine-131. Mutat Res. 1974;25:397-402.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , . The in vitro micronuleus technique. Mutat Res. 2000;455:81-95.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , . Cytogenetic damage after 131-iodine treatment for hyperthyroidism and thyroid cancer. Eur J Nucl Med. 1999;26:1589-96.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , . Biological effects of radiation - Radiation and cancer. London: Taylor & Francis Ltd; . p. :111-25. 147-76
  9. , , , , , . Radioiodine therapy for thyroid cancer and hyperthyroidism in patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis. Thyroid. 2005;15:1321-31.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , . Chromosome preparation of leukocyte culture from peripheral blood. Exp Cel Res. 1960;20:613-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , . Pachytene chromosome maps of human chromosomes 19 and 20. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1960;27:97-200.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. WHO. In: Guidelines for the study of genetic effects in human populations, Environmental Health Criteria, No. 46. Geneva: World Health Organization; .
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , . Measurement of micronuclei in human lymphocytes. Mutat Res. 1983;148:29-36.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , . The production of micronuclei from chromosome aberrations in irradiated cultures of human lymphocytes. Mutat Res. 1976;41:321-32.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , . Giaccia. Radiobiology for the radiologist. USA: Lippincott Wilkins & Williams; . p. :16-28.
  16. , , , , , . Micronuclei induction by 131I exposure.Study in hyperthyroidism patients. Mutat Res. 1997;373:39-45.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , . Multicolour FISH detection if radioactive iodine induced 17ce-p53 chromosomal breakages in buccal cells from therapeutically exposed patients. Carcinogenesis. 2000;21:1581-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , . Cytogenetic damage after 131-iodine treatment for hyperthyroidism and thyroid cancer.A study using the micronucleus test. Euro J Nuc Med. 1999;26:1589-96.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , , . Micronuclei as anindex of cytogenetic damage: past, present and future. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1991;18:277-91.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , . Micronuclei: a biological indicator of radiation damage. Mutat Res. 1996;366:163-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , , . Evaluation of radiotoxicity after I 131 therapy for thyroid cancer using the micronucleus assay. J Nucl Med. 1998;39:436-40.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , . Methods for the analysis of human chromosome aberrations 1973:21-2.
Show Sections
Scroll to Top