Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Editorial
139 (
5
); 657-660

Towards better hypertension management in India

Department of Medicine, Fortis Escorts Hospital, Jaipur 302 017, India
Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences & McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

*For correspondence: rajeevgg@gmail.com

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Hypertension is an important public health problem in India and leads annually to 1.1 million deaths (uncertainity index 0.9-1.3 million)1. It is estimated to account for 10.8 per cent of all deaths and 4.6 per cent of all disability adjusted life years (DALYs) in the country1. Globally also, hypertension is the most important risk factor for death and disease burden and is estimated to be responsible for 9.4 million deaths and 7.0 per cent DALYs2.

Several guidelines published in 2013 have refocussed international attention on hypertension3456. A crucial focus in all these guidelines is both the achievement of optimum blood pressure (BP) as well as overall reduction in cardiovascular (CV) risk. These can be achieved by combination of a range of interventions: (i) lifestyle changes (increased physical activity, increased consumption of fruits and vegetables, sodium restriction, weight management, alcohol abstinence and smoking/tobacco cessation); (ii) drugs to lower BP (calcium channel blockers-CCBs, diuretics, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors-ACEI, angiotensin receptor blockers-ARBs, beta-blockers, etc.) and to lower lipids using statins3. All these lifestyle and pharmacological strategies are likely to be equally important in Indians with hypertension, although no previous trial of BP reduction or lipid lowering has been conducted in South Asians or have included sizeable numbers of participants of South Asian origin. Based on the currently available data, a few issues need highlighting: (i) over half of those with hypertension in India are not aware that they have elevated BP; (ii) of those who are aware that they have hypertension, only about 60 to 80 per cent are treated with medications; and (iii) of those who are treated, the majority do not have adequate control of BP and fewer have other risk factors addressed. Consequently, only about 10-15 per cent of those with hypertension have controlled BP. These massive gaps in detection of hypertension, its treatment and control require systematic strategies to tackle barriers. Some of the important strategies are summarized in the Table.

Table Recommendations for better hypertension control in India

Hypertension occurs in 25-30 per cent of middle aged individuals in urban and 15-20 per cent in rural areas of the country7. The Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study has reported that hypertension prevalence in South Asian adults aged 35-70 yr varies from 30.7 per cent in India, 33.5 per cent in Pakistan and 39.3 per cent in Bangladesh8. Among those with hypertension, awareness (40.4%), treatment (31.9%) and control (13.0%) are very low8. There is an urgent need for increasing awareness of hypertension (through better detection and education of the public) and to promote its treatment and control by using public health measures. Relevant for India and other lower middle and low income countries, are policy initiatives, promotion of widespread BP measurements (screening), and strategies to ensure lifelong BP control in those having hypertension.

Public health measures include media and educational campaigns to promote awareness that (i) hypertension is asymptomatic, (ii) BP measurements are essential, (iii) BP reduction is required, and (iv) drugs are effective, safe and well tolerated and are required to be taken for life even when the BP is “controlled”. Promotion of healthy lifestyles can be done by focussing on messages to avoid smoking and any tobacco use, minimizing or eliminating alcohol consumption, increasing the consumption of fresh fruits and vegetables and reducing animal fat consumption. Salt intake should be reduced especially in those with high consumption (>5 g sodium/day) and in older individuals. Other useful measures are promotion of physical activity by local environmental changes at home, workplace and schools; user friendly food labelling and consumer information regarding fat, trans-fat and salt content; and subsidies for healthy foods (low-fat dairy products, fruits and green vegetables)9.

Screening as a tool for greater hypertension detection and awareness is important3. Opportunistic screenings for BP in all adults should be performed at every healthcare system encounter. Screening can be successfully and efficiently performed by trained non-physician healthcare workers as well as during routine medical consultation. Early diagnosis is the critical step to initiating proper management, and is associated with substantial reductions in cardiovascular mortality and morbidity3. Besides screening, non-physician healthcare workers can also be trained to provide lifestyle advice, to initiate low doses of safe medications and to reinforce adherence. This approach of task shifting is likely to be an extremely cost-effective strategy and is essential if a large and resource challenged country, such as India, is to control a common condition such as hypertension affecting one third of adults10.

A number of pharmacological agents are available for BP control. Older guidelines promoted a stepped-care pharmacological approach and drugs were classified as first line (diuretics, beta-blockers), second line (ACE inhibitors, ARBs, CCBs) and third line (others)11. However, all the recent statements and guidelines advise an a la carte approach to drug treatment3456. In fact, combination of two drugs from separate classes (ACE inhibitors, ARBs, CCBs, beta-blockers or diuretics) in low doses should be the initial choice and is more effective and better tolerated than using high doses of a drug from a single class12. Rational fixed drug combinations have been advised by European guidelines3 and combination pills are widely available in India. Multi-drug combinations not only provide better BP control over a short term, but also reduce physician inertia (i.e. the delays in increasing dose or adding a second drug), promote compliance and adherence. These are convenient, and cost-effective.

An important component of hypertension management is cardiovascular risk reduction. Controlling risk factors beyond BP control by smoking cessation, reduction of cholesterol and diabetes management can further reduce cardiovascular events in patients with hypertension. Clinical trials (e.g. ASCOT) have reported that management of lipids using statins leads to greater reduction of clinical events as compared to isolated BP control13. All these studies, however, used separate pills for achieving targets. It is now possible to combine several BP medications and a statin into a combination pill (polypill)14. Use of a polypill is promising and phase 2 trials show incremental BP control and large risk reductions (60 to 70%) in CVD events15. Several large clinical trials utilizing the polypill strategy are ongoing (HOPE-3, TIPS-3) and results should be available by 2016 and 20181415.

Promoting lifelong adherence to drug therapy is important for optimal hypertension management. There are multiple reasons for non-adherence, most are related to patients’ attitudes and factors, provider related issues and barriers in the healthcare system16. Relevant for India are poor understanding among patients about hypertension (its risk, its asymptomatic nature and the need for lifelong therapy), and about potential benefits of treatment and proper use of medications; poor interaction of patient with physicians and the healthcare system; poor access to medications and relatively high costs; and inadequate distribution of physicians and other healthcare professionals, with only a few in rural areas and in poor communities. Multiple strategies have been used to improve adherence, and include patient level, drug treatment level and health system level interventions17. Complex interventions are most effective and use several approaches together16. These approaches include provision of more convenient care which is more easily accessed by patients, information about hypertension and the need for lifelong treatments, periodic reminders, counselling about lifestyle modification, family support, telephone follow up, supportive care and worksite- and pharmacy-based programmes3. In India and other low and lower-middle income countries, use of community health workers is an attractive strategy for hypertension management10. Such workers have been successfully utilized to reduce maternal mortality, promotion of smallpox and polio immunizations and HIV/AIDS management18. Whether such a strategy will be effective for hypertension management in India is being evaluated in a few studies (e.g. PREPARE19, DISHA20. Another strategy that has been successfully utilized in BP control is the use of pharmacists or nurse practitioners. In India, unfortunately, the pharmacists are not authorised to prescribe and the category of nurse-practitioners does not exist. Such legal barriers need to be removed for specified conditions as has been done in many other countries. Twenty two countries worldwide and all the 50 US States have legislations that authorise nurse practitioners or pharmacists to prescribe simple treatments21. Countries that allow pharmacists to prescribe these drugs include developed countries such as Australia, Canada, New Zealand, South Africa, UK and USA, and middle income countries such as Malaysia. A meta-analysis reported that pharmacist led team intervention reduced systolic BP by 9.3 mm Hg and diastolic BP by 3.6 mm Hg over a one-year period compared to usual care22. This would project to an additional 25 to 30 per cent risk reduction in CVD compared to usual care and can have a huge clinical and public health impact. Similar legislations are required in countries such as India, to enhance wider access of patients to simple and evidence based drugs for chronic and stable conditions such as hypertension, and to promote long term adherence.

In conclusion, hypertension is an important public health problem in India. Hypertension detection, awareness and its control are poor. Improved detection and management can prevent hundreds of thousands of premature deaths and avoid a similar number of strokes and heart attacks every year. Innovative “systems” based strategies (Table) to better manage hypertension are required. A combined approach to lowering risk with lifestyle changes and combined use of anti-hypertensive and lipid lowering therapy (perhaps through a polypill) can reduce the cardiovascular risk by as much as 75 per cent15. There is a need for improved systems of healthcare for widespread screening for hypertension so that it can be detected. Once detected, effective BP control and reduced CVD risk is best achieved by combinations of BP lowering agents and a statin. Such an approach shall have an enormous clinical and public health impact.

References

  1. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. India high blood pressure. Available from: http://www.healthmetricsandevaluation.org/search-gbd-data
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , . A comparative risk assessment of burden of disese and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2224-60.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . 2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension; the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) J Hypertens. 2013;31:1281-357.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , . An effective approach to high blood pressure control: a science advisory from the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Hypertension. 2014;63:878-85.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , . 2014 evidence-based guidelines for the management of high blood pressure in adults : report from the panel members appointed to the Eight Joint National Committee (JNC 8) JAMA. 2014;311:507-20.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . Clinical practice guidelines for the management of hypertension in the community: a statement by the American Society of Hypertension and the International Society of Hypertension. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2014;16:14-26.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , . Hypertension epidemiology in the 21st century India. J Prev Cardiol. 2013;2:350-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , . PURE (Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology) Study investigators. Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in rural and urban communities in high-, middle-, and low-income countries. JAMA. 2013;310:959-68.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, Council Nutrition, Physical Activity and Metabolism, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, Council on the Kidney in Cardiovascular. Population approaches to improve diet, physical activity and smoking habits: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012;126:1514-63.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , . Hypertension education and adherence in South Africa: a cost-effectiveness analysis of community health workers. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:240.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , . The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289:2560-72.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , . ASCOT Investigators. Prevention of coronary and stroke events with atorvastatin in hypertensive patients who have average or lower-than-average cholesterol concentrations, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial - Lipid Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2003;361:1149-58.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , . ASCOT Investigators. Prevention of cardiovascular events with an antihypertensive regimen of amlodipine adding perindopril as required versus atenolol adding bendroflumethiazide as required, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366:895-906.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , . The polypill in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases: key concepts, current status, challenges, and future directions. Circulation. 2010;122:2078-88.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , . Combination pharmacotherapy to prevent cardiovascular disease: present status and challenges. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:353-64.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , . Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:487-97.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , . Compliance with pharmacological therapy in hypertension: can we do better, and how? J Hum Hypertens. 2004;18:595-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Global Health Workforce Alliance, World Health Organization. Global experience of community health workers for delivery of health related millennium development goals: a systematic review, country case studies, and recommendations for integration into national health systems. 2010
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , , . Rationale and design of the primary prevention strategies at the community level to promote adherence of treatments to prevent cardiovascular diseases (PREPARE) trial. Am Heart J. 2013;166:4-12.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , . Diet and lifestyle Interventions through Anganwadi Workers and Accredited Social Health Activists (DISHA). Effectiveness of diet and lifestyle intervention through Information Education Communication (IEC) tools with Angan Wadi Centres (AWCs) as the centre of knowledge dissemination for hypertension (including hypercholesterolemia and diabetes) risk reduction – a cluster randmised controlled trial. CTRI/2013/10/004049 Available from: http://www.ctri. nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?trialid=6727
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , . Healthcare inequity and physician scarcity: empowering non-physician healthcare. Econ Pol Wkly. 2013;48:112-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , . The potency of team-based care interventions for hypertension: a meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1748-55.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    27

    PDF downloads
    7
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections
    Scroll to Top