Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Commentary
139 (
4
); 484-486

Tobacco cessation in India: A priority health intervention

Achutha Menon Centre for Health Science Studies Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences & Technology Thiruvananthapuram 695 011, India ;

Read COMMENTARY-ARTICLE associated with this -

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

While tobacco use is decreasing in many developed countries it is increasing in developing countries such as India. As per the latest nationally representative Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS), India had 275 million current tobacco users in the year 2009-2010 (over 35 per cent of adults): majority of them used smokeless tobacco (164 million) and 42 million used both forms of tobacco1. An estimated one million people die every year due to tobacco related diseases in India. In order to reduce the impact of tobacco related morbidity and mortality, we need a combination of strategies aimed at avoiding initiation of tobacco by the non-users and cessation of tobacco use among current users. More than half of current tobacco users will die from tobacco related diseases, if they do not quit. If the current use of tobacco among adults is reduced to half by the year 2020, 180 million deaths due to tobacco could be avoided2. Tobacco cessation is the only way to save the current tobacco users from tobacco related mortality and morbidity in the short run. Therefore, it is essential to provide tobacco cessation services to the current tobacco users.

Recognizing the importance of tobacco cessation, 13 tobacco cessation clinics (TCCs) were started in 2002 by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, with the support of the World Health Organization India Country office, and increased subsequently to 19 to provide tobacco cessation interventions. The objectives of these clinics were to evolve cessation strategies for smokers and smokeless tobacco users, to generate experience in tobacco cessation interventions and find out the feasibility of scaling up these intervention strategies. In the first five years, 34,741 tobacco users attended these clinics and baseline information was recorded for 23,3203. Only behavioural intervention was provided for 69 per cent of the users and the remaining 31 per cent received both behavioural intervention and pharmacotherapy. At the sixth week follow up, 14 per cent reported to have completely quit tobacco and another 22 per cent reported harm reduction (reducing tobacco use by at least 50 per cent of the baseline use)3. Limited number of tobacco users accessing these clinics and very low proportion of tobacco users from rural areas were the major disadvantages of these clinics.

Considering the above limitations of TCCs, a group of researchers conducted a community based group intervention for tobacco cessation in rural areas of Tamil Nadu State to see the impact of such interventions. This study reported a quit rate of 12.5 per cent and harm reduction of 21.7 per cent in the intervention group which was significantly higher than the six per cent quit rate and the nine per cent harm reduction in the control group at two months follow up4. Although the group intervention was provided by a doctor in this cluster randomized trial, even in the control group that received only leaflets on the need for tobacco cessation the quit rate was six per cent indicating the potential for cessation even with minimum intervention. If this could be suitably integrated with the primary health care system in India, a substantial number of tobacco users will be able to quit tobacco.

Smoking cessation intervention was reported among patients attending primary health centres in Kerala State. Patients were grouped into minimal intervention and augmented intervention groups. The minimal intervention group received doctor's quit advice and the augmented intervention group received additional brief intervention counselling for smoking cessation by a trained non-doctor health professional. At three months follow up, the quit rates were 16 per cent in the minimal intervention group and 21 per cent in the augmented intervention group5. Although this difference was not significant, the quit rates among both groups were higher than that of the TCCs and the community based group intervention in rural Tamil Nadu. If all the doctors in the health system offer a quit advice to all the tobacco users, a large number of patients are likely to quit tobacco. However, a study among doctors in Kerala reported that most doctors asked about tobacco use only to a minority of their patients6 indicating the need for encouraging doctors to include tobacco advice in their routine medical practice. As per the GATS India report less than half of the smokers and 27 per cent of smokeless tobacco users were advised to quit by their health care providers1. The consultation time can be effectively used by doctors as an opportunity to promote patients to quit tobacco when they are motivated to listen.

The article by Mony et al7 published in this issue on ‘tobacco cessation outcomes in a cohort of patients attending a tobacco cessation clinic located within the chest medicine out-patient clinic in Bangalore city, southern India’ underscores the importance of tobacco cessation among patients attending different specialty clinics5. The authors report five per cent quit rate among these patients at 24 months follow up in the intention-to-treat analysis. This quit rate was higher than the population level quit rate of less than two per cent in India8. However, this was much lower than the 50 per cent quit rate reported among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients in a developed country9. In a recent study from the Kerala State self-reported quit rate among diabetes patients was substantially higher than that was reported in this article10. All the patients in this study were given a strong quit advice by the doctor and leaflets on the need for smoking cessation. The intervention group received an additional 30 minutes diabetes specific smoking cessation counselling session by a trained and certified non-doctor health professional. At six month follow up, the quit rate of 51.8 per cent in the intervention group was significantly higher than the 12.5 per cent in the control group. At one year follow up the quit rate in the intervention group remained high at 45.8 per cent compared to the 19.8 per cent in the control group11.

Tuberculosis (TB) is another disease which is linked to even small amounts of tobacco smoking8. In Kerala, smoking rate among TB patients was reported to be two times higher than the general population and the need for TB specific tobacco cessation counselling to these patients was highlighted earlier12. It was also suggested to provide tobacco cessation advice at each stage of TB treatment in order to avoid relapse. The possibility of shifting from smoking to smokeless tobacco use by TB patients has also been reported from India13 which needs to be addressed in tobacco cessation programme for these patients.

The unassisted smoking cessation in India is very low unlike in the West14. In India, tobacco users quit after they get some diseases. Therefore, it is all the more important that doctors and other health professionals address tobacco as a serious risk to public health. Tobacco cessation in general population is usually preceded by tobacco cessation among health professionals. The Quit Tobacco International (QTI) supported by the Fogarty International Centre of the United States National Institutes of Health has embarked on a project incorporating tobacco cessation intervention in the undergraduate medical curriculum in two countries: India and Indonesia. The major objective of this project is to build capacity for tobacco cessation among medical students so that the future doctors will have the skills to offer tobacco cessation to their patients using the five ‘A's (Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist, Arrange) and the five ‘R's (Relevance, Risks, Rewards, Roadblocks, Repetition). As part of this project in India, 15 course modules were developed, piloted, implemented and evaluated in various departments of five medical colleges in Kerala and Karnataka States. The list of the modules and the details are available in the QTI website15. Each module consists of five components: a set of mini lectures with speaker notes, clinical case scenario, fact sheet, instructor resources and sample questions for examinations. In addition, 14 short clinical videos of five to eight minutes duration were also developed and uploaded on the website. All these resources could be utilized for teaching medical students within the available flexible curriculum not only in India and Indonesia but in other parts of the world.

Tobacco cessation needs to go beyond the health sector. The recent successful quit tobacco intervention carried out by teachers in the Indian State of Bihar is an excellent example of tobacco cessation intervention outside the health sector. The intervention comprised educational efforts, tobacco control policies and cessation support. Among teachers in the intervention group the quit rate of 20 per cent was significantly higher compared to the five per cent in the control group16.

Tobacco cessation in India needs to be implemented in multiple settings. Incorporating tobacco cessation training in medical and other health professional education, training of health professionals to offer cessation advice in their routine health care practice, disease specific counselling sessions in diabetes, TB and selected other specialties are likely to result in significant quit rates among current tobacco users. Effective implementation of the Framework Convention of Tobacco Control is likely to have impact not only on the prevention of initiation of tobacco use but also on tobacco cessation to a large extent.

Acknowledgement

K.R. Thankappan is the Indian Principal Investigator of the Quit Tobacco International project supported by a grant from the Fogarty International Centre of the US National Institutes of Health (RO1TW005969-01).

References

  1. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Mumbai. Global adult tobacco survey India (GATS India), 2009-2010. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; .
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , . The tobacco atlas. (3rd ed). Atlanta, Georgia, USA: American Cancer Society; .
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . Tobacco cessation services in India: recent developments and the need for expansion. Indian J Cancer. 2010;47(Suppl):69-74.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , . Community-based group intervention for tobacco cessation in rural Tamil Nadu, India: a cluster randomized trial. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2012;43:53-60.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , . Smoking cessation intervention program in Primary Health Centres in Palakkad district, Kerala. Thiruvananthapuram, Kerela, India: Unpublished PhD thesis, Achutha Menon Centre for Health Science Studies, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology; .
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , . Doctors’ behavior & skills for tobacco cessation in Kerala. Indian J Med Res. 2009;129:249-55.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , . Tobacco cessation outcomes in a cohort of patients attending a chest medicine outpatient clinic in Bangalore city, southern India. Indian J Med Res. 2014;139:523-30.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , . A nationally representative case-control study of smoking and death in India. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1137-47.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , . Smoking cessation buddies in COPD. Nurs Times. 2011;107:22-23.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , . Smoking cessation among diabetes patients: results of a pilot randomized controlled trial in Kerala, India. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:47.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , . Smoking cessation among diabetes patients: one year follow-up results of a randomized controlled trial in Kerala, India. Diabetes. 2013;62:A1-A98.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , . The need for cessation of tobacco use among patient with tuberculosis in Kerala, India. Natl Med J India. 2009;22:333.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , . Smokeless tobacco use among Tuberculosis patients in Karnataka, India: The need for cessation services. Natl Med J India. 2012;25:142-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , . The global research neglect of unassisted smoking cessation: Causes and consequences. PLoS Med. 2010;7:e1000216.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Project quit tobacco international. Available from: http://quittobaccointernational.org
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , . Effects of a tobacco control intervention for teachers in India: results of the Bihar school teachers study. Am J Public Health. 2013;103:2035-40.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    20

    PDF downloads
    9
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections
    Scroll to Top