Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Addendum
Announcement
Announcements
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Books Received
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Corrrespondence
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Podcast
Errata
Erratum
FORM IV
GUIDELINES
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Panel of Reviewers (2006)
Panel of Reviewers (2007)
Panel of Reviewers (2009) Guidelines for Contributors
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Method
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Authors’ response
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Public Notice
Research Brief
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers
Short Paper
Some Forthcoming Scientific Events
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
View Point
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Addendum
Announcement
Announcements
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Books Received
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Corrrespondence
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Podcast
Errata
Erratum
FORM IV
GUIDELINES
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Panel of Reviewers (2006)
Panel of Reviewers (2007)
Panel of Reviewers (2009) Guidelines for Contributors
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Method
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Authors’ response
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Public Notice
Research Brief
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers
Short Paper
Some Forthcoming Scientific Events
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
View Point
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
162 (
1
); 5-13
doi:
10.25259/IJMR_799_2025

The untold story of elimination of human schistosomiasis from Gimavi village, Ratnagiri district, Maharashtra State, India: A qualitative study

Department of Community Medicine, Bharati Vidyapeeth University Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Central Research and Publication Unit, Bharati Vidyapeeth University Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India

*For correspondence: Dr Prakash Doke, Department of Community Medicine, Bharati Vidyapeeth University Medical College, Pune 411 043, Maharashtra, India e-mail: prakash.doke@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Abstract

Background & objectives

Infection with Schistosoma haematobium (S. haematobium) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality in humans, primarily affecting the African countries. In 1952, a pathology professor discovered an endemic focus of S. haematobium in a small village named Gimavi in Ratnagiri district, Maharashtra. Its emergence about 5,000 km away from its homeland in Africa, the absence of the known vector, Bullinus, in India, and its confinement to only one village were enigmatic. The Government of Maharashtra executed several activities and eliminated the focus after about 40 years. Many practicing and teaching public health experts today are unaware of the focus and the efforts undertaken for its elimination. This study's objectives were to identify clinical features, enlist the containment activities undertaken by the government, and identify reasons for confinement.

Methods

We conducted a qualitative study using in-depth interviews. All available past patients, two health personnel (male and female health workers), a medical officer, a district health officer, the concerned senior officer from the Directorate of Health Services, a scientist from Haffkine Institute, Gramsevak/Talathi (village level healthcare workers), Sarpanch/Up-sarpanch (administrative heads of a large village or a cluster of small villages), at least one from each category, were interviewed. The study included persons who worked during that period.

Results

The investigator interviewed ten personnel and two past patients. Many children had painless and mild haematuria, which persisted for some years. All respondents knew about the tiny snails living in the rivulet transmitted the disease. Construction of bridges, tanks, toilets, water supply schemes, barbed fencing along banks, manual collection/destruction of snails, health education, and mass drug administration eliminated the focus. Besides Gimavi, the rivulet flows through two villages and joins an estuary of a river where, due to high salinity, tiny freshwater snails cannot survive.

Interpretation & conclusions

A new species of snail was discovered to transmit S. haematobium. The disease was mild and self-limiting. A multipronged attack eliminated the focus. The unique environmental conditions restricted the spread of the disease.

Keywords

Estuary
Ferrissia tenuis
mild painless haematuria
praziquantel
rivulet

Schistosomiasis is one of the parasitic diseases that has been known for a long time. In Egypt in 1851, Theodor Bilharz first described this parasitic infection in the bladder at autopsy. Hence, the disease is named as bilharziasis. Globally, more than 700 million people reside in endemic areas. The World Health Organization (WHO), in 2021, estimated that more than 250 million people require treatment1. Seventy-eight countries reported transmission of Schistosomiasis, mostly from poor and rural communities. Urogenital Schistosomiasis is caused by Schistosoma haematobium (S. haematobium). Five species cause intestinal Schistosomiasis; among them, Schistosoma mansoni and Schistosoma japonicum are the most common. Almost 90 per cent of human cases are reported from Africa1. In India, from 1877–78, a few sporadic clinically suspected cases were reported. Nearly all of them had contracted the disease in Africa2. Hence, India was never considered as an endemic focus. However, animals were frequently found positive3.Various types of snails' act as vectors. Genus Bulinus is the only known vector for S. haematobium.

A professor of pathology working in the Grant Medical College, Mumbai for the first time in 1952 observed an endemic focus of S. haematobium in a small village named Gimavi in Ratnagiri district, Maharashtra, India4. Figure 1 shows the geographical location of the village. Scientists from the Haffkine Institute conducted surveys after 19765.The Directorate of Health Services Government of Maharashtra took the initiative to eliminate the focus. Various departments of the Zilla Parishad (District administration), Ratnagiri and the elected peoples' representatives contributed to the elimination endeavour. In the latter half of the 1980s, to treat the patients, the Directorate of Health Services attempted to import Praziquantel, which was unavailable in India then. Later, Praziquantel was also made available with the support of the WHO and administered to the population. Over the last 25 years, there have been no reported cases of human Schistosomiasis from that village or any other parts of India. It was present only in one village, Gimavi, in the Guhagar block, Ratnagiri district, Maharashtra, India. Many currently practicing and teaching public health experts are unaware of the focus and efforts made to eliminate it. The objective of this study was to document the experiences of past patients and health personnel (male and female health workers, medical officer, district health officer, concerned senior officer from the Directorate of Health Services, Mumbai), scientists from Haffkine Institute, Gramsevak, Talathi, elected representatives (Sarpanch/Up-sarpanch), at least one from each category.

Village Gimavi Ratnagiri district. Source: Map generated using Google map (https://www.mapsofindia.com/districts-india/).
Fig. 1.
Village Gimavi Ratnagiri district. Source: Map generated using Google map (https://www.mapsofindia.com/districts-india/).

Materials & Methods

Study setting

The census population of the village of Gimavi marginally increased from 769 in 1951 to 963 in 2011. According to the family health survey conducted in June 2024, there are 319 families, and the village population is 965, including eight infants, 135 adolescents (10–19 yr), and 268 senior citizens. Two rivulets flow through the village and join in the village itself, and the united rivulet flows on the north side (Fig. 2). The village has 10 Wadis/Wadas (clusters of houses). Adjacent to the rivulets, there are 65 houses. The village is on Latitude 17°30′ 36″ N and Longitude 73° 19′ 25″ E.

The span of rivulet from Gimavi village, India. Source: Map generated using Google map (https://www.mapsofindia.com/districts-india/).
Fig. 2.
The span of rivulet from Gimavi village, India. Source: Map generated using Google map (https://www.mapsofindia.com/districts-india/).

Research team and reflexivity

All authors have formal post-graduate training in Public Health and experience in conducting in-depth interviews and focused group discussions. They also have about 15 yr of work experience in the area of public health. Presently, they are faculty from the department of Community Medicine of a private medical college. The principal investigator was involved in the schistosomiasis control activities. He had an acquaintance with a few senior health officers who were working at that time. He requested and interviewed those officers who, in turn, communicated the purpose of the interviews to other health workers, past patients, and other government workers from Gimavi.

Study design

The study adopted a qualitative inquiry technique and used in-depth interviews (IDIs). We used content analysis. The sampling was purposive. The people who worked during the time of schistosomiasis elimination in Gimavi were contacted; if not available, the people working after them were contacted for IDIs. The interviewees were informed in advance and requested to participate. An interview guide was prepared and validated by the faculty in the department of Community Medicine. All the conversations took place in the local language (Marathi) and were written on the spot. Each interview lasted for about 40 min. At the end of the interview, the respondents were informed about what they had shared with the interviewer.

We attempted to review all available documents at the Sub-Centre, Primary Health Centre, District Health Office, Grampanchayat, and Directorate of Health Services related to the topic of our investigation.

The Institutional Ethics Committee approved the research project. We obtained written informed consent (two telephonic) from all the respondents for participation in the study and publication.

Findings & analysis (W=worker, P=patient)

The principal investigator enrolled 10 personnel and three patients for IDIs. Two past patients were present in the village, and the third patient was in Mumbai. The principal investigator conducted the first patient's interview face-to-face, and the other patient present in the village was a senior farmer with cognitive impairment and was unable to respond sensibly. The third patient's interview was conducted by telephone. The female health worker and one medical officer were interviewed at the Sub-Centre and Primary Health Centre. Health personnel were present during the interview. They did not participate in our request. They did not distract from conversations. The principal investigator interviewed the other medical officer over the phone. All other interviews were conducted at the participants' homes (except for one, who came to the principal investigator's home for the interview). The mean age of the 10 interviewees was 70.7 yr, ranging from 55 to 80 yr. The interviewed patients were 65 and 74 yr old. All the participants were men except the female health worker. The interviews were conducted from July to December 2024.

Perceptions about clinical features

All respondents remembered that there were many cases. People reported that painless mild haematuria was the leading complaint; however, one said,

Blood in stool was also observed” (W: 65 yr old, female).

A few said it was associated with general symptoms like abdominal pain, diarrhoea, fever, and weakness. “Mostly children were affected, but rarely adults were affected, and in adults, the haematuria was frank and severe” (W: 71 yr old, male).

Most had observed that no person landed in a clinically serious condition or died. In the absence of deaths and severe morbidity, people were not worried about mild, painless, and transient haematuria in children; hence, they did not pay attention. Both patients stated that during micturition, the last few drops were blood.

Rarely clotted blood was also seen in urine, and I was used to it” (P: 74 yr old, male).

All three patients were 5 to 14 yr of age when they suffered. The haematuria persisted for 4 to 15 yr and then resolved without taking any treatment.

The last symptomatic case was somewhere between 1987 and 1990. Most respondents remembered the names of the last two cases. One patient who was repeatedly positive for microscopic haematuria got acquainted with officers from the Haffkine Institute and joined the Institute as a laboratory assistant. Patients with microscopic haematuria were recorded until 1985–1986; however, in primary health centres (PHCs), records of patients with complaints of haematuria were not available. Later, cases were microscopically diagnosed.

Perceptions about transmission:

  1. Mode of spread: All respondents knew that the parasite was transmitted through snails living in water. The people opined that the disease was connected with migration to Africa (W: 71 yr old male, W: 74 yr old male). Except for one officer, others were unaware of the scientific name of the vector (F. tenuis). One officer described the features of the vector as tiny freshwater snails usually resting on/below leaves (W: 80 yr old male). One village resident also explained the features of calling the snail Khubi in the local language. He said that the snails were observed perennially (W: 55 yr old, male).

  2. Reasons for not spreading: One health worker believed the disease did not spread due to prompt actions taken (W: 65 yr old, female), and the affected village was small and isolated. The villagers travelled minimally. Environmental factors responsible for affecting a limited geographical area were seasonal water collection in that small area, the presence of the specific snails only in Gimavi, and the small span of the rivulet (Fig. 2). There was almost no chance of residents of other villages coming in contact with the snails. Man-to-man transmission was not known. Such a conducive environment and vector combination did not exist in other villages.

  3. Disease origin: Presently, no Muslim resides in the village, and only one grave exists in the village. Presumably,

    some local Muslim soldiers must have participated in the First/Second World War and might have had a connection with Africa before 1951” (W: 71 yr old, male).

Disease control measures

All workers remembered various actions taken by the government to mitigate the disease (schistosomiasis).

Fencing

The most remembered action was barbed wire fencing on both banks of the rivulet to restrict access to contaminated water. The fencing was approximately 3 to 4 km long, as the snails were found only within a stretch of a few kilometres. After a few years, the fencing was destroyed as it caused inconvenience.

Health education

Health education was delivered through boards displaying messages prohibiting entry into the stream, drinking water, and washing clothes. Such messages were also given in schools. Health education sessions were conducted during house-to-house surveys to enlist patients with haematuria.

Potable drinking water

In 1970 and 1990, Zilla Parishad provided two jack wells (as a priority) for drinking water in the village due to schistosomiasis. The water supply scheme was well constructed and renovated later.

Infrastructure for improved hygiene and sanitation

The responsible government officers constructed area-wise tanks (for washing clothes and animals) and public latrines and also regularly chlorinated water using ‘Tropical Chloride of Lime’ bags. Through the District Planning and Development Committee, two Sakavs (temporary wooden bridges) were approved, and one was constructed between 1975 and 1980 to prevent contact with stream water. Later, bridges were constructed at two sites. The earlier and present scenario is depicted in figure 3.

(A-B)No bridge and indiscriminate use of rivulet water in 1950s. (C) The bridge and the absence of human beings in the rivulet. Source: (A-B) Ref 12, reproduced with permission from the author. (C) Photograph taken by the authors.
Fig. 3.
(A-B)No bridge and indiscriminate use of rivulet water in 1950s. (C) The bridge and the absence of human beings in the rivulet. Source: (A-B) Ref 12, reproduced with permission from the author. (C) Photograph taken by the authors.

Environmental waste and vector disposal

The government employed two temporary and two regular workers to collect leaves dropped in the stream regardless of sheltering the snails with long-handled nets, collecting the snails from surrounding surfaces by stick, counting them, and burn in the evening. The residents still remember the names of two persons who worked for many years. While the stream was flowing, there was minimal problem. However, from December to June, the water stagnated, favouring the collection of dropped leaves and snails.

Line listing and testing

House-to-house surveys were conducted to enlist patients with haematuria. scientists from the Haffkine Institute collected urine samples from all individuals three to four times for microscopic examination, the last time being in 1989–90. Community Health Volunteers (the scheme was functional then) fully supported these activities. During house-to-house survey, stool samples were also collected.

Pharmaceutical interventions

Imidazole mass administration was conducted from 1979 to 1980. A team from WHO visited Gimavi in 1989–90, and then Praziquantel was made available and administered as a single dose to all the residents (about 1,000). It took 10 days to cover the whole population. A scientist from the Haffkine Institute facilitated the administration and assisted with the distribution of iron-folic acid supplementation. The probable event timeline is depicted in figure 4.

Event timeline of Schistosomiasis elimination in village Gimavi.
Fig. 4.
Event timeline of Schistosomiasis elimination in village Gimavi.

Barriers

People were unaware of the pathogenesis and were anxious; hence, initially, they did not share information or provide urine samples. Another reason for initial non-cooperation was the absence of severe disease or death. They were curious why so many people visited the village frequently. Gradually, the situation changed to good cooperation. Overall, there were no long-standing barriers.

Positive reactions

People after realizing the benefits started cooperating. The villagers received water supply and electricity as a priority over other villages. People stopped washing clothes in the stream and drinking water from the rivulet. Elected people's representatives from Gram Panchayat, Zilla Parishad (particularly the CEO for Sakav), and the Legislative Assembly were the trailblazers in the actions. As the then Health Minister was from Ratnagiri district, he took the initiative to eliminate the focus. Other department personnel helped contact the villagers and insisted on cooperation.

Opinions about actions taken

The actions were satisfactory; hence, there were no frank cases after 1990. One senior officer said,

Prevention of contact with water habilitating snails was enough. The actions were proportionate to the severity of the problem. No other actions were warranted” (W: 76 yr old, male).

However, a few participants commented that the actions were relatively slow. A few reported that IEC should have been a core component of all departments not of the health department alone.

One response was unique. The respondent said,

As it was the only focus of Schistosomiasis, the government could have relocated the village to some other place” (W: 63 yr old, male).

Another respondent said, “Regular snail studies and Molluscicide might have been used to control the snail population” (W: 80 yr old, male).

Recurrence

Almost all respondents felt the probability of recurrence was ‘nil to negligible’. About 30 to 35 yr have elapsed since the last case was reported. Now, water contact is almost not happening. One officer feels that

The environment is conducive. We do not know about chronic carriers. The Government must conduct mass urine examination and thoroughly investigate infestation among snails before the final declaration of elimination” (W: 72 yr old, male).

Observations

Presently, there is a constructed bridge at the infamous spot of the stream. People are not wading through the stream.

Discussion

The discourse of this section, apart from the findings, is derived from published articles. Among snails, presence of five types of schistosomiasis has been observed3. In animals, other types of schistosome have been frequently reported from various States6, 7. Endemic cercarial dermatitis is known8; sporadically a few cases of other schistosome species have been found in human stools9. Almost all sporadic cases of S. haematobium, reported before the detection of the endemic focus, mainly were Muslims and having history of travel to Africa2. An episode of haematuria in a large number of children was reported in Madhya Pradesh. But it was most likely animal schistosoma10. Indigenous haematobium causing urinary involvement was never predicted because this schistosome is transmitted by Bulinus species of snail, which is not found in India. Probably the cases from Gimavi started getting recognized in 1949 with a 19 year old woman resident of Gimavi complaining painless haematuria for nine years and was admitted in JJ Hospital in Mumbai. She passed large numbers of eggs identified as those of Schistosoma haematobium. She did not have any travel history. She informed that a large number of people in Gimavi were affected with the same symptoms. Cystoscopic examination was suggestive of Bilharziasis. She was successfully treated with antimony tartrate11. Although first published evidence was in 1952; the people from the village said that the disease was prevalent since about 18904. The disease existed probably since 1600 century12.

The clinical features, affected age group and the Wadi/Wadas affected described by the respondents matched the evidence published from 1952. The respondents described that the disease had affected many children, manifesting painless and mild haematuria persisting for some years4. Respondents' perception of maximum occurrence among children corresponds to all published studies4, 1214. The persistence of symptoms is co-terminus mainly with the death of the adult worm (taking 10 to 12 yr); reinfection does not occur due to disease-acquired immunity13. Elderly persons were not found to be infected, but they provided a history of past disease4. In the absence of knowledge of transmission, people used to wade through the stream water, fetched the water for drinking, and washed their clothes/animals; most likely, indiscriminate urination/defecation might have frequently been occurring.

The proportion of infected persons assessed by the presence of terminally spined ova ranged from 46.1 per cent (incomplete records of ova positivity or haematuria) in the 1950s to about one per cent in 1970 and 1980s4, 5, 1215. The prevalence of infection was very high in first 10 years, which declined gradually12. Scientists from the Haffkine Institute conducted the later studies. In their survey in 1976 and 1982 only four and six persons excreted ova in the urine. Frank haematuria almost disappeared, but microscopic presence of haematuria continued. Skin test showed 20 per cent positivity in Gimavi and 1.47 to 3.28 per cent in the surrounding four villages5. In the school survey, 21 students out of 40 had microscopic haematuria, but none excreted ova14. The diurnal variation in excretion of urinary ova (maximum excretion during 12 to 2 PM) was confirmed in the 1980s16. About 40 per cent of cases were observed in one locality4, 12, 15, adjacent to the rivulet. Many newcomers (31.5%) residing near the stream got infected within five years15. The mean number of ova excreted by the infected persons was about 2–5 per ml17.

In the village-stream F. tenuis, Paludomas obesa, Indoplanorbis Exustus, Melanoides tuberculatus, and Pisidium were observed18. Paludomus obesa and F. tenuis were predominantly found. Laboratory infection was possible only in F. tenuis19. F. tenuis (sub-genus Pettancylus) is a very small freshwater limpet. Its shell's width is about 1.3 to 2 mm, length 2.5 to 3 mm, and height 0.6 to 0.8 mm. The shells are oval-shaped, bilaterally symmetrical, opaque in colour, and brittle14, 20. The infection rate with cercariae in snails was only 2.6 per cent12. The snails produce very few (3 to 5) cercariae daily21. A large population of snails compensates for the limited cercarial productivity of F. tenuis. It was observed that a single leaf might shelter up to 200 snails22. Hence, the effective cercarial load was substantial. In the laboratory out of Paludomus obesa, F. tenuis, and Indoplanorbis Exustus types of snails observed in Gimavi laboratory, breeding of F. tenuis was only possible23. The doubts about the role of F. tenuis in the transmission were removed by Gadgil, demonstrating completion of life cycle of Schistosoma haematobium in F. Tenuis in the laboratory19. In the laboratory, infection of six types of snails was attempted. Only F. tenuis could be infected19. As a next stage for establishing the life cycle, 75 to 100 batches of F. tenuis and P. obesa were exposed to active and fresh miracidia from a patient. Only F. tenuis got infected. Then, four white mice were exposed to emitted cercaria. One mouse showed the presence of worms24. Later in the laboratory, 30 mice were exposed to cercarial infection; 18 became positive, and out of six hamsters, four became positive, and about 150 adult worms were recovered from infected animals. The eggs and adult worms from Gimvi material matched those of haematobium from Egypt21. Attempts to infect a large number of Indian snails did not succeed25. But even in 2015, some scientists differed, and rather than mentioning S. haematobium suggested, Schistosome of Gimavi village26.

From 1958 to 1969, Dr. Gadgil visited Gimavi frequently and, with the help of the community and the public health department, used Copper sulphate to kill the snails.This is most likely reason for declining the population of F. tenuis in the rivulet and consequently patients' number27. Community participated in the construction of Sakav. Other containment measures also contributed to decreased number of patients. The medical officer from the concerned PHC categorically affirmed they did not come across patients complaining of haematuria since his appointment 1973. However, the focus did not disappear. Microscopic haematuria and excretion of ova disappeared only after mass drug administration14, 22.

The vector was detected in 2020 about 150 km away from Gimavi20. However, another focus is not likely to emerge. Similar environmental conditions are rampant in India; still the focus was limited to Gimavi28. It did not spread to other areas for several reasons. The village was small and isolated. People travelled minimally. The rivulet is only eight km long and flows close to two villages, and then meets Vashisti river which meets the sea after flowing for about eight km. The water in estuary of the river is so saline that vector snail cannot survive. A combination of the presence of freshwater bodies, a vulnerable vector population, contamination by human urine, and barefoot wading through the water, all of which are essential for continued transmission. Hence, the recurrence of transmission in the study village (Gimavi) after the elimination initiative was least likely. Various multipronged actions taken by the government, may were probably slow, but eliminated the focus. We hope that the government will officially declare elimination after extensive search for infected vector, and subclinical cases. It should happen at the earliest.

The principal investigator was involved twice in the Government actions of eliminating schistosomiasis and he had first-hand information. This study has some limitations. Most of the people participating in the investigation had forgotten the details. Some healthcare workers (Gramsevaks), and Panchayati Raj's elected representatives were unavailable; either they had migrated or expired. We could not get any official records from the sub-centre, primary health centre, or district health office. It is learnt that the files stored at State level including of Ratnagiri district were destroyed while weeding out old records.

Financial support & sponsorship

None.

Conflicts of Interest

None.

Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Assisted Technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of AI-assisted technology for assisting in the writing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Reference

  1. . Schistosomiasis. Available from:? accessed on June 12, 2024
    [Publisher]
  2. . Does bilharzia (Schistosomiasis) exist in India? Ind Med Gaz. 1914;49:10-4.
    [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . Five mammalian schistosome species in an endemic focus in India. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1991;85:231.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , . Human schistosomiasis in India. Discovery of an endemic focus in the Bombay State. Indian J Med Sci. 1952;6:760-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , et al. Studies on schistosomiasis in village Gimvi of Maharashtra. Indian J Med Res. 1981;74:352-7.
    [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , et al. Prevalence and associated risk factors of Schistosoma indicum infection in cattle of Assam, India. Indian J of Anim Sci. 2022;92:1380-5.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. . A study on the prevalence of schistosomiasis in bovines. Intas Polivet. 2007;8:143-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , . Indian schistosomes: a need for further investigations. J Parasitol Res. 2011:250868.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , . Human passage of schistosoma incognitum, Tamil Nadu, India, and review of autochthonous schistosomiasis, South Asia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2024;30:1236-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  10. , . Schistosoma haematobium infection in Lahager, a village in Raipur District of Madhya Pradesh. Indian J Med Res. 1969;57:2016-7.
    [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , . Urinary schistosomiasis in India with a report of one case. Indian J Med Sci. 1949;3:376-81.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. . Human schistosomiasis in India. [Ph.D. Thesis]. Savitribai Phule Pune University: University of Pune; .
  13. , . Human schistosomiasis in India. Part III. Note on the clinical survey of the endemic focus. Ind Jour Med Res. 1955;43:703-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. . Studies on Schistosomiasis in India with particular reference to the focus in village Gimavi, Dist. Ratnagiri, Maharasthra State. [Ph.D. Thesis]. The University of Bombay; .
  15. , . Re-survey and present status of the endemic focus of schistosomiasis. Indian J Med Res. 1958;46:546-56.
    [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. , . Observations on periodicity of output of schistosome eggs in the urine samples of schistosomiasis cases. Bull Haffkine Inst. 1984;12
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , . Reinvestigation of an old focus of schistosomiasis in Gimvi Village, District Ratnagiri, in Maharashtra State India. Bull Haffkine. 1981;9:34-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , . Studies on snails of a focus of human schistosomiasis in India. Bull Haffkine Inst. 1983;11:56-63.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , . Human schistosomiasis in India. Part II. Infection of snails with schistosoma hematobium. Indian J Med Res. 1955;176:35-47.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , . First report of the freshwater gastropod Pettancylus tenuis (Bourguignat, 1862) (Gastropoda, Planorbidae) from Pune region, India. CheckList. 2021;17:873-6.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. . Human schistosomiasis in India. Indian J Med Res. 1963;51:244-51.
    [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. , . Human Schistosomiasis in India? Parasitol Today. 1990;6:166-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. , . Human schistosomiasis in India. Part I. The study of snails. Indian J Med Res. 1955;43:689-94.
    [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. , . Human schistosomiasis in India Part IV, establishing the life cycle in the laboratory. Ind Jour Med Res. 1956;44:577-80.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , , . Experiments on the transmission of human schistosomiasis in India. Indian J Med Res. 1946;34:311-5.
    [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. . Schistosome infections: an Indian perspective. J Clin Diagn Res. 9:DE01-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , . Dr R K Gadgil - An eminent Indian pathologist, pioneer in starting rural medical camps and a researcher who discovered an endemic focus of schistosomiasis in Maharashtra, India. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2020;63:518-20.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. , . Some facts on south Asian schistosomiasis and need for international collaboration. Acta Trop. 2018;180:76-80.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections
Scroll to Top