Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Practice: Student IJMR
157 (
2-3
); 216-219
doi:
10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_4148_20

Status of universal drug-susceptibility testing among sputum smear-positive tuberculosis patients diagnosed at a tertiary care centre

Department of Preventive & Social Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
Pulmonary Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India

For correspondence: Dr Chinnakali Palanivel, Department of Preventive & Social Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry 605 006, India e-mail: palaniccm@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Background & objectives:

This study was aimed at estimating the proportion among sputum smear-positive tuberculosis (TB) patients diagnosed at a tertiary care centre in India, who did not undergo universal drug-susceptibility testing (UDST), assessing the sociodemographic and morbidity-related factors associated with it, ascertaining the reasons for not getting tested and estimating the proportion with any drug resistance (DR).

Methods:

TB Notification Register and TB Laboratory Register, maintained in Designated Microscopy Centre and Intermediate Research Laboratory, respectively were used to obtain the patient details and information regarding UDST and DR-TB status. Under UDST, the TB patients had undergone rapid molecular tests to check for any DR. TB patients who dropped out of this strategy (those who did not submit a sputum sample for DR testing even after being instructed) were telephonically contacted and asked regarding reasons for not getting themselves tested.

Results:

Of the 215 patients, 74 [34.4%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 28.1-41.2] did not undergo UDST. Of these 74 participants, 60 per cent reported the reason that they were not informed regarding the drug-susceptibility test. Among the 141 patients who underwent UDST, six (4.3%, 95%. CI: 1.58-9.03) had DR. Non-UDST patients were significantly more in percentage among TB patients who were aged <30 years (adjusted prevalence ratio 2.36; 95% CI: 1.19-4.68) compared to >60 years.

Interpretation & conclusions:

The present findings point towards a need to sensitize healthcare workers and TB patients to improve UDST.

Keywords

Cross-sectional studies
drug resistance
medical records
operational research
tuberculosis
universal drug-susceptibility testing

To achieve the World Health Organization 2030 End TB targets by 20251, the government of India rolled out the Revised National TB Control Programme (RNTCP) universal drug-susceptibility testing (UDST) in 20172,3. Under UDST, the sputum smear-positive TB patients are offered two rapid molecular tests, cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification test and line probe assay to check for any drug resistance (DR). Usually, the patient turnaround time for drug-susceptibility testing (DST) is about four days4. However, after the implementation of this strategy, there is limited literature related to its evaluation5,6. The study was aimed to (i) estimate the proportion of TB-diagnosed patients who did not undergo UDST, (ii) assess the sociodemographic and morbidity-related factors associated with it, (iii) ascertain their reasons for not getting tested, and (vi) estimate the proportion with any DR.

Material & Methods

A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted among all sputum smear-positive TB patients diagnosed in the designated microscopy centre (DMC) of Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, a government tertiary care centre (TCC) in Puducherry, India, between February and July 2019. Since the DR status of these patients was unknown and following the UDST strategy, all the patients were instructed to submit a sputum sample to the intermediate reference laboratory (IRL).

Patients were consecutively recruited and line-listed using the RNTCP (rechristened as National TB Elimination Programme in 2020) TB notification register maintained in DMC. Data related to NIKSHAY ID, sociodemographic profile and the presence of comorbid conditions were collected. Information regarding the outcome of drug sensitivity using the NIKSHAY ID from the TB Laboratory Register kept in IRL was extracted. The patients missing in the TB Laboratory Register, i.e. who did not submit a sputum sample for DST even after being instructed, were considered loss to follow up (drop out for UDST). These patients were contacted by telephone/mobile and were asked about the reasons for not getting themselves tested. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee and written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Data were entered in EpiCollect5 software (centre for genomic pathogen surveillance, University department in Oxford, England, UK) and analyzed using Stata version 14 (Stata Corp. LP, College Station, TX, USA). Resistance to either rifampicin or isoniazid was considered as any DR-TB. Multivariable analysis (log-binomial model) was done to calculate the adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) with a 95 per cent confidence interval (CI) to report association.

Results & Discussion

A total of 215 sputum smear-positive TB patients were included. The mean±standard deviation age and weight of the participants were 46.9±13.8 yr and 45.4±10.5 kg, respectively with 74 per cent (n=159) being males (Table). It was found that 34.4 per cent (n=74) (95% CI: 28.1-41.2) of sputum smear-positive TB patients did not undergo UDST, which was similar to the findings of the studies conducted in Karnataka where 33 and 34.6 per cent did not undergo UDST in 2018 and 2019, respectively6,7 which has further increased to 42 per cent2 in 2020. NIKSHAY ID at the time of sputum smear microscopy and its application to establish cohort-wise tracking will significantly decrease the attrition rate8.

Table Multivariable analysis showing association of socio-demographic and morbidity-related characteristics with patients who have not undergone universal drug susceptibility testing among sputum smear-positive tuberculosis patients diagnosed in a tertiary care center in Puducherry, 2019 (n=215)
Characteristics Total Not undergone UDST, n (%) Unadjusted PR (95% CI) Adjusted PR* (95% CI)
Total participants 215 74 (34.4) - -
Age (yr)
≤ 30 28 17 (60.7) 2.66 (1.35-5.23) 2.36 (1.19-4.68)
31-60 152 49 (32.2) 1.41 (0.74-2.70) 1.32 (0.69-2.51)
>60 35 8 (22.8) 1 1
Gender
Male 159 54 (33.9) 1 -
Female 56 20 (35.7) 1.05 (0.69-1.59) -
Weight (kg)
25-39 54 21 (38.8) 2.82 (1.07-7.43) 2.21 (0.82-5.95)
40-54 126 46 (36.5) 2.65 (1.04-6.76) 2.37 (0.92-6.13)
55-69 29 4 (13.8) 1 1
≥70 6 3 (50) 3.63 (1.08-12.18) 3.39 (0.98-11.66)
Diabetes status
Diabetic 54 15 (27.7) 1 -
Non-diabetic 161 59 (36.4) 1.32 (0.82-2.12) -
HIV status
Non-reactive 208 71 (34.1) 1 -
Reactive 7 3 (42.8) 1.26 (0.52-3.01) -

*Based on log-binomial model-included variables age and weight which had P<0.1 in univariate analysis; Row percentage; P<0.05. UDST, universal drug susceptibility testing; PR, prevalence ratio; CI, confidence interval

Among the 141 patients who underwent UDST, 4.3 per cent (n=6) (95% CI: 1.58-9.03) had any DR; two were R resistant, two were H resistant and two had resistance to both R and H. Similar to the findings of the present study, Goyal et al9 reported a worsening trend in DR-TB in India between the two study decades (1995-2005; 2006-2015). It was estimated that 2.8 per cent of new TB patients and 14 per cent of previously treated TB patients in India were MDR-TB cases10. The estimates in the present study could be below as not all eligible patients could be tested. Thus, proper implementation of the ‘Detect-Treat-Prevent-Build’ approach in a well-constructed system is the need of the hour for the early and accurate diagnosis of DR-TB11.

In adjusted analysis, patients not undergoing UDST were significantly twice more common among TB patients aged ≤30 yr (aPR 2.36; 95% CI: 1.19-4.68) than >60 yr (Table). This could be due to the younger age group being more involved in career development than health-seeking behaviour12,13. Furthermore, as the TB burden increases with age, older age groups are more health-conscious and aware of the importance of disease treatment and its benefits14.

Of the 74 participants who did not undergo UDST, one third (n=25) could be contacted over the phone. A majority (60%, n=15) of them reported that they were not informed about DST and this was cited as the reason for not undergoing UDST. Other reasons were travel issues (24%, n=6) and the inability to produce sputum (16%, n=4). These findings re-emphasize ineffective communication by the healthcare providers to patients regarding the diagnosis and treatment procedures15. Divergence from the UDST algorithm has been found in other studies also15. However, at a sufficient scale, UDST can control MDR-TB transmission by detecting a more significant number of DR-TB cases16. Weekly monitoring of NIKSHAY ID of patient referrals between DMC and laboratories and developing a feedback mechanism to the DMC might improve testing coverage.

The study was based on the experience of a single tertiary care centre with a limited sample size and so had restricted generalizability. It is difficult to conclude the reasons for not getting tested with such a small number of interviews. Elicitation of reasons for undergoing test from participants who got the UDST done would have added advantage to the present study.

To conclude, one third of sputum smear-positive TB patients did not undergo UDST, most commonly young people; and one in 20 of those who underwent UDST had any DR-TB.

Acknowledgment:

Authors acknowledge the support from the Designated Microscopy Centre and Intermediate Reference Laboratory staff.

Financial support & sponsorship: None.

Conflicts of Interest: None.

References

  1. . The end TB strategy. Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/the-end-tb-strategy
  2. . 2020
  3. . New Delhi: MoHFW, GoI; .
  4. , , , , , , . High pre-diagnosis attrition among patients with presumptive MDR-TB: An operational research from Bhopal district, India. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:249.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , . Differential yield of universal versus selective drug susceptibility testing of patients with tuberculosis in high-burden countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5:e003438.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . Uptake of universal drug susceptibility testing among people with TB in a south Indian district: How are we faring? Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2022;116:43-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , . Threefold increase in the number of drug resistant TB cases after introduction of universal drug susceptibility testing: Experiences from two south India districts. J Tuberc Res. 2020;8:42-52.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , . Provider reported barriers and solutions to improve testing among tuberculosis patients 'eligible for drug susceptibility test': A qualitative study from programmatic setting in India. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0196162.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , . Prevalence of drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis in India: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:817.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. . License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Global tuberculosis report 2020. Geneva: WHO; .
  11. . National Tuberculosis Elimination Programme, Central TB Division, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi; July 2020
  12. , , , . A systematic review of the factors associated with delays in medical and psychological help-seeking among men. Health Psychol Rev. 2015;9:264-76.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , . Adolescents and young adults: A neglected population group for tuberculosis surveillance. Eur Respir J. 2018;51:1800176.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , . Predictors of avoiding medical care and reasons for avoidance behavior. Med Care. 2014;52:336-45.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , . Gaps in doctor patient communication: A community-based study. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2017;3:26.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , . Impact of UDST: A step forward to end TB. Indian J Tuberc. 2020;67:213-5.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections
Scroll to Top