Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Addendum
Announcement
Announcements
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Books Received
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Corrrespondence
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Podcast
Errata
Erratum
FORM IV
GUIDELINES
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Panel of Reviewers (2006)
Panel of Reviewers (2007)
Panel of Reviewers (2009) Guidelines for Contributors
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Method
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Authors’ response
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Public Notice
Research Brief
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers
Short Paper
Some Forthcoming Scientific Events
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
View Point
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Addendum
Announcement
Announcements
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Books Received
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Corrrespondence
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Podcast
Errata
Erratum
FORM IV
GUIDELINES
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Panel of Reviewers (2006)
Panel of Reviewers (2007)
Panel of Reviewers (2009) Guidelines for Contributors
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Method
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Authors’ response
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Public Notice
Research Brief
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers
Short Paper
Some Forthcoming Scientific Events
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
View Point
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Viewpoint
146 (
3
); 301-303
doi:
10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1704_16

Shorter & cheaper regimen to treat multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: A new hope

Department of Pulmonary Medicine, ERA's Lucknow Medical College & Hospital, Lucknow 226 024, Uttar Pradesh, India
Department of General Medicine, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226 024, Uttar Pradesh, India

*For correspondence: rprasadkgmc@gmail.com

Licence

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is defined as a disease due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis that is resistant to at least both rifampicin and isoniazid with or without resistance to other anti-tuberculosis (TB) drug. Rifampicin-resistant TB (RR-TB) is defined as resistance to rifampicin detected using genotypic or phenotypic methods with or without resistance to other anti-TB drugs. MDR-TB/RR-TB is emerging as a major problem due to poor management of drug-sensitive as well as drug-resistance TB. MDR-TB is treatable but is very expensive, requires long duration of treatment (usually two years) and contains potentially toxic drugs1234.

The Global Tuberculosis Report 2016 estimated that 3.9 per cent newly diagnosed and 21 per cent of previously treated TB cases had MDR-TB. It has been estimated that of the 580,000 cases of TB resistant to at least rifampicin (RR-TB) globally in 2015, 480,000 were resistant to both rifampicin and isoniazid (MDR-TB) and 250,000 deaths were reported due to MDR-TB/RR-TB in 2015 globally. Of the estimated 580,000 MDR-TB/RR-TB cases, only 132,120 (23%) cases were detected and even fewer 124,990 (20%) cases were started on appropriate treatment and only 52 per cent of these were treated successfully5. In India, estimates showed that the prevalence of MDR-TB among new and previously treated patients was 2.5 and 16 per cent, respectively. It is estimated that 130,000 cases of MDR-TB/RR-TB emerged in India, of whom 79,000 were among notified cases of TB in 2015. Of the 79,000 MDR-TB/RR-TB cases, only 28,876 (36%) were diagnosed, 26,988 (34%) were started on treatment and treatment success rate was only 46 per cent5.

The reasons for poor result are probably due to lengthy, expensive and toxic regimens, leading to poor compliance6. In May 2016, the WHO recommended the use of a shorter regimen treatment for MDR-TB which was aimed to reduce cost, improve compliance and cure rate7. In patients with RR-TB or MDR-TB who have not been previously treated with second-line drugs and in whom resistance to fluoroquinolones and second-line injectable agents has been excluded or is considered highly unlikely, a shorter MDR-TB regimen of 9-12 months may be used instead of the conventional regimen of usually two years duration. To rule out resistance to second-line drugs, a prerequisite for shorter MDR regimen, the WHO recommends second-line probe assay, a rapid diagnostic test, GenoType MTBDRsL that identifies genetic mutation in MDR strains that detects resistance to fluoroquinolones and injectable second-line anti-TB drugs8. The shorter MDR regimen consists of an intensive phase of four months (extended to six months in case of delayed sputum smear conversion) containing high-dose gatifloxacin or moxifloxacin, kanamycin, prothionamide, clofazimine, high-dose isoniazid, pyrazinamide and ethambutol followed by a continuation phase of five months containing gatifloxacin or moxifloxacin, clofazimine, ethambutol and pyrazinamide. It can be given to children, adults and people living with HIV who meet above-specified criteria but should not be used in extrapulmonary TB and in pregnant women. This recommendation is based on results of a meta-analysis5 of initial programmatic studies conducted by the Union, Damien Foundation, Medecins Sans Frontieres and the Antwerp Institute of Tropical Medicine in Belgium, involving 1205 patients with uncomplicated MDR-TB91011. Data of 486 patients under the Damien Foundation pilot programme which was the first study, using a nine-month treatment regimen in Bangladesh, showed cure rate of 82.1 per cent and overall success rate of 84.5 per cent9. This study was followed by the Union coordinated first multi-country MDR-TB patient cohort study of 1000 patients in nine countries of West Africa (Benin, Burkina-Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Central African Republic, Niger, Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda), treated with a modified Bangladesh regimen12. Interim analysis of 408 patients has demonstrated 82.1 per cent treatment success rate, demonstrating that the nine-month regimen can be successful in other environments than Bangladesh, and also in settings with high HIV prevalence12. They showed that shorter MDR-TB treatment regimens given in patients who met specific inclusion criteria had a significantly higher likelihood of treatment success than those who received longer conventional regimens (89.9 vs. 78.3%)7. Currently, Union-sponsored and USAID-supported STREAM (Standard Treatment Regimen of Anti-tuberculosis Drugs for Patients With Multi-Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis) Stage1 study (multicentre international randomized controlled trial)13 which was started in July 2012 to evaluate shortened regimens for patients with MDR-TB, is underway and results are expected early in 2018. STREAM has been recently expanded (Stage 2)1415 to test two additional shortened treatment regimens using bedaquiline. This expanded study will evaluate a nine-month all-oral regimen without injections and an even shorter simplified six-month regimen. It is expected to finish enrolment of patients in 2018 and initial results are expected by 2020. There are a number of other oral regimens without injections under evaluation, of which under phase 3 evaluation are STAND (Shortening Treatment by Advancing Novel Drugs)16 and NIX TB trials17. STAND trial consists of moxifloxacin, pretomanid and pyrazinamide and NIX TB trial consists of bedaquiline, pretomanid and linezolid with duration of treatment of six months.

The recently recommended shorter regimen by WHO has proven successful in developing countries like Bangladesh9. Hence, it should also be effective in country like India. Shorter regimen will improve compliance as it reduces duration by almost half, cost by one-third and number of adverse events which ultimately will lead improvement in treatment success rate. Decision-makers of especially high TB burden countries like India need to make use of new opportunity by adapting WHO-recommended shorter MDR-TB regimen to fulfil the goal of end TB strategy by 2030 or earlier18 as envisaged in sustainable development goal 3.319.

Conflicts of Interest: None.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Companion handbook to the WHO guidelines for the programmatic management of drug resistant tuberculosis. WHO/HTM/TB/2014.11. Geneva: WHO; .
    [Google Scholar]
  2. . New Delhi: Directorate of General Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; .
  3. , , . Multidrug and extensively drug resistant TB (M/XDR TB) management: Current issues. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2013;1:124-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , . Multidrug and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis management: Evidences and controversies. Lung India. 2012;29:154-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2016. WHO/HTM/2016.13. Geneva: WHO; .
  6. , , . Multidrug Resistance Tuberculosis: Diagnosis And Treatment. In: MDR and XDR Tuberculosis (1st ed). New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publisher (P) Ltd; . p. :92-111.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. World Health Organization. WHO Treatment Guidelines for Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis 2016 Update. WHO/HTM/TB/2016.04. Geneva: WHO; .
    [Google Scholar]
  8. World Health Organization. The Use of Molecular Line Probe Assays for the Detection of Resistance to Second-Line Anti-Tuberculosis Drugs. WHO/HTM/TB/2016.07. Geneva: WHO; .
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . Short, highly effective, and inexpensive standardized treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182:684-92.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , . High effectiveness of a 12-month regimen for MDR-TB patients in cameroon. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015;19:517-24.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , . High cure rate with standardised short-course multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment in Niger: No relapses. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014;18:1188-94.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , . Expanding shortened MDR-TB treatment: The West African experience. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014;18(Suppl 1):S15.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , . Evaluation of a standardized treatment regimen of anti-tuberculosis drugs for patients with multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis (STREAM): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014;15:353.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. STREAM clinical study first to include Bedaquiline to test shortened treatment regimens for multidrug-resistant TB in phase III trial. Available from: https://www.theunion.org/news-centre/press-releases/document/STREAM-Bedaquiline-Press-Release-FINAL-13-04-16-2.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  15. The Evaluation of a Standard Treatment Regimen of Anti-Tuberculosis Drugs for Patients With MDR-TB (STREAM) Available from: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT02409290
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Shortening Treatment by Advancing Novel Drugs (STAND) Available from: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/nct02342886
    [Google Scholar]
  17. A phase 3 study assessing the safety and efficacy of Bedaquiline plus PA-824 plus linezolid in subjects with drug resistant pulmonary tuberculosis. Available from: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02333799
    [Google Scholar]
  18. World Health Organization. The End TB Strategy. WHO/HTM/TB/2015.19. Available from: http://www.who.int/tb/End_TB_brochure.pdf?ua=1
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , . Sustainable Development Goals: 17 Goals to transform our world. Goal 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages. Available from: http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/health/
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    387

    PDF downloads
    194
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections
    Scroll to Top