Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Addendum
Announcement
Announcements
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Books Received
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Corrrespondence
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Podcast
Errata
Erratum
FORM IV
GUIDELINES
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Panel of Reviewers (2006)
Panel of Reviewers (2007)
Panel of Reviewers (2009) Guidelines for Contributors
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Method
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Authors’ response
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Public Notice
Research Brief
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers
Short Paper
Some Forthcoming Scientific Events
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
View Point
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Addendum
Announcement
Announcements
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Books Received
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Corrrespondence
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Podcast
Errata
Erratum
FORM IV
GUIDELINES
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Panel of Reviewers (2006)
Panel of Reviewers (2007)
Panel of Reviewers (2009) Guidelines for Contributors
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Method
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Authors’ response
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Public Notice
Research Brief
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers
Short Paper
Some Forthcoming Scientific Events
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
View Point
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
162 (
6
); 856-862
doi:
10.25259/IJMR_1903_2025

Serum uric acid levels in patients with different phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome

Department of Internal Medicine, Usak University School of Medicine, Usak, Turkey
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Usak University School of Medicine, Usak, Turkey
The Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Usak University School of Medicine, Usak, Turkey

For correspondence: Dr Canan Akkus, Department of Internal Medicine, Usak University School of Medicine, Usak 061 70, Turkey e-mail: cananozkal@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Abstract

Background & objectives

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrinopathy in reproductive-aged women, frequently associated with insulin resistance, obesity, and increased cardiovascular risk. Serum uric acid, linked to oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction, may contribute to the cardiometabolic complications of PCOS. Although hyperuricemia is common in PCOS, differences in serum uric acid among phenotypes remain unclear. This study compared serum uric acid across PCOS phenotypes, hypothesising that classic, obese phenotypes would exhibit higher levels due to synergistic metabolic and hormonal effects.

Methods

A total of 180 women with PCOS [phenotypes A(n=96), B (n=19), C (n=35), and D (n=30)] and 51 age-matched controls were included. PCOS was diagnosed according to the revised 2003 Rotterdam criteria, and phenotyping was based on the presence of hyperandrogenism, oligo-anovulation, and polycystic ovarian morphology. Fasting serum uric acid levels were measured using the uricase method, and hyperuricemia was detected as ≥6.0 mg/dL. Analyses were performed using the Shapiro–Wilk test for normality, Levene’s test for homogeneity, and appropriate parametric or non-parametric tests with Holm correction for multiple comparisons.

Results

Among 231 women evaluated, age distributions were similar between groups. Median body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) were higher in the PCOS cohort, most prominently in Phenotype A (both P<0.001). Serum uric acid was significantly higher in Phenotype A [4.8 (2.7–8.9) mg/dL] than in controls [4.1 (2.7–6.3) mg/dL] and Phenotype C [4.2 (2.6–5.8) mg/dL] (both P<0.001). Hyperuricemia was more frequent in PCOS than in controls (P=0.035), occurring predominantly in Phenotype A. Most hyperuricemic patients were obese; notably, no obese controls were available for comparison. Serum uric acid levels were positively associated with BMI (Spearman rho=0.452, +) and WC (0.412, P<0.001), yet in BMI categories, no significant differences were found in serum uric acid among phenotypes.

Interpretation & conclusions

Among PCOS patients, elevated serum uric acid is significantly associated with the classic hyperandrogenic phenotype (Phenotype A) and may also be related to obesity, emphasising the importance of monitoring serum uric acid in obese classical PCOS females, particularly those presenting with Phenotype A.

Keywords

Body mass index
hyperuricemia
phenotype
polycystic ovary syndrome
uric acid

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is an endocrinological disease that affects 5-20 per cent of women of reproductive age. PCOS is characterised by oligo-anovulation (OA), clinical or biochemical hyperandrogenemia (HA), and polycystic ovaries (PCO) appearing on ultrasonography (USG)1,2. PCOS is also diagnosed under the revised 2003 Rotterdam criteria1,2, and is often accompanied by the features of metabolic syndrome, such as dyslipidaemia, hypertension, insulin resistance (IR), obesity, and glucose intolerance3-5. Increased inflammation is also one of the main features of PCOS6,7. Until recently, PCOS was viewed as a uniform entity; however, accumulating evidence indicates that the degree of metabolic dysregulation and inflammatory activation differs among its phenotypes8. For this reason, Phenotypes A (HA+OA+PCO), B (HA+OA), C (HA+PCO), and D (OA+PCO) are the four phenotypes of PCOS determined by combinations of HA, OA, and PCO. The severity and frequency of associated metabolic problems and inflammation in PCOS diminish as the phenotypic letters move from A to D8.

Uric acid, the final product of purine metabolism, is a major plasma antioxidant with dual biological effects, exerting protective antioxidant activity extracellularly, yet demonstrating pro-oxidant and potentially harmful actions once it enters cells9,10. Elevated serum uric acid enhances oxidative stress through lipid peroxidation and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol oxidation, promoting cardiovascular disease9,11. Moreover, serum uric acid levels correlate positively with insulin resistance, and hyperuricemia is regarded as a potential marker of insulin resistance12.

Previous studies investigating the relationship of PCOS with serum uric acid have revealed conflicting results. While some reported a markedly higher prevalence of hyperuricemia, up to 40 per cent, particularly with increasing obesity, others found serum uric acid levels comparable to those of healthy controls13-18. However, most studies were conducted in unclassified PCOS cohorts without considering phenotypic differences. This study aimed to compare serum uric acid levels across PCOS phenotypes to determine whether serum uric acid elevation is driven primarily by obesity and/or by phenotype-specific factors.

Materials & Methods

Designed prospectively as a case-controlled study, the present study was conducted in the departments of Internal Medicine, Endocrinology and metabolic diseases, and Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Usak University, the training and research hospital between April 1, 2022, and July 20, 2023. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Usak University School of Medicine and also registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Registration No: NCT06342180). After obtaining informed consent from all individual participants, women between 18–35 yr of age and with the diagnosis of PCOS under the 2003 Rotterdam criteria2 were included in light of the biochemical, hormonal, and USG criteria. Participants with no known malignancy, hepatic or renal failure, gout, hypertension, active infection, or use of medications affecting serum uric acid or insulin resistance, and other endocrine diseases such as congenital adrenal hyperplasia, the existence of androgen-secreting tumours or Cushing syndrome, were excluded from the study2.

Diagnostic criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome

The diagnostic criteria of PCOS consisted of the presence of two of these three criteria: (i) OA [oligomenorrhea (cycle length >35 days or <8 menstrual bleeding/year) or amenorrhea (absence of menses >3 months)], (ii) Clinical [hirsutism (the Ferriman–Gallwey scoring system was applied, with a total score ≥8 considered diagnostic for the presence of hirsutism) and/or acne] and/or biochemical [increased total testosterone levels or dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS)] signs of HA, and (iii) PCO appearance (the presence of 12 or more follicles in each ovary measuring 2-9 mm in diameter, and/or increased ovarian volume >10 mL) on USG. Biochemical hyperandrogenaemia was assessed by measuring DHEA-S (1.9–12.5 IU/L) using chemiluminescent immunoassays on the Snibe Maglumi 4000 Plus analyser (Shenzhen, China), and total testosterone (12–60 ng/dL) using the Abbott Advia Centaur system (Tarrytown, New York, USA).

Study population and sample size calculation

A priori sample size estimation was carried out through G*Power software (version 3.1.9.7). According to the study by Mu et al14, women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) exhibited significantly higher serum uric acid levels than controls (mean difference=0.64 mg/dL, P<0.001). Similarly, Yarali et al19 reported a comparable difference between PCOS and control groups (mean difference=0.70 mg/dL, P=0.04). Based on these data, the effect size (d) for the primary comparison between PCOS and control groups was determined as 0.7, corresponding to a large effect. Considering that PCOS cases were further categorised into four phenotypes according to the Rotterdam criteria, an allocation ratio of 1:4 (control: PCOS) was applied. Using a two-tailed α=0.05 and statistical power=0.80, minimum total sample size required was calculated to be 104 participants (21 controls and 83 PCOS cases). However, despite this sample size estimation, a larger number of patients and controls took part in the presented study to enhance the robustness of the analysis. Based on these criteria, patients were categorised into four phenotypes: Phenotypes A, B, C, and D, including 96, 19, 35, and 30 patients, respectively. A healthy control group of 51 age-matched and meeting the exclusion criteria women (18-35 yr) was included; specifically, they had no diagnosis of PCOS, and history of known cancers, or liver/kidney failures, on no medications to affect their serum uric acid and insulin resistance levels; and presented with no active infections, hirsutism, acne, polycystic ovaries (on USG), or irregular menstrual cycles.

Weight, height, waist circumference (WC), and presence of hirsutism was reassessed by the same investigator (CD). Fasting blood samples for serum uric acid measurement were collected, centrifuged, and stored at −70°C till all samples were analysed. The serum uric acid levels (2.5-6.2 mg/dL) were evaluated using the uricase method and the Architect C series (Abbott Co., Lake Forrest, IL, USA), and the level of serum uric acid ≥6 mg/dL was considered hyperuricemia20. Furthermore, overweight and obesity were acquired under the formula suggested by WHO (BMI 25.0–29.9 kg/m2 and ≥30.0 kg/m2, respectively), and patients were categorised into corresponding groups based on these definitions. All participants were re-evaluated by the same researcher (OO) for ovarian PCO morphology using a Mindray DC-7 device with a 3–6.6 MHz transabdominal and/or 3–5 MHz transvaginal transducer (Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd., Shenzen, China).

Statistical analysis

The data were analysed with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences for Windows, v22.0 (IBM Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The normally distributed data and variance homogeneity were investigated with the Shapiro–Wilk and Levene’s tests, respectively. Continuous variables were summarised as median [Q1, Q3]; mean ± standard deviation was also provided when assumptions were met. For comparisons between two groups, the student’s t-test (or Welch’s t-test when variances were unequal) was applied if assumptions were satisfied, and the Mann-Whitney U test otherwise. For comparisons among more than two groups, one-way ANOVA (or Welch’s ANOVA when appropriate) was performed when assumptions were met, and the Kruskal–Wallis test otherwise. When omnibus tests were significant, pairwise comparisons were conducted using Tukey HSD or Games–Howell following ANOVA, and Dunn’s test after Kruskal–Wallis, with P-values adjusted by the Holm method. For categorical variables, Pearson’s chi-square test was used when expected frequencies were adequate, and exact methods (e.g., Fisher’s test) when they were not. All tests were two-tailed, with a statistically significant value of P≤0.05.

Results

A total of 231 women were evaluated (180 PCOS, 51 controls). Age did not differ between groups. Median BMI and WC values were found significantly elevated in the PCOS cohort than in the control group (P<0.001). Among phenotypes, elevations were most pronounced in Phenotype A. For BMI, Phenotype A exceeded controls (P<0.001), Phenotype C and D (P<0.001 and P=0.050, respectively), whereas A-B and B-C comparisons were not significant. For WC, Phenotype A exceeded controls and Phenotype C (both P<0.001) and was also higher than Phenotype D (P=0.044). Regarding serum uric acid, the overall PCOS group had higher levels than the controls (P<0.001); only Phenotype A differed from the controls (P<0.001). Serum uric acid in Phenotype A was higher than in C (P<0.001) but not different from B or D (Table I).

Table I. Demographic and laboratory data in controls and PCOS phenotypes (with adjusted pairwise comparisons)
Control (n=51) Phenotype A (n=96) Phenotype B (n=19) Phenotype C (n=35) Phenotype D (n=30) Total PCOS (n=180) p (Kruskal-Wallis) p1 (Control-A) p2 (Control-B) p3 (Control-C) p4 (Control-D) p5 (A-B) p6 (A-C) p7 (A-D) p8 (B-C) p9 (B-D) p10 (C-D) p11 (Control- Total PCOS)
Age (yr) 23.0 (23.0, 24.5) 25.0 (22.0, 29.3) 22.0 (20.0, 28.0) 25.0 (22.0, 28.0) 24.0 (23.0, 28.8) 24.0 (22.0, 29.0) 0.337 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.458
BMI (kg/m2) 21.5 (20.0, 24.1) 27.2 (23.3, 35.9) 24.8 (21.1, 32.5) 22.2 (20.9, 25.1) 24.9 (21.2, 27.2) 25.5 (21.6, 32.4) <0.001 <0.001 0.201 0.587 0.050 0.560 <0.001 0.201 0.587 0.773 0.587 <0.001
Waist circumference (cm) 75.0 (71.0, 81.0) 89.5 (78.0, 103.3) 82.0 (74.5, 94,00) 77.0 (70.5, 88.0) 78.0 (70.3, 93.8) 83.5 (74.8, 99.3) <0.001 <0.001 0.292 0.953 0.807 0.396 <0.001 0.044 0.953 1.0 1.0 <0.001
serum uric acid (mg/dL) 4.1 (3.6, 4.6) 4.8 (4.1, 5.8) 4.7 (4.1, 5.6) 4.2 (3.7, 4.9) 4.3 (3.9, 5.1) 4.6 (4.0, 5.5) <0.001 <0.001 0.159 1.0 0.489 1.0 <0.001 0.258 0.385 1.0 1.0 <0.001

Values are presented as median [Q1, Q3]. For each variable, ‘Global P’ indicates the results of ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis, depending on assumption suitability. Pairwise P-values (P1 to P11) are reported with Holm correction (adj. p) applied to Mann–Whitney U. BMI, body mass index; Control, control group; A–D, PCOS phenotypes

Consistent with these findings, levels of serum uric acid revealed no significant difference across PCOS phenotypes within individual BMI categories (Supplementary Table). Obesity distribution analysis showed that obese individuals were markedly overrepresented among women with PCOS, particularly in Phenotype A (44.8%) and Phenotype B (36.8%), whereas normal-weight individuals were relatively underrepresented. When stratified by BMI, most hyperuricemic cases in PCOS were concentrated in the obese subgroup. In Phenotype A, 15 of 21 hyperuricemic patients (71.4%) were obese, while only one case occurred in the normal-weight subgroup. Similar patterns were observed in Phenotypes B and D, where all hyperuricemic patients were either overweight or obese. No obese participants were present in the control group, precluding direct comparison (Supplementary Table).

Supplementary material

The prevalence of hyperuricemia (≥6 mg/dL) was significantly higher in women with PCOS than in controls (14.4% vs 2.0%, P=0.035). Among phenotypes, the highest rate was observed in Phenotype A (22.9%, P=0.005 vs controls), followed by Phenotypes B (10.5%) and D (6.7%), whereas no hyperuricemia was detected in Phenotype C (Table II).

Table II. Frequency of hyperuricemic patients in PCOS phenotypes and the control group
Hyperuricemia
p1 p2 p3 p4
No (%) Yes (%)
The control group 50 (98) 1 (2)
Phenotype A 74 (77.1) 22 (22.9) 0.005
Phenotype B 17 (89.5) 2 (10.5) 0.197 0.530
Phenotype C 35 (100) 0 (0) 1 0.004 0.136
Phenotype D 28 (93.3) 2 (6.7) 0.555 0.107 1 0.224
Total PCOS cases 154 (85.6) 26 (14.4) 0.035

PCOS, Polycystic ovary syndrome; p1, Comparisons between the control group and PCOS Phenotypes; p2, Comparisons between Phenotype A, and Phenotypes B, C, and D; p3, Comparisons between Phenotype B, and Phenotypes C and D; p4, Comparisons between Phenotypes C and D

Correlation analyses supported these findings

Serum uric acid levels were not significantly associated with age (Spearman rho = 0.035, P = 0.601), whereas significant positive correlations were observed with BMI (Spearman rho = 0.452, P< 0.001) and WC (Spearman rho = 0.412, P< 0.001).

Discussion

We found that the frequency of hyperuricemia was higher among women with PCOS than in the controls. Serum uric acid levels were elevated, particularly in Phenotype A compared with the controls and Phenotype C, while Phenotypes B and D showed no statistically significant difference. The prevalence of hyperuricemia was greater in Phenotype A, as compared to the control group and Phenotype C. Most hyperuricemic patients in our cohort were clustered within the obese and overweight subgroups of Phenotype A.

Hyperuricemia is a common metabolic disorder encountered in PCOS patients13-15. In prevalence studies, the hyperuricemia frequency has been shown as 2-3 times higher in PCOS patients than in the controls, depending on the degree of obesity14,15. Consistent with these observations, the present study demonstrated that hyperuricemia was predominantly clustered within the obese subgroup, increasing progressively with obesity severity. However, these studies were conducted in unstratified PCOS populations, whereas the current study provides a more refined, phenotype-specific analysis.

In our study, no correlation was detected between serum uric acid levels and age, whereas serum uric acid concentrations were positively associated with both BMI and waist circumference, consistent with previous findings16,21. In one of our previous studies stratified by obesity status, serum uric acid levels in obese PCOS patients were comparable to those in obese controls, whereas non-obese PCOS patients exhibited higher serum uric acid concentrations than non-obese controls16. Although obesity is widely recognised as a major determinant of hyperuricemia, these findings suggest that PCOS itself may exert an independent effect on serum uric acid elevation. In our study, obese women were overrepresented across all PCOS phenotypes, particularly in Phenotypes A and B. Hyperuricemia was observed predominantly among obese PCOS patients, less frequently in overweight individuals, and rarely in those of normal weight. When serum uric acid was compared between PCOS and controls within underweight, normal-weight, and overweight subgroups, no significant differences were observed, and no obese controls were available for direct comparison. Furthermore, serum uric acid levels did not differ significantly across PCOS phenotypes within each BMI category, indicating that inter-phenotypic variations were not solely driven by adiposity. This observation aligns with previous studies reporting higher serum uric acid levels in lean PCOS women than BMI-matched controls and suggests that, beyond adiposity, intrinsic hormonal or metabolic disturbances may contribute to serum uric acid elevation in PCOS22. However, these findings contrast with studies reporting comparable serum uric acid levels between PCOS and control groups after adjustment for obesity17,18.

Although previous studies have reported conflicting results regarding whether obesity or PCOS itself is a more dominant feature in the development of hyperuricemia, our findings indicate that serum uric acid elevation is most evident in the classical PCOS phenotype and is positively associated with adiposity. These results suggest that both metabolic and hormonal factors may contribute to increased serum uric acid levels in PCOS.

Androgen excess may partly explain the phenotype-specific differences observed23-25. Experimental data indicate that androgens enhance hepatic purine synthesis and renal uric acid reabsorption, whereas anti-androgen therapy can reduce serum uric acid levels18,26,27. Accordingly, the elevated serum uric acid levels seen in Phenotype A likely reflect the impact of biochemical or clinical hyperandrogenism, suggesting that androgen excess contributes to the increased uric acid burden characteristic of this phenotype.

Inflammation, a hallmark of PCOS, varies among phenotypes and is most prominent in the classic hyperandrogenic form (Phenotype A). Considering that inflammation may exacerbate oxidative and endothelial stress, both linked to uric acid metabolism28-30, and that hyperandrogenaemia may also elevate serum uric acid14,18, the higher serum uric acid levels observed in Phenotype A may be related to the combined effects of inflammation and androgen excess. As both inflammatory activity and hyperandrogenism tend to decrease progressively from Phenotype A to D, the predominance of hyperuricemia in Phenotype A may represent a biologically plausible association rather than a causal relationship.

As there were no obese individuals in the control group, preventing direct comparison with obese PCOS patients, this represents one of the main limitations of our study. The absence of data regarding anti-androgen treatment represents the limitation of the present study, as its potential impact on serum uric acid concentrations could not be evaluated. Another limitation of the study is the unequal phenotype distribution, with particularly small sample sizes for Phenotypes B and D. Nevertheless, Phenotype A constituted the largest and most metabolically active subgroup, consistent with a prior meta-analysis reporting that classic Phenotypes A and B collectively account for approximately 66 per cent of all PCOS cases31. Although the overall sample size was sufficient for phenotype-based comparisons, subgroup sizes decreased substantially after stratification by obesity categories, which may have reduced the reliability of these subgroup analyses. Additional limitations include the lack of control for dietary confounders such as purine, fructose, or alcohol intake. Furthermore, the absence of biochemical assessment of insulin resistance limits the interpretation of the metabolic mechanisms underlying elevated serum uric acid levels in PCOS. We consider that novel studies with larger populations will provide more accurate findings.

Financial support & sponsorship

None.

Conflicts of Interest

None.

Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Assisted Technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of AI-assisted technology for assisting in the writing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

References

  1. , , , , , , et al. Polycystic ovary syndrome. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16057.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. . Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) Hum Reprod. 2004;19:41-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. . Syndrome x: Is one enough? Am Heart J. 1994;127:1439-42.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . Degree of hyperinsulinemia, independent of androgen levels, is an important determinant of the severity of hirsutism in PCOS. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:643-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , . The severity of menstrual dysfunction as a predictor of insulin resistance in PCOS. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98:E1967-71.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , . The perils of portliness: Causes and consequences of visceral adiposity. Diabetes. 2000;49:883-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , . Serum lipoprotein lipid profile in women with the polycystic ovary syndrome: Relation to anthropometric, endocrine and metabolic variables. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1994;41:463-71.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , . Uric acid: The oxidant-antioxidant paradox. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids. 2008;27:608-19.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , . Uric acid participating in female reproductive disorders: A review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021;19:65.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , . Uric acid metabolism in polycystic ovary syndrome. Clin Chim Acta. 2021;517:74-80.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , . Hyperuricemia and insulin resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;78:25-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , et al. Association of glomerular filtration rate with inflammation in polycystic ovary syndrome. Int J Fertil Steril. 2015;9:176-82.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , et al. Association between the prevalence of hyperuricemia and reproductive hormones in polycystic ovary syndrome. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018;16:104.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , et al. Correlation between serum uric acid and body fat distribution in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;12:782808.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , . Visceral adiposity index levels in overweight and/or obese, and non-obese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome and its relationship with metabolic and inflammatory parameters. J Endocrinol Invest. 2017;40:487-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , . Correlation between kisspeptin and biochemical markers in obese and non-obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2023;39:2215869.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , . Serum uric acid concentration as a non-classic cardiovascular risk factor in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: Effect of treatment with ethinyl-estradiol plus cyproterone acetate versus metformin. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:1594-601.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , , et al. Diastolic dysfunction and increased serum homocysteine concentrations may contribute to increased cardiovascular risk in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:511-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , . Uric acid transport and disease. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:1791-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , . Normal serum uric acid concentrations in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:2405-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , , et al. The associations between alanine aminotransferase and other biochemical parameters in lean PCOS. Reprod Sci. 2023;30:633-41.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , , et al. Proteomics analysis of potential serum biomarkers for insulin resistance in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Int J Mol Med. 2020;45:1409-16.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , , et al. Effect of insulin on uric acid excretion in humans. Am J Physiol. 1995;268:E1-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , . Insulin resistance in polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamp studies. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:2619-31.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , . Influence of testosterone on purine nucleotide turnover in rat kidney. Horm Metab Res. 1990;22:334-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , , . Effect of testosterone on purine nucleotide metabolism in rat liver. Horm Metab Res. 2004;36:614-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , , , , et al. Uric acid stimulates monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 production in vascular smooth muscle cells via mitogen-activated protein kinase and cyclooxygenase-2. Hypertension. 2003;41:1287-93.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , . Uric acid-induced C-reactive protein expression: Implication on cell proliferation and nitric oxide production of human vascular cells. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:3553-62.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , , , , et al. Hyperuricemia as a mediator of the proinflammatory endocrine imbalance in the adipose tissue in a murine model of the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes. 2011;60:1258-69.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , , , , et al. Phenotypes and body mass in women with polycystic ovary syndrome identified in referral versus unselected populations: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:1510-2.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections
Scroll to Top