Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Addendum
Announcement
Announcements
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Books Received
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Corrrespondence
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Podcast
Errata
Erratum
FORM IV
GUIDELINES
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Panel of Reviewers (2006)
Panel of Reviewers (2007)
Panel of Reviewers (2009) Guidelines for Contributors
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Method
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Authors’ response
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Public Notice
Research Brief
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers
Short Paper
Some Forthcoming Scientific Events
Special Article
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
View Point
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Addendum
Announcement
Announcements
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Books Received
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Corrrespondence
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Podcast
Errata
Erratum
FORM IV
GUIDELINES
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Panel of Reviewers (2006)
Panel of Reviewers (2007)
Panel of Reviewers (2009) Guidelines for Contributors
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Method
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Authors’ response
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Public Notice
Research Brief
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers
Short Paper
Some Forthcoming Scientific Events
Special Article
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
View Point
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
163 (
3
); 406-414
doi:
10.25259/IJMR_1973_2025

Serum uric acid and its association with intrauterine insemination outcomes in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome

Center for Reproductive Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong, China
Department of Physiology, Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong, China
Equal contribution

For correspondence: Dr Yehao Dong, Department of Center for Reproductive Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, 272 029, Shandong, China e-mail: micedong@sjtu.edu.cn

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Zhang X, Qin Q, Yang H, Yu L, Li Y, Sun R, et al. Serum uric acid and its association with intrauterine insemination outcomes in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Indian J Med Res. 2026;163:406-14. doi: 10.25259/IJMR_1973_2025.

Abstract

Background and objectives

Uric acid is associated with many systemic diseases. Recent evidence demonstrated that high serum uric acid levels in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) could lead to a poor prognosis of in-vitro fertilisation. The objective of this study was to explore the association between serum uric acid levels and reproductive outcomes in women with PCOS undergoing intrauterine insemination (IUI) treatment.

Methods

We included 682 patients with PCOS who underwent IUI treatment between 2015 and 2024. They were stratified into three groups according to the level of serum uric acid: normal (251-360 µmol/L), low (≤250 µmol/L), and high (>360 µmol/L). Pregnancy and obstetric outcomes of patients were evaluated and linked to serum uric acid levels. The primary outcome measures of this study were the clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate. Secondary outcome measures included the rates of biochemical pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage, and low birth weight.

Results

There was no significant difference between the three groups with respect to clinical pregnancy rate (23.3% vs. 26.2% vs. 30.4%) and live birth rate (86.2% vs. 81.5% vs. 93.6%). Biochemical pregnancy rate (25.1% vs. 28.2% vs. 35.3%), ectopic pregnancy rate (3.5% vs. 1.9% vs. 3.2%), miscarriage rate (10.4% vs. 16.7% vs. 3.2%), and low-birth-weight rate (14.6% vs. 12.5% vs. 19.4%) were comparable among the three groups.In terms of birth weight, the three study groups showed comparable values (3122.8±81.10 vs. 3095.6±68.96 vs. 3099.5±162.09 g), and no significant difference was observed. These results remained the same after adjusting for baseline clinical characteristics and in-hospital treatment.

Interpretation and conclusions

Our findings demonstrated that maternal pre-pregnancy serum uric acid level was not significantly related to pregnancy and obstetric outcomes following IUI treatment in women with PCOS.

Keywords

Infertility
Intrauterine insemination
Polycystic ovary syndrome
Reproductive outcomes
Uric acid

Uric acid is the final product of purine metabolism in the human body, which possesses dual biological properties of antioxidant and pro-oxidant activities.1 Growing evidence indicates that serum uric acid levels tend to be higher in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and correlate with clinical severity.2,3 The prevalence of hyperuricemia in the PCOS population is approximately three times higher than that in those without PCOS.4 A recent study demonstrated that each 50 µmol/L serum uric acid increase correlated with a 16 g reduction in neonatal birth weight and a 0.06 wk decrease in gestational age in women undergoing IVF/ICSI.5 However, there are no studies evaluating the impact of pre-pregnancy serum uric acid levels on intrauterine insemination (IUI) outcomes among the PCOS population. We aimed to explore the relationship between serum uric acid in infertile females with PCOS and their reproductive outcomes of IUI cycles.

Methods

This retrospective study was undertaken by the Department of Reproductive Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, China. The present work was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the ethics committee of the hospital. No informed consent was required as this was a retrospective study without any intervention or influence on clinical treatment.

Study population

A total of 682 cycles of IUI conducted in the reproductive centre of the Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University from 2015 to 2024 were retrospectively analysed. The inclusion criteria of this study were as follows: (i) participant (recipient) age between 20 and 40 yr; (ii) duration of infertility ≥1 yr; (iii) more than 10 million motile sperm per ejaculate (in donor); (iv) at least one patent fallopian tube (in recipient). The exclusion criteria were the following: (i) women without PCOS; (ii) recipient’s body mass index (BMI) more than 30 kg/m2; (iii) using sperm from a sperm bank; (iv) uterine malformations (single-horned uterus, double uterus, and septate uterus); (v) endocrine abnormalities such as thyroid dysfunction, hyperprolactinemia, and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism; and (vi) chronic diseases including diabetes, hypertension, and autoimmune diseases.

According to the diagnostic criterion, serum uric acid level ≤360 µmol/L in premenopausal women was regarded as normal, while >360 µmol/L was clinically defined as hyperuricemia.6,7 However, recent studies revealed that low serum uric acid concentration (≤250 µmol/L) diminished the antioxidant capacity of plasma and appeared to be related to adverse clinical outcomes.8-10 Thus, 250 µmol/L was used as the lower cut-off value of the normal range of serum uric acid in our research. Based on serum uric acid level, the study population was categorised into three groups: normal (251-360 µmol/L), low (≤250 µmol/L), and high (>360 µmol/L).

Data collection

Hospital information system and patient records were used to identify all PCOS patients undergoing IUI treatment. The baseline demographic information, including age, BMI, education level, and smoking status, was collected. Detailed patient data, like history of infertility and number of IUI cycles, were retrieved. The laboratory parameters, including levels of circulating serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinising hormone (LH), oestradiol, prolactin (PRL), testosterone, progesterone, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), fasting blood glucose (FBG), and uric acid, were also noted. Data on endometrial thickness and antral follicle count (AFC) was extracted from the ultrasound reports.

The natural cycle was adopted for women with regular menstrual cycles. Patients having irregular menstruation, ovulation disorders, or unexplained subfertility underwent ovarian stimulation. The detailed description of these protocols and procedures can be found in our previous publication.11 Operational records provided the clinically relevant semen parameters, ovarian stimulation, and IUI protocol for each patient.

Pregnancy outcome assessment

A biochemical pregnancy test (positive human chorionic gonadotropin test) was initially administered 14 days after IUI to determine if the woman was pregnant. Once the test result was positive, transvaginal sonography at the seventh week of gestation was performed to confirm clinical pregnancy by detecting the presence of a gestational sac and foetal heartbeat. The termination of a pregnancy before 28 wk of gestation or foetal weight less than 1000 g was considered a miscarriage. Ectopic pregnancy refers to the presence of one or more gestational sacs outside the uterine cavity. A live birth was defined as the delivery of an infant exhibiting vital signs such as heartbeat, breathing, umbilical cord pulsation, or voluntary muscle contraction at 28 wk or more of gestation. Low-birth-weight (LBW) was regarded as the birth weight of an infant less than 2500 g.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables are presented as mean±standard error (SE), and assumption testing was performed using Kruskal-Wallis to compare statistically significant differences among multiple groups. Categorical variables were expressed as numbers (n) and percentages (%), and the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was conducted for comparison of proportions. Median values were used to replace missing values for continuous variables, and modes were used to replace missing categorical variables. All covariates identified as statistically significant in the univariate analysis were included in the logistic regression to adjust for the relationship between serum uric acid levels and reproductive outcomes. Before logistic regression, we examined the collinearity between independent variables by calculating the tolerance and the variance inflation factor. The results showed that the tolerance of each variable was greater than 0.1, and the variance inflation factor was less than 10, indicating that there was no multicollinearity among the variables. The following adjustments were made: Model 1: no adjustment; Model 2: adjusted for age and BMI in women; Model 3: additionally adjusted for age at menarche, type of infertility, indication for IUI, basal LH, basal testosterone, FBG, SBP, normal sperm morphology, total motility, progressive motile sperm, treatment protocol, and ovarian stimulation protocol. The odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95 per cent confidence interval (CI) were calculated to indicate the effect size and assess the reliability of the model. All data analyses were performed using SPSS version 27.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). P less than 0.05 was regarded as significant.

Results

Figure shows the flowchart of the study.

Flow chart of the study. IUI, intrauterine insemination; BMI, body mass index; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome.
Figure.
Flow chart of the study. IUI, intrauterine insemination; BMI, body mass index; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome.

Baseline characteristics of study population

Table Ⅰ compares the demographic and clinical characteristics of study participants categorised by serum uric acid levels.

Table Ⅰ. Baseline characteristics of patients according to levels of serum uric acid
Variable Normal serum uric acid group (n=374) Low serum uric acid group (n=206) High serum uric acid group (n=102) P value
Serum uric acid, μmol/L 299.8 ± 1.53 213.4 ± 1.86 406.7 ± 4.24
Female
Age, yr 28.7 ± 0.19 29.0 ± 0.23 27.5 ± 0.37 0.008
BMI, kg/m2 23.7 ± 0.16 22.6 ± 0.21 26.1 ± 0.24 <0.001
Education 0.641
Less than high school 24.6% (92/374) 25.2% (52/206) 28.4% (29/102)
High school 21.1% (79/374) 16.5% (34/206) 17.7% (18/102)
More than high school 54.3% (203/374) 58.3% (120/206) 53.9% (55/102)
Age at menarche, yr 13.7 ± 0.06 13.9 ± 0.09 13.3 ± 0.13 0.002
Menstrual cycle, d 55.2 ± 1.76 53.5 ± 1.66 56.7 ± 3.21 0.673
Endometrial thickness, mm 5.7 ± 0.11 5.6 ± 0.12 5.9 ± 0.19 0.400
Duration of infertility, yr 2.5 ± 0.08 2.5 ± 0.11 2.2 ± 0.16 0.098
Type of infertility 0.002
Primary 58.6% (219/374) 61.7% (127/206) 77.5% (79/102)
Secondary 41.4% (155/374) 38.4% (79/206) 22.6% (23/102)
Indication for IUI 0.014
Female factor 19.3% (72/374) 25.2% (52/206) 15.7% (16/102)
Male factor 26.2% (98/374) 22.3% (46/206) 29.4% (30/102)
Both factor 13.6% (51/374) 6.3% (13/206) 5.9% (6/102)
Unexplained 40.9% (153/374) 46.1% (95/206) 49.0% (50/102)
Number of IUI cycles, n 1.6 ± 0.04 1.5 ± 0.05 1.7 ± 0.10 0.383
Basal FSH, mIU/mL 6.79 ± 0.08 6.97 ± 0.13 6.66 ± 0.15 0.384
Basal LH, mIU/mL 10.26 ± 0.40 11.82 ± 0.68 10.18 ± 0.82 0.016
Basal oestradiol, pg/mL 70.19 ± 10.63 86.27 ± 15.67 58.53 ± 8.38 0.097
Basal PRL, ng/mL 14.05 ± 0.35 14.36 ± 0.51 16.14 ± 0.87 0.148
Basal testosterone, ng/mL 0.59 ± 0.02 0.54 ± 0.02 0.65 ± 0.03 <0.001
Basal progesterone, ng/mL 0.67 ± 0.03 1.09 ± 0.31 0.89 ± 0.13 0.429
AMH, ng/mL 9.68 ± 0.27 9.42 ± 0.34 8.43 ± 0.46 0.098
TSH, mIU/L 2.31 ± 0.06 2.19 ± 0.07 2.46 ± 0.13 0.540
AFC, n 30.5 ± 0.61 28.1 ± 0.64 29.2 ± 0.86 0.058
FBG, mmol/L 5.0 ± 0.03 4.9 ± 0.04 5.1 ± 0.05 0.007
DBP, mmHg 74 ± 0.39 74 ± 0.48 75 ± 0.73 0.108
SBP, mmHg 115 ± 0.54 115 ± 0.63 119± 1.00 <0.001
Male
Age, yr 29.5 ± 0.19 29.6 ± 0.25 28.8 ± 0.34 0.302
BMI, kg/m2 25.7 ± 0.22 25.9 ± 0.29 25.6 ± 0.46 0.536
Smoking 11.0% (41/374) 14.1% (29/206) 9.8% (10/102) 0.433
Raw semen
Semen volume, mL 2.7 ± 0.03 2.7 ± 0.04 2.8 ± 0.05 0.054
Semen concentration, ×106 per mL 33.5 ± 0.63 33.1 ± 0.88 31.8 ± 0.91 0.812
Total motility, % 58.5 ± 0.56 58.4 ± 0.70 58.0 ± 1.10 0.994
Variable Normal serum uric acid group (n=374) Low serum uric acid group (n=206) High serum uric acid group (n=102) P value
Progressive motile sperm, % 34.7 ± 0.46 35.0 ± 0.51 34.2 ± 0.87 0.781
Normal sperm morphology, % 4.2 ± 0.11 4.4 ± 0.14 4.1 ± 0.12 0.006
Prepared semen
Semen volume, mL 0.4 ± 0.00 0.4 ± 0.00 0.4 ± 0.00 0.487
Semen concentration, ×106 per mL 62.6 ± 1.11 63.9 ± 1.49 64.1 ± 1.76 0.247
Total motility, % 82.0 ± 0.43 82.5 ± 0.58 79.4 ± 1.05 0.018
Progressive motile sperm, % 68.4 ± 0.44 69.3 ± 0.59 65.8 ± 1.04 0.006
Normal sperm morphology, % 7.7 ± 0.27 7.8 ± 0.32 6.9 ± 0.20 0.081

BMI, body mass index; IUI, intrauterine insemination; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; LH, luteinizing hormone; PRL, prolactin; AMH, anti-Müllerian hormone; TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone; AFC, antral follicle count; FBG, fasting blood glucose; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; SBP, systolic blood pressure

Comparisons of ovarian stimulation protocols

A total of 317 natural cycles and 365 stimulated cycles were enrolled in the analysis. In stimulated cycles, patients were given clomiphene citrate (CC), letrozole (LE), human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG), or FSH before the operation. As shown in Table Ⅱ, the percentage of women who underwent stimulation cycles was significantly lower in the low uric acid group compared to those with high uric acid. Based on the medication scheme, all ovarian stimulation protocols were divided into three categories: LE/LE + HMG, CC/CC + HMG, and FSH/HMG. Treatment and ovarian stimulation protocols in these groups are compared in Table II.

Table Ⅱ. Stimulation protocol for the study population
Variable Normal serum uric acid group (n=374) Low serum uric acid group (n=206) High serum uric acid group (n=102) P value
Treatment protocol 0.027
Natural cycle 46.8% (175/374) 51.5% (106/206) 35.3% (36/102)
Ovarian stimulation cycle 53.2% (199/374) 48.5% (100/206) 64.7% (66/102)
Ovarian stimulation protocol 0.037
LE/LE + HMG 68.3% (136/199) 82.0% (82/100) 72.7% (48/66)
CC/CC + HMG 20.6% (41/199) 12.0% (12/100) 24.2% (16/66)
FSH/HMG 11.1% (22/199) 6.0% (6/100) 3.0% (2/66)

HMG, Human menopausal gonadotropin; LE, Letrozole; CC, Clomiphene citrate

Pregnancy and obstetric outcomes in women with PCOS

Table Ⅲ shows the proportions of different reproductive outcomes of our participants. There was no ascending or descending trend in the biochemical pregnancy rate with the alteration of serum uric acid. Other pregnancy outcomes, such as clinical pregnancy rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, and birth weight, were consistent with this result. To confirm the stability of results, we used logistic regression to evaluate the association between serum uric acid levels and reproductive outcomes in the unadjusted model and adjusted models (Table Ⅳ). No significant differences in terms of pregnancy and obstetric outcomes were noted between the groups.

Table Ⅲ. Pregnancy and obstetric outcomes according to serum uric acid levels
IUI outcomes Normal serum uric acid group (n=374) Low serum uric acid group (n=206) High serum uric acid group (n=102) P value
Biochemical pregnancy rate 25.1% (94/374) 28.2% (58/206) 35.3% (36/102) 0.123
Clinical pregnancy rate 23.3% (87/374) 26.2% (54/206) 30.4% (31/102) 0.314
Ectopic pregnancy rate 3.5% (3/87) 1.9% (1/54) 3.2% (1/31) 1.000
Miscarriage rate 10.4% (9/87) 16.7% (9/54) 3.2% (1/31) 0.166
Live birth rate 86.2% (75/87) 81.5% (44/54) 93.6% (29/31) 0.325
Pregnancy type 1.000
Single on Pregnancy 78.2% (68/87) 74.1% (40/54) 87.1% (27/31)
Multiple 8.1% (7/87) 7.4% (4/54) 6.5% (2/31)
Birth weight, g 3122.8 ± 81.10 3095.6 ± 68.96 3099.5 ± 162.09 0.450
LBW rate 14.6% (12/82) 12.5% (6/48) 19.4% (6/31) 0.703

LBW, low-birth-weight

Table Ⅳ. Logistic regression analysis of the association between serum uric acid levels and reproductive outcomes in patients with PCOS undergoing IUI treatment
IUI outcomes OR (95% CI)
P value
Normal serum uric acid group Low serum uric acid group High serum uric acid group
Biochemical pregnancy
Model 1 Ref 1.17 (0.80-1.71) 1.63 (1.02-2.60) 0.125
Model 2 Ref 1.15 (0.78-1.70) 1.67 (1.02-2.74) 0.120
Model 3 Ref 1.24 (0.83-1.85) 1.83 (1.09-3.07) 0.064
Clinical pregnancy
Model 1 Ref 1.17 (0.79-1.74) 1.44 (0.89-2.34) 0.316
Model 2 Ref 1.15 (0.77-1.72) 1.50 (0.90-2.50) 0.284
Model 3 Ref 1.22 (0.81-1.84) 1.62 (0.95-2.76) 0.182
Miscarriage
Model 1 Ref 1.73 (0.64-4.68) 0.29 (0.04-2.38) 0.197
Model 2 Ref 2.13 (0.76-5.96) 0.22 (0.03-1.84) 0.081
Model 3 Ref 2.11 (0.49-9.13) 0.17 (0.01-2.18) 0.106
Live birth
Model 1 Ref 0.70 (0.28-1.76) 2.32 (0.49-11.01) 0.325
Model 2 Ref 0.59 (0.23-1.53) 3.14 (0.63-15.54) 0.135
Model 3 Ref 0.59 (0.16-2.21) 4.69 (0.68-32.32) 0.089
LBW
Model 1 Ref 0.83 (0.29-2.39) 1.40 (0.48-4.13) 0.705
Model 2 Ref 0.84 (0.29-2.42) 1.41 (0.45-4.35) 0.736
Model 3 Ref 1.14 (0.27-4.78) 0.77 (0.15-4.09) 0.919

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; Ref, reference; LBW, low-birth-weight

Model 1: unadjusted model; Model 2: adjusted for age and BMI; Model 3: adjusted for the variables in Model 2 plus age at menarche, type of infertility, indication for IUI, basal LH, basal testosterone, FBG, SBP, normal sperm morphology, total motility, progressive motile sperm, treatment protocol, and ovarian stimulation protocol

Discussion

In the present study, we did not find any correlation between pre-pregnancy serum uric acid levels in patients with PCOS and the rates of biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, and miscarriage following IUI. Currently, there are scarce and controversial data on whether uric acid affects delivery outcomes in women with PCOS undergoing in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment.5,12,13 A study by Yang et al12 showed that as the serum uric acid level increased, the live birth rate of women undergoing their first fresh-embryo transfer cycles exhibited an overall decreasing trend both in the unadjusted and adjusted generalised additive models. Wu et al5 found that the impact of serum uric acid on live birth in PCOS is not universal. In our study, no difference in live birth rate was observed among groups of women undergoing IUI, and the result remained the same after adjusting for potential confounders. Elevated levels of serum uric acid have been shown to increase the risk of LBW in women with PCOS following IVF.12 We did not observe any such risk.

In 2024, Gong et al2 observed significant positive correlations between serum uric acid levels and FBG, fasting insulin, and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, and our results are consistent with this finding. In our study, patients with hyperuricemia had the highest levels of FBG, far exceeding those in other groups. A previous retrospective cross-sectional study performed at a large reproductive medicine centre reported that 25.5% of women with PCOS suffered from hyperuricemia,4 slightly higher than that in our study (15.0%). This difference might be attributed to our exclusion of obese individuals (BMI >30 kg/m2). Local hypoxia in adipose tissue of obese patients could augment uric acid production by enhancing xanthine oxidoreductase activity.14 The accumulation of visceral fat induces a large influx of plasma free fatty acids into the portal vein and liver, thereby stimulating triglyceride production and subsequently elevating uric acid secretion by activating the uric acid synthesis pathway.15 It was reported that 58.8% of obese women with PCOS had hyperuricemia, which was almost three times higher than that in those with a normal BMI.4 Thus, we had to rule it out as a confounding factor in our study.

Existing evidence on the association between serum uric acid levels and sex hormones is limited and inconclusive. The generally prevailing opinion is that high levels of testosterone are closely correlated with elevated serum uric acid levels and prevalence of hyperuricemia. A 1H nuclear magnetic resonance-based plasma metabolomics analysis indicated that PCOS patients with hyperandrogenism had higher serum uric acid levels than those with polycystic ovaries and anovulation.16 Furthermore, some reports have shown that serum uric acid levels increase with increasing testosterone levels in postmenopausal women.17,18 This effect may be due to testosterone-induced functional modifications in the renal uric acid reabsorption system via upregulation of sodium-coupled monocarboxylate transporter 1.19 Previous animal studies also suggested that testosterone might increase serum uric acid levels by affecting the normal liver cell function, purine nucleotide, and nucleic acid metabolism.20,21 However, a recent study by Tan et al22 claimed that genetically predicted total testosterone levels were negatively associated with serum uric acid levels. In patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation during IVF cycles, Yan et al23 did not find any correlation between levels of serum uric acid and testosterone. Our present results showed that serum uric acid levels exhibited a positive relationship with testosterone in women with PCOS. These differences are probably caused by the different populations examined and require further research to reveal this relationship. In addition, Jung et al24 examined the impacts of different types of hormone therapy on serum uric acid levels and ascribed the reduction to the effects of other reproductive hormones rather than oestradiol, which is consistent with our result showing that oestradiol is not linked to serum uric acid in women with PCOS.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to explore the effect of serum uric acid level on reproductive outcomes following IUI in women with PCOS. Some limitations should also be considered. The retrospective cohort design relies on the accuracy and completeness of recorded data, which may introduce inherent bias. Despite adjustment for multiple potential confounders, there may still be hidden confounding factors that could influence the results. Results are from a single centre, which might restrict the generalisability of the findings. Therefore, it will be necessary to perform further research with large multicentre samples and evaluate additional confounding factors to confirm the results of our study.

To conclude, serum uric acid levels are not correlated with pregnancy or obstetric outcomes in women with PCOS undergoing IUI. This evidence-based finding optimises clinical decision-making, alleviates patient anxiety, and avoids unnecessary uric acid monitoring.

Acknowledgment

Authors acknowledge all working staff at the Centre for Reproductive Medicine of the Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University for their active involvement and collaboration in project administration. Moreover, the authors are sincerely grateful for the participants in this study.

Author contributions

XZ: Concepts, study design, data acquisition, provided clinical samples; QQ: Concepts, study design, data acquisition, provided clinical samples; HY: Data analysis, manuscript writing, data interpretations; LY: Data analysis and interpretations, manuscript writing; YL: manuscript writing; RS: manuscript writing; SW: manuscript writing; XW: manuscript writing; FC: Concepts, study design, data analysis, data interpretations; YD: Concepts, study design, data acquisition, provided clinical samples, data interpretations. All authors have read and approved the final printed version of the manuscript.

Financial support and sponsorship

The study received funding support from the Excellent Youth Innovation Team Project of Shandong Higher Education Institutions (project no 2024KJJ006) awarded to ninth author (FC).

Conflicts of Interest

None.

Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Assisted Technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of AI-assisted technology for assisting in the writing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

References

  1. , , . Uric acid: A danger signal from the RNA world that may have a role in the epidemic of obesity, metabolic syndrome, and cardiorenal disease: Evolutionary considerations. Semin Nephrol.. 2011;31:394-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , . The positive association between hyperuricemia and polycystic ovary syndrome and analysis of related factors. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne).. 2024;15:1356859.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . Visceral adiposity index levels in overweight and/or obese, and non-obese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome and its relationship with metabolic and inflammatory parameters. J Endocrinol Invest.. 2017;40:487-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , et al. Association between the prevalence of hyperuricemia and reproductive hormones in polycystic ovary syndrome. Reprod Biol Endocrinol.. 2018;16:104.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , . Serum uric acid is associated with ovarian reserve and neonatal outcomes in women undergoing IVF/ICSI: observational and genetic evidence. Hum Fertil (Camb).. 2026;29:2610586.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , et al. Is it time to revise the normal range of serum uric acid levels? Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014. ;18:1295-306.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , et al. Hyperuricemia, acute and chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease: Report of a scientific workshop organized by the National Kidney Foundation. Am J Kidney Dis.. 2018;71:851-65.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , et al. U-Shaped association between serum uric acid and short-term mortality in patients with infective endocarditis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne).. 2021;12:750818.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , . Prognostic significance of uric acid levels in ischemic stroke patients. Neurotox Res.. 2016;29:10-2.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , . U-shaped association between serum uric acid concentration and mortality in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients. Ups J Med Sci.. 2020;125:44-51.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , et al. Comprehensive evaluation of the effect of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccination on female fertility: A retrospective cohort study. J Med Virol.. 2023;95:e29161.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , et al. Elevated serum uric acid level is associated with adverse reproductive outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection embryo transfer cycles: a retrospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol.. 2023;228:324.e1-e10.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , . Association between high serum uric acid level and adverse reproductive outcomes in infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod.. 2022;37:deac107.334.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , et al. Hypoxanthine secretion from human adipose tissue and its increase in hypoxia. Obesity (Silver Spring).. 2018;26:1168-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , et al. The relationship between body mass index and uric acid: A study on Japanese adult twins. Environ Health Prev Med.. 2015;20:347-53.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , et al. Metabolic profiles characterizing different phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome: Plasma metabolomics analysis. BMC Med.. 2012;10:153.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , et al. The associations between gonadal hormones and serum uric acid levels in men and postmenopausal women with diabetes. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne).. 2020;11:55.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , . The relationship of sex steroids to uric acid levels in plasma and urine. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh).. 1977;85:198-20.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , . The effect of testosterone upon the urate reabsorptive transport system in mouse kidney. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids.. 2010;29:574-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , . Effect of testosterone on purine nucleotide metabolism in rat liver. Horm Metab Res.. 2004;36:614-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , . Effect of testosterone on purine metabolism and morphometric parameters in the rat liver. Mol Cell Endocrinol.. 1996;119:123-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , , et al. Decoding connections in the European population: Serum uric acid, sex hormone-binding globulin, total testosterone, estradiol, and female infertility - advanced bidirectional and mediative Mendelian randomization. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne).. 2024;15:1398600.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , . Serum uric acid did not affect embryonic and pregnancy outcomes in women without PCOS during IVF procedures. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne).. 2024;15:1310122.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , . Serum uric acid levels and hormone therapy type: A retrospective cohort study of postmenopausal women. Menopause.. 2018;25:77-81.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections
Scroll to Top